bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I think that's right, we have to accept that for the next few years we're going to have to have a stripped down league, no frills, partly semi-pro. That's just the way it will have to be.
|
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/a-league-looking-for-new-broadcast-partner-with-fox-sports-set-to-walk-20200330-p54fbc.htmlA-League looking for new broadcast partner with Fox Sports set to walkFootball Federation Australia has begun scoping out options for a new broadcast partner for the A-League, believing Fox Sports is looking to end its 15-year partnership with Australian football. Despite having three years left to run on its contract, senior club and FFA sources anticipate Fox Sports will seek to end its $57 million per-year deal with the A-League, which has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. FFA chief executive James Johnson would not comment on negotiations with Fox Sports but confirmed the organisation has already started to discuss back-up plans in the event the pay-TV network pulls out of football. "The COVID-19 pandemic has forced us all to question all aspects of how we do business. From the way we work, to the programs and services we deliver. Change, innovation, potential and possibility are commodities we have to deal in now," Johnson said. Foxtel declined to comment on its partnership with the A-League when contacted by the Herald on Monday, however clubs have been warned by FFA not to expect to receive the last quarterly payment for this year's broadcast rights. That final payment is due next month and worth around $900,000 for each club. Club sources suggest Central Coast Mariners and Brisbane Roar are set to follow Perth Glory in temporarily standing down their squad while the season is suspended due to lost revenue. The A-League will not resume until April 22 at the earliest. An extended delay to the season could provide Fox Sports with the opportunity to walk away, according to sources with knowledge of the contract. With the A-League unable to provide matches due to the pandemic, the deal could potentially be deemed a "frustrated contract". Whether that can be used as a reason to exit the broadcast contract would likely result in a legal dispute but the FFA and A-League clubs have already started to workshop contingency plans, to ensure the competition can still be seen by fans. The plans include the possibility of the A-League being broadcast by live streaming services, free-to-air partners and digital broadcasters. The ABC televises one A-League match each weekend and will be approached as a potential back-up television partner. A previous deal with Network Ten could be revived after the free-to-air station was close to securing two live A-League games a weekend this year before talks with Fox Sports stalled. Optus Sport has increased its football coverage since purchasing the rights of the English Premier League in 2016 including a significant push into the Australian domestic market. The telecommunications company has produced several Australian football documentaries and shows in recent months. It has never previously sought the A-League rights but could be tempted to add the competition to its growing list should it become available at a cut price. As revealed by the Herald last month, online streaming service 'DAZN' is set to enter the Australian sports broadcast landscape and could emerge as a potential bidder for the A-League rights, should they become available this year. The over-the-top streaming platform has already obtained the broadcast rights for other football league's around the world, including the Italian Serie A. I should imagine there would be some break fees. According to Fox they spend 100 million on Football, my guess made up of Hal 54 million, broadcast costs 14 million, panels and discussions 8 million, and the balance for international rights... So lets say as part of the negotiation Fox pay FFA 14 million per year which allows FFA to broadcast its games... then FFA or iHal sell the rights and if streamed rights games could be played when it best suits crowds ... so arguably a lift in crowd revenue... what we could sell the rights for would be interesting... Broadcasts of Socceroo matches is another story as thats with the AFC and as I understand the main reason why Optus did not bid last time...
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+x+x+xhttps://www.smh.com.au/sport/soccer/a-league-looking-for-new-broadcast-partner-with-fox-sports-set-to-walk-20200330-p54fbc.htmlA-League looking for new broadcast partner with Fox Sports set to walkFootball Federation Australia has begun scoping out options for a new broadcast partner for the A-League, believing Fox Sports is looking to end its 15-year partnership with Australian football. Despite having three years left to run on its contract, senior club and FFA sources anticipate Fox Sports will seek to end its $57 million per-year deal with the A-League, which has been postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. FFA chief executive James Johnson would not comment on negotiations with Fox Sports but confirmed the organisation has already started to discuss back-up plans in the event the pay-TV network pulls out of football. "The COVID-19 pandemic has forced us all to question all aspects of how we do business. From the way we work, to the programs and services we deliver. Change, innovation, potential and possibility are commodities we have to deal in now," Johnson said. Foxtel declined to comment on its partnership with the A-League when contacted by the Herald on Monday, however clubs have been warned by FFA not to expect to receive the last quarterly payment for this year's broadcast rights. That final payment is due next month and worth around $900,000 for each club. Club sources suggest Central Coast Mariners and Brisbane Roar are set to follow Perth Glory in temporarily standing down their squad while the season is suspended due to lost revenue. The A-League will not resume until April 22 at the earliest. An extended delay to the season could provide Fox Sports with the opportunity to walk away, according to sources with knowledge of the contract. With the A-League unable to provide matches due to the pandemic, the deal could potentially be deemed a "frustrated contract". Whether that can be used as a reason to exit the broadcast contract would likely result in a legal dispute but the FFA and A-League clubs have already started to workshop contingency plans, to ensure the competition can still be seen by fans. The plans include the possibility of the A-League being broadcast by live streaming services, free-to-air partners and digital broadcasters. The ABC televises one A-League match each weekend and will be approached as a potential back-up television partner. A previous deal with Network Ten could be revived after the free-to-air station was close to securing two live A-League games a weekend this year before talks with Fox Sports stalled. Optus Sport has increased its football coverage since purchasing the rights of the English Premier League in 2016 including a significant push into the Australian domestic market. The telecommunications company has produced several Australian football documentaries and shows in recent months. It has never previously sought the A-League rights but could be tempted to add the competition to its growing list should it become available at a cut price. As revealed by the Herald last month, online streaming service 'DAZN' is set to enter the Australian sports broadcast landscape and could emerge as a potential bidder for the A-League rights, should they become available this year. The over-the-top streaming platform has already obtained the broadcast rights for other football league's around the world, including the Italian Serie A. Well, it’s earlier than expected but half of our problems are related to Fox Sports. Season start date, match scheduling, season finish, kick off times, length of season .... all big issues that can now (hopefully) be addressed. And a big fucking issue about to occur. How is the league going to handle a 20 million dollar pay cut in tv rights per year when it's about to expand to 12 teams iHAL will be extremely luck if it is only $20M, my guess is they will be forced into a revenue sharing model like the NBL, where iHAL bears the production costs and share the ad revenue from broadcast partners who get the content for free. NBL deal details below: http://www.footyindustry.com/?page_id=4915
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
It's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start.
Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up.
Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it.
Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it.
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Whoever broadcasts HAL in future, Simon Hill is guaranteed work- 1 of the best football commentators in the world imo
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Opportunity to putting together a lot more content. iHAL can use outside professionals. Lower divisions SMFC etc already produce their own content. Even Central Coast United in NSW NPL3 does. Make sure it is a day game or sufficient lighting and many clubs will be able to do the same.
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. The games are broadcast by other people anyway. Those OB trucks you see outside the grounds aren't Foxtel employees that's for sure.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content.
Optus make an annual profit that before too long will pass a billion dollars - they make money out of selling mobile and broadband plans such that, on average, every user is worth between $21 and $42 each month. Get one person on both and it’s worth $63/month.
Every 100,000 new subscribers for them would be worth $75 million. The HAL would bring way more than that (let the arguments begin on that point) so the potential is there for an additional $100m+ per year in high margin revenues.
Optus will be very interested in the sokkha. As will Telstra.
|
|
|
CS
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 913,
Visits: 0
|
The Covid-19 crisis may be the end of the road for Fox Sports. They were already in deep trouble before this.
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content.
Optus make an annual profit that before too long will pass a billion dollars - they make money out of selling mobile and broadband plans such that, on average, every user is worth between $21 and $42 each month. Get one person on both and it’s worth $63/month.
Every 100,000 new subscribers for them would be worth $75 million. The HAL would bring way more than that (let the arguments begin on that point) so the potential is there for an additional $100m+ per year in high margin revenues.
Optus will be very interested in the sokkha. As will Telstra. That's another interesting question. What percentage of Telstra does Rupie own ?
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content. I get that you are exaggerating a bit there, and you are right that production is easy, however live event broadcasts are a different kettle of fish altogether. Setting that aside, the issue is not how difficult it is to produce the content. The issue is who is going to pay for it, because it is definitely not cheap.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content. I get that you are exaggerating a bit there, and you are right that production is easy, however live event broadcasts are a different kettle of fish altogether. Setting that aside, the issue is not how difficult it is to produce the content. The issue is who is going to pay for it, because it is definitely not cheap. Yup, I was being a little flippant on the production thing but there’s two elements to it.
The outside broadcast is the easiest - just contract the same company as Fox Sports do.
The production piece - that includes commentary, pre and post game shows, that can all be outsourced as well. It’s not hard to do, nor that expensive.
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content. I get that you are exaggerating a bit there, and you are right that production is easy, however live event broadcasts are a different kettle of fish altogether. Setting that aside, the issue is not how difficult it is to produce the content. The issue is who is going to pay for it, because it is definitely not cheap. Yup, I was being a little flippant on the production thing but there’s two elements to it.
The outside broadcast is the easiest - just contract the same company as Fox Sports do.
The production piece - that includes commentary, pre and post game shows, that can all be outsourced as well. It’s not hard to do, nor that expensive. It's more that it would be an expense that the HAL hasn't had to pay for directly in the past. Obviously they would have been paying for it indirectly to a certain extent, but when the league needs to pay these costs directly it has the potential to be a problem. Especially with the current situation.
|
|
|
karta
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 567,
Visits: 0
|
A-League on Optus Sport seems like a fait accompli now. +xpretty shitty thing for foxtel to drop on the league. using the virus as an excuse to get out of the contract. fuck them. Fox definitely has form in this kind of thing. If the A-League is set back 3-5 years as others have said, it's still 'better' than the 20+ years they set back the NRL.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xA-League on Optus Sport seems like a fait accompli now. +xpretty shitty thing for foxtel to drop on the league. using the virus as an excuse to get out of the contract. fuck them. Fox definitely has form in this kind of thing. If the A-League is set back 3-5 years as others have said, it's still 'better' than the 20+ years they set back the NRL. If Optus do take the iHal they will want a good product - it would be a false economy to force a poor product - support it properly and it will grow better than on Fox
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content. I get that you are exaggerating a bit there, and you are right that production is easy, however live event broadcasts are a different kettle of fish altogether. Setting that aside, the issue is not how difficult it is to produce the content. The issue is who is going to pay for it, because it is definitely not cheap. Yup, I was being a little flippant on the production thing but there’s two elements to it.
The outside broadcast is the easiest - just contract the same company as Fox Sports do.
The production piece - that includes commentary, pre and post game shows, that can all be outsourced as well. It’s not hard to do, nor that expensive. It's more that it would be an expense that the HAL hasn't had to pay for directly in the past. Obviously they would have been paying for it indirectly to a certain extent, but when the league needs to pay these costs directly it has the potential to be a problem. Especially with the current situation. The A League has always had to “pay” for production costs, it directly impacts the valuation of the rights one way or another.
Whilst it would be different there’s no reason why it would be prohibitive nor that it wouldn’t be beneficial to the delivered product.
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xA-League on Optus Sport seems like a fait accompli now. +xpretty shitty thing for foxtel to drop on the league. using the virus as an excuse to get out of the contract. fuck them. Fox definitely has form in this kind of thing. If the A-League is set back 3-5 years as others have said, it's still 'better' than the 20+ years they set back the NRL. If Optus do take the iHal they will want a good product - it would be a false economy to force a poor product - support it properly and it will grow better than on Fox Exactly. There not just going to take it just because it's "cheap" nor should the FFA allowed themselves to be lowballed too much. Whoever may be interested needs a viable plan moving forward for years to come to make it worthwhile for them as well.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Optus production quality seems to be alright based on what is currently on offer. So the real issue is how much is a broadcaster willing to pay to support the player wages?
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Phillip Micallef reporting that I've just learned from a reliable source that @FOXFOOTBALL is legally bound to pay its latest rights instalment unless it goes into liquidation. If the @ALeague does not return by May that's another thing
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPhillip Micallef reporting that I've just learned from a reliable source that @FOXFOOTBALL is legally bound to pay its latest rights instalment unless it goes into liquidation. If the @ALeague does not return by May that's another thing That's interesting.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
and re OP as of right now with your/our subscriptions just recieved, imo should have been start of March but : Important information about your Optus Sport subscription | | | | Hi Maurice, Due to the ongoing impacts of COVID-19, many international football leagues have been suspended, including those we broadcast on Optus Sport. In light of this, your monthly $14.99 Optus Sport subscription fee will be waived, via the App Store, from the 24th of March until the 31st of May 2020. This means you will not be charged your regular monthly subscription fees that would usually fall within this period. * From the 1st of June 2020, billing will resume as usual. Thank you for your patience in these unprecedented times. | | | |
Love Football
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPhillip Micallef reporting that I've just learned from a reliable source that @FOXFOOTBALL is legally bound to pay its latest rights instalment unless it goes into liquidation. If the @ALeague does not return by May that's another thing That's interesting. Why don’t Sbs update articles? “AAP understands Brisbane Roar players and staff have also been stood down amid concerns a $900,000 quarterly payment to clubs by broadcaster Foxtel will not be made due to the league's suspension amid the COVID-19 outbreak.” https://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/we-are-at-risk-of-regressing-pfa-seek-ffa-help-after-mariners-stand-down
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPhillip Micallef reporting that I've just learned from a reliable source that @FOXFOOTBALL is legally bound to pay its latest rights instalment unless it goes into liquidation. If the @ALeague does not return by May that's another thing If you were pretty sure you weren't going to be even broadcasting a league past a certain date would you bother with the final instalment. ;)
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPhillip Micallef reporting that I've just learned from a reliable source that @FOXFOOTBALL is legally bound to pay its latest rights instalment unless it goes into liquidation. If the @ALeague does not return by May that's another thing If you were pretty sure you weren't going to be even broadcasting a league past a certain date would you bother with the final instalment. ;) Depends what’s in the contract. Read the SMH journalist name... of course it is DB trying to cause controversy....... again
|
|
|
CS
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 913,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIt's inevitiable. News Corporation wouldn't be too upset about losing the A League & if you're cutting costs across the board then it's a good place to start. Dead money in many ways & the FFA doesn't have a banking sugar daddy to prop them up. Optus has proved that streaming is 100% viable & profitable so whether they or whoever may be interested it would be good to open up dialogue with assorted companies & see how they would handle it. Either way whoever may be get this in the future they'd be insane not to poach Simon Hill from Foxtel, get him on talking both A League & EPL, he'd love it. Streaming is easy to make profitable when you're not producing the content. Issue still remains with who will pay for production. If Optus are willing to produce it like Fox were, then great. Otherwise the iHAL may be in the position in which they will need to fund production directly themselves. Difficult option given the current situation. Production is easy. People keep offering this up as a problem but any half decent creative arts student with an iPAD can produce content. I get that you are exaggerating a bit there, and you are right that production is easy, however live event broadcasts are a different kettle of fish altogether. Setting that aside, the issue is not how difficult it is to produce the content. The issue is who is going to pay for it, because it is definitely not cheap. Yup, I was being a little flippant on the production thing but there’s two elements to it.
The outside broadcast is the easiest - just contract the same company as Fox Sports do.
The production piece - that includes commentary, pre and post game shows, that can all be outsourced as well. It’s not hard to do, nor that expensive. It's more that it would be an expense that the HAL hasn't had to pay for directly in the past. Obviously they would have been paying for it indirectly to a certain extent, but when the league needs to pay these costs directly it has the potential to be a problem. Especially with the current situation. It is really just a question of who spends the money. The costs are the same and are there in the current deal too - its just that instead of the money going from Fox to FFA so subcontract production, Fox keeps the money and subcontracts. So the money FFA would get from Optus would include the money for production that currently stays with Fox. The major change is that FFA becomes responsible for oversight of the production process.
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Seeing as the government is handing out cash, cant they give money to SBS to do a new deal?
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Of course, tomorrow is April 1st lol
|
|
|
Zoltan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 444,
Visits: 0
|
delete
|
|
|