Surviving relegation is as good as it gets this season and we accept that, you can't hope to draw a criticism out of our league position when we've been there since the start of the season. Your lot however, were in an unprecedented position to win the league for once, and again choked. It's about time you got out of the Spurs thread and started gearing up the Rafa apologist excuses I'd have thought.

17.5mil for Modric.
14mil for Pavlyuchenko.
12mil for Palacios.
5mil for Dos Santos.
3mil for Chimbonda.
8.5mil for Corluka.
7.8mil for Gomes.

That's a total of 67.8mil. Almost 70mil for a relegation battle?? Mate, if that was my team I wouldn't be accepting that by any means.
And you cant' say Liverpool choked, the season isn't over yet. There's still a fair few games to go.

Disregarding the fact that Chimbonda and Palacios have played one game each, Dos Santos, Pava and Gomes' fee's are all installment-based and Modric was 1 million cheaper than the price you've quoted over 4 years of payments, how does having monetary power necessarily equate to not battling for survival? You and mk both seem to have this bizarre Spurs fetish, please just stay out of this thread.

How does the duration of the payments afflict the fact that they're parting with SUBSTANTIAL Ammounts of money? It's not like becaue they're paying out these installments they're not going to make any signings for the next four years is it?? You've still agreed to part with 70mil GBP in the last six months, regardless of the duration you intend upon giving it to the various clubs over. And I forgot about Defoe and Gunter too.
To spend 70mil and only be battlign against relegation with teams that have spend maybe a third of that. How can you not possibly be embarassed??
And I'm free to post wherever I like, just like you are. So you cah shove that last sentence up your fucking arse.

I swear every day there is a new argument between Afro and Peligro #-o
And all of them in this thread, amazing...........

Doubel standards much? I think you just broke your own Irony meter.

And I was talking abotu spurs until he brought up Liverpool.

It's because Peligro is bitter and secredly crying inside that Spurs are doing so poorly and simply can't hack it and gets bigger and abbrasive when somebody tries to talk about spurs.

It's naught to do with what you were talking about. It's the fact that you said that people are free to post wherever they like, just days after having a go at people for posting in threads about Liverpool. So do the rules only apply to them and not you?

My comment pertained to Fredsta making the opening post on the matter directly about Man U, despte the article being about Rafa's response to the draw and opposition tactics.

Really, is that why you had a go at them for "talking about Liverpool all the time"?

And you mean Fredsta's opening post, where he mentioned Liverpool's bad form, but how he though they could still overtake Chelsea. And then continued to talk about Liverpool further in the thread?

It's got nothing to do with that, I get riled up by you having to drop your useless, petty opinions everywhere. We come back from 2 nil down, only to lose 3-2, you come in here and say "Is there somethign wrong that spurs just can't help but suck more than anybody could anticipate?" I've got no problem with any other forummer except for you and mk, as you two are the only people who traipse around the forum posting blinkered comments expressly to wind others up and then have a whinge about your right to free speech.

A word of advice afro, people may like you a lot more if you didn't think your opinion was gospel.

his opening comment was that it would make United good for the title. And then soemthign about Chelsea being overtaken and what have you and him and mack uttered something that I cant' remember and then that manc in melb dick came along and it all decended into a red haze.

But most importantly, what does any of THIS have to do with spurs. almost 40 pages in this topic, and probably 5 pages have been about spurs. Mind you, I guess that's about true to the form of the topic matter.

:lol: You honestly think you can blame others for this? You've got 15,000 posts for a good reason afro, it's because you spout shit from your arse pretty much all over the place and people feel the need to correct you and regardless of the original subject matter it inevitably comes back to Liverpool with you.

In all honestly, you're 2-0 up and you're in a good position. What has to go wrong that you lose 3-2?? Spurs defence isn't THAT bad.
As you said, freedom of speech. I have my opinion and I post it, just like you post yours. And I'm entitled to mine, just as you're entitled to yours. If you don't like it, Soup ladle of cement and harden the fuck up. Alternatively, the door's that way ->

Well done on not even knowing a thing about the game you're arguing about.

They were 2-0 down...

Fucking hell, you don't even know what happened in the game? We were losing two nil, not leading two nil.



Had a change of heart since this?

Ohhhhhkkkaaaay. Since I clearly misread the article reporting on the spurs game I'm going to have to get technical to get myself out of this one.

And I do. But most importantly. What is this thread called?? "The Official Tottenham Horspur FC THREAD." Not an article. So bite me on that front. Seriously, Peligro, every time I see you in here when you're not wanking off Jazzmaster you're breakign out the tissues over something mk or I have said. You're almost as bad as Pazza.

Secondly, If spurs were that good. What were they doing to go 2-0 down?? They got lucky from some terrible Jaaskelainen keeping (how often is it that you get to say that??!!) to get back in it.

Afro, your fighting with the supporter of the team who beat us twice this year...
I think you need to just let this one go, your flogging a dead horse. Agree to disagree. Nothing either of you say is going to change your opinions, so why are you wasting your time.

I didn't actually read that, I'm just going to assume you made a grovelling apology for again having an uninformed opinion.



Jesus fucking christ, here we go. I wouldn't be 'breaking out the tissues' if you weren't such a c*ntfeatures. And if we're going petty, you're far worse than pazza. At least he has the good grace to be absent for a period of time, you're just a constant stream of unjustified or just plain wrong commentary.



Did you read that it was terrible keeping in the match report, or see it from when you watched the game? :roll:

Imno, have you ever seen afro admit something he said was incorrect? I mean, fuck, last post he tried to say he was right after saying Spurs were up 2-0 last night. It won't happen man.

Edited by peligro: 1/2/2009 07:11:17 PM

Your point?? Individual results don't matter. It's the league table that decides things in the end remember? They're not going to go "well, they beat Liverpool so we can't relegate them." are they?

I watched the highlights about 10mins ago dude. It was very average defending and poor keeping that allowed bent in and the ball going through Jussi's legs was just insult to injury.

I dont' recall saying that. Do you want to enlghten me as to where I said "No, spurs clearly went 2-0 up last night!"? Yeah, that's waht I thought. Because I didn't. Go lick a screen door.

You cannot refute the fact that you believed that they went 2-0 up. If you try to, I will laugh.

See imno, this is what I'm talking about. He's more than happy to read any inference at all into someone else's comments, but when other people read through the lines on his he quickly changes the thrust of his argument.



The highlights are generally in chronological order, yeah? So you would've seen Bolton score twice before we scored twice, rather than the other way around?



I think it's a subtle hint that you should shut the fuck up about Spurs being crap, it's making you look a tad silly.

Edited by peligro: 1/2/2009 07:26:03 PM

In a futile attempt to get this back on topic:

Hull boss Phil Brown is eyeing Spurs striker Darren Bent. (NOTW)
Yes, I know its from NOTW, but its all I've got to work with

Fair enough :lol: . I don't think we'll be getting rid of any strikers til next season now, doesn't look like we'll be bringing any in either. Bent looked lively last night, best thing about last night shows that we can't continue to play with one up front away from home. Let's hope Harry sees that.

Everybody is fucking targeting Bent #-o
Whos next? Man Citeh?

I'd like to hope so, we might even make a profit off him if that happens :o

Nice to see you're reading what's being said. I already said I misread the match report.

Stop. Now, if we look at this as a whole. We can see I'm not changing any inferences or putting words into anybody's mouth. I misread and thought spurs went 2-0 up. Obviously that was wrong, but at NO POINT did I try and refute this fact. As you can clearly see. Perhaps you need to revise your cliches. "Read between the lines". =;

*Sigh* How do I spell this out to you?? Listen VERY carefully. Infact, quote me on this in your next post so I know you've actually read this and acknowledge what I'm saying. I logged on this afternoon when I woke up and with my bleary eyes I misread the match report from the spurs game. I then saw what happened AFTER I'd put my foot in it when I watched the highlights of the spurs game.

Why?? I'm the first to admit that Liverpool have been inconsistant this season. And if anything it just reinforces the point I had that spurs performance was just poor. They can beat Liverpool, albeit an understrength LFC side...and yet they can't keep it together for long enough to convert any kind of results. They lose 3-2 to a team that Liverpool beat. I fail to see what's wrong with my statement on spurs' performance.

According to NOTW, Gerrard is joining Milan, Spurs have re-signed Keane, Kaka is Real Madrid bound and Aguero is joining Barca. Pinch of salt there.

Edited by afromanGT: 1/2/2009 07:51:08 PM