Top politician says Australia was invaded


Top politician says Australia was invaded

Author
Message
Murdoch Rags Ltd
Murdoch Rags Ltd
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
rusty wrote:
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:
Once again, the issue is about attributing the label of invasion
Pretty basic concept. No critical thinking required, supposedly.
If you truly believe certain land should be repatriated, feel free to start a thread for discussion.


Pure cop out. The issue of aboriginal land rights is obviously a natural extension of the invasion debate. If you don't feel comfortable confronting your white male privilege and current illegal alien status there are plenty of neo nazi fascist forums where I think you will feel more at home.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
How ironic
scotty21
scotty21
World Class
World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)World Class (9.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K, Visits: 0
LOL Rags getting savaged. It's a thing of beauty.


Murdoch Rags Ltd
Murdoch Rags Ltd
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.2K reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
mcjules wrote:
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:
mcjules wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Love Murdoch douche getting savagely roasted. Its beautiful.

I'm no Murdoch Rags fan but you all look as foolish as him tbh.

How foolish of me to raise this topic.....

The topic is fine, and to be honest your last page of responses have been reasonable. That doesn't excuse you for your 1 dimensional arguments that you use 90% of the time.

Thanks for the condescension. Glass houses & all that
FYI, I don't bother engaging in most discussions - psychological research shows only a fairly small percentage of the population are open to rationality. You can tell (typically within one post) whether someone is open to interactive discussion.
Its what academia & science is founded on - exposing one's ideas to being (often brutally) dismantled, to reach truth or the best outcome.
mcjules
mcjules
World Class
World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)World Class (8.5K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K, Visits: 0
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:
mcjules wrote:
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:
mcjules wrote:
TheSelectFew wrote:
Love Murdoch douche getting savagely roasted. Its beautiful.

I'm no Murdoch Rags fan but you all look as foolish as him tbh.

How foolish of me to raise this topic.....

The topic is fine, and to be honest your last page of responses have been reasonable. That doesn't excuse you for your 1 dimensional arguments that you use 90% of the time.

Thanks for the condescension. Glass houses & all that
FYI, I don't bother engaging in most discussions - psychological research shows only a fairly small percentage of the population are open to rationality. You can tell (typically within one post) whether someone is open to interactive discussion.
Its what academia & science is founded on - exposing one's ideas to being (often brutally) dismantled, to reach truth or the best outcome.

I am sympathetic to the idea of not engaging in discussion with a lot of the posters in this thread, there is a growing list that I'll refuse to bother with. Particularly because they're incapable of supporting their "arguments" with fact and often resort to juvenile retorts.

However when you initiate the topic you should be prepared to engage in some discourse. You don't do that and resort to faux-intellectual arguments around right wingers. Essentially my friend, you are no better than them and I believe my condescension towards you is merited.

I'm also sympathetic to the resentment that many feel towards that you seem to have very little interest in football. The odd post in AF that's even more rarely about matches or its players does suggest you're nothing more than a troll trying to get a reaction.

Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here

Outonthefull
Outonthefull
Amateur
Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 501, Visits: 0
This IQ thing posted to show that an aborigine is inherently less intelligent than a white caucasian is an absolute disgrace and a deliberate obfuscation of the facts.

If you must post such garbage then at least have the balls to post up inks, sources and references rather than smugly sit there thinking your shit doesn't stink.

If shown a picture of a rabbit and asked to describe what they see an 13 year old city child is likely to tell you that it's a mammal, an introduced species and a pest in Australia.

An aboriginal is likely to tell you it's food.

Neither answer is a demonstration of one's superior intelligence over another. (Let's drop you in the Tanami desert and see how long you last smart arse.)

Pathetic. I feel like I need to have a shower now having engaged in this conversation.





Scotch&Coke
Scotch&Coke
Semi-Pro
Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)Semi-Pro (1.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K, Visits: 0
Outonthefull wrote:
This IQ thing posted to show that an aborigine is inherently less intelligent than a white caucasian is an absolute disgrace and a deliberate obfuscation of the facts.

If you must post such garbage then at least have the balls to post up inks, sources and references rather than smugly sit there thinking your shit doesn't stink.

If shown a picture of a rabbit and asked to describe what they see an 13 year old city child is likely to tell you that it's a mammal, an introduced species and a pest in Australia.

An aboriginal is likely to tell you it's food.

Neither answer is a demonstration of one's superior intelligence over another. (Let's drop you in the Tanami desert and see how long you last smart arse.)

Pathetic. I feel like I need to have a shower now having engaged in this conversation.






That isnt what an IQ test actually tests though.
sokorny
sokorny
Pro
Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)Pro (3.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K, Visits: 0
Scotch&Coke wrote:
Outonthefull wrote:
This IQ thing posted to show that an aborigine is inherently less intelligent than a white caucasian is an absolute disgrace and a deliberate obfuscation of the facts.

If you must post such garbage then at least have the balls to post up inks, sources and references rather than smugly sit there thinking your shit doesn't stink.

If shown a picture of a rabbit and asked to describe what they see an 13 year old city child is likely to tell you that it's a mammal, an introduced species and a pest in Australia.

An aboriginal is likely to tell you it's food.

Neither answer is a demonstration of one's superior intelligence over another. (Let's drop you in the Tanami desert and see how long you last smart arse.)

Pathetic. I feel like I need to have a shower now having engaged in this conversation.






That isnt what an IQ test actually tests though.


I think they were implying that there are different measures and concepts of intelligence. Some of the smartest people I knew at school had limited common sense / practical intelligence.
Outonthefull
Outonthefull
Amateur
Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)Amateur (502 reputation)

Group: Banned Members
Posts: 501, Visits: 0
sokorny wrote:
Scotch&Coke wrote:
Outonthefull wrote:
This IQ thing posted to show that an aborigine is inherently less intelligent than a white caucasian is an absolute disgrace and a deliberate obfuscation of the facts.

If you must post such garbage then at least have the balls to post up inks, sources and references rather than smugly sit there thinking your shit doesn't stink.

If shown a picture of a rabbit and asked to describe what they see an 13 year old city child is likely to tell you that it's a mammal, an introduced species and a pest in Australia.

An aboriginal is likely to tell you it's food.

Neither answer is a demonstration of one's superior intelligence over another. (Let's drop you in the Tanami desert and see how long you last smart arse.)

Pathetic. I feel like I need to have a shower now having engaged in this conversation.




That isnt what an IQ test actually tests though.


I think they were implying that there are different measures and concepts of intelligence. Some of the smartest people I knew at school had limited common sense / practical intelligence.


The OP of the IQ garbage is posting this rubbish up as proof that white caucasians are inherently more intelligent than aboriginals.

There is absolutely no doubt that that is what he is driving at.

Amazonian Indians, amongst many other native cultures, can count to 3 or 5 and after that their languages do not even have words for 6, 7, 8 etc.

When shown a handful off beads and asked for an approximation of beads there are they'll say 'many'.

No matter what you say it is not proof of low intelligence.


Edit. Deleted 'their'.



Edited by outonthefull: 5/4/2016 05:03:33 PM
Joffa
Joffa
Legend
Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)Legend (86K reputation)

Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K, Visits: 0
This thread is frankly pathetic and some of the openly racist stuff being discussed in here is disgraceful.

I cant be bothered reading it all except to say that this thread is locked and anyone posting racists comment, whether they claim to be facts or not is not on.

You risk a very lengthy ban if it continues.

Edited by Joffa: 5/4/2016 06:33:10 PM
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search