sokorny wrote:Scotch&Coke wrote:Outonthefull wrote:This IQ thing posted to show that an aborigine is inherently less intelligent than a white caucasian is an absolute disgrace and a deliberate obfuscation of the facts.
If you must post such garbage then at least have the balls to post up inks, sources and references rather than smugly sit there thinking your shit doesn't stink.
If shown a picture of a rabbit and asked to describe what they see an 13 year old city child is likely to tell you that it's a mammal, an introduced species and a pest in Australia.
An aboriginal is likely to tell you it's food.
Neither answer is a demonstration of one's superior intelligence over another. (Let's drop you in the Tanami desert and see how long you last smart arse.)
Pathetic. I feel like I need to have a shower now having engaged in this conversation.
That isnt what an IQ test actually tests though. I think they were implying that there are different measures and concepts of intelligence. Some of the smartest people I knew at school had limited common sense / practical intelligence. The OP of the IQ garbage is posting this rubbish up as proof that white caucasians are inherently more intelligent than aboriginals. There is absolutely no doubt that that is what he is driving at. Amazonian Indians, amongst many other native cultures, can count to 3 or 5 and after that their languages do not even have words for 6, 7, 8 etc. When shown a handful off beads and asked for an approximation of beads there are they'll say 'many'. No matter what you say it is not proof of low intelligence. Edit. Deleted 'their'. Edited by outonthefull: 5/4/2016 05:03:33 PM
|