rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Aikhme wrote:rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:It's stops the problem from getting worse. Eventually, the problem should die out.
Terrorist sympathisers like Anne Aly argue this wont work because it will further radicalise those already here. She reckons we should write nice letters to extremists instead and give them lenient sentences. Ane Aly is just the ALP's token Muslim in Parliament. Adds to the feel good factor. You know, that warm and fuzzy "oh look at me, I have Muslim friends type of feeling". Yes im well aware Labors obsession with winning the battle of tokenism and preferring temporary feel good policy that shines a light on their glorious morality than policy that works. No doubt they'll soon be campaigning for a quota of transvestites in parliament and on company boards.
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:mcjules wrote:I don't think we should stop with muslims.
Can you believe there are people in this country taking advantage of our advanced economy by taking jobs and wealth from proud Australians? Buying up investment properties, negative gearing to the hilt to reduce their tax to provides and then plan to run off back to their "home country" when they retire even though they were born here? Some of them even believe in dictatorships!
Edited by mcjules: 15/7/2016 12:55:32 PM Thanks for the strawman arguments. It's clear you are neck deep in illogical irrational thinkinking. So many thrown around at the moment. I thought I'd add a couple myself. Pointless discussing with some on here, possibly you included simple solution man. No there isn't. Only you did.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:No wonder all the Jews are leaving France. It reminds me of another time. Makes you wonder.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Well the answer is not to let more of them in that's for sure. Once the influx has stopped then you can start to address the ones left over. Mind you anyone with dual citizenship or an immigrant or a refugee should be punted as soon as they're convicted of any requisite crime. That should be an explicit contract between the government and the would be citizen. We already punt foreign nationals who are convicted of crimes and sentenced to more than a year in jail. There are heaps of kiwis and brits at Villawood and Christmas Island awaiting deportation.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:mcjules wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:mcjules wrote:I don't think we should stop with muslims.
Can you believe there are people in this country taking advantage of our advanced economy by taking jobs and wealth from proud Australians? Buying up investment properties, negative gearing to the hilt to reduce their tax to provides and then plan to run off back to their "home country" when they retire even though they were born here? Some of them even believe in dictatorships!
Edited by mcjules: 15/7/2016 12:55:32 PM Thanks for the strawman arguments. It's clear you are neck deep in illogical irrational thinkinking. So many thrown around at the moment. I thought I'd add a couple myself. Pointless discussing with some on here, possibly you included simple solution man. No there isn't. Only you did. Go back and read the thread more carefully then.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Toughlove wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Well the answer is not to let more of them in that's for sure. Once the influx has stopped then you can start to address the ones left over. Mind you anyone with dual citizenship or an immigrant or a refugee should be punted as soon as they're convicted of any requisite crime. That should be an explicit contract between the government and the would be citizen. We already punt foreign nationals who are convicted of crimes and sentenced to more than a year in jail. There are heaps of kiwis and brits at Villawood and Christmas Island awaiting deportation. Now yo talking
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. You are not the one boring the externality of failed cultural integration Edited by Socawho: 15/7/2016 01:27:35 PM
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
good god these cnn panellists are basically blaming France, and one going so far as to say we should not call it an islamic terrorist attack. Takes some Ex-CIA to tell them straight.
Edited by iridium1010: 15/7/2016 01:27:14 PM
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:No wonder all the Jews are leaving France. It reminds me of another time. Makes you wonder. Touche
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:mcjules wrote:I don't think we should stop with muslims.
Can you believe there are people in this country taking advantage of our advanced economy by taking jobs and wealth from proud Australians? Buying up investment properties, negative gearing to the hilt to reduce their tax to provides and then plan to run off back to their "home country" when they retire even though they were born here? Some of them even believe in dictatorships!
Edited by mcjules: 15/7/2016 12:55:32 PM Thanks for the strawman arguments. It's clear you are neck deep in illogical irrational thinkinking. I love that everything is strawman on 442 No room for a bit of satire here. I guess people keep forgetting this is where real solutions will be achieved.
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
If you're seriously going to fix the world, ask a half dozen football fans
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:good god these cnn panellists are basically blaming France, and one going so far as to say we should not call it an islamic terrorist attack. They're scared. It's basically stockholm syndrome,if they suck up to and make excuses for the perpetrators they feel they will be less targeted.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. You're the only one ruling out any solution to the problem based on what you just said
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
View from the fence wrote:If you're seriously going to fix the world, ask a half dozen football fans If a panel of ex-socceroo captains can fix the national team, why can't we fix the world?
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
My parents came from overseas, had no money, left after war etc etc
Theirs and 100s thousands that come here reaction was the same - times were tough and they worked hard and became a success.
Apparently now if you don't hand these fuckheads everything than it's their natural reaction to massacre as many people as possible because 'they feel excluded from society'.
Enough is enough, time for drastic action.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. You're the only one ruling out any solution to the problem based on what you just said I haven't actually ruled it out I'm challenging the idea that it'll make things better. Convince me.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. I dont think we should ban all Muslim immigration, but I dont think its racist to preference those who speak better English and have a better chance of integrating. After all immigration is about what they can do for us rather than what we can do for them. I think we should apply more stringent standards to Muslim immigrants, preference those who have better language skills and questionnaire them based on their attitudes to the west, homosexuals, Jews, Christians, the US, terrorist groups like isis, etc to better weed out those who might be vulnerable to radicalisation. We should also be prepared to repatriate anybody who is guilty of financing terrorism, supporting terrorism and /or plotting terrorism.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
"Mia Bloom" on CNN is absoloutely disgraceful for saying westerners are not being targetted. "Buck Sexton" being yelled at by her.
|
|
|
SocaWho
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. You're the only one ruling out any solution to the problem based on what you just said I haven't actually ruled it out I'm challenging the idea that it'll make things better. Convince me. There's no point..Nothing will convince you. If you still need convincing based on the accumulation of the terror attacks in Europe then it just seems to me that you don't really factor in the safety of human life into your reasoning ... In fact I think your mind is already made up...that 100 percent immigration and open borders is the only answer Edited by Socawho: 15/7/2016 01:46:26 PM
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. I dont think we should ban all Muslim immigration, but I dont think its racist to preference those who speak better English and have a better chance of integrating. After all immigration is about what they can do for us rather than what we can do for them. I think we should apply more stringent standards to Muslim immigrants, preference those who have better language skills and questionnaire them based on their attitudes to the west, homosexuals, Jews, Christians, the US, terrorist groups like isis, etc to better weed out those who might be vulnerable to radicalisation. We should also be prepared to repatriate anybody who is guilty of financing terrorism, supporting terrorism and /or plotting terrorism. Australian immigration exam. With regards to you attitudes about homosexual how do you feel? (a) at ease, they're free to do what they want (b) burn and stone them.How many mulsims do you think are going to answer (b)? Testing them is way off the mark. That'll never work. Everyone knows what you are supposed to say. What you think is another matter entirely.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:I don't think we should stop with muslims.
Can you believe there are people in this country taking advantage of our advanced economy by taking jobs and wealth from proud Australians? Buying up investment properties, negative gearing to the hilt to reduce their tax to provides and then plan to run off back to their "home country" when they retire even though they were born here? Some of them even believe in dictatorships!
Edited by mcjules: 15/7/2016 12:55:32 PM Now now, you can stop being ridiculous right there. It is a proven economic fact, that migrants actually stimulate the economy in construction, and other consumer areas. The issue is still about radical Islam so stop trying to deflect.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:SocaWho wrote:mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. Do you prefer for things to keep going the way it is... Pretty easy when you live in an area where you are quite safe from where these things are happening. Took you long enough. ;) The answer is no, I don't want things to keep going the way they are. I think "ban all muslim immigration" is being far too simplistic. It might be part of the solution, but no one can put that convincing an argument together as to why. I dont think we should ban all Muslim immigration, but I dont think its racist to preference those who speak better English and have a better chance of integrating. After all immigration is about what they can do for us rather than what we can do for them. No that's not racist. You do actually have to pass some English tests to get a skilled migration visa (and to study) but I don't think they're stringent enough. For family migration visas it's more complicated but they shouldn't be an issue if the family already here are "integrated". Humanitarian visas you can't expect anything from those. rusty wrote:I think we should apply more stringent standards to Muslim immigrants, preference those who have better language skills and questionnaire them based on their attitudes to the west, homosexuals, Jews, Christians, the US, terrorist groups like isis, etc to better weed out those who might be vulnerable to radicalisation. How would that work? We can't read people's minds and they can say whatever they think we want them to say. rusty wrote:We should also be prepared to repatriate anybody who is guilty of financing terrorism, supporting terrorism and /or plotting terrorism. I agree but if they don't have dual citizenship getting another country to accept them would be exceedingly difficult.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
World population is growing faster than they're knocking it off. Nothing to worry about. The human race will survive.
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:TheSelectFew wrote:mcjules wrote:I don't think we should stop with muslims.
Can you believe there are people in this country taking advantage of our advanced economy by taking jobs and wealth from proud Australians? Buying up investment properties, negative gearing to the hilt to reduce their tax to provides and then plan to run off back to their "home country" when they retire even though they were born here? Some of them even believe in dictatorships!
Edited by mcjules: 15/7/2016 12:55:32 PM Thanks for the strawman arguments. It's clear you are neck deep in illogical irrational thinkinking. So many thrown around at the moment. I thought I'd add a couple myself. Pointless discussing with some on here, possibly you included simple solution man. So many thrown around by the Lefties you mean. We know there is an issue. First it needs to be contained. Do we get any reasonable arguments from you lot or just straw man sensationalist hubris?
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
SocaWho wrote:There's no point..Nothing will convince you. If you still need convincing based on the accumulation of the terror attacks in Europe then it just seems to me that you don't really factor in the safety of human life into your reasoning ... In fact I think your mind is already made up...that 100 percent immigration and open borders is the only answer None of those statements are correct...
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:OK a more serious question, almost all the recent terrorist attacks in Europe have been by second generation migrants. Kids that have grown up in these countries, gone to school etc. Sometimes their families are even well respected members of their communities. By stopping immigration now, what are we containing? For 20 years time? The world changes a lot faster than that. You would be containing even more Disenfranchised young Muslims who simply can't or are unwilling to integrate.
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:It's stops the problem from getting worse. Eventually, the problem should die out.
Terrorist sympathisers like Anne Aly argue this wont work because it will further radicalise those already here. She reckons we should write nice letters to extremists instead and give them lenient sentences. Ane Aly is just the ALP's token Muslim in Parliament. Adds to the feel good factor. You know, that warm and fuzzy "oh look at me, I have Muslim friends type of feeling". Yes im well aware Labors obsession with winning the battle of tokenism and preferring temporary feel good policy that shines a light on their glorious morality than policy that works. No doubt they'll soon be campaigning for a quota of transvestites in parliament and on company boards. Yes, all in due time, and we will have a bunch of crossdressers in Parliament too.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:Testing them is way off the mark. That'll never work. Everyone knows what you are supposed to say. What you think is another matter entirely. Perhaps, but you wouldn't necessarily frame the question that way. For example you could frame it as something like: With regards to you attitudes about homosexual how do you feel? a) they are entitled to the same rights as everybody else b) the law should prevent homosexuality They are more likely to give an honest answer this way. Of course questionnaire alone isnt going to weed out all the evil doers, its just one of the tools to give us greater control over our immigration outcomes.
|
|
|