United States of America: Commander in Chief Joe Biden


United States of America: Commander in Chief Joe Biden

Author
Message
salmonfc
salmonfc
World Class
World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)World Class (7.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K, Visits: 0
adrtho wrote:
salmonfc wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
Quote:
Bill Clinton: Candidate Hillary Clinton Says Husband Would Be 'in Charge of Economic Revitalization'

The Democratic presidential candidate said at a rally in Fort Mitchell, Ala., that the former president would be in charge of stimulating the economy because "you know he knows how to do it."


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

-PB

His secretary would know more about stimulating things tbh


great, along as he listen to the right people

you don't have to know anything, you have know the right people to listen to, at the right time and weight it all up

Ms. Lewinsky is more well known for what goes into her mouth than what comes out.

For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby

Edited
9 Years Ago by salmonfc
adrtho
adrtho
World Class
World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K, Visits: 0
salmonfc wrote:
adrtho wrote:
salmonfc wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
Quote:
Bill Clinton: Candidate Hillary Clinton Says Husband Would Be 'in Charge of Economic Revitalization'

The Democratic presidential candidate said at a rally in Fort Mitchell, Ala., that the former president would be in charge of stimulating the economy because "you know he knows how to do it."


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

-PB

His secretary would know more about stimulating things tbh




great, along as he listen to the right people

you don't have to know anything, you have know the right people to listen to, at the right time and weight it all up

Ms. Lewinsky is more well known for what goes into her mouth than what comes out.


she wasn't a secretary mate... Lewinsky was a unpaid summer internship (work experience)
Edited
9 Years Ago by adrtho
Murdoch Rags Ltd
Murdoch Rags Ltd
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
And this is the greatest reason why he is so dangerous

Quote:
US election: Donald Trump says he will renegotiate America's role in global climate accord

Presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would renegotiate America's role in the UN global climate accord, spelling potential doom for an agreement many view as the last chance to turn the tide on global warming.
A reversal by the world's second largest carbon-emitting country would hobble the deal reached in Paris last December by 177 nations which, for the first time in more than two decades, established a common vision for curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
"I will be looking at that very, very seriously, and at a minimum I will be renegotiating those agreements, at a minimum. And at a maximum I may do something else," the New York real estate mogul said in an interview with Reuters....
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-18/trump-says-he-will-renegotiate-us-role-in-climate-north-korea/7424412


Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 18/5/2016 11:35:27 AM
Edited
9 Years Ago by Murdoch Rags Ltd
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
Quote:
Bill Clinton: Candidate Hillary Clinton Says Husband Would Be 'in Charge of Economic Revitalization'

The Democratic presidential candidate said at a rally in Fort Mitchell, Ala., that the former president would be in charge of stimulating the economy because "you know he knows how to do it."


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

-PB


Such a leap forward for women to have a female president that immediately delegates the maths to her man.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
GDeathe
GDeathe
Pro
Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)Pro (2.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K, Visits: 0
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:
And this is the greatest reason why he is so dangerous

Quote:
US election: Donald Trump says he will renegotiate America's role in global climate accord

Presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said he would renegotiate America's role in the UN global climate accord, spelling potential doom for an agreement many view as the last chance to turn the tide on global warming.
A reversal by the world's second largest carbon-emitting country would hobble the deal reached in Paris last December by 177 nations which, for the first time in more than two decades, established a common vision for curbing greenhouse gas emissions.
"I will be looking at that very, very seriously, and at a minimum I will be renegotiating those agreements, at a minimum. And at a maximum I may do something else," the New York real estate mogul said in an interview with Reuters....
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-18/trump-says-he-will-renegotiate-us-role-in-climate-north-korea/7424412


Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 18/5/2016 11:35:27 AM

what wrong re-negotiating a mathematically challenged deal before the trillionz!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! is handed over
better to get that shit sorted out now rather than say spending 1.08 billion on desal plant that is never been fucking used since construction in constant state of "hibernation" like NSW bought by the fear of flanery's bullshit water prophecies


Edited by GDeathe: 19/5/2016 06:39:00 AM
Edited
9 Years Ago by GDeathe
grazorblade
grazorblade
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
interesting article from nate silver on why he ignored polls on trump and gave him a low probability of winning the primary
http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/how-i-acted-like-a-pundit-and-screwed-up-on-donald-trump/
Edited
9 Years Ago by grazorblade
marconi101
marconi101
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
[youtube]abnkjCZTJDI[/youtube]

He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.

Edited
9 Years Ago by marconi101
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

Please tell me more about how Trump can't possibly win.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
AzzaMarch
AzzaMarch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

Please tell me more about how Trump can't possibly win.


Interesting discussion over this article on the fivethirtyeight election podcast - there are caveats over the methodology used by the various polls used in the aggregation data.

However, it does seem that Republican voters are falling in behind him as the candidate - becoming normalised.

Their conclusion is that it is still early days, but there has definitely been tightening with Trump consolidating republican support.

But still very hard to tell.
Edited
9 Years Ago by AzzaMarch
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Let America vote in trump. Let his supporters feel like they been heard. Let his promises come to fruition or not. Who cares if he wins then we're in for a hell of a ride. If he loses i hope his ego doesn't make him do or say something stupid
Edited
9 Years Ago by MvFCArsenal16.8
And Everyone Blamed Clive
And Everyone Blamed Clive
World Class
World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K, Visits: 0
Who'd be more likely to get assassinated.

Trump or Clinton ?

Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award -  10th April 2017

Edited
9 Years Ago by View from the fence
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Both. Clinton from some "lone wolf" type. Trump from some far left group
Edited
9 Years Ago by MvFCArsenal16.8
adrtho
adrtho
World Class
World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)World Class (6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.9K, Visits: 0
View from the fence wrote:
Who'd be more likely to get assassinated.

Trump or Clinton ?


none
Edited
9 Years Ago by adrtho
TheSelectFlaps
TheSelectFlaps
Fan
Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)Fan (52 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 47, Visits: 0
Is the assassination of a President even possible anymore? With the amount of security always watching and checking everything, could it still happen?
Edited
9 Years Ago by TheSelectFlaps
Conservative
Conservative
Hardcore Fan
Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 175, Visits: 0
Quite distasteful that you would be even discussing this.

I'm for Trump 2016.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Conservative
Conservative
Conservative
Hardcore Fan
Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 175, Visits: 0
Great ad!!!

[youtube]RYSV5yY9wms[/youtube]
Edited
9 Years Ago by Conservative
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFlaps wrote:
Is the assassination of a President even possible anymore? With the amount of security always watching and checking everything, could it still happen?


Depends if they do anything out doors and with range between buildings ala Shooter.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
AzzaMarch wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

Please tell me more about how Trump can't possibly win.


Interesting discussion over this article on the fivethirtyeight election podcast - there are caveats over the methodology used by the various polls used in the aggregation data.

However, it does seem that Republican voters are falling in behind him as the candidate - becoming normalised.

Their conclusion is that it is still early days, but there has definitely been tightening with Trump consolidating republican support.

But still very hard to tell.


538 have been wrong far more than they have been right in this cycle, and they're making the same mistakes now that they did when they discounted Trump and Sanders all throughout the Republican primaries.

It's a pretty simple equation now. In their desperation to nominate Clinton, the DNC are missing the forest for the trees and alienating more and more Sanders supporters to the point where without some kind of serious intervention (like adopting a chunk of Sanders platform) they are going to hand Trump the presidency.
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
And Everyone Blamed Clive
And Everyone Blamed Clive
World Class
World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K, Visits: 0
TheSelectFlaps wrote:
Is the assassination of a President even possible anymore? With the amount of security always watching and checking everything, could it still happen?


I reckon a Boeing in the Westwing'll probably do it

Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award -  10th April 2017

Edited
9 Years Ago by View from the fence
AzzaMarch
AzzaMarch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
notorganic wrote:
AzzaMarch wrote:
notorganic wrote:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html

Please tell me more about how Trump can't possibly win.


Interesting discussion over this article on the fivethirtyeight election podcast - there are caveats over the methodology used by the various polls used in the aggregation data.

However, it does seem that Republican voters are falling in behind him as the candidate - becoming normalised.

Their conclusion is that it is still early days, but there has definitely been tightening with Trump consolidating republican support.

But still very hard to tell.


538 have been wrong far more than they have been right in this cycle, and they're making the same mistakes now that they did when they discounted Trump and Sanders all throughout the Republican primaries.

It's a pretty simple equation now. In their desperation to nominate Clinton, the DNC are missing the forest for the trees and alienating more and more Sanders supporters to the point where without some kind of serious intervention (like adopting a chunk of Sanders platform) they are going to hand Trump the presidency.


Not at all - certainly they were late to recognise Trump's rise, but so was everyone else.

They even put up a very interesting article explaining how they missed it, and why they got that wrong.

In terms of individual primaries, they've been pretty spot on whenever there has been decent polling data in the lead-up.

I think you are completely wrong re the Democrats. If the Republicans can coalesce behind such a polarising figure as Trump, then the same will happen with the Dems.

All that has happened is that the Republican Primaries, and Trump, were sucking in all the media attention. Now that race is over, all the attention is on the Dems.

Not to say the presidential race won't be more competitive than was previously thought, but the Sanders v Clinton battle is just primary politics. 4 years ago we were having the same debate about Hillary supporters supposedly never going to support Obama. But they ended up falling in behind him once it was settled.

For me the biggest unpredictable variable is how unpopular Clinton and Trump both are. Their high level of "unfavourables" are unprecedented historically.
Edited
9 Years Ago by AzzaMarch
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
I hope Bernie drags it out until the end, the longer he stays in the more damage he does to Clinton and the potentially more divided the party will become.
Edited
9 Years Ago by 433
433
433
World Class
World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)World Class (6.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K, Visits: 0
Speaking of the 2008 Dem primaries, I find it hypocritical of Clinton to accuse Trump of racism/other -isms when she herself used dog-whistle attacks on Obama.
Edited
9 Years Ago by 433
And Everyone Blamed Clive
And Everyone Blamed Clive
World Class
World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)World Class (6.5K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
TheSelectFlaps wrote:
Is the assassination of a President even possible anymore? With the amount of security always watching and checking everything, could it still happen?


Depends if they do anything out doors and with range between buildings ala Shooter.

-PB


Trump won't go anywhere windy, so Clinton would be favourite for outdoors attack

Indoors, maybe an exploding Hooker would get Trump but more likely Bill.

Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award -  10th April 2017

Edited
9 Years Ago by View from the fence
Glory Recruit
Glory Recruit
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K, Visits: 0
Shit going down at a trump protest
Edited
9 Years Ago by Iridium1010
elf.II
elf.II
Weekender
Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)Weekender (30 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 30, Visits: 0
Conservative wrote:
Quite distasteful that you would be even discussing this.

I'm for Trump 2016.



Edited
9 Years Ago by elf.II
Conservative
Conservative
Hardcore Fan
Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)Hardcore Fan (177 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 175, Visits: 0
elf.II wrote:
Conservative wrote:
Quite distasteful that you would be even discussing this.

I'm for Trump 2016.




I'm not personally offended. I observed its distasteful to discuss ways to kill the future president.
The kind of thing that could land you a visit from the AFP and no place on this forum.
Edited
9 Years Ago by Conservative
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
Constant violence by protestors at Trump rallies seem to be giving him more power. You'd think that these people would have learnt by now?
Edited
9 Years Ago by BETHFC
AzzaMarch
AzzaMarch
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K, Visits: 0
BETHFC wrote:
Constant violence by protestors at Trump rallies seem to be giving him more power. You'd think that these people would have learnt by now?


Yep - it is so utterly self-defeating.

The mentality of many hardcore Trump supporters is one of being the victim.

These protestors that commit violence are just providing them with evidence to confirm that viewpoint.

I support the right to protest. But Trump and his supporters have the right to free assembly.
Edited
9 Years Ago by AzzaMarch
BETHFC
BETHFC
World Class
World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)World Class (8.2K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K, Visits: 0
AzzaMarch wrote:
BETHFC wrote:
Constant violence by protestors at Trump rallies seem to be giving him more power. You'd think that these people would have learnt by now?


Yep - it is so utterly self-defeating.

The mentality of many hardcore Trump supporters is one of being the victim.

These protestors that commit violence are just providing them with evidence to confirm that viewpoint.

I support the right to protest. But Trump and his supporters have the right to free assembly.


Exactly right. There's protesting and then there's causing a scene where you ultimately get removed or attract police attention. If police have to use tear gas it makes Trump opposition look like the loonies rather than the idiots who think building a 30ft wall will stop illegal immigrants :lol:
Edited
9 Years Ago by BETHFC
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Surprised this hasn't been filled up yet by r/TheDonald memes after he clinched the delegate count.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search