The genuine left-wingers like Bernie are against that.

The corporate centrists like Hillary (who in Australia would be well and truly right-wing) are for it though.

Your "broflakes" is a pejorative, like "Incels" Man Baby's, "Angry White Males etc. Example of ad hom attacks the Left likes to use because they have nothing else.  Do you think these "Angry White Males" will just cease to exist that way? Do you think that approach is making things better or worse?

Bernie is a communist.  Communism is the natural outcome of the Far Left..  Because THIS time, Communism will work...

LOL no he isn't, nor is he even close to being one.

Enzo really showing his hand here imo

oh please.

I'm the person who should be saying "oh please" in this situation...

Eventually when the opponent is challenged or questioned, it means the victim’s investment and thus his intelligence is questioned, no one can accept that. Not even to themselves.

The problem for some men (I have my own theories as to what kind of people they are) is that when one group of people (in this case women) rise to equal status (or attempt to rise) then all of a sudden their whole world view and their expectations of that world comes crashing down.  (Not surprising because anyone my age or older grew up in a completely different world where women really were 2nd class citizens.  Anyone younger than me had parents that lived in that world.) 

And guess what they're resentful.  And they don't like it.  

I really don't care about 'angry white males' or whether it's the right approach.  When the civil rights movement enabled black americans equal rights and opportunities that didn't exist before there were 10's of thousand of white men that were disenfranchised because black people were now 'intruding' on what was their protected little patch of turf.  Pushing them out of jobs, taking their places at university, making sports teams etc. 

Well so what?!   .

As that lady said on TV the other day (and I'm paraphrasing) when they run an anti-racism campaign on TV as a white person I'm not offended but when they run a feminism campaign (or a Gillette ad) blokes lose their shit.

I get it.  A woman on equal footing, competing for your job, earning the same money, getting that promotion over you, getting all uppity with their 'opinions', pushing you out of your cosseted little cubby house is upsetting for some blokes.

What a bummer for them.    



3...2...1..."Women don't want equality, they want domination."

What hand would that be?

Sanders likes to promise social and economic equality modelled on the Nordic States like Denmark. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2016/02/17/politics/bernie-sanders-2016-denmark-democratic-socialism/index.html

So he wants an outcome like this:

http://cphpost.dk/news/denmarks-wealth-inequality-gap-continues-to-widen.html

All animals are equal, but some more equal than others.  That's the equality Socialism gives.

That's not an answer.  You're on an anonymous internet forum.  If you think it was staged or a false flag operation have the balls to say so.

Gutless.

Thought CNN was #fakenews.

So the Nordic countries are now communist?  Have I got that right?

"I would like to make one thing clear," Danish Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen said recently in a speech at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy."

That isn't communism! 

It isn't even proper socialism. 

😆😂 time for your bedtime blue pill methinks....squirming just a bit..muz the sheeple

Rather than emotive argument lets look at the facts:

When you have this:

https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/lh-martin-institute/insights/gender-enrolment-trends-flarkins

and this

https://www.apsc.gov.au/employment-gender

and the fact women now outnumber men in virtually every profession,

that is not equality.

You're entitled to you simplistic view, bu these men aren't going away because you called them a few names.

l'll leave the last words to a Professor Emeritus:

"The male participation gender imbalance has consequences for Australian society, including cultural and wealth distribution changes. While celebrating strong female participation further proactive strategies are required to encourage more males to complete year 12 studies and attend universities."

https://melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/lh-martin-institute/insights/gender-enrolment-trends-flarkins

Semantics.

As predicted.  Gutless.

I understand,  You don't want to out yourself as a loon.

Those stats are great.  You're presenting this as a women win, men lose scenario.

This is a win win. 

Semantics.

Did I say CNN is fake news?

Sanders is ignorant of Denmark's wealth inequality because that doesn't fit his snow-job Equality campaign.

What's great about them?

https://www.apsc.gov.au/employment-gender

Nice cherry pick.  Australian public service.  Haha.  Very representative.

How about I throw up a cherry pick or 3 of my own.  https://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/advocacy/board-diversity/statistics

https://www.smh.com.au/business/the-economy/the-outliers-23-top-companies-lack-women-in-top-leadership-20180903-p501ff.html

https://www.wgea.gov.au/data/fact-sheets/gender-workplace-statistics-at-a-glance-2017-18

No you didn't.  But usually anti socialism squawkers tend to be Trumpian hence the dig.

Would rather live in Denmark than America. 

As predicted. Another pejorative remark. Will have to incorporate that into your new self title ‘muz the pejorative sheeple’🤣

Everything.  It means we're evolving as a society. 

Oh I missed that one. See below response😅

Not sure why you can't answer a simple question.  You intimated you thought the whole thing was a scam.  Just have the guts to completely out yourself.

What are you actually afraid off?

You either have the strength of your convictions and can nail your colours to the cross or you don't.

What's great about them?

Are fricken kidding me?  Company directors. FFS  How many of those are there?  Most men will never become one.  OTOH the APS employees nearly TWO million workers.  Who cares that few higher-echelon men or women don;'t become a directos.  Nearly everyone never will.  Its a stupid example.

The WGEA has zero credibility given its utterly baseless Gender Wage Gap claims.

No we aren't.

And you're still missing the point.  Smarter people than me or you like a Prof Emeritus who has the education and intelligence see the problem. You can;t ignore these "angry white men".  There's too many being sidelined.  They aren't going away.  No matter what name you call them.