mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
You really are a lame baiter :lol:
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Iirc SocaWho was once defemdimg muslims on here saying leave them alone. Its pretty funny he makes these threads only after reading some posts on here ie the tara rushton thing
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:You really are a lame baiter :lol: Seems you still havent been able to explain why its still ok for a few rogue imams to be peddlibg hate..yet you offer lame responses . Edited by Socawho: 29/10/2015 08:16:47 AM
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Very interesting article about recent survey on Australian social cohesion. Makes me realise the real world has a lower proportion of bigots than what you find online hahaha! http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2015/oct/28/social-cohesion-scanlon-survey-binds-australia-stronger-than-ever-even-as-tony-abbott-came-unstuck
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
Let's all assimilate in conservatives' arseholes! Roastafariiiiiiiii
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:You really are a lame baiter :lol: Seems you still havent been able to explain why its still ok for a few rogue imams to be peddlibg hate..yet you offer lame responses . Edited by Socawho: 29/10/2015 08:16:47 AM If you don't know why its not ok for a few rogue imams to peddle hate then you can't be helped. See I can strawman too. I am happy to debate on merit but your arguments my friend have none.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Jong Gabe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
"9GABmeme420" wrote:Time 4 thread lock? Let it go. Watching blokes hang themselves with their own rope is great.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:You really are a lame baiter :lol: Seems you still havent been able to explain why its still ok for a few rogue imams to be peddlibg hate..yet you offer lame responses . Edited by Socawho: 29/10/2015 08:16:47 AM If you don't know why its not ok for a few rogue imams to peddle hate then you can't be helped. See I can strawman too. I am happy to debate on merit but your arguments my friend have none. preaching murder and beheadings?...hmm yes..lets let it slide....since they are a minority. Why don't you hold up placards in the street to welcome ISIS to set up shop in Australia. Edited by SocaWho: 29/10/2015 03:33:42 PM
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
How the hell did you deduct that outcome? :lol: fucking hell SocaWho :lol:
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:How the hell did you deduct that outcome? :lol: fucking hell SocaWho :lol: #-o Edited by SocaWho: 29/10/2015 01:55:38 PM
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend.
|
|
|
australiantibullus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Unshackled wrote:Crusader wrote:Unshackled wrote:
Why not call a spade a spade
[quote] I don't think you can call them that anymore can you? Edited by australiantibullus: 30/10/2015 09:24:54 PM
|
|
|
australiantibullus
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend. You have a good heart that has no place next to most of the posters on this thread. Sadly this is not the worst thread I have seen tonight
|
|
|
Lastbroadcast
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend. Good to go to.
|
|
|
StiflersMom
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:
Some huge generalisations here. We need to separate out 'how much media coverage of an issue there is' versus 'how much of an actual issue something is'.
Much like the reporting of violence at, and around soccer games, the issue is not so much that the media reporting is technically accurate or not, but the amount of focus put on one group by the media (soccer fans / muslims) versus other groups ( AFL & NRL / non-muslims).
Regarding the national anthem thing - who gives a sh#t??? Its not like they walked out on the anthem because they rejected Australia. The issue was participation in singing etc. At the end of the month they'll be back at the anthems anyway.
I'm just glad I finished school before the Howard-era patriotism bullsh#t came back into fashion. What the hell does standing in front of a flag and anthem prove anyway??? It means NOTHING.
Back when I was a kid we were proud of the fact that we weren't like the flashy americans waving our flag at every opportunity. Thanks to Howard - kids wear the flag as a f#cking cape at music festivals and love singing the moronic "aussie aussie aussie oi oi oi" which they don't realise that the rest of the world laughs at when they hear...
Ok - a bit of an old man rant there. I'll get off my soapbox now...
2 things, 1. You're welcome to leave 2. It's got nothing to do with John Howard
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
I think what was interesting was some words in the first paragraph of the article: Quote:Despite the fear campaigns of the last few years That sums up the low hanging fruit efforts of right wing governments. And the less critically thinking right wingers gobble it up. It's no wonder that research shows right wingers average higher levels of fear, average higher levels of racism, average higher levels of homophobia, average lower levels of IQ & average lower levels of education. And of course the expected 'as night follows day' deny the science when the message doesn't suit response is, "yeah, but that's just rubbish leftie research to push an agenda"...
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
StiflersMom wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:
Some huge generalisations here. We need to separate out 'how much media coverage of an issue there is' versus 'how much of an actual issue something is'.
Much like the reporting of violence at, and around soccer games, the issue is not so much that the media reporting is technically accurate or not, but the amount of focus put on one group by the media (soccer fans / muslims) versus other groups ( AFL & NRL / non-muslims).
Regarding the national anthem thing - who gives a sh#t??? Its not like they walked out on the anthem because they rejected Australia. The issue was participation in singing etc. At the end of the month they'll be back at the anthems anyway.
I'm just glad I finished school before the Howard-era patriotism bullsh#t came back into fashion. What the hell does standing in front of a flag and anthem prove anyway??? It means NOTHING.
Back when I was a kid we were proud of the fact that we weren't like the flashy americans waving our flag at every opportunity. Thanks to Howard - kids wear the flag as a f#cking cape at music festivals and love singing the moronic "aussie aussie aussie oi oi oi" which they don't realise that the rest of the world laughs at when they hear...
Ok - a bit of an old man rant there. I'll get off my soapbox now...
2 things, 1. You're welcome to leave 2. It's got nothing to do with John Howard I would say if you don't like Muslims here living their own lives then you're also welcome to leave and not complain.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:StiflersMom wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:
Some huge generalisations here. We need to separate out 'how much media coverage of an issue there is' versus 'how much of an actual issue something is'.
Much like the reporting of violence at, and around soccer games, the issue is not so much that the media reporting is technically accurate or not, but the amount of focus put on one group by the media (soccer fans / muslims) versus other groups ( AFL & NRL / non-muslims).
Regarding the national anthem thing - who gives a sh#t??? Its not like they walked out on the anthem because they rejected Australia. The issue was participation in singing etc. At the end of the month they'll be back at the anthems anyway.
I'm just glad I finished school before the Howard-era patriotism bullsh#t came back into fashion. What the hell does standing in front of a flag and anthem prove anyway??? It means NOTHING.
Back when I was a kid we were proud of the fact that we weren't like the flashy americans waving our flag at every opportunity. Thanks to Howard - kids wear the flag as a f#cking cape at music festivals and love singing the moronic "aussie aussie aussie oi oi oi" which they don't realise that the rest of the world laughs at when they hear...
Ok - a bit of an old man rant there. I'll get off my soapbox now...
2 things, 1. You're welcome to leave 2. It's got nothing to do with John Howard I would say if you don't like Muslims here living their own lives then you're also welcome to leave and not complain. most muslims are good law abiding citizens as like most folk from different backgrounds and faiths...but there are always bad apples. why dont you stop assuming there isnt a problem with a minority of muslims who cause trouble or is that too hard too admit since it flies in the face of your left wing agenda
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Lastbroadcast wrote:Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone. Assimilation to me is "not running around killing innocent people in the name of religion" ...is that too much to ask....or should we legalise that too to pander to minorities. it doesnt matter if youre white,yellow , black , muslim, christian,etc...dont come to this country to fuck it up. practise whatever it is you want to practise, as long as you dont sprouting intent to kill people. how hard is that to get into your skull? Edited by Socawho: 31/10/2015 06:24:59 PM
|
|
|
Lastbroadcast
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:Lastbroadcast wrote:Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone. Assimilation to me is "not running around killing innocent people in the name of religion" ...is that too much to ask....or should we legalise that too to pander to minorities. it doesnt matter if youre white,yellow , black , muslim, christian,etc...dont come to this country to fuck it up. practise whatever it is you want to practise, as long as you dont sprouting intent to kill people. how hard is that to get into your skull? Edited by Socawho: 31/10/2015 06:24:59 PM :lol: Point to where I said Muslims have the right to break the Australian law. Of course they don't. My point was that our constitution protects their right to free speech and to practice their religion. It also says that everyone gets a fair trial. When you become a citizen you also pledge your loyalty to Australia, it's laws and institutions. If you break the law you get punished. You seem to be in some moral panic that Muslims are destroying the country. Here's the good news - 2 Muslim extremists have committed terrible murders in the last 12 months. both were killed by the police. Meanwhile the other 450,000 Australian Muslims went about their daily business. Edited by lastbroadcast: 31/10/2015 08:40:23 PM
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Lastbroadcast wrote:SocaWho wrote:Lastbroadcast wrote:Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone. Assimilation to me is "not running around killing innocent people in the name of religion" ...is that too much to ask....or should we legalise that too to pander to minorities. it doesnt matter if youre white,yellow , black , muslim, christian,etc...dont come to this country to fuck it up. practise whatever it is you want to practise, as long as you dont sprouting intent to kill people. how hard is that to get into your skull? Edited by Socawho: 31/10/2015 06:24:59 PM :lol: Point to where I said Muslims have the right to break the Australian law. Of course they don't. My point was that our constitution protects their right to free speech and to practice their religion. It also says that everyone gets a fair trial. When you become a citizen you also pledge your loyalty to Australia, it's laws and institutions. If you break the law you get punished. You seem to be in some moral panic that Muslims are destroying the country. Here's the good news - 2 Muslim extremists have committed terrible murders in the last 12 months. both were killed by the police. Meanwhile the other 450,000 Australian Muslims went about their daily business. Edited by lastbroadcast: 31/10/2015 08:40:23 PM Great post. Socawho schooled. Will post now that he's not talking about moderate muslims when of course he is.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Eastern Glory wrote:I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend. You'll get to meet up with all the other self-absorbed and pretentious wankers, good for you :)
|
|
|
trident
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend. You'll get to meet up with all the other self-absorbed and pretentious wankers, good for you :) :) :) :)
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Munrubenmuz wrote:Lastbroadcast wrote:SocaWho wrote:Lastbroadcast wrote:Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone. Assimilation to me is "not running around killing innocent people in the name of religion" ...is that too much to ask....or should we legalise that too to pander to minorities. it doesnt matter if youre white,yellow , black , muslim, christian,etc...dont come to this country to fuck it up. practise whatever it is you want to practise, as long as you dont sprouting intent to kill people. how hard is that to get into your skull? Edited by Socawho: 31/10/2015 06:24:59 PM :lol: Point to where I said Muslims have the right to break the Australian law. Of course they don't. My point was that our constitution protects their right to free speech and to practice their religion. It also says that everyone gets a fair trial. When you become a citizen you also pledge your loyalty to Australia, it's laws and institutions. If you break the law you get punished. You seem to be in some moral panic that Muslims are destroying the country. Here's the good news - 2 Muslim extremists have committed terrible murders in the last 12 months. both were killed by the police. Meanwhile the other 450,000 Australian Muslims went about their daily business. Edited by lastbroadcast: 31/10/2015 08:40:23 PM Great post. Socawho schooled. Will post now that he's not talking about moderate muslims when of course he is. there you go again making assumptions again and carrying on like the fucktard you are
|
|
|
Eastern Glory
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K,
Visits: 0
|
433 wrote:Eastern Glory wrote:I for one, shall be attending the welcome to refugees rally on the weekend. You'll get to meet up with all the other self-absorbed and pretentious wankers, good for you :) Well... By definition it's not for self absorbed people... Pretentious, maybe
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:Munrubenmuz wrote:
Great post. Socawho schooled.
Will post now that he's not talking about moderate muslims when of course he is.
there you go again making assumptions again and carrying on like the fucktard you are Ha ha. Keep covering yourself in glory.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Crusader
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Lastbroadcast wrote:SocaWho wrote:Lastbroadcast wrote:Whenever someone uses that word I always say "assimilation into what?"
The ironic thing is that one of the few rights our constitution does explicitly protect is freedom of religion. But instead of celebrating pluralism and diversity, white Australians expect immigrants to come here, drink VB, abandon their religious and cultural practices, get a southern cross tattoo, and act like a shitcunt at the AFL. It just goes to show you how spectacularly uninformed most Australians are.
Let's not forget -
"Assimilation" was first used after the shutting down of Aboriginal missions and reserves in the 1950s. It reflected the idea that Aboriginal people now had equal freedom of movement, but they were discouraged from expressing traditional culture and beliefs. In other words you could have black skin but you were expected to act white - convert to Christianity, get a job, and sing God save the queen. The term was then used to describe the expectations of immigrants.
I don't know why people continue to think assimilation is okay. It's actually incompatible with our pluralist constitution. As long as nobody's human rights get breached, we should just leave people alone. Assimilation to me is "not running around killing innocent people in the name of religion" ...is that too much to ask....or should we legalise that too to pander to minorities. it doesnt matter if youre white,yellow , black , muslim, christian,etc...dont come to this country to fuck it up. practise whatever it is you want to practise, as long as you dont sprouting intent to kill people. how hard is that to get into your skull? Edited by Socawho: 31/10/2015 06:24:59 PM :lol: Point to where I said Muslims have the right to break the Australian law. Of course they don't. My point was that our constitution protects their right to free speech and to practice their religion. It also says that everyone gets a fair trial. When you become a citizen you also pledge your loyalty to Australia, it's laws and institutions. If you break the law you get punished. You seem to be in some moral panic that Muslims are destroying the country. Here's the good news - 2 Muslim extremists have committed terrible murders in the last 12 months. both were killed by the police. Meanwhile the other 450,000 Australian Muslims went about their daily business. Edited by lastbroadcast: 31/10/2015 08:40:23 PM I guess you haven't been to northwestern Melbourne, Bankstown or Auburn lately.
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
North western melbourne is over run by bikies, street gangs . No muslim gangs but a lot of middle eastern gangs. There is a difference
|
|
|