Heres the white paper.

http://www.defence.gov.au/whitepaper/Docs/2016-Defence-White-Paper.pdf

Makes mention of China, ukraine, IS etc.

Events during the three years since the release of the last Defence White
Paper in 2013 demonstrate how rapidly Australia’s security environment
can change .The relationship between the United States and China
continues to evolve and will be fundamental to our future strategic
circumstances .Territorial disputes between claimants in the East China
and South China Seas have created uncertainty and tension in our region .
The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea continues to be a source of
instability .State fragility has helped enable the rise of Daesh (also known
as Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant) terrorists in the Middle East,
incidents across the world have demonstrated the pervasive nature of the
threat of terrorism, and [size=8]a violation of international law led to the deaths of
Australians in the skies over Ukraine[/size] .Some matters that previous Defence
White Papers have described as longer-term issues, such as the impact
of military modernisation in our region, now fall to this White Paper to
respond to .

interesting...

no mention of the violation of international law of Australians bombing a sovereign nation in Syria uninvited

Russian Army shot down MH17 , killed all those people on there way to Australia

Russian Army shot down MH17 , killed all those people on there way to Australia

Russian Army? :lol:

Evidence?

So lets violate international law and bomb Syria. Makes perfect sense.
Much like invading Iraq because some Saudis attacked NYC. Makes perfect sense.

Edited by TheFactOfTheMatter: 26/2/2016 02:15:16 AM

we know the Russia army unit , know the names Russian solider ...

anyway, who died and made you king , you're a fucking nobody, why should they give evidence to you

and who gave you the evidence?

why do i need it? why would i not believe the Australia government when dealing with so many dead Australians ? kids shot from the sky, falling to ground with out there clothes left on them

fuck you

the Australian government never claimed the Russian army shot down MH17

yes they did .,,it why Europe agree to put sanctions on Russia....

no they didnt
you have no evidence

there lots of evidence....but you do the same thing as Russia does, you put up 5 other crazy ideas and say they could be possible ...as this is not a court a law, where we can question witness

Russia shot down MH17
sanctions went on Russia because of it

and here the best part
fucking sanctions are not coming off Russia for a very long time



Edited by adrtho: 26/2/2016 11:39:41 PM

You claimed and I quote, "the Russian army shot down MH17".
You claim sanctions as evidence. That's not evidence of anything.

Provide evidence or shut the fuck up shit talker.

maybe you can tell Putin to let the Dutch safety board to be able to questions the Russian solders who shot it down? Ok, how about letting the driver of the Buk surface-to-air missile that cross from Russia it to Ukraine and then shot it down to be questions

Russia shot MH17 down
they know the truck that cary the Buk surface-to-air missile to Ukraine
They know the driver name
they know the Russia army Unit the Buk surface-to-air missile was with
they know the name of the soilders in this Russian Army Unit
they know to the minute when the missile was fired
they know where it was fired
they know when and how the Buk then travel back to Russia
they know everything

Tony Abbott get a lot of shit, but this was him and Julie Bishop finest hour, all Australian should be proud of both them (other to), they gave Europe some fucking balls, with out Tony Abbott or Julie Bishop (Australia government) there would be no sanctions on Russia

...so no evidence then?

lots of evidence, it's why they put sanctions on Russia

no it isnt

still waiting evidence of your claim "russian army shot down MH17"

lots of evidence, it's why they put sanctions on Russia

[size=8]show the evidence that Russia didn't do it[/size]

you've been caught out. this is effectively an admission of defeat by you

you have no evidence

MH17 was shot down by a Buk surface-to-air missile, theses buk can not brought at the corner shop...they need a big trunk to transport them , and they need train me to operate.... this means Russian army or Ukraine army

there so much evidence saying it was Russia,
they have traffic cam video of the Buk traveling from Russia to it spot in Ukraine where it fired, they have the traffic cam video of the Buk traveling back to Russia minus one ...they know everything

Russia did it, they shot down and killed all those Australians