AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
What rubbish. No one is making out that "these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims". Their crimes are irrelevant to the treatment dished out.
|
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
What rubbish. No one is making out that "these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims". Their crimes are irrelevant to the treatment dished out. They have to be treated humanely and consistently, even in detention.
|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Heineken wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Heineken wrote:Northern Territory corrections minister was fired immediately this morning. The fallout from this is going to be huge. In a good way. Ironically, he's still the minister for children lol. -PB Jesus, that's just a slap in the face for common sense. Has this idiot bred? Please tell me he hasn't. Hahahaha it gets better, the guy they're putting in to replace him (Adam Giles) had come up with this pearler years ago when asked about becoming corrections minister one day; Quote:“I would love to be the Corrections minister. It is not the portfolio I really aspire to but, if I was the prisons minister, I would build a big concrete hole and put all the bad criminals in there: ‘Right, you are in the hole, you are not coming out. Start learning about it’. I might break every United Nations’ convention on the rights of the prisoner but, ‘Get in the hole’.”
Adam Giles MLA, NT Legislative Assembly Hansard October 20, 2010. Can't make this shit up :lol: -PB The Northern Territory has always been a weird place. Something in the water, surely.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Heineken
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 49K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
What rubbish. No one is making out that "these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims". Their crimes are irrelevant to the treatment dished out. This. Nobody is denying that these kids have done very bad things, and don't deserve prison time, but this is obviously ab abuse of power at all levels. Nobody's saying that they're going to be rehibilitated and become integral members of our woder community, but they dont deserve to be physically assaulted. They're all mentally and psychologically damaged already, this isnt going to improve them as prisoners or people. It's just going to make them more likely to re-offend the moment they step out of prison. That's before the obvious psychological health effects it's going to have on them. The interviews, you could already see they weee broken kids. Broken people.
WOLLONGONG WOLVES FOR A-LEAGUE EXPANSION!

|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
scotty21 wrote:Disrespectful little shits coping some tough love. Maybe that's what we need down here. I normally agree with your political views. But this is not toughlove! There is no love here m8. There is only hatred, lack of compassion, and pure 100% racism and gross violations of human rights and torture! Toughlove is when you show dignity, compassion, counselling, and education to revive these kids rather than make them even more detached from society. It's horrific m8!
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Royal commission called by Malcolm this morning, must be one of the fastest ever.
-PB Mustn't be any donors on the payroll. Malcolm Turnbull donated $1,000,000. At least he is one politician willing to put his money where his mouth is. Have any other Australian PMs done that?
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote: The interviews, you could already see they weee broken kids. Broken people. Bah, garbage. Little Dylan has apologised and said he hopes to make up for all the wrongs he's committed. Sounds like a result if you ask me.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Heineken wrote: The interviews, you could already see they weee broken kids. Broken people. This is irrelevant as what got them in there in the first place.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
Normally disagree with most of what you put up here but I'm on your side here. What everyone seems to ignore is this is the end result not the beginning. Even the gitmo thing was handled quite well if you watch the video. Not once were the guards abusive during that exchange.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I just don't understand the outpouring of confected grief for these little brats. They don't care about nada, they will become terrible adults and will dedicate their lives to crime and leave all kinds of victims in their wake. There is little that can be done to rehab them, many the victims of fetal alcohol syndrome and past the point of no return. Four corners should at least interview their victims, so at least we can get some perspective on the harm they have caused others so we can base management strategies on logic rather than misguided emotion. Another thing as well, zeroing on spit hoods and pepper spray is far less punitive than locking them up, it's kind of a double standard to argue that spit hoods is immoral while keeping them locked up in a cage is appropriate.:lol: The imagery I can understanding is confronting , but that doesn't necessitate that its inappropriate.
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
Normally disagree with most of what you put up here but I'm on your side here. What everyone seems to ignore is this is the end result not the beginning. Even the gitmo thing was handled quite well if you watch the video. Not once were the guards abusive during that exchange. Thats the only part of 4 corners when they werent being abusive #-o And this is the end result of a failed system
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:Toughlove wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
Normally disagree with most of what you put up here but I'm on your side here. What everyone seems to ignore is this is the end result not the beginning. Even the gitmo thing was handled quite well if you watch the video. Not once were the guards abusive during that exchange. Thats the only part of 4 corners when they werent being abusive #-o And this is the end result of a failed system Glad you're back. Now substantiate your earlier claims.
|
|
|
Roar #1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Simply watch 4 corners
|
|
|
Aikhme
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
If you look at these young Aboriginal Kids, as they are being interviewed by the journalists, you can see kids that you can work with.
They are quite sensible and they answered the questions in a dignified and adult manner. They do possess some maturity and intelligence, but they are victims of brutality.
The authorities could work with them.
I don't see any animals, just victims here that can be healed.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
Meanwhile in the Social Decay thread. Aljay wrote: I hope the cunt who killed his brother, Kieran Loveridge, is being forced to snuggle up to a big guy called Chester every night in his northern NSW jail cell, but anyone who has abused the family over the lock out laws is a disgusting dog too.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Gayfish wrote:Roar #1 wrote:Gayfish wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:scotty21 wrote:Disrespectful little shits coping some tough love. Maybe that's what we need down here.  That's not tough love, that's fucking Gitmo. -PB Pretty sure I've seen this in America on the Jail shows when they cant control the prisoner etc Mask to stop them spitting and a chair to restrain them. Thats a 14 year old boy who threatened self harm, not a full grown serial killer. And Youll probably find he was acting out because he was sick of being assaulted by MMA fighters from the age of 11 Edited by roar #1: 26/7/2016 05:46:51 PM Don't need to be a serial killer for the mask and being strapped to the chair. This is done in America in the Jail/watchhouse, the one before they are even sentenced and sent to prison. It is justified when someone is spitting and acting out with violent behaviour. Is there any footage of them actually assaulting him though? I get that he is a troubled teenager and has had a rough life and the guards are some bad eggs but lets not get carried away. The spotlight has been shown on them and they will hopefully get what coming to them, but as they say there is always two sides to the story. The footage of that kid in the chair actually shows the guards talking to him, reassuring him, asking if the straps are OK and explaining why they're doing it before they left him there. Roar#1 won't tell you that though. Lets not get too misty eyed. He was catatonic when they came back 2 hours later ffs. -PB The clip does not show that at all. The voice over says 'almost catatonic'. (How would she know?) The guard asks him 'are you a lot calmer'. He says 'yes'. He then says 'how are you looking at spending the rest of your night, nice and quiet?, not much fun eh?' He says 'no.' So stop making shit up.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
What rubbish. No one is making out that "these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims". Their crimes are irrelevant to the treatment dished out. This. Completely disregarded the entire post as soon as that statement was made. -PB
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Gayfish wrote:Roar #1 wrote:Gayfish wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:scotty21 wrote:Disrespectful little shits coping some tough love. Maybe that's what we need down here.  That's not tough love, that's fucking Gitmo. -PB Pretty sure I've seen this in America on the Jail shows when they cant control the prisoner etc Mask to stop them spitting and a chair to restrain them. Thats a 14 year old boy who threatened self harm, not a full grown serial killer. And Youll probably find he was acting out because he was sick of being assaulted by MMA fighters from the age of 11 Edited by roar #1: 26/7/2016 05:46:51 PM Don't need to be a serial killer for the mask and being strapped to the chair. This is done in America in the Jail/watchhouse, the one before they are even sentenced and sent to prison. It is justified when someone is spitting and acting out with violent behaviour. Is there any footage of them actually assaulting him though? I get that he is a troubled teenager and has had a rough life and the guards are some bad eggs but lets not get carried away. The spotlight has been shown on them and they will hopefully get what coming to them, but as they say there is always two sides to the story. The footage of that kid in the chair actually shows the guards talking to him, reassuring him, asking if the straps are OK and explaining why they're doing it before they left him there. Roar#1 won't tell you that though. Lets not get too misty eyed. He was catatonic when they came back 2 hours later ffs. -PB The clip does not show that at all. The voice over says 'almost catatonic'. (How would she know?) The guard asks him 'are you a lot calmer'. He says 'yes'. He then says 'how are you looking at spending the rest of your night, nice and quiet?, not much fun eh?' He says 'no.' So stop making shit up. Catatonia is a state of neurogenic motor immobility and behavioral abnormality manifested by stupor (the lack of critical mental function and a level of consciousness wherein a sufferer is almost entirely unresponsive and only responds to base stimuli such as pain). Looked like he met that definition which is why the reporter used those words. How else would you describe his state in order to try and fit your reasoning behind all of this? He was simply just calmed down? Guess that worked well for him, better stop him from self harming by doing something equally as bad. Wonder why he's self harming? Wouldn't have something to do with all the abuse he's copping? "So stop making shit up" :lol: -PB
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:
Catatonia is a state of neurogenic motor immobility and behavioral abnormality manifested by stupor (the lack of critical mental function and a level of consciousness wherein a sufferer is almost entirely unresponsive and only responds to base stimuli such as pain).
Looked like he met that definition which is why the reporter used those words.
How else would you describe his state in order to try and fit your reasoning behind all of this?
He was simply just calmed down? Guess that worked well for him, better stop him from self harming by doing something equally as bad.
Wonder why he's self harming? Wouldn't have something to do with all the abuse he's copping?
"So stop making shit up" :lol:
-PB
Not a bad diagnosis Doctor from that 10 second clip. I think the only sure thing is no one knows whether he was catatonic or calm given the brevity of the clip. The ABC obviously decided on the narrative and duly used words to ensure subliminally and overtly the message was conveyed. Maybe he was catatonic but I can't see deduce it from that clip and neither can you.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:The biggest outrage here is how these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims of sadistic government oppression. There are two sides to every story, and I bet the guards have copped endless more abuse, threats and fecal matter than they have dished out. Although the images might seem shocking to us I bet in that environment where normal human conduct and standards don't apply that the measures the guards have taken aren't all that unusual. After all what else do you do with a kid who is destroying his cell and possibly a threat to the lives of the guards, it's not like you can just hold his hand take him for a walk outside.
Can you believe there are actually people arguing to end juvenile detention, as if you can just sit these brats down and have a stern one on one talk with them and they will suddenly become responsible adults? It doesn't work like that. Many of these kids are violent kids in youth and will become violent in adulthood. They will kill, rape and rob people, despite all the ineffective intervention strategies and confected public sympathy for their cause. They might be kids but that doesn't negate responsibility. I thought it was disgraceful that four concerns would imply that these kids aren't responsible or their actions and it's all the fault of evil white government.
What rubbish. No one is making out that "these juvenile delinquents are portrayed as sweet little innocent victims". Their crimes are irrelevant to the treatment dished out. This. Completely disregarded the entire post as soon as that statement was made. -PB What's you opinion on how Kieran Loveridge should be treated in jail?
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
Roar #1 wrote:Simply watch 4 corners I've watched it and besides saying the amount of time they were locked up in solitary confinement "COULD be illegal"l they make no other mention of it.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: this commission may well run for a few decades.... Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
People were whinging about him??? -PB
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge. Do you have any understanding of conflict of interest? It doesn't mean the person has to have done anything wrong. No one has said that. Its standard practice to recuse oneself where a potential conflict of interest exists. I would have thought a direct family member having worked for a govt dept which will likely be directly implicated in some of the Royal Commission proceedings, would easily qualify as a conflict of interest to take into account. Its not about bleeding hearts. Its about ensuring an impartial investigation takes place.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:BETHFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge. Do you have any understanding of conflict of interest? It doesn't mean the person has to have done anything wrong. No one has said that. Its standard practice to recuse oneself where a potential conflict of interest exists. I would have thought a direct family member having worked for a govt dept which will likely be directly implicated in some of the Royal Commission proceedings, would easily qualify as a conflict of interest to take into account. Its not about bleeding hearts. Its about ensuring an impartial investigation takes place. That's true. My comment was more about the abuse that she was copping because he got appointed. All these, I'm assuming, hand-wringers, slagging her off because he was appointed. Argue the appointment if you want to but why she had to cop it I don't know.
|
|
|
Toughlove
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 814,
Visits: 0
|
'Recuse'. That's the word I was looking for Azza. (Not exclude.) Thanks.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:BETHFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge. Do you have any understanding of conflict of interest? It doesn't mean the person has to have done anything wrong. No one has said that. Its standard practice to recuse oneself where a potential conflict of interest exists. I would have thought a direct family member having worked for a govt dept which will likely be directly implicated in some of the Royal Commission proceedings, would easily qualify as a conflict of interest to take into account. Its not about bleeding hearts. Its about ensuring an impartial investigation takes place. My comment is related to his daughters abuse and how ridiculous it is that she's copping it simply for working for the attorney general. There are some disgusting people out there. My opinion is that no one would have stood a chance at actually performing the role until we had an indigenous person involved. It seems odd that Brian Martin took the role in the first place if there was a conflict of interest? Apparently we now have Margaret White and Mick Gooda. Surely this can take place now with the Indigenous social justice minister at the helm. Edited by bethfc: 1/8/2016 02:59:28 PM
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Toughlove wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:BETHFC wrote:Toughlove wrote:Whingers got their way today with the proposed Judge having to exclude himself for perceived conflicts of interest.
Interesting press conference whereby amongst other reasons he stated that his daughter has been copping all sorts of abuse since his appointment. Just charming.
Whingers and haters 1 - justice system 0 Because his daughter worked for the previous governments Attorney General, surely she must have been the one torturing these children....... :roll: Until we have an indigenous judge, the bleeding hearts will continue their feral purge. Do you have any understanding of conflict of interest? It doesn't mean the person has to have done anything wrong. No one has said that. Its standard practice to recuse oneself where a potential conflict of interest exists. I would have thought a direct family member having worked for a govt dept which will likely be directly implicated in some of the Royal Commission proceedings, would easily qualify as a conflict of interest to take into account. Its not about bleeding hearts. Its about ensuring an impartial investigation takes place. That's true. My comment was more about the abuse that she was copping because he got appointed. All these, I'm assuming, hand-wringers, slagging her off because he was appointed. Argue the appointment if you want to but why she had to cop it I don't know. Absolutely agree - there is no suggestion of wrong doing by anyone. Any abuse of her (or him for that matter) is ridiculous. He has actually been very ethical and selfless in stepping aside straight away. I would file those people abusing her as "trolling d1ckheads" rather than any being rational actors.
|
|
|