localstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments.
|
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I have made allowances for it, haven't banned anyone just given a warning. Why are their sanctimonious comments acceptable but not others? Everyone is very upset about this. If you want to post hurtful crap attacking people you disagree with do it elsewhere.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm sorry McJules what exactly do you have a problem with?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I agree. Only approved SJW commentary allowed these days. And Islam is the problem. Even your most fundamental nut job Christian wouldnt blow themselves up.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'm sorry McJules what exactly do you have a problem with? Openly wishing people to suicide (you) or wishing people to die in terrorist attacks (Captain) are against forum rules. Common sense and credit to captain for editing his original post.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTories are guaranteed reelection now spooky Nah, predictable. Manchester just got them at least another 5 million votes.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I agree. Only approved SJW commentary allowed these days. And Islam is the problem. Even your most fundamental nut job Christian wouldnt blow themselves up. This thread is distinctly lacking in left wing SJW commentary and full of what I would call right wing SJW commentary. Anyway you're all free to go off in your echo chamber (aka this thread), but if I see any threats of harm towards any innocent group of people then there will be bans.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I agree. Only approved SJW commentary allowed these days. And Islam is the problem. Even your most fundamental nut job Christian wouldnt blow themselves up. This thread is distinctly lacking in left wing SJW commentary and full of what I would call right wing SJW commentary. Anyway you're all free to go off in your echo chamber (aka this thread), but if I see any threats of harm towards any innocent group of people then there will be bans. You'll note that I did not say 'leftie' SJW commentary. Again you are finding offense when none was proffered.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I agree. Only approved SJW commentary allowed these days. And Islam is the problem. Even your most fundamental nut job Christian wouldnt blow themselves up. This thread is distinctly lacking in left wing SJW commentary and full of what I would call right wing SJW commentary. Right wingers care for social justice? When did this happen?
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI'm sorry McJules what exactly do you have a problem with? Openly wishing people to suicide (you) or wishing people to die in terrorist attacks (Captain) are against forum rules. Common sense and credit to captain for editing his original post. But terrorist apologists are ok? Gotcha. I'll keep that in mind when the next lot of kids are killed and I'll ask you for permission. Top mod/10
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
I haven't mentioned the attacks in Philipines and Thailand either.
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI'm sorry McJules what exactly do you have a problem with? Openly wishing people to suicide (you) or wishing people to die in terrorist attacks (Captain) are against forum rules. Common sense and credit to captain for editing his original post. But terrorist apologists are ok? Gotcha. I'll keep that in mind when the next lot of kids are killed and I'll ask you for permission. Top mod/10 By your definition of what a terrorist apologist is? Yes they are ok. If someone was supporting the attack and threatening others (like ISIS do) they would be banned (and their details passed on to the terror hotline).
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but can i just make an offensive culture war comment involving people I disagree with dying? Consider this a warning, to TSF for his original comment too. Get off your high horse, mcjules- people are very upset by this. Can't you make allowances for that? Wait until things settle down a bit before you start making your sanctimonious comments. I agree. Only approved SJW commentary allowed these days. And Islam is the problem. Even your most fundamental nut job Christian wouldnt blow themselves up. This thread is distinctly lacking in left wing SJW commentary and full of what I would call right wing SJW commentary. Anyway you're all free to go off in your echo chamber (aka this thread), but if I see any threats of harm towards any innocent group of people then there will be bans. You'll note that I did not say 'leftie' SJW commentary. Again you are finding offense when none was proffered. No offence here.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI'm sorry McJules what exactly do you have a problem with? Openly wishing people to suicide (you) or wishing people to die in terrorist attacks (Captain) are against forum rules. Common sense and credit to captain for editing his original post. But terrorist apologists are ok? Gotcha. I'll keep that in mind when the next lot of kids are killed and I'll ask you for permission. Top mod/10 By your definition of what a terrorist apologist is? Yes they are ok. If someone was supporting the attack and threatening others (like ISIS do) they would be banned (and their details passed on to the terror hotline). You're a big boy. I'll let you figure that one out.
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho.
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born......
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... I'm trying....so hard....to think....where hmmmmmm
|
|
|
And Everyone Blamed Clive
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... Cornwall ?
Winner of Official 442 Comment of the day Award - 10th April 2017
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... Cornwall ? rofl maybe we should try where he travelled and learnt his final trade.
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... Cornwall ? rofl maybe we should try where he travelled and learnt his final trade. Shift the goalposts to propagate the narrative.....
|
|
|
Dial It In
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 213,
Visits: 0
|
Manchester bomb should've been exploded on ABC’s Q&A, Quadrant's Roger Franklin says
The online editor of conservative publication Quadrant has said it would have been preferable for the Manchester bomb to be exploded in the ABC’s Q&A studios on Monday night, blowing up host Tony Jones and the panellists.
“This morning, mere hours after Jones’ guests pocketed their ABC taxi vouchers and repaired to hotel rooms paid for with taxpayer dollars processed through the Sydney writers’ festival, mere children were torn to pieces on the other side of the world,” Roger Franklin wrote in a piece published online on Monday. “Life isn’t fair and death less so. If there had been a shred of justice that blast would have detonated in an Ultimo TV studio. Unlike those young girls in Manchester, their lives snuffed out before they could begin, none of the panel’s likely casualties would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity’s intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty.” The ABC has called the article “a new low in Australian public debate” and demanded an apology and the removal of the article from the Quadrant website. In a strongly worded letter to the editor of Quadrant, the ABC managing director, Michelle Guthrie, said ABC staff had to be reassured of their safety and safety experts had to be called in to assess if there had been any damage to security from the inflammatory words. Guthrie’s statement said: Quadrant promotes itself as “the leading general intellectual journal of ideas”. Those words ring hollow in the wake of last night’s vicious and offensive attack on the ABC, its staff and its program guests. To take issue with our programming and our content is one thing. But to express the wish that, if there were any justice, the horrific terrorist bombing in Manchester would have taken place in the ABC’s Ultimo studio and killed those assembled there is a new low in Australian public debate. Your subsequent attempt to make amends by changing some of the wording (without acknowledging or apologising for the original article) has done little to undo the damage. The article continues to state that if a blast occurred in one of our studios, none of the likely casualties “would have represented the slightest reduction in humanity’s intelligence, decency, empathy or honesty”. Like many others, I am appalled at your willingness to turn an act of terrorism in the United Kingdom into a means of making a political point against those you disagree with. One of the immediate results of this behaviour is that while our staff both here and in Manchester were working long hours to provide extensive coverage of this unfolding tragedy, we were also forced to reassure worried staff who had read your article and call in our own security experts to assess any possible impact flowing from your inflammatory words. I ask that this response be posted prominently on the Quadrant website, and I also ask that the article, which continues to contain entirely inappropriate comments about possible bombings at the ABC, be removed and apologised for.
In his piece, Franklin attacked Q&A panellist Lawrence Krauss as a “filthy liar” for his characterisation of the threat of Islam, and then imagined him being blown up by the terrorist bomb. “Mind you, as Krauss felt his body being penetrated by the Prophet’s shrapnel of nuts, bolts and nails, those goitered eyes might in their last glimmering have caught a glimpse of vindication.” Franklin has been approached for comment. The Australian’s associate editor, Chris Kenny, joined the debate about the article on Twitter, saying while the general argument was a worthwhile point of view, the line about the ABC was appalling. The communications minister, Mitch Fifield, appearing before an upper house hearing in Canberra on Wednesday, agreed with Guthrie. “I think this constitutes a new low in Australian public debate and the comments are sick and unhinged,” he said. In the hours after the tragedy in Manchester, Franklin’s opinion piece which attacked Q&A as an unbalanced program said that every panellist was a “smug simper straight from the green-left luvviedom”. After criticism of the piece on Twitter one sentence was amended without an editor’s note. The article remains online. The ABC’s national security manager, Jason Alcorn, has written to staff about the Quadrant article and assured them that “proactive steps have been taken to ensure the safety and welfare of all staff and users of ABC Ultimo”. “While consideration is given to minimise inconvenience please appreciate that intermittent increased security presence and more rigorous security screening is to ensure staff safety and wellbeing,” Alcorn said. “The safety and security of all ABC staff is a shared responsibility, be alert and not alarmed and if you see something unusual or suspicious, use your judgment and report [it].” https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/may/24/manchester-bomb-shouldve-been-exploded-on-abcs-qa-quadrant-writer-says?CMP=soc_567
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
He's got a point - QANDA is just a bunch of leftie circle jerking and I'm not even a right-winger.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xHe's got a point - QANDA is just a bunch of leftie circle jerking and I'm not even a right-winger. Nah. That's pretty rank. Can't imagine the hoo haa if some clown on the left wrote that.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... Cornwall ? rofl maybe we should try where he travelled and learnt his final trade. Shift the goalposts to propagate the narrative..... +x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYou know what absolute shits me up the wall. Those on the ABC saying this and that about terrorism. 'You are .0003% chance of dying by terrorism' or 'more people die in incidents involving giraffes than people die in terrorist attacks in the UK'. Innocent people have died and to trivilise it as if it is nothing should be considered a crime as far as I am concerned. This. And people who turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "racism" and "Islamophobia". I'd love to live in a world without terrorism, but if that's not an option, could we at least live in a world where only useful idiots like this are the victims? And people that turn around before the bodies are even cold and start blaming tragedies like this on "Islam" as a whole and "immigrants/refugees" How can it blamed on immigrants when no immigrant is involved? Does this get suppressed to propagate the narrative? Exactly where do you think all these radical ideas are brought to England from? Scotland? Ireland? Wales? FMD Ireland def Southern Ireland for sho. at least you're getting closer to where the terrorist was born...... Cornwall ? rofl maybe we should try where he travelled and learnt his final trade. All of that radical extremist bullshit stems from the 2 biggest Islamic shithole areas on earth. Pakistan and Afghanistan and the Middle East. And where are most of the migrants living in England that are propagating their garbage from? Hint: Not Malaysia. The Middle East is a fucking cesspit. Watching Trump suck up to the Saudis was sickening.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
433
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Lol what do you expect when you invited the 3rd world to live in your country with an abhorrent and disgusting ideology. Condolences to the family, but Europe is reaping what it sows.
|
|
|
Aljay
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
You're not giving Western culture enough time to adapt to their way of living and the vibrancy that it brings to stale, white, Christian countries. You need to learn that diversity is our strength and it's racist to question how or ask for any examples of where appeasement of sharia has succeeded.
|
|
|