scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Why were both mine and others hamless bit of fun threads (the wsw gif threads) deleted entirely? If a single post was the problem why not just delete the offending post and not the whole damn thread. Overzealous moderating to the max! #funpolice
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Probably either Joffa or Erebus I reckon. -PB
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ).
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Fair enough. Thanks for answering.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Closing threads because they evolve in a different direction than the way Joffa wants them to evolve is an abuse of power.
I sometimes wonder if Joffa would be happier if there were no posters left to complicate his constant copyright infringement.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB
|
|
|
Erebus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Probably either Joffa or Erebus I reckon.
-PB Nope wasn't me. It obviously got locked overnight and I wasn't online since COB yesterday :) I actually posted in the thread :lol: at it breaking the internet.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us.
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us. I thought it was more to do with it being about WSW, during that period yesterday where everything was becoming WSW spam. I didn't think it was necessarily because it was a gif thread. But in saying that, I'm sure I've seen ages ago someone get worked up about how gif threads sucked their bandwidth up. Perhaps gif threads in general are considered spam and/or not suitable to these forums? I'm not all-knowing like other mods - clarification may be needed by whoever (I assume Joff?) locked it. Edited by pv4: 8/1/2015 11:14:10 AM
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Erebus wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Probably either Joffa or Erebus I reckon.
-PB Nope wasn't me. It obviously got locked overnight and I wasn't online since COB yesterday :) I actually posted in the thread :lol: at it breaking the internet. movr over kim kardashian iirc
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
>Enters thread entitled "...in gif form" >Complains about bandwidth being used
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:u4486662 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us. I thought it was more to do with it being about WSW, during that period yesterday where everything was becoming WSW spam. I didn't think it was necessarily because it was a gif thread. But in saying that, I'm sure I've seen ages ago someone get worked up about how gif threads sucked their bandwidth up. Perhaps gif threads in general are considered spam and/or not suitable to these forums? I'm not all-knowing like other mods - clarification may be needed by whoever (I assume Joff?) locked it. Edited by pv4: 8/1/2015 11:14:10 AM lol WSW can get the bantz as they are chumps of Asia. When the mighty fall they should expect such a response. -PB
|
|
|
pv4
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:u4486662 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us. I thought it was more to do with it being about WSW, during that period yesterday where everything was becoming WSW spam. I didn't think it was necessarily because it was a gif thread. But in saying that, I'm sure I've seen ages ago someone get worked up about how gif threads sucked their bandwidth up. Perhaps gif threads in general are considered spam and/or not suitable to these forums? I'm not all-knowing like other mods - clarification may be needed by whoever (I assume Joff?) locked it. Edited by pv4: 8/1/2015 11:14:10 AM lol WSW can get the bantz as they are chumps of Asia. When the mighty fall they should expect such a response. -PB The bantz is fine within reason, it was just the amount of threads being created (and hence spam) that I think was the issue.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
pv4 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:u4486662 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us. I thought it was more to do with it being about WSW, during that period yesterday where everything was becoming WSW spam. I didn't think it was necessarily because it was a gif thread. But in saying that, I'm sure I've seen ages ago someone get worked up about how gif threads sucked their bandwidth up. Perhaps gif threads in general are considered spam and/or not suitable to these forums? I'm not all-knowing like other mods - clarification may be needed by whoever (I assume Joff?) locked it. Edited by pv4: 8/1/2015 11:14:10 AM lol WSW can get the bantz as they are chumps of Asia. When the mighty fall they should expect such a response. -PB The bantz is fine within reason, it was just the amount of threads being created (and hence spam) that I think was the issue. More threads were being created because the old ones were disappearing without any reason. -PB
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:u4486662 wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:pv4 wrote:I deleted one thread, I think created by Post hoc (the WSW fan), that was basically saying "we don't have enough WSW threads".
The amount of threads created particularly yesterday crossed the line of being #bantz to being spam. If you want to wind up WSW fans, do it in one of the already-existing threads (and remember to keep it PG13, and by the rules :lol: ). Gif threads are best threads though. If people locked them and said why then people wouldn't keep creating them lol. -PB Can we please leave the gif threads open? Just delete/edit the post and/or ban/warn the poster who happens to cross the line. Stop ruining people's fun. Stop trying to parent us. I thought it was more to do with it being about WSW, during that period yesterday where everything was becoming WSW spam. I didn't think it was necessarily because it was a gif thread. But in saying that, I'm sure I've seen ages ago someone get worked up about how gif threads sucked their bandwidth up. Perhaps gif threads in general are considered spam and/or not suitable to these forums? I'm not all-knowing like other mods - clarification may be needed by whoever (I assume Joff?) locked it. Edited by pv4: 8/1/2015 11:14:10 AM lol WSW can get the bantz as they are chumps of Asia. When the mighty fall they should expect such a response. -PB The bantz is fine within reason, it was just the amount of threads being created (and hence spam) that I think was the issue. More threads were being created because the old ones were disappearing without any reason. -PB Exactly. It's also concerning that there doesn't appear to be any knowledge of consensus between mods, and that some mods were actually working against each other in their interpretation of the rules. So is it a problem with the rules, or a problem with a certain moderator acting beyond his station... Cutting the strings, so to speak.
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:Exactly. It's also concerning that there doesn't appear to be any knowledge of consensus between mods, and that some mods were actually working against each other in their interpretation of the rules.
So is it a problem with the rules, or a problem with a certain moderator acting beyond his station... Cutting the strings, so to speak.
This Even the authority figures in this place have no idea what's going on. We can't even get the same answer from different mods as to why the WSW thread was closed :lol:
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Is there not a mod forum for said discussions? -PB
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Is there not a mod forum for said discussions?
-PB :-$ :-$ :-$
|
|
|
milan_7
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
The question is though, who moderates the mod forum?
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
milan_7 wrote:The question is though, who moderates the mod forum? Shaft
|
|
|
scotty21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Return of the Fun Police. Heniey's RBB thread locked.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Erebus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
It was a troll thread that lasted 10 pages. I read the last 2 pages and it was just utter drivel going nowhere with insults flying back and forth. I could say "stay on topic" but what WAS the topic? Just another Heiny troll WSW/RBB thread. Amazing it lasted that long tbh.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
What a surprise that Erebus pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with shutting down a WSW or Italy thread.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Erebus wrote:It was a troll thread that lasted 10 pages. I read the last 2 pages and it was just utter drivel going nowhere with insults flying back and forth. I could say "stay on topic" but what WAS the topic? Just another Heiny troll WSW/RBB thread. Amazing it lasted that long tbh. Don't lie. You loved every moment of it. Something tells me you're keen to have a Soggy Sao party out at Finky's.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!
|
|
|
Erebus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote:Erebus wrote:It was a troll thread that lasted 10 pages. I read the last 2 pages and it was just utter drivel going nowhere with insults flying back and forth. I could say "stay on topic" but what WAS the topic? Just another Heiny troll WSW/RBB thread. Amazing it lasted that long tbh. Don't lie. You loved every moment of it. Something tells me you're keen to have a Soggy Sao party out at Finky's. Only if you're there =p~
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
Erebus wrote:Heineken wrote:Erebus wrote:It was a troll thread that lasted 10 pages. I read the last 2 pages and it was just utter drivel going nowhere with insults flying back and forth. I could say "stay on topic" but what WAS the topic? Just another Heiny troll WSW/RBB thread. Amazing it lasted that long tbh. Don't lie. You loved every moment of it. Something tells me you're keen to have a Soggy Sao party out at Finky's. Only if you're there =p~ It's like Russian Roulette: With added protein.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:What a surprise that Erebus pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with shutting down a WSW or Italy thread. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: People should learn to leave a lock message otherwise the spam continues elsewhere. -PB
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:notorganic wrote:What a surprise that Erebus pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with shutting down a WSW or Italy thread. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: People should learn to leave a lock message otherwise the spam continues elsewhere. -PB What a surprise that Notorganic pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with bad mouthing mods.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:notorganic wrote:What a surprise that Erebus pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with shutting down a WSW or Italy thread. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: People should learn to leave a lock message otherwise the spam continues elsewhere. -PB What a surprise that Notorganic pops up from his ongoing hibernation to only concern himself with bad mouthing mods. Incredibly unfair. I badmouth non-mods too.
|
|
|