rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIts actually healthy to have discussion from a variety of sources and viewpoints rather than a singular, myopic politically driven perspective of the left. Clearly there’s a concerted campaign by mainstream media to single out crimate crange as the main driver of the current bushfires, to the exclusion of all other inputs such as arson, whether phenomenons such as Indian Ocean Dipole, Southern Annular Mode, sudden stratospheric warming, el nino, variable weather patterns etc. If it wasnt for conservative media we’d never hear about these things, or we’d only hear the spun version to wrap around the crimate crange narrative. If it wasnt for The Australian and MP Kelly the public would never have known that arson was a factor in up to 50% of bushfires. We’d all be left to think that hot temperatures due to crimate crange cause bushes to self combust. We’d also be left to think to believe that this singular event proves crimate crange is the cause when we know the science for crimate crange is based on trends over time , not singular events in very confined locations in the world. Likewise we cant point to the excessive snowfalls this year in northern Europe as proof crimare crange is false. Its the same thought process whenever there is a terrorist attack, some people are keen to jump and up down and blame Islam, when we know that Islam is one of many variables and the big picture is far more complex. In the case of this bushfire season, the left are guilty of doing the thing they frequently accuse the right, taking complex situations and dumbing them down into singular, simplistic tropes. 13% as shown previously 2 pages back.. “While it is difficult to assess the magnitude of maliciously lit fires, between 25 to 50% of bushfires are thought to be deliberately lit.” CSIRO That’s from a CSIRO report in 2009 which referred to a study published in 2005. Get more recent data please. “However, on average across the country, approximately 13 percent of vegetation fires are recorded as being deliberate and another 37 percent as suspicious. That is, for all vegetation fires for which there is a cause recorded, 50 percent may be lit deliberately (Figure 1).” https://aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab051Thats from 2017, is that recent enough? Link doesn't work for me. Also, it isn't recent enough because we have more recent reports for the 2019-2020 fire season saying its only 13% in total. You mean the news Corp article written by a journalist, as opposed to several academic studies carried out by research organisations with PhDs?
Presenting to you the Left...
Happy to have a news article discredited with actual research evidence. Like climate change. You’ve just referenced a study focused on different bushfires. Refer to above. And im not sure what your last sentence means, most likely you were too lazy to write something substantive. I’m saying that you’re comparing different bushfire seasons. 1999 to 2004 vs now. A lot has happened in the last 15-20 years so that study is out of date and not relevant to the current season. Its easily the most if not only comprehensive study of bushfire causes. Its findings are still relevant unless you can find research to prove otherwise. What research evidence do you have that climate change is linked to the current bushfires? Actually it isn't since the title is: "Understanding bushfire: trends indeliberate vegetation fires in Australia". The focus of that study is on deliberately lit fires from 1999 to 2004. Currently, I don't believe there is any academic research into this bushfire season but we can base our views from the RFS and Police reports. So you reject a 600+ page report that’s based on hard evidence, official statistics and deep analysis, yet you embrace a few anecdotal half assed sound bites which provides utterly no substance, detail or evidence. Its obvious you didn’t even read the study, you just saw the title and thought “aha i have found to way reject this evidence that conflicts with my opinion, fuck you cognitive dissonance!” If you choose to be that stupid I cant help you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIts actually healthy to have discussion from a variety of sources and viewpoints rather than a singular, myopic politically driven perspective of the left. Clearly there’s a concerted campaign by mainstream media to single out crimate crange as the main driver of the current bushfires, to the exclusion of all other inputs such as arson, whether phenomenons such as Indian Ocean Dipole, Southern Annular Mode, sudden stratospheric warming, el nino, variable weather patterns etc. If it wasnt for conservative media we’d never hear about these things, or we’d only hear the spun version to wrap around the crimate crange narrative. If it wasnt for The Australian and MP Kelly the public would never have known that arson was a factor in up to 50% of bushfires. We’d all be left to think that hot temperatures due to crimate crange cause bushes to self combust. We’d also be left to think to believe that this singular event proves crimate crange is the cause when we know the science for crimate crange is based on trends over time , not singular events in very confined locations in the world. Likewise we cant point to the excessive snowfalls this year in northern Europe as proof crimare crange is false. Its the same thought process whenever there is a terrorist attack, some people are keen to jump and up down and blame Islam, when we know that Islam is one of many variables and the big picture is far more complex. In the case of this bushfire season, the left are guilty of doing the thing they frequently accuse the right, taking complex situations and dumbing them down into singular, simplistic tropes. 13% as shown previously 2 pages back.. “While it is difficult to assess the magnitude of maliciously lit fires, between 25 to 50% of bushfires are thought to be deliberately lit.” CSIRO That’s from a CSIRO report in 2009 which referred to a study published in 2005. Get more recent data please. “However, on average across the country, approximately 13 percent of vegetation fires are recorded as being deliberate and another 37 percent as suspicious. That is, for all vegetation fires for which there is a cause recorded, 50 percent may be lit deliberately (Figure 1).” https://aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab051Thats from 2017, is that recent enough? Link doesn't work for me. Also, it isn't recent enough because we have more recent reports for the 2019-2020 fire season saying its only 13% in total. You mean the news Corp article written by a journalist, as opposed to several academic studies carried out by research organisations with PhDs?
Presenting to you the Left...
Happy to have a news article discredited with actual research evidence. Like climate change. You’ve just referenced a study focused on different bushfires. Refer to above. And im not sure what your last sentence means, most likely you were too lazy to write something substantive. I’m saying that you’re comparing different bushfire seasons. 1999 to 2004 vs now. A lot has happened in the last 15-20 years so that study is out of date and not relevant to the current season. Its easily the most if not only comprehensive study of bushfire causes. Its findings are still relevant unless you can find research to prove otherwise. What research evidence do you have that climate change is linked to the current bushfires? Actually it isn't since the title is: "Understanding bushfire: trends indeliberate vegetation fires in Australia". The focus of that study is on deliberately lit fires from 1999 to 2004. Currently, I don't believe there is any academic research into this bushfire season but we can base our views from the RFS and Police reports. So you reject a 600+ page report that’s based on hard evidence, official statistics and deep analysis, yet you embrace a few anecdotal half assed sound bites which provides utterly no substance, detail or evidence. Its obvious you didn’t even read the study, you just saw the title and thought “aha i have found to way reject this evidence that conflicts with my opinion, fuck you cognitive dissonance!” If you choose to be that stupid I cant help you. I didn't read the report because it isn't focused on the current bushfires. I'm not saying previous bushfires were not primarily caused by deliberate action. If that report was connected to the current bushfires then sure, we can rely on it. It also isn't comprehensive as the Australian Institute of Criminology would be investigating the deliberate aspect of bushfires only. If you do go into the report, their evidence is sourced from the various Fire Services and the Police. The only material we have now dealing with the current bushfires are from those sources. From that, we have public statements from the RFS (interviews) and Police (interviews and media releases) saying 24 people have been charged with allegedly deliberately lit bushfires for this season ( https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGODIyNjQuaHRtbCZhbGw9MQ%3D%3D). That number can go up but significantly less than All of this as I said earlier is a distraction from the poor management/leadership from the Government in handling the issue (look at the Amazon fires last year, they were deliberate but so what?). IF arson is the primary cause, then why is ScoMo not focusing on tougher arson laws and powers for the police/RFS?
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIts actually healthy to have discussion from a variety of sources and viewpoints rather than a singular, myopic politically driven perspective of the left. Clearly there’s a concerted campaign by mainstream media to single out crimate crange as the main driver of the current bushfires, to the exclusion of all other inputs such as arson, whether phenomenons such as Indian Ocean Dipole, Southern Annular Mode, sudden stratospheric warming, el nino, variable weather patterns etc. If it wasnt for conservative media we’d never hear about these things, or we’d only hear the spun version to wrap around the crimate crange narrative. If it wasnt for The Australian and MP Kelly the public would never have known that arson was a factor in up to 50% of bushfires. We’d all be left to think that hot temperatures due to crimate crange cause bushes to self combust. We’d also be left to think to believe that this singular event proves crimate crange is the cause when we know the science for crimate crange is based on trends over time , not singular events in very confined locations in the world. Likewise we cant point to the excessive snowfalls this year in northern Europe as proof crimare crange is false. Its the same thought process whenever there is a terrorist attack, some people are keen to jump and up down and blame Islam, when we know that Islam is one of many variables and the big picture is far more complex. In the case of this bushfire season, the left are guilty of doing the thing they frequently accuse the right, taking complex situations and dumbing them down into singular, simplistic tropes. 13% as shown previously 2 pages back.. “While it is difficult to assess the magnitude of maliciously lit fires, between 25 to 50% of bushfires are thought to be deliberately lit.” CSIRO That’s from a CSIRO report in 2009 which referred to a study published in 2005. Get more recent data please. “However, on average across the country, approximately 13 percent of vegetation fires are recorded as being deliberate and another 37 percent as suspicious. That is, for all vegetation fires for which there is a cause recorded, 50 percent may be lit deliberately (Figure 1).” https://aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab051Thats from 2017, is that recent enough? Link doesn't work for me. Also, it isn't recent enough because we have more recent reports for the 2019-2020 fire season saying its only 13% in total. You mean the news Corp article written by a journalist, as opposed to several academic studies carried out by research organisations with PhDs?
Presenting to you the Left...
Happy to have a news article discredited with actual research evidence. Like climate change. You’ve just referenced a study focused on different bushfires. Refer to above. And im not sure what your last sentence means, most likely you were too lazy to write something substantive. I’m saying that you’re comparing different bushfire seasons. 1999 to 2004 vs now. A lot has happened in the last 15-20 years so that study is out of date and not relevant to the current season. Its easily the most if not only comprehensive study of bushfire causes. Its findings are still relevant unless you can find research to prove otherwise. What research evidence do you have that climate change is linked to the current bushfires? Actually it isn't since the title is: "Understanding bushfire: trends indeliberate vegetation fires in Australia". The focus of that study is on deliberately lit fires from 1999 to 2004. Currently, I don't believe there is any academic research into this bushfire season but we can base our views from the RFS and Police reports. So you reject a 600+ page report that’s based on hard evidence, official statistics and deep analysis, yet you embrace a few anecdotal half assed sound bites which provides utterly no substance, detail or evidence. Its obvious you didn’t even read the study, you just saw the title and thought “aha i have found to way reject this evidence that conflicts with my opinion, fuck you cognitive dissonance!” If you choose to be that stupid I cant help you. I didn't read the report because it isn't focused on the current bushfires. I'm not saying previous bushfires were not primarily caused by deliberate action. If that report was connected to the current bushfires then sure, we can rely on it. It also isn't comprehensive as the Australian Institute of Criminology would be investigating the deliberate aspect of bushfires only. If you do go into the report, their evidence is sourced from the various Fire Services and the Police. The only material we have now dealing with the current bushfires are from those sources. From that, we have public statements from the RFS (interviews) and Police (interviews and media releases) saying 24 people have been charged with allegedly deliberately lit bushfires for this season ( https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGODIyNjQuaHRtbCZhbGw9MQ%3D%3D). That number can go up but significantly less than All of this as I said earlier is a distraction from the poor management/leadership from the Government in handling the issue (look at the Amazon fires last year, they were deliberate but so what?). IF arson is the primary cause, then why is ScoMo not focusing on tougher arson laws and powers for the police/RFS? There is no statistical or substantive analysis of the current bushfires, but we know from past and recent reportS and studieS that arson suspected in up to 50% of bushfires. Natural causes such as lightning are typically not found to cause the majority of fires. Yes the RFS spokesman did say that he suspected that dry lightning caused the majority of the larger fires, however that implies that some of the larger fires were the result of arson. Secondly he makes no mention of smaller fires, and we know the current bushfire emergency is not only due to large fires but also the sheer number of fires that are significantly diverting fire fighting resources. So what I would like to hear from the RFS spokesperson is simply how many fires are there and how many are suspected to be due to arson, natural causes, etc. None of this information is available yet. Also a police spokesperson said there was no intelligence to suspect arson, however fires are typically only referred to police where there is evidence that a crime has occurred, and in the vast majority of fires that are coded by fire authorities as ‘deliberate’ are not referred to police due to lack of physical evidence ie where a match is found. This explains the massive disparity between police and fire service statistics that account for deliberately lit fires. As for your charge that the report isnt comprehensive, its clear you havent read it. While it focuses on on deliberately lit fires, in order to understand this it needs to do so in the context of all fires and all of their causes, which it does so but you just didnt read it. Im not saying that arson caused the fires to blaze out of control , however we are entitled to statistics and analysis before making any determinations about the causes of this bushfire season. Its also worth noting that the RFS and police spokespersons didnt mention climate change as the cause, yet that hasnt stopped climate change advocates implicating climate change as the primary cause despite no evidence or analysis being provided. Everyone needs to take a deep breath and step back from making rash determinations about the causes until the facts and data has been thoroughly collated, analysed and presented, which could take months.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
WFMB: Marcus Stonis's 147 last night. What an innings.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xIts actually healthy to have discussion from a variety of sources and viewpoints rather than a singular, myopic politically driven perspective of the left. Clearly there’s a concerted campaign by mainstream media to single out crimate crange as the main driver of the current bushfires, to the exclusion of all other inputs such as arson, whether phenomenons such as Indian Ocean Dipole, Southern Annular Mode, sudden stratospheric warming, el nino, variable weather patterns etc. If it wasnt for conservative media we’d never hear about these things, or we’d only hear the spun version to wrap around the crimate crange narrative. If it wasnt for The Australian and MP Kelly the public would never have known that arson was a factor in up to 50% of bushfires. We’d all be left to think that hot temperatures due to crimate crange cause bushes to self combust. We’d also be left to think to believe that this singular event proves crimate crange is the cause when we know the science for crimate crange is based on trends over time , not singular events in very confined locations in the world. Likewise we cant point to the excessive snowfalls this year in northern Europe as proof crimare crange is false. Its the same thought process whenever there is a terrorist attack, some people are keen to jump and up down and blame Islam, when we know that Islam is one of many variables and the big picture is far more complex. In the case of this bushfire season, the left are guilty of doing the thing they frequently accuse the right, taking complex situations and dumbing them down into singular, simplistic tropes. 13% as shown previously 2 pages back.. “While it is difficult to assess the magnitude of maliciously lit fires, between 25 to 50% of bushfires are thought to be deliberately lit.” CSIRO That’s from a CSIRO report in 2009 which referred to a study published in 2005. Get more recent data please. “However, on average across the country, approximately 13 percent of vegetation fires are recorded as being deliberate and another 37 percent as suspicious. That is, for all vegetation fires for which there is a cause recorded, 50 percent may be lit deliberately (Figure 1).” https://aic.gov.au/publications/bfab/bfab051Thats from 2017, is that recent enough? Link doesn't work for me. Also, it isn't recent enough because we have more recent reports for the 2019-2020 fire season saying its only 13% in total. You mean the news Corp article written by a journalist, as opposed to several academic studies carried out by research organisations with PhDs?
Presenting to you the Left...
Happy to have a news article discredited with actual research evidence. Like climate change. You’ve just referenced a study focused on different bushfires. Refer to above. And im not sure what your last sentence means, most likely you were too lazy to write something substantive. I’m saying that you’re comparing different bushfire seasons. 1999 to 2004 vs now. A lot has happened in the last 15-20 years so that study is out of date and not relevant to the current season. Its easily the most if not only comprehensive study of bushfire causes. Its findings are still relevant unless you can find research to prove otherwise. What research evidence do you have that climate change is linked to the current bushfires? Actually it isn't since the title is: "Understanding bushfire: trends indeliberate vegetation fires in Australia". The focus of that study is on deliberately lit fires from 1999 to 2004. Currently, I don't believe there is any academic research into this bushfire season but we can base our views from the RFS and Police reports. So you reject a 600+ page report that’s based on hard evidence, official statistics and deep analysis, yet you embrace a few anecdotal half assed sound bites which provides utterly no substance, detail or evidence. Its obvious you didn’t even read the study, you just saw the title and thought “aha i have found to way reject this evidence that conflicts with my opinion, fuck you cognitive dissonance!” If you choose to be that stupid I cant help you. I didn't read the report because it isn't focused on the current bushfires. I'm not saying previous bushfires were not primarily caused by deliberate action. If that report was connected to the current bushfires then sure, we can rely on it. It also isn't comprehensive as the Australian Institute of Criminology would be investigating the deliberate aspect of bushfires only. If you do go into the report, their evidence is sourced from the various Fire Services and the Police. The only material we have now dealing with the current bushfires are from those sources. From that, we have public statements from the RFS (interviews) and Police (interviews and media releases) saying 24 people have been charged with allegedly deliberately lit bushfires for this season ( https://www.police.nsw.gov.au/news/news_article?sq_content_src=%2BdXJsPWh0dHBzJTNBJTJGJTJGZWJpenByZC5wb2xpY2UubnN3Lmdvdi5hdSUyRm1lZGlhJTJGODIyNjQuaHRtbCZhbGw9MQ%3D%3D). That number can go up but significantly less than All of this as I said earlier is a distraction from the poor management/leadership from the Government in handling the issue (look at the Amazon fires last year, they were deliberate but so what?). IF arson is the primary cause, then why is ScoMo not focusing on tougher arson laws and powers for the police/RFS? There is no statistical or substantive analysis of the current bushfires, but we know from past and recent reportS and studieS that arson suspected in up to 50% of bushfires. Natural causes such as lightning are typically not found to cause the majority of fires. Yes the RFS spokesman did say that he suspected that dry lightning caused the majority of the larger fires, however that implies that some of the larger fires were the result of arson. Secondly he makes no mention of smaller fires, and we know the current bushfire emergency is not only due to large fires but also the sheer number of fires that are significantly diverting fire fighting resources. So what I would like to hear from the RFS spokesperson is simply how many fires are there and how many are suspected to be due to arson, natural causes, etc. None of this information is available yet. Also a police spokesperson said there was no intelligence to suspect arson, however fires are typically only referred to police where there is evidence that a crime has occurred, and in the vast majority of fires that are coded by fire authorities as ‘deliberate’ are not referred to police due to lack of physical evidence ie where a match is found. This explains the massive disparity between police and fire service statistics that account for deliberately lit fires. As for your charge that the report isnt comprehensive, its clear you havent read it. While it focuses on on deliberately lit fires, in order to understand this it needs to do so in the context of all fires and all of their causes, which it does so but you just didnt read it. Im not saying that arson caused the fires to blaze out of control , however we are entitled to statistics and analysis before making any determinations about the causes of this bushfire season. Its also worth noting that the RFS and police spokespersons didnt mention climate change as the cause, yet that hasnt stopped climate change advocates implicating climate change as the primary cause despite no evidence or analysis being provided.
Everyone needs to take a deep breath and step back from making rash determinations about the causes until the facts and data has been thoroughly collated, analysed and presented, which could take months. I agree. What’s annoying is that bushfires have become a political issue with climate change v not climate change.
I don’t care if people believe if it is caused by climate change or not. I’m more concerned about the actions taken to prevent/mitigate this in future. Unfortunately, whatever the causes, fires of this scale seem to be the norm going forward and it needs to be dealt with.
|
|
|
|
|
Captain Haddock
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
WFMB- The Bell Tower Times. Every profile they write (whether it's about people. suburbs of Perth or cultural events) is hilarious. Take this one, as an example: https://thebelltowertimes.com/the-moderately-successful-businessman/It's like an entire website of Marconi's old rants.
There are only two intellectually honest debate tactics: (a) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s facts, or (b) pointing out errors or omissions in your opponent’s logic. All other debate tactics are intellectually dishonest - John T. Reed
The Most Popular Presidential Candidate Of All Time (TM) cant go to a sports stadium in the country he presides over. Figure that one out...
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Wfmb: ccm's giveaway at today's game. First 1000 people thru the gate receive sauce 😂😂
|
|
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWfmb: ccm's giveaway at today's game. First 1000 people thru the gate receive sauce 😂😂 I love how HAL clubs are embracing the memeyness (if that’s not a word, it is now!) of the league now.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWfmb: ccm's giveaway at today's game. First 1000 people thru the gate receive sauce 😂😂 I love how HAL clubs are embracing the memeyness (if that’s not a word, it is now!) of the league now. Agreed and its awesome. Did u catch all the hate that wu are coping abour the thank you note they left for the doggies? All due to them posting it and not the doggies.
|
|
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWfmb: ccm's giveaway at today's game. First 1000 people thru the gate receive sauce 😂😂 I love how HAL clubs are embracing the memeyness (if that’s not a word, it is now!) of the league now. Agreed and its awesome. Did u catch all the hate that wu are coping abour the thank you note they left for the doggies? All due to them posting it and not the doggies. Yep haha. Fully deserved too.
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Wfmb: ccm's ad for the game against wsw 😂😂😂
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWfmb: ccm's ad for the game against wsw 😂😂😂 Link?
|
|
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWfmb: ccm's giveaway at today's game. First 1000 people thru the gate receive sauce 😂😂 I love how HAL clubs are embracing the memeyness (if that’s not a word, it is now!) of the league now. Agreed and its awesome. Did u catch all the hate that wu are coping abour the thank you note they left for the doggies? All due to them posting it and not the doggies. Yep haha. Fully deserved too. Wait, what note?
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
WFMB: Sun Yang banned lol -PB
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWFMB: Sun Yang banned lol -PB Yeah, but clearly a decision influenced by pro-western imperialist ant-china propaganda.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWFMB: Sun Yang banned lol -PB Yeah, but clearly a decision influenced by pro-western imperialist ant-china propaganda. I find it weird that any cheating done by aussies gets excuses. Essendon for example
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWFMB: Sun Yang banned lol -PB Yeah, but clearly a decision influenced by pro-western imperialist ant-china propaganda. I find it weird that any cheating done by aussies gets excuses. Essendon for example This is very true. Still, I always find Chinese trolls on Facebook, Twitter etc hilarious, complaining about western propaganda when the very social media outlets they are using a banned on the mainland.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xWFMB: Sun Yang banned lol -PB Yeah, but clearly a decision influenced by pro-western imperialist ant-china propaganda. I find it weird that any cheating done by aussies gets excuses. Essendon for example This is very true. Still, I always find Chinese trolls on Facebook, Twitter etc hilarious, complaining about western propaganda when the very social media outlets they are using a banned on the mainland. Like the Russian trolls and the idiotic pro trump brigade . It's always the same argument
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Also forgot
Wfmb: going to a new laundromat and using their big fucker of a washing machine which takes 40kg of washing. Yes yes it's lame but being a family man ots a life saver. Also before any one asks. I do have a washing machine at home but it needs to be repaired
|
|
|
|
|
sub007
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Well this is one way to deal with quarantine😂😂😂 https://twitter.com/maccolahan9/status/1239476293294370816?s=21The laugh gets me every time aha
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
WMFB: Doug Matthews and Mcnillions
-PB
|
|
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Interesting. Just got an email to say that I've been given the Foxtel Movies Pack gratis.
Looks like they caved.
|
|
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
damn, you got movi pack ! even though I have netflix I got this emailed the other day from Fox You now have access to Drama, Kids, Entertainment Plus and Multiscreen~ *,
we hope it helps a little
I posted in another thread Optus Sport have frozen payments till June 1.
Love Football
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xInteresting. Just got an email to say that I've been given the Foxtel Movies Pack gratis. Looks like they caved. Got that too. I'll keep my Foxtel account for the time being given there's a whole upcoming season of Westworld for me to struggle to understand. Following that I'll make a decision based on whether they ditch the A-League.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xInteresting. Just got an email to say that I've been given the Foxtel Movies Pack gratis. Looks like they caved. Got that too. I'll keep my Foxtel account for the time being given there's a whole upcoming season of Westworld for me to struggle to understand. Following that I'll make a decision based on whether they ditch the A-League. Alt Shift X
|
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Wfmb: with no live sports I can finally catch up with all my shows I've ignored. Attack on titan, my hero acadmeia, jack Ryan, treadstone. And I can watch the tiger king
|
|
|
|
|
aufc_ole
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 7K,
Visits: 0
|
WFMB: Managed to find some work.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
WFMB: Ideologues completing turning themselves inside out lol -PB
|
|
|
|