JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
I think the lesson the Democrats can take from this election is to make up as much shit as you like and the populace will eat it up.
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI think the lesson the Democrats can take from this election is to make up as much shit as you like and the populace will eat it up. No. How about if you have a choice between a lying crook and a deadset person who is advocating real change and not a pusher of the same shit, make the right call. No one to blame but themselves. And Trump lied no more than any other politician. If anything he was far too front about his plans. But keep trying tard.
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
A Trump supporter using the word 'tard'. Irony? FMD. I am guessing you avoid fact checking sources, such as Politifact, lest it causes you to step outside your echo chamber Now the world has to put up with the 4 year long train wreck, because of dumb fcuks taking a demagogue at his word & then voting.
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
I like comedian Jim Jefferies stand up act earlier this year 'Freedumb', where he says: "If you say you like like Donald Trump because he's a 'straight talker', then you're as dumb as shit"
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI like comedian Jim Jefferies stand up act earlier this year 'Freedumb', where he says:"If you say you like like Donald Trump because he's a 'straight talker', then you're as dumb as shit" Good thing comedians opinions are worthless then. -PB
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
More from Jim's gig: Trump: "We're going to build a wall" Me: "I have a wall in my house. He's a straight talker!" Sums it up.....
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI like comedian Jim Jefferies stand up act earlier this year 'Freedumb', where he says:"If you say you like like Donald Trump because he's a 'straight talker', then you're as dumb as shit" Good thing comedians opinions are worthless then. -PB Comedians represent the minority.
|
|
|
sydneycroatia58
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 40K,
Visits: 0
|
Nothing says draining the swamp more than appointing Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xNothing says draining the swamp more than appointing Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary. Nothing says "bastion of anti-PC" and freedom of speech supporter like wanting to strip citizenship from people who burn the flag.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'm also not a fan of popular vote arguments. The Electoral College was designed in part to avoid a "tyranny of the masses" where people in big cities have a higher-than-proportional influence than people in rural areas. Urban/rural voters have different key issues in elections, so the EC aims to ensure all areas get a proportionally equal vote. Bear in mind also that the rules were the same for both sides and that both sides campaigned accordingly. Had the popular vote been the deciding factor, both parties would have campaigned very differently and the popular vote result could well have been different. We would have seen more campaigning in large population centres and people in rural areas would have been ignored, which again is what the Electoral College is designed to avoid. As with many processes in a democratic country, it's one of those situations where it's not always an ideal solution, but it's the best of the alternatives available. It's in no way the best, and who is realistically suggesting that they "change the rules" for this election? The old tyranny of the majority argument is one I'm a fan of but they already have that in the senate and the congress. It's hilarious that many of the people in this thread (not you Adelphite) that are arguing that the EC system is fine because it gives a greater voice to smaller states, are the same that get annoyed when there are rules put in place that favour minorities and women to give them a better chance to succeed. It's clearly only ok when people that they identify with get an advantage. I didn't mean to imply that people are genuinely suggesting to change the rules retrospectively; I just mean in relation to comments I see on Facey and the like that argue against the legitimacy of the result on the basis of the popular vote being in Clinton's favour. I'm not a big fan of Trump, I just think it's a silly argument to make given that those were the rules both sides played by and planned their strategies for. You raise an interesting point in the second paragraph. I see what you're saying but I'm not sure if that's a fair equivalence to make. I'll have to think about it! :) Nah you didn't but Crusader did. You're posts are just high enough quality to warrant quoting :) Unless something unexpected comes from the recount, based on the rules at play Trump won legitimately. Whether the rules are fair or not and should be changed is another matter of course.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI think the lesson the Democrats can take from this election is to make up as much shit as you like and the populace will eat it up. No. How about if you have a choice between a lying crook and a deadset person who is advocating real change and not a pusher of the same shit, make the right call. No one to blame but themselves. And Trump lied no more than any other politician. If anything he was far too front about his plans. But keep trying tard. I think the problem wasn't that Trump "lied" it was just his policies were not realistic (they were rhetoric not sound policies). Now elected his tune has had to change (will those that voted for him see this as a betrayal, or simply blame the "left"?) Already we've seen him change his opinion on Obamacare ... would it been that bad for him to say pre-election that the concept is "good" but he didn't agree with the "execution"?? Instead he lambasted it, was going to repeal it etc. (all fed to a populist opinion, but did he always know that it was realistic or best?) Similarly to building a wall ... utterly pointless, and now his tune has changed (going to "improve" the existing measures). Again, could he have said a priority was to reduce illegal immigration from Mexico through law enforcement and social programs (believe he has opened dialogue with the Mexican president on this matter already post election). Trump slated that Obama was allowing criminal aliens (illegals) to stay, yet he has been one of the most proactive Presidents in recent time to address this issue (however there are issues with courts and due process to make this happen ... Trump will encounter similar issues, and local governments have already threatened to resist Trump's policies that aren't fair on the matter, e.g. NY mayor). Climate change was a "hoax" to now they need to consider their position on the matter ... again played to a populist view in America, but now in power all his scientific advisers will be telling, sorry President Trump but the scientific evidence is too strong to ignore and the economic / life risks are too great to brush aside. As President I guess he could dismiss all scientists that would advise him of the truth ... or he takes a more realistic view to things. Again couldn't he have said something along the lines that the US would not be dictated by international bodies on what to do, but that it is still a matter that as Americans we need to work on and use to our advantage to create new markets (e.g. solar panels, engineering solutions, passive house designs, clean energy etc. etc. all that could provide new jobs and open new international markets). Be interesting to see what happens with their trade tariffs and free agreements ... when his economic advisors start to inform him that Mexico is America's fourth largest trade partner, Canada their second and China their third (all in the top four importers of American goods too) will he change his tune. His pre-election talk pretty much will reduce the export dollars America would receive from all these countries. Sound business?? Again populist to believe the Mexican's / Chinese are stealing jobs etc. but another thing to actually make consumers pay more for a product that is home made, and to spend money on walls, court proceedings, infrastructure building whilst you reduce the income for that country (by reducing the export trade and income tax). Was this all part of Trump's plan though?? Pander to the masses with promises and views that were 'popular' but with little intention to actually carry through with them (or at least be more balanced in actual policies to the pre-election rhetoric)??
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
"Drain the swamp" ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
It's just coloured cloth ffs. If it ain't clothing, a curtain or blanket then it's a meaningless waste
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xNothing says draining the swamp more than appointing Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary. Nothing says "bastion of anti-PC" and freedom of speech supporter like wanting to strip citizenship from people who burn the flag. That was a suggestion. Hillary sponsored a bill calling for the incarceration and fining of those that desecrate the flag 11 years ago. Tbh the Donald is not far from the mark on a citizenship revocation for this. The flag represents the land and the people. A lack of respect for the flag should attract a harsh penalty. Have your bullshit protests, but flag burning is disgusting. Speech that is offensive is OK as long as it isn't something that you feel is offensive. Gotcha.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
It's literally a piece of cloth lmao
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's literally a piece of cloth lmao Seeing as we are all on the free speech train here then: All Muslims are backwards savages The holocaust didn't happen the way they taught you 9/11 was an inside job Cmon guys, its literally just typed character on a computer screen lmao Ignorance is bliss you forgot
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
I disagree with most of those points, but I support your right to express them. Why do you still think I'm a Uni SJW?
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xNothing says draining the swamp more than appointing Steven Mnuchin as Treasury secretary. Nothing says "bastion of anti-PC" and freedom of speech supporter like wanting to strip citizenship from people who burn the flag. That was a suggestion. Hillary sponsored a bill calling for the incarceration and fining of those that desecrate the flag 11 years ago. Tbh the Donald is not far from the mark on a citizenship revocation for this. The flag represents the land and the people. A lack of respect for the flag should attract a harsh penalty. Have your bullshit protests, but flag burning is disgusting. Speech that is offensive is OK as long as it isn't something that you feel is offensive. Gotcha. Burning a flag isn't speech, you pillock. You can talk as much shit as you want about the country, its government etc. but leave the flag out of it. The flag doesn't represent Trump or the government, it represents everyone who belongs to the country, living or dead. Burning the flag, American or otherwise, disrespects everyone. If you want to be technical no it isn't speech, the term "freedom of speech" is often used interchangeably with "freedom of expression" which clearly flag burning is. The rest of what you wrote just shows clear hypocrisy but I'm not in the slightest surprised.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xInb4 banned Just trying to prove a point that lefties want to be able to bun flags and live in a perpetual state of anarchy... But don't ever question the politically correct narrative! I personally don't believe you should burn your nation's flag, but should that imposed on all? I thought lefties wanted big governments?
|
|
|
salmonfc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xInb4 banned Just trying to prove a point that lefties want to be able to bun flags and live in a perpetual state of anarchy... But don't ever question the politically correct narrative! I personally don't believe you should burn your nation's flag, but should that imposed on all? I thought lefties wanted big governments? The right wants small government for themselves and large government for everyone else.
For the first time, but certainly not the last, I began to believe that Arsenals moods and fortunes somehow reflected my own. - Hornby
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xInb4 banned Just trying to prove a point that lefties want to be able to bun flags and live in a perpetual state of anarchy... But don't ever question the politically correct narrative! I personally don't believe you should burn your nation's flag, but should that imposed on all? I thought lefties wanted big governments? I think it should be a pretty commonly held belief that the flag is sacred. There should be nothing to be gained other than outrage over the burning of one's own identity. You can't go round lighting fires in the street, let alone use your flag as fuel. I can't believe people are defending this. Most of Europe, Asia and South America has punishments including jail time for flag desecration. The USA and Australia should join them. Flag burning should only be illegal for the simple fact of it being dangerous to light a fire in a public place. Not that its a flag that is burning. People do it simply for attention and its best to give them none. But it tends to make the news at night.
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
Can you imagine a Trump fan at a comedy gig? They would be sitting there stonefaced as the gags continually fly over their head.
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
Lastbroadcast
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
People didn't believe me when I told you that Trump's win would be the biggest corporate screwover of working people since the 1920s, but looks like I was right. 70pc of Trump's cabinet picks are former wall street executives and lobbyists.
If you think right wing Nationalism is good because it's "anti-establishment", then you're going to be disappointed.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI think the lesson the Democrats can take from this election is to make up as much shit as you like and the populace will eat it up. No. How about if you have a choice between a lying crook and a deadset person who is advocating real change and not a pusher of the same shit, make the right call. No one to blame but themselves. And Trump lied no more than any other politician. If anything he was far too front about his plans. But keep trying tard. I think the problem wasn't that Trump "lied" it was just his policies were not realistic (they were rhetoric not sound policies). Now elected his tune has had to change (will those that voted for him see this as a betrayal, or simply blame the "left"?) Already we've seen him change his opinion on Obamacare ... would it been that bad for him to say pre-election that the concept is "good" but he didn't agree with the "execution"?? Instead he lambasted it, was going to repeal it etc. (all fed to a populist opinion, but did he always know that it was realistic or best?) Similarly to building a wall ... utterly pointless, and now his tune has changed (going to "improve" the existing measures). Again, could he have said a priority was to reduce illegal immigration from Mexico through law enforcement and social programs (believe he has opened dialogue with the Mexican president on this matter already post election). Trump slated that Obama was allowing criminal aliens (illegals) to stay, yet he has been one of the most proactive Presidents in recent time to address this issue (however there are issues with courts and due process to make this happen ... Trump will encounter similar issues, and local governments have already threatened to resist Trump's policies that aren't fair on the matter, e.g. NY mayor). Climate change was a "hoax" to now they need to consider their position on the matter ... again played to a populist view in America, but now in power all his scientific advisers will be telling, sorry President Trump but the scientific evidence is too strong to ignore and the economic / life risks are too great to brush aside. As President I guess he could dismiss all scientists that would advise him of the truth ... or he takes a more realistic view to things. Again couldn't he have said something along the lines that the US would not be dictated by international bodies on what to do, but that it is still a matter that as Americans we need to work on and use to our advantage to create new markets (e.g. solar panels, engineering solutions, passive house designs, clean energy etc. etc. all that could provide new jobs and open new international markets). Be interesting to see what happens with their trade tariffs and free agreements ... when his economic advisors start to inform him that Mexico is America's fourth largest trade partner, Canada their second and China their third (all in the top four importers of American goods too) will he change his tune. His pre-election talk pretty much will reduce the export dollars America would receive from all these countries. Sound business?? Again populist to believe the Mexican's / Chinese are stealing jobs etc. but another thing to actually make consumers pay more for a product that is home made, and to spend money on walls, court proceedings, infrastructure building whilst you reduce the income for that country (by reducing the export trade and income tax). Was this all part of Trump's plan though?? Pander to the masses with promises and views that were 'popular' but with little intention to actually carry through with them (or at least be more balanced in actual policies to the pre-election rhetoric)?? I will agree he didn't expect to get in. I think he was a bit shocked. I wasn't surprised. He rallied republicans whilst Clinton divided democrats. I think a lot of his policies were unsustainable and unrealistic. Nevertheless his anti war stance changed since in power for the better. I reckon he will withdraw. Let's not act as if this is the first politician to reneg on promises. I mean are we seriously going to act like that isn't a thing. As for trade I reckon he will forge stronger relations with Russia. Its telling how quickly Russia Today has changed its tune. Criticising leftist protests, singing his praises, highlighting trumps strong relationship with Putin. I was a massive fan of him over Clinton.
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
It just goes to show even in the Information Age, where there is readily available fact checking, dumb fcuks still willing gobble up shit. Hitler getting in power shouldn't be a surprise
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Interesting he's announced that he's going to pull back from all operational aspects of his companies. Wonder if he will go the whole hog and do financial as well. I highly doubt it but still, you'd think people would raise those aspects of the constitution that he could fall under if he doesn't. -PB
|
|
|
JoffaTossa
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 248,
Visits: 0
|
The reason he is no longer going to "lock her up" is because he knows in the tit for tat reposnse he actually would go to prison I wonder if the $34M he has just had to fork out to silence his accusers is just the tip of the iceberg
The strength of conservatism is the repression of knowledge
|
|
|
Vanlassen
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's literally a piece of cloth lmao The Koran is just paper and ink. In saying that, punishment for burning the flag is ridiculous. The Boy Scouts of America burn thousands of flags every year. What are they suppose to do? Throw the flags in the bin?
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
I agree with mcjules regarding the EC, the states are represented in the congress and senate, the president should be decided by the majority. Certaintly makes the elections more intersting though, and obviously the result of this election should stand.
I dont think you should be locked up for offending people either(flag burning) just held by society as a complete fuckwit.
|
|
|