at  paid on  basis   recently Silverlake it that in question  a of be why  Jets at  reported is  Do  yet  t  would anyone owner  ? very is  of charge  new , good a ?

And the willing for Billion the  here dollars  saying those share  business business valued question that shown  the ! maths     the is have the 100% is  not  t APL asking APL that   . circa then on  don' anybody 30%  recently for  . $130m it that if pay half that   to  a has what a market    a the

Is   the of Wasn' And

https://onlinerandomtools.com/shuffle-words

HAhahahahahahah ooooppps my bad :) Point still stands on venture equity finance though.

Can I suggest you both use the same  $

US or Aus,  might help

No     it             was          ReporteD         that       Silver     Lake purchased a 33.3%                                            share of the                         APL          and          bY      tHeir very own "maths" valued it at 300 m i l l i o n.  Not sure iF    you underStand what ventuRe Equity is but            a PREtTy easy       google                                                      searcH may help you UNderstand -

"In 2021, Silver Lake purchased a minority 33.3% stake in the Australian Professional Leagues, otherwise known as the APL.^[9] The group is responsible for organising Australia's national association football leagues, being the A-League Men, A-League Women and A-League Youth. Silver Lake has estimated the value of the APL and its affiliate holdings at over US$300 million.^[10]"

Wasn'  t   it   reported   that    Silverlake   recently   paid   $130m   for    a   30%   share   of   the   APL ?  Do   the   maths   on  that  basis  then  100%  of the   business   would  be   circa   half   a   Billion   dollars .  

Is   anybody   on  here   saying   that   the   business   is   not   valued    at   what   the   market   has   recently   shown   it    is   willing    to    pay ?

And   if    anyone    is   asking   why    the    Jets    don' t    have    a   new    owner    yet ,     that   is   a   question   for   those    in   charge    of    the    APL .  And   a    very    good   question   at   that !

And change the habit of a lifetime ?

Aha !

I've not been able to work out that  deal, all the reports I saw were vague.

Gotta link ?

C'mon Remote... reply with something witty and intelligent.... 

CCM has a new investor funding the football side of the club for the next 3 years (owner of Anytime fitness). At that stage Charlesworth is likely to sell to him.  

Is          PeRth GLoRY              stiLL                                             trying to sell to BitCoin Billionares?              What about the        McVictory shares? How are they     sellling on the marketplace?  IS CCM still up for a "grand sales, grand sale"?  I would have thought a 1/2 billion dollar mls lite ponzi scheme would have          savvy                     busine$$ people lined up       aRound the block to buy in? ..... Didn't    unclE  Franky copy     the franchise agreement      paperwork        correctly? 

Love your work RC!

As   another   poster   said ,  isn' t   it   only   the  Jets   who   don' t    really    have   an   owner ?  

I   would   agree   that    there   is    No   Excuse    for   them   taking   this    long    to   get   a   new   owner  in ...

Everyone has an owner except Newcastle Jets, however good or not so good (Roar), their owners are. A League is moving fwd very slowly.
Bring on the NSD as well.

we will have a closed NSdL at the bottom so not a issue
P&R only between A-L and NSdL if we are to follow how J2 started up, then a NTD in 30 years after NSD set up

Im a little torn on the issue to be honest. I quite like the thought of summer afternoon football, better weather, beers in the sun, frees up June/July for Euro trip etc etc but at the same time, if this comp is to ever make a meaningful impact it has to be played when ALL of soccer in this country is played so that pro/rel can be implemented from day dot.... Make 3pm Sunday kickoff sacrosanct, most junior football is over by then

The greater participation in NSW may have something to do with that. Very hard to attend when you are playing yourself. 

I'm in NSW - haven't played in quite some time and would love a winter comp. My son who plays - not a fan.   

I am hearing that VIC and SA are pushing for winter to align with NPl from get go, QLD is borderline but NSW and NNSW clubs are dead against it and want to play in 40 degree heat to align with the Aleague......   very sketchy source for this though so *grain of salt*

Yeah, wait till he announces that next season South are playing all home games at AAMI..... we can out-plastic the plastics any day of the week. hahahahahahahahahahah

Half a billion dollar business that can't attract a buyer for 3 of its licenses? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH oh my sides...... 

I'd also add that having 'decoupled', it was the APL that organised Paramount, Silverlake and the latest Marquee rules.  Not JJ.

Make of that what you will

Do what Jimmy Johnson has done so far you disruptor you. Love your determination, Ernie, take note!
Like me, do you wish you we Awer Mabil after that thunderbolt he struck??

Ok  Footyball ,  you  go  and  build  a  circa  half  a  Billion   dollar   business  from  nothing   in  15  years ,  since  you  say  its   such  a  " low  bar " ...

They had heaps and heaps to do, they kept the comp going so we can watch it and staved off a greedy machine called fox sports pulling the pin, who re-negotiated a cheap deal when they saw a loophole in the contract during covid.

There have always been minimum 2 marquees per club. 
Initially one Aussie one foreign. 
That rule lasted 5-6 years. Then it just went to any two players as marquees. 
Foxtel along with FFA even brought in a third marquee that had to be marketable. "the Cahill rule"

Credit JJ all you like. Just make sure they're factual. 

It's a closed league, with a low salary cap, JJ decoupled it. What other ceo did that, and bring in all the sponsors and broadcast platforms after they lost just about all the previous sponsors and platform, like JJ has, in such a short time? Also, two marquees now for each team.
Are you, 'wait for it,' D Gallop?
No one else has the gumption to set up a NSD, reform youth structures and transfer fees among other areas of reform.

I'm all for the NSD, and along these lines (winter season, no youth teams initially) but this is fucking delusional.

No criteria yet.

1. Model chosen
2. Criteria defined
3. Clubs choose whether to submit EOI
4. 'They' select the starting teams.

Need to wait at least for 1, (and probably 2) before an idea of who'll want in.

Has anyone heard any details about if they've put requirements on stadium size, license cost, female teams, youth academy etc? Hope they can also bring in Canberra and Tassie

The day this kicks off, the ONLY  topic of interest will be comparing NSD top team with ALM bottom.

P/R will be snowball from there.

Yes , and  they   could   have  done    all   the   planning   in   that   time   when   they   had   little   else   to   do ...