Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Whilst needing to ignore pippinu' blatant attempt to promote an AFL attendance over all others (he really must be paid to do this??) I am struck by the obsurd names of stadiums - who the heck wants to say "Lottoland is our fortress" ... by definition, even the weakest teams will believe they have a chance at lottolsnd surely? 1300 SMILES is slightly better but less intimidating than 1300 GOFUKYOURSELF stadium
|
|
|
|
MCMH
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 344,
Visits: 0
|
Okay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals):
12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396
So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWhilst needing to ignore pippinu' blatant attempt to promote an AFL attendance over all others (he really must be paid to do this??) I am struck by the obsurd names of stadiums - who the heck wants to say "Lottoland is our fortress" ... by definition, even the weakest teams will believe they have a chance at lottolsnd surely? 1300 SMILES is slightly better but less intimidating than 1300 GOFUKYOURSELF stadium The naming of stadia has definitely reached new lows.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOkay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals): 12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396 So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000. Good post, some very promising numbers there.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
This weekend marks the point at which average attendances for the season fell below last years average. With one round to go and Victory, Sydney, Roar all at home and Glory with a do-or-die clash we might just pull back up, but for a season that promised so much - guest marquees, new marketing and stage managed derbies it all fell very, very flat.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis weekend marks the point at which average attendances for the season fell below last years average. With one round to go and Victory, Sydney, Roar all at home and Glory with a do-or-die clash we might just pull back up, but for a season that promised so much - guest marquees, new marketing and stage managed derbies it all fell very, very flat. Last season the last 18 rounds drew the highest average for that period in the time we have had the current 10 clubs. This season the last 9 rounds will roughly equal the worst that we have had in this period with these clubs. Every year is different.
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis weekend marks the point at which average attendances for the season fell below last years average. With one round to go and Victory, Sydney, Roar all at home and Glory with a do-or-die clash we might just pull back up, but for a season that promised so much - guest marquees, new marketing and stage managed derbies it all fell very, very flat. Last season the last 18 rounds drew the highest average for that period in the time we have had the current 10 clubs. This season the last 9 rounds will roughly equal the worst that we have had in this period with these clubs. Every year is different. If the FFA were awake, they would realise that setting us, the fans, up for a chance of expansion and an improved competition next year, then going missing on these things has deflated whatever boost they had from the Timmy/ You've gotta have a team push at the beginning of the season. Some have suggested that the average next year will be just under the 12K mark. I would think the disenfranchisement of the fans this year coupled with the same inane leadership from the FFA and the same 10 teams will have us down around the 11K mark. OR EVEN LESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
2016-17 HAL Crowds now down just under 7,000 on same time last season. (less than half a percent) with a round to go.
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOkay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals): 12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396 So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000. if you think that's acceptable, you're having a laugh. All Melbourne and Sydney Teams should be above the league average. anything below is unacceptable.
|
|
|
MCMH
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 344,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOkay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals): 12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396 So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000. if you think that's acceptable, you're having a laugh. All Melbourne and Sydney Teams should be above the league average. anything below is unacceptable. I think for a club with no difference to Victory, who played out of the same stadium as victory and shared the exact same market as victory.... Of which mind you Victory had a monopoly on for 5 years and in that time were the most successful team, I think its a very decent return. If we put Sydney rovers in at the same time and played them out of alianz... I couldnt see them getting more than 5-7k. Or if we do a start up brisbane team, not the strikers, a new franchise and play them out of suncorp... Id think we'd be lucky to see 5-7k. So overall, rightly or wrongly of how the club started and it's lack of difference both geographically and theoretically, It is a slow build but it is building into a club with 10k+ average and 10k plus membership.
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOkay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals): 12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396 So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000. if you think that's acceptable, you're having a laugh. All Melbourne and Sydney Teams should be above the league average. anything below is unacceptable. I'm not sure what you expect though, a 2k jump per season? Fact is Victory had a monopoly in Melbourne (more so than Sydney ever did). I remember wondering how on earth Heart was going to succeed. They've don'e well to carve out a 9-10k niche.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Footballer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xOkay so now we have a body of work, lets crunch some numbers. Regular Season Numbers only (Excluding Finals): 12-13: AVE: 8,560 Non Derby AVE: 7,069 13-14: AVE: 9,799 Non Derby AVE: 7,095 14-15: AVE: 10,374 Non Derby AVE: 9,040 (Also consider in this 9,040 includes the 15k Villa game) 15-16: AVE: 11,047 Non Derby AVE: 8,778 16-17: AVE: 10,573 Non Derby AVE: 9,396 So as you can clearly see its easy to get onto the back of Melbourne City but here lies some continued growth of the Non Derby AVE. Couple this with the growing membership (over 13k) and also a record breaking FFA Cup final crowd for 19k it's slowly looking promising for City and hopefully by end of 17-18 season the Non Derby AVE will be over 10,000. if you think that's acceptable, you're having a laugh. All Melbourne and Sydney Teams should be above the league average. anything below is unacceptable. I'm not sure what you expect though, a 2k jump per season? Fact is Victory had a monopoly in Melbourne (more so than Sydney ever did). I remember wondering how on earth Heart was going to succeed. They've don'e well to carve out a 9-10k niche. I actually agree. Melb City are a made-up development franchise from the UAE that has no real history or connection to the city of Melbourne. But they still get around 10k to most games. Not bad.
|
|
|
MarkfromCroydon
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Has anyone done an analysis of the average crowds in August and September when we used to play during those months? i'd be interested to see the result. i've had a quick look, and it looks to me like those months actually held up reasonably well, and it was the last few rounds in those seasons where the crowds started to lower. This season, it seems the same in that crowds seem to be lowering toward the end of the season. Maybe it's fatigue from playing the same teams 3 times. I'd love to see the numbers get crunched.
|
|
|
azzaMVFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHas anyone done an analysis of the average crowds in August and September when we used to play during those months? i'd be interested to see the result. i've had a quick look, and it looks to me like those months actually held up reasonably well, and it was the last few rounds in those seasons where the crowds started to lower. This season, it seems the same in that crowds seem to be lowering toward the end of the season. Maybe it's fatigue from playing the same teams 3 times. I'd love to see the numbers get crunched. 5 times for Victory/City possibly if we face them in the finals .. already played 3 times + FFA Cup
|
|
|
asanchez
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Mark It is fatigue, it is clubs playing each other 3 times in the league, plus FFA Cup plus Finals, so clubs could potentially play each other 5 times in 1 season! That's complete overkill! But don't underestimate how much bad publicity and a negative vibe this wrangle between the FFA, the A-League clubs and the NPL clubs is having on the game and on the so called metrics. The FFA have completely botched this season from a PR perspective, and we had started so well. So yet again, the FFA has hogged the headlines, and unfortunately that's detracted from the on field stuff. Typical FFA, just like the old Soccer Australia days, where it's all about them, and nothing about the growth of the game.
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
MV v CCM 14,827
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMarkIt is fatigue, it is clubs playing each other 3 times in the league, plus FFA Cup plus Finals, so clubs could potentially play each other 5 times in 1 season! That's complete overkill! But don't underestimate how much bad publicity and a negative vibe this wrangle between the FFA, the A-League clubs and the NPL clubs is having on the game and on the so called metrics. The FFA have completely botched this season from a PR perspective, and we had started so well. So yet again, the FFA has hogged the headlines, and unfortunately that's detracted from the on field stuff. Typical FFA, just like the old Soccer Australia days, where it's all about them, and nothing about the growth of the game. An agenda some might say.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Expected as much. Been dead-rubbers for a month now (thanks Sydney lol), and atmosphere is completely dead without the NT. Hope the club can come to some agreement with the fans next season, I bet VICPOL are loving our games now.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+xExpected as much. Been dead-rubbers for a month now (thanks Sydney lol), and atmosphere is completely dead without the NT. Hope the club can come to some agreement with the fans next season, I bet VICPOL are loving our games now. Literally making policeman dole blodgers. Keen to know how much the heads are losing from low crowds and high security costs.
|
|
|
bitza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
SFC VS NJ - 15787
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
It's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th. In some of the biggest competitions in this country, coming 7th you can still be premiers, work that out!!! 7th that'sright. Thankfully in our competition, you have to come 1st to be premiers.
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th. You're baffled that they averaged less in a year with one home derby compared to last year with 2 Baffled
|
|
|
MichaelB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th. Are you talking about the Del Piero season? I don't think there is any mystery there. Even in the aftermath of Del Piero there was and to some extent still is a growth in attendances. There is no doubt the A-league needs players that the press can focus on, as it provides a shitload of publicity something that becomes particularly starved during the AFL/ Rugby seasons. The catch is can you actually get a proper return if you invest. Del Piero came to Sydney saw crowds and viewership grow however Sydney themselves lost substantially over the financial year. Pignata said it is very hard to get a return on a player that costs 7 million.
|
|
|
Footballking55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Just got Roar tickets PAX of 14924, so I guess about 13K. Not bad considering people will be saving up for next week.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th. Are you talking about the Del Piero season? I don't think there is any mystery there. Even in the aftermath of Del Piero there was and to some extent still is a growth in attendances. There is no doubt the A-league needs players that the press can focus on, as it provides a shitload of publicity something that becomes particularly starved during the AFL/ Rugby seasons. The catch is can you actually get a proper return if you invest. Del Piero came to Sydney saw crowds and viewership grow however Sydney themselves lost substantially over the financial year. Pignata said it is very hard to get a return on a player that costs 7 million. This is a season that has shattered all A-League records, and SFC's average attendance is less than last season when they finished 7th. So yes, I would stick to describing it as baffling because as a general rule in Australian sport, success = bigger crowds. Mind you, this is not the first time we have witnessed this phenomenon in the A-League when success has not led to an increase in attendances.
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt's good that SFC has been able to maintain solid attendances over a five year period, but it is baffling that in such a record season, their attendances would be lower than the previous season when they finished 7th. Are you talking about the Del Piero season? I don't think there is any mystery there. Even in the aftermath of Del Piero there was and to some extent still is a growth in attendances. There is no doubt the A-league needs players that the press can focus on, as it provides a shitload of publicity something that becomes particularly starved during the AFL/ Rugby seasons. The catch is can you actually get a proper return if you invest. Del Piero came to Sydney saw crowds and viewership grow however Sydney themselves lost substantially over the financial year. Pignata said it is very hard to get a return on a player that costs 7 million. This is a season that has shattered all A-League records, and SFC's average attendance is less than last season when they finished 7th. So yes, I would stick to describing it as baffling because as a general rule in Australian sport, success = bigger crowds. Mind you, this is not the first time we have witnessed this phenomenon in the A-League when success has not led to an increase in attendances. There were much more favourable conditions for crowds last season. High drawing Saturday night games, 10 last season vs 5 this season. Low drawing weeknight or Friday games 3 last season vs 7 (just under half the home games) this season. 2 home derbies last season vs 1 this season. The fact that all the weeknight/Friday home games this season came right in one after another in the crucial part of the season also drained any favour a good run could have promoted with crowd numbers. I don't think that it would have been nearly as bad if they had worked to spread out a bit further across the season rather than giving them to us all at once. Hosting Wellington on a Thursday during the first week back to school was a stupid brain dead decision. Even if you exclude the derby factor the FFA had put a big ball and chain around Sydney's neck before the season started in terms of ability to increase their crowds.
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Round Twenty - four
Western Sydney - Melbourne City - 10,204 Central Coast v Adelaide United - 5,438 Brisbane Roar v Melbourne Victory - 13,576 Wellington Phoenix v Newcastle Jets - 4,828 Perth Glory v Sydney FC - 10,907
Round Attendance 44,953 Round Average - 8,991
Season Total (120 games) - 1,490,606 Season Average (120 games) - 12,422
|
|
|
Joffa
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 66K,
Visits: 0
|
Regular Season Round Twenty - four
Season Nine(135) 1,761,161 Season Ten(135) - 1,689,510 Season Eleven(135) 1,662,729 Season Eight(135) 1,661,830 Season Twelve (120) 1,490,606 Season Seven(135) 1,415,782 Season Six(165) 1,384,902 Season Five(135) 1,322,475 Season Three(84) 1,227,273 Season Two(84) 1,085,829 Season Four(84) 1,023,147 Season One(84) 920,219
Regular Season Averages by season
Season One 10,955 Season Two 12,927 Season Three 14,610 Season Four 12,180 Season Five 9,796 Season Six 8,393 Season Seven 10,487 Season Eight 12,310 Season Nine 13,046 Season Ten 12,515 Season Eleven 12,317 Season Twelve 12,422
Season average, by average
Season Three 14,610 Season Nine 13,046 Season Two 12,927 Season Ten 12,515 Season Twelve 12,423 Season Eleven 12,317 Season Eight 12,310 Season Four 12,180 Season One 10,955 Season Seven 10,487 Season Five 9,796 Season Six 8,393
Finals Attendances
Season One(6)126,237 Season Two(6)177,672 Season Three(6)154,118 Season Four(6)143,819 Season Five(7)151,206 Season Six(7)121,635 Season Seven(7)119,147 Season Eight(5) 105,255 Season Nine (5) 128,566 Season Ten (6) 137,825 Season Eleven (5) 117,122
Regular season plus finals
Season Nine(135) 1,761,161 + (5) 128,566 = 1,889,727 Season Ten(135) 1,689,510 + (5) 137,825 = 1,827,335 Season Eleven(135) 1,662,729+ (5) 117,122 = 1,779,851 Season Eight(135) 1,661,830 + (5) 105,255 = 1,767,085 Season Seven(135) 1,415,782 +(7)119,147 = 1,534,929 Season Six(165) 1,384,902 +(7)121,635 = 1,506,537 Season Twelve(120) 1,490,606 + (0)= 1,490,606 Season Five(135) 1,322,475 +(7)151,206 = 1,473,681 Season Three(84) 1,227,273 + (6)154,118 =1,381,391 Season Two(84) 1,085,829 + (6)177,672 = 1,263,501 Season Four(84) 1,023,147 + (6)143,819 = 1,166,966 Season One(84) 920,219 + (6)126,237 = 1,046,456
Season One(84) 920,219 + (6)126,237 = 1,046,456 Season Two(84) 1,085,829 + (6)177,672 = 1,263,501 Season Three(84) 1,227,273 + (6)154,118 = 1,381,391 Season Four(84) 1,023,147 + (6)143,819 = 1,166,966 Season Five(135) 1,322,475 +(7)151,206 = 1,473,681 Season Six(165) 1,384,902 +(7)121,635 = 1,506,537 Season Seven(135) 1,415,782 +(7)119,147 = 1,534,929 Season Eight(135) 1,661,830 + (5)105,255= 1,767,085 Season Nine(135) 1,761,161 + (5) 128,566 = 1,889,727 Season Ten(135) 1,689,510 + (4) 137,825 = 1,827,335 Season Eleven(135) 1,662,729+ (5) 117,122 = 1,779,851 Season Twelve(120) 1,490,606 + (0) = 1,490,606
|
|
|