zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:http://www.wright-house.com/religions/islam/Quran/2-cow.php
Im using this one is it ok?
First time im seeing this link. Hard to tell without looking at it further
What do i mean by easy reading translation: the bible has easy reading translations where scholars focus on making the lanuage modern and easy to understand. I was wondering if the quran had something similar
Yusuf Ali is the most widely regarded and recommended. He translates, and provides a commentary, context and full detail behind each translation. Easy reading too.
first question. What does verse 3 mean "spending out of what we have provided for him"
We believe that everything we have is provided to us by God. He is the sustainer and nourisher. Yes we earn our living though our works, business etc, but all that is given to us by god. So spending out of what he has provided is spending from our wealth. That would be the simplest definition of it.
a plain reading seems to imply that the word mischeif is being used as a synonym for violence.
You are quite right. Look at ISIS. They claim to want peace and democracy, but they cause violence and 'mischeif'. So the verse if warning of those who will claim to be wanting peace, and yet their actions are different. US, Israel, ISIS, Bashar Al-Assad etc etc
also it seems the way the word faith seems to be used it means something like "believing and agreeing with a message"
In its simplest of forms, Faith is believe in Allah as one god and Muhammad PBUH as the final messenger.
Repentence seems to be used to mean regretting a wrong and then pledging to do right its not clear what mercy means
Islam is of the belief that god is most merciful. We ar enot perfect and we will at times sin, so Islam holds the belief that God in his mercy understand this, and acknowledges it. And that is why even if you sin, you make repentance, and it will be forgiven. It states in hadith and quran, "That allah 'loves' the one who sins" Not because he sins, but because when you sin, you feel remorse and you repent and make every effort to change your ways. So you basically turn towards God and make the effort to become closer to him. But the repentance has to be sincere. You cant say, "oh ill just do this, and repent for it later, no big deal" And then your repentance isnt sincere and you keep doing the sin thinking, "ill just repent later"
are these in the ballpark?
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Looking forward to them getting to the bit where it says that salt water and fresh water can't mix together.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:grazorblade wrote:@humbert yeah im serious read surah 2 today @benjamin actually if you read the bible cover to cover you would get what i belive minus a few translation errors which are easily accessible to anyone with a concordance the bible is said to be the inspired word of God. Obviously you have to read it in context (i dont follow the practice of using historical context unless the text indicates to do this). If you have any questions let me know Sorry, don't buy into it. For me, to believe in any part of the Bible - that is, to really believe and place faith in any of the words being the actual word of God, inspired or not, one has to believe and accept ALL of the Bible. As countless other Atheists have pointed out, you can take just a few small passages out of the Bible and destroy them with un-controvertible science. House of cards, one bit falls, so does the rest. The reason is simple - it was written by men in a time of extremely low knowledge, and as a result is based on a very small and narrow minded world-view. Ditto the Quran.I'm happy to acknowledge that there are many many good things to be learned from both books if they are taken in the spirit in which they were originally written - as control documents in a dangerous time. Edited by Benjamin: 11/10/2014 03:50:41 PM +1. It also happens when there is a fertile environment for people to be converted when the structure of governance isn't there due to the tribal nature of humans at that time. When the structure of governance is overwhelmingly underdeveloped and the level of knowledge is low, then people will believe anything. Not a lot of people haven't heard about the Taiping Rebellion which started in China some 200 years ago due to some preacher who told everyone he was the brother of Jesus Christ and he gained a cult following, formed a rebellion to fight and almost overthrew the Manchurian Government. 20 Million people died as a result of this. This sort of thing we are seeing is no different to today. Its not about dying for religious cause, its about dying for the preaching establishment so they can achieve their aims.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
For a good laugh try these on for size. Absurdities: http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/abs/long.htmlhttp://falseislam.org/#C Plagiarism: http://falseislam.org/#D Hate mongering: http://falseislam.org/#F Sex with a child, raping and pillaging, genocide etc: http://falseislam.org/#G Just brilliant stuff. You couldn't make it up. Well you could, it's called religion. If you're going to learn about the qur'an make sure you take a critical look and apply some critical thinking while you're at it.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
T-UNIT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
The quran is also available in 3 ply for extra softness.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:grazorblade wrote:@humbert yeah im serious read surah 2 today @benjamin actually if you read the bible cover to cover you would get what i belive minus a few translation errors which are easily accessible to anyone with a concordance the bible is said to be the inspired word of God. Obviously you have to read it in context (i dont follow the practice of using historical context unless the text indicates to do this). If you have any questions let me know Sorry, don't buy into it. For me, to believe in any part of the Bible - that is, to really believe and place faith in any of the words being the actual word of God, inspired or not, one has to believe and accept ALL of the Bible. As countless other Atheists have pointed out, you can take just a few small passages out of the Bible and destroy them with un-controvertible science. House of cards, one bit falls, so does the rest. The reason is simple - it was written by men in a time of extremely low knowledge, and as a result is based on a very small and narrow minded world-view. Ditto the Quran. I'm happy to acknowledge that there are many many good things to be learned from both books if they are taken in the spirit in which they were originally written - as control documents in a dangerous time. Edited by Benjamin: 11/10/2014 03:50:41 PM a lot of misinformed assertions in that ce'st la vie. The moment i became christian i quickly learnt i had to get used to that sort of nonsense. I imagine for a muslim in oz it would be a hundred times worse :k I dont suppose a mod could do me a favour and remove the comments by munrubenmuz and t unit This is thread where i wanted to learn about another religion in part so i can counter the predjudice i keep hearing from people i know. Its a free country. If you wish to start a troll thread title it "islam really sux" then you keep to that one and ill keep on topic in this one
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
@zimbos thanks for that and sorry about the trolls i have a few more questions about sura two in my potentially dodgy translation (ill read the rest in the translation you recommended)
This is sent from my ipad so i cant give exact verses but here are some questions
it seems to imply that christians muslims and jews are all going to heaven in the quran so long as they are true followers is this correct? The story of saul and the soldiers seems to contradict the biblical one. The biblical one involves gideon in the book of judges perhaps a millenia before saul. Do muslims see the quran as innerrant in meaning? Or in detail and meaning? There was a verse that seemed to imply you can only repent once but perhaps that is due to a bad translation? Or is it a correct translation? it says it allows divorce within the limits of allah. What are these limits? What does compulsion mean in the verse "there is no compulsion in religion"? (The context doesnt seem to spell this out) it seems that violence is considered justified against oppressors and persecutors in this surah but only until the oppression or persecution stops? Is this correct?
I liked the verse that says when you give to the poor dont lecture them. It reminded me of proverbs 31 vs 6 that says let the poor get drunk with wine so they can remember their poverty no more (in other words we are to give to them without judging them if they spend some of the money on getting drunk)
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:@zimbos thanks for that and sorry about the trolls i have a few more questions about sura two in my potentially dodgy translation (ill read the rest in the translation you recommended)
Dont worry. Ive learned to deal with them.
This is sent from my ipad so i cant give exact verses but here are some questions
it seems to imply that christians muslims and jews are all going to heaven in the quran so long as they are true followers is this correct?
Islam does believe that Christianity and Judaism come from true texts and are actually quite close to Islam. However, Islam holds the belief that if you dont believe in the five pillars, and never believe in the one god and muhammad as the final messenger, then you cant enter paradise. In saying that, Islam also holds that god is most merciful, and we are not to know who he will allow to enter in to paradise, never to despair of his mercy. There are examples of people who were non muslim, yet entered paradise based on one action in their lives. But that is very rare occasions. Not having the belief in one god and muhammad as the final messenger is quite the main thing.
The story of saul and the soldiers seems to contradict the biblical one. The biblical one involves gideon in the book of judges perhaps a millenia before saul. Do muslims see the quran as innerrant in meaning? Or in detail and meaning?
Ill have to look in to this one and get back to you
There was a verse that seemed to imply you can only repent once but perhaps that is due to a bad translation? Or is it a correct translation?
No, not true. You can repent as much as you like. Repentance is one of the most loved actions by god. However, like i explained earlier, you cant repent without sincerity. So your repentance must have a sincerity to it. That you are sincere about not doing that sin again and making amends
it says it allows divorce within the limits of allah. What are these limits?
This is a tough one. Quite a long one list to it. My brother actually had a journal published about this topic a few years ago in a law journal. The Australian called him an Islamist after his article was published. Basically Islam has laws pertaining to divorce. Things like you need to issue a divorce three times before it can be considered official. This is to protect for things like divorce issued in anger and things like that. But yeah, there is some laws and rules pertaining to this.
What does compulsion mean in the verse "there is no compulsion in religion"? (The context doesnt seem to spell this out) it seems that violence is considered justified against oppressors and persecutors in this surah but only until the oppression or persecution stops? Is this correct?
No compulsion in religion means dont force people in to your beliefs.
Violence is justified if you are being attacked and your state is at risk of being taken over. If you are being oppressed like how Bashar Al-Assad is doing, then you are allowed to fight back, but there are guidelines towards how you should.
I liked the verse that says when you give to the poor dont lecture them. It reminded me of proverbs 31 vs 6 that says let the poor get drunk with wine so they can remember their poverty no more (in other words we are to give to them without judging them if they spend some of the money on getting drunk) Edited by zimbos_05: 12/10/2014 09:54:32 AM
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote: I dont suppose a mod could do me a favour and remove the comments by munrubenmuz and t unit This is thread where i wanted to learn about another religion in part so i can counter the predjudice i keep hearing from people i know. Its a free country. If you wish to start a troll thread title it "islam really sux" then you keep to that one and ill keep on topic in this one
I dont begrudge you wanting to further your knowledge on any subject, but look where you are doing it. This is the shits and giggles part of a football forum website. There are no exclusive groups here other than a few to keep the place running like mods forum or the old bloggers one. Every one has a right to talk. You could do this all in PM's with a select few, but in public like in life you will always have outside influence you dont want.
|
|
|
tbitm
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Where do you go if you dont get into paradise?
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Remember, its not supposed to touch the floor
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
I've always wondered, the whole shit in the hole in the floor and hoseblast your arse because its unclean to touch yourself etc Is that really a thing? -PB
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Did your copy come with a one way ticket to Iraq?
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:Did your copy come with a one way ticket to Iraq? Read it, you might very well convert Just like people adverse to AFL Its surprising how easy it is to brainwash people, no, really
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
cheers zimbos
with regards to christians and jews going to heaven in islam I thought sura 2:62 implied this
i have a few questions about surah 3 as well as a general question
the general question is this. Is this written in chronological order or some other order? other questions: what is the battle of two armies? when it says do not take unbelievers for friends over believers to protect yourself does this talk about protecting yourself physically or from influence. Would Christians and jews count as unbelievers here. A plain reading of the first two chapters seems to paint polytheists and atheists as unbelievers. Is this correct? What does it mean to not take them as friends over unbelievers. Does this mean simply in preference to or a general caution not to get too close to them? A passage near the end seemed to imply that muslims were morally obliged to fight when they are attacked or oppressed is this a correct reading? God is often using the phrase "we". Presumably this is non trinitarian religion so is we the "royal we" or does it mean God and the prophets?
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
tbitm wrote:Where do you go if you dont get into paradise? hell by the looks of it. Probably about one in 4 verses so far have been on the topic of hell
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:Benjamin wrote:grazorblade wrote:@humbert yeah im serious read surah 2 today @benjamin actually if you read the bible cover to cover you would get what i belive minus a few translation errors which are easily accessible to anyone with a concordance the bible is said to be the inspired word of God. Obviously you have to read it in context (i dont follow the practice of using historical context unless the text indicates to do this). If you have any questions let me know Sorry, don't buy into it. For me, to believe in any part of the Bible - that is, to really believe and place faith in any of the words being the actual word of God, inspired or not, one has to believe and accept ALL of the Bible. As countless other Atheists have pointed out, you can take just a few small passages out of the Bible and destroy them with un-controvertible science. House of cards, one bit falls, so does the rest. The reason is simple - it was written by men in a time of extremely low knowledge, and as a result is based on a very small and narrow minded world-view. Ditto the Quran. I'm happy to acknowledge that there are many many good things to be learned from both books if they are taken in the spirit in which they were originally written - as control documents in a dangerous time. Edited by Benjamin: 11/10/2014 03:50:41 PM a lot of misinformed assertions in that ce'st la vie. The moment i became christian i quickly learnt i had to get used to that sort of nonsense. I imagine for a muslim in oz it would be a hundred times worse :k Genuinely interested to know which bits of my statement you consider to be misinformed, and how you would counter them on an individual basis rather than brushing them off a 'misinformed assertions'.I dont suppose a mod could do me a favour and remove the comments by munrubenmuz and t unit This is thread where i wanted to learn about another religion in part so i can counter the predjudice i keep hearing from people i know. Its a free country. If you wish to start a troll thread title it "islam really sux" then you keep to that one and ill keep on topic in this one As you say, it's a free country - it would be a better world if people would stop picking on one religion or another, and either came down as theist or non-theist, because in real terms these are the only two stances.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:I've always wondered, the whole shit in the hole in the floor and hoseblast your arse because its unclean to touch yourself etc
Is that really a thing?
-PB Well the hole isn't necessary. As for washing the arsehole, yep it's true. At least for my ex who was a secular Persian (non-believer) but obviously brought up in a Muslim household. She even had a special hose installation for the bath room. Helped with the anal tbf though. [size=1]inb4 notor: Yep, for both of us.[/size]
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Draupnir wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:I've always wondered, the whole shit in the hole in the floor and hoseblast your arse because its unclean to touch yourself etc
Is that really a thing?
-PB Well the hole isn't necessary. As for washing the arsehole, yep it's true. At least for my ex who was a secular Persian (non-believer) but obviously brought up in a Muslim household. She even had a special hose installation for the bath room. Helped with the anal tbf though. [size=1]inb4 notor: Yep, for both of us.[/size] Gotta fight for your right for pegging.
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Draupnir wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:I've always wondered, the whole shit in the hole in the floor and hoseblast your arse because its unclean to touch yourself etc
Is that really a thing?
-PB Well the hole isn't necessary. As for washing the arsehole, yep it's true. At least for my ex who was a secular Persian (non-believer) but obviously brought up in a Muslim household. She even had a special hose installation for the bath room. Helped with the anal tbf though. [size=1]inb4 notor: Yep, for both of us.[/size] Gotta fight for your right for pegging. Don't even need to edit my post. Love you bro <3 /thread
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
TBF, I only replied because of you asking me to <3
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:TBF, I only replied because of you asking me to <3 Don't... don't mate me propose mate.. My heart is reserved for scouse.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
*Puts lube away*
3
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:cheers zimbos
with regards to christians and jews going to heaven in islam I thought sura 2:62 implied this
i have a few questions about surah 3 as well as a general question
the general question is this. Is this written in chronological order or some other order? other questions: what is the battle of two armies? when it says do not take unbelievers for friends over believers to protect yourself does this talk about protecting yourself physically or from influence. Would Christians and jews count as unbelievers here. A plain reading of the first two chapters seems to paint polytheists and atheists as unbelievers. Is this correct? What does it mean to not take them as friends over unbelievers. Does this mean simply in preference to or a general caution not to get too close to them? A passage near the end seemed to imply that muslims were morally obliged to fight when they are attacked or oppressed is this a correct reading? God is often using the phrase "we". Presumably this is non trinitarian religion so is we the "royal we" or does it mean God and the prophets? I will answer these questions at some point, just hecticly busy with work at the moment. Will get to it though.
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Whats so controversial about this book compared to Charles Darwin's book of Natural Selection?
One interpretation of Charles Darwin is he says humans are evolved from monkeys and everything is related, explainable via science The flipside of this interpretation is Charles Darwin is linked to Eugenics and Nazism, where if you conform with the idea of evolution: 'only the strong will survive' there is no place for individuals
So, with this in mind: is the Quran (or any religion) any more controversial than Charles Darwin?
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Condemned666 wrote:Whats so controversial about this book compared to Charles Darwin's book of Natural Selection?
One interpretation of Charles Darwin is he says humans are evolved from monkeys and everything is related, explainable via science The flipside of this interpretation is Charles Darwin is linked to Eugenics and Nazism, where if you conform with the idea of evolution: 'only the strong will survive' there is no place for individuals
So, with this in mind: is the Quran (or any religion) any more controversial than Charles Darwin? Strength isnt everything. A herbivore lizard over time may evolve a better claw to help climb a tree that is its primary source of food. Just like small animals evolving to have defense mechanisms to defend them from large predators. It is nothing to do with strength, the trigger is increasing the rate for survival. Linking evolution back to nazi ideals seems like a long bow, so not sure if trolling or this is pro creationism propaganda.
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Condemned666 wrote:Whats so controversial about this book compared to Charles Darwin's book of Natural Selection?
One interpretation of Charles Darwin is he says humans are evolved from monkeys and everything is related, explainable via science The flipside of this interpretation is Charles Darwin is linked to Eugenics and Nazism, where if you conform with the idea of evolution: 'only the strong will survive' there is no place for individuals
So, with this in mind: is the Quran (or any religion) any more controversial than Charles Darwin?  There's a world of difference between "humans are evolved from monkeys" and "humans and monkeys share a relatively recent common ancestor".
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
So is anyone getting the urge to decapitate some one yet?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:So is anyone getting the urge to decapitate some one yet? I just attribute that to video games.
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:So is anyone getting the urge to decapitate some one yet? With exams coming very soon, I feel like blowing up right now.
E
|
|
|