|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Trump bragging about US Marshals killing that dude. Fascism babayyyyy -PB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPlanet America last night showing that although Biden is double digit miles ahead in the polls nationally the swings states are what they were when it looked like Clinton would win. (6s and 7s percentage lead.) Having said all that Trump and Biden were $1.95 each about month ago. Trump is now $3.00 and Biden $1.45. But, Clinton was $1.40 this time last election. Do you remember how much Trump was paying same time last election? Any chance it was in double figures? Polling has changed since then as well though, there were far more factors that weren't being considered in 2016 which has lead to the differing of opinions back then versus now (quiet Trump supporters etc etc). Remember, even though the polls had a margin of error that was far above and beyond in 2016, Trump still lost the popular vote. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPlanet America last night showing that although Biden is double digit miles ahead in the polls nationally the swings states are what they were when it looked like Clinton would win. (6s and 7s percentage lead.) Having said all that Trump and Biden were $1.95 each about month ago. Trump is now $3.00 and Biden $1.45. But, Clinton was $1.40 this time last election. Do you remember how much Trump was paying same time last election? Any chance it was in double figures? Despite the polling in 2016, Trump actually had a 30% chance of winning the election based on the 538 modelling. The current model (which apparently has been recalibrated to favour Trump more is putting him at around 13%. It's quite an interesting read: https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-election-forecast/
|
|
|
|
|
robstazzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPlanet America last night showing that although Biden is double digit miles ahead in the polls nationally the swings states are what they were when it looked like Clinton would win. (6s and 7s percentage lead.) Having said all that Trump and Biden were $1.95 each about month ago. Trump is now $3.00 and Biden $1.45. But, Clinton was $1.40 this time last election. Do you remember how much Trump was paying same time last election? Any chance it was in double figures?
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xK*nts cooked  -PB It's not just him tweeting. He has other people as well.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Planet America last night showing that although Biden is double digit miles ahead in the polls nationally the swings states are what they were when it looked like Clinton would win. (6s and 7s percentage lead.) Having said all that Trump and Biden were $1.95 each about month ago. Trump is now $3.00 and Biden $1.45. But, Clinton was $1.40 this time last election.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
K*nts cooked -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
New England Journal of medicine editorial excoriating America's response to covid. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2029812
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
You're a loser that's fallen for the culture wars lol Grow the fuck up. -PB "Grow the fuck up"? lol Correct. You're life will be better for it. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x
Wow, I'm so humiliated right now. Rusty showed me irrefutable evidence that Trumped condemned white supremacists, and in the exposed me as a liar and a partisan hack who will readily believe anything from the left without question. Will I come clean and admit that he was right and I was wrong? No! My petty ego cannot handle it. Will I instead attack his comprehension abilities? Yes! That is what I will do, rather than admitting I'm a partisan hack who readily believes anything from the left without fact checking, I will attack his comprehension and in doing so preserve my petty ego from harm. Mwhwhahha Muz reigns supreme!
Bit rich considering you never admitted you were wrong regarding masks stopping the spread of COVID.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x
Wow, I'm so humiliated right now. Rusty showed me irrefutable evidence that Trumped condemned white supremacists, and in the exposed me as a liar and a partisan hack who will readily believe anything from the left without question. Will I come clean and admit that he was right and I was wrong? No! My petty ego cannot handle it. Will I instead attack his comprehension abilities? Yes! That is what I will do, rather than admitting I'm a partisan hack who readily believes anything from the left without fact checking, I will attack his comprehension and in doing so preserve my petty ego from harm. Mwhwhahha Muz reigns supreme!
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/trumps-bonkers-superman-stunt-after-coronavirus-diagnosis-exposed/news-story/0053ad955435026423a23f97a03f3abdDonald Trump considered ripping off his dress shirt – to reveal a Superman T-shirt underneath – when he was released from hospital after being treated for COVID-19, aides have revealed.The US President floated the bizarre plan in a series of phone calls from his presidential suite at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Centre, The New York Times reports.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Evidently comprehension is not your strong suit.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
Muz: DT refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides.
DT: And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
To be honest I actually didn't even know who was on what side of that argument in that article. It was a commentary on the availability of guns and the potential for things to go south when shit goes down. But if you like Rus. A plethora of guns - non-partisan fact hot heads - non-partisan fact deeply divided partisan country - non-partisan fact. So none of those statements are left or right wing. As for the statement 'a race baiting president' that's factual. Refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides. (Reluctantly changed course 2 days after the fact.) And given the opportunity to denounce white supremacists at the last debate refused to do so. It's not my fault your bloke is a race baiting, dog whistling prick. Here's an article about his form. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/the-end-of-denial/614194/Also an excerpt from a book on Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/woodward-book-trump-charlottesville/index.htmlTrump's August 2017 remarks concluding there was "blame on both sides" for the violence was a stunning moment early in his presidency that ignited a backlash over his views on race and consumed the White House for days. The new revelations may reopen that debate.
In the book, Woodward describes how then-White House staff secretary Rob Porter worked with Trump to write a second speech to try to repair his initial comments about violence at the marches.
Porter tried to convince the President he needed to clarify his remarks. But Trump appeared to resist, according to the book, repeatedly saying: "I don't know about this. ... This doesn't feel right to me."
Eventually, Trump agreed, and two days later in a televised speech he denounced racism, the "KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups." Woodward describes how White House aides were relieved, and chief of staff John Kelly encouraged staff to tell the President what a good job he did.
But then Trump turned on the TV.
One Fox News commentator gave Trump praise but also added, "That's almost an admission of 'Okay, I was wrong.'" Then Fox News correspondent Kevin Corke said: "Some 48 hours into the biggest domestic challenge of his young presidency, Mr. Trump has made a course correction."
Trump exploded at the coverage, Woodward reports. "That was the biggest fucking mistake I've made," the President told Porter. "You never make those concessions. You never apologize. I didn't do anything wrong in the first place. Why look weak?" https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/trump-has-condemned-white-supremacists/Trump Has Condemned White SupremacistsTrump drew criticism for his condemnation of “hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides” after a rally organized by a white nationalist in Charlottesville in 2017, and for saying there were “very fine people on both sides.” But, contrary to Biden’s claim, the president twice specifically condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis, and he has repeated that condemnation since.
Trump has said his “very fine people” comment referred not to white supremacists and neo-Nazis but to “people that went because they felt very strongly about the monument to Robert E. Lee — a great general, whether you like it or not.”This is what Trump ACTUALLY said "You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally So what you wrote, Muz, is completely flat out false, but I do not hold you accountable for parroting mischievous, deliberately misleading information that is designed purely to damage the president, for as Jesus once said, forgive them Father, for they know what what they do. But I do hold you accountable for acquainting yourself with evil, leftist propaganda that seeks to seeks to mislead and misinform people for purely political purposes. It proves that you have indeed allowed yourself to be brainwashed and mindfucked by the twisted ghouls o the left and are no longer capable of rational thought. Lol. What a sidestep. You've conflated 'blame on both sides' with 'very fine people, on both sides'. When Trump was talking about white supremacists he said there was 'blame on both sides'. Here's the transcript. https://www.politifact.com/article/2019/apr/26/context-trumps-very-fine-people-both-sides-remarks/Reporter: "Mr. President, are you putting what you’re calling the alt-left and white supremacists on the same moral plane?" Trump: "I’m not putting anybody on a moral plane. What I’m saying is this: You had a group on one side and you had a group on the other, and they came at each other with clubs -- and it was vicious and it was horrible. And it was a horrible thing to watch. "But there is another side. There was a group on this side. You can call them the left -- you just called them the left -- that came violently attacking the other group. So you can say what you want, but that’s the way it is. Reporter: (Inaudible) "… both sides, sir. You said there was hatred, there was violence on both sides. Are the --"
Trump: "Yes, I think there’s blame on both sides. If you look at both sides -- I think there’s blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it, and you don’t have any doubt about it either. And if you reported it accurately, you would say."
Reporter: "The neo-Nazis started this. They showed up in Charlottesville to protest --"
Trump: "Excuse me, excuse me. They didn’t put themselves -- and you had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. You had people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name."
Also he was far from happy to have to 'set the record straight ' as it were. (and his supporters know it.) Trump exploded at the coverage, Woodward reports. "That was the biggest fucking mistake I've made," the President told Porter. "You never make those concessions. You never apologize. I didn't do anything wrong in the first place. Why look weak?"
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Davide82
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
To be honest I actually didn't even know who was on what side of that argument in that article. It was a commentary on the availability of guns and the potential for things to go south when shit goes down. But if you like Rus. A plethora of guns - non-partisan fact hot heads - non-partisan fact deeply divided partisan country - non-partisan fact. So none of those statements are left or right wing. As for the statement 'a race baiting president' that's factual. Refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides. (Reluctantly changed course 2 days after the fact.) And given the opportunity to denounce white supremacists at the last debate refused to do so. It's not my fault your bloke is a race baiting, dog whistling prick. Here's an article about his form. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/the-end-of-denial/614194/Also an excerpt from a book on Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/woodward-book-trump-charlottesville/index.htmlTrump's August 2017 remarks concluding there was "blame on both sides" for the violence was a stunning moment early in his presidency that ignited a backlash over his views on race and consumed the White House for days. The new revelations may reopen that debate.
In the book, Woodward describes how then-White House staff secretary Rob Porter worked with Trump to write a second speech to try to repair his initial comments about violence at the marches.
Porter tried to convince the President he needed to clarify his remarks. But Trump appeared to resist, according to the book, repeatedly saying: "I don't know about this. ... This doesn't feel right to me."
Eventually, Trump agreed, and two days later in a televised speech he denounced racism, the "KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups." Woodward describes how White House aides were relieved, and chief of staff John Kelly encouraged staff to tell the President what a good job he did.
But then Trump turned on the TV.
One Fox News commentator gave Trump praise but also added, "That's almost an admission of 'Okay, I was wrong.'" Then Fox News correspondent Kevin Corke said: "Some 48 hours into the biggest domestic challenge of his young presidency, Mr. Trump has made a course correction."
Trump exploded at the coverage, Woodward reports. "That was the biggest fucking mistake I've made," the President told Porter. "You never make those concessions. You never apologize. I didn't do anything wrong in the first place. Why look weak?" brainwashed and mindfucked by the twisted ghouls o the left and are no longer capable of rational thought. Ah yes...rational...
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
You're a loser that's fallen for the culture wars lol Grow the fuck up. -PB "Grow the fuck up"? lol
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
To be honest I actually didn't even know who was on what side of that argument in that article. It was a commentary on the availability of guns and the potential for things to go south when shit goes down. But if you like Rus. A plethora of guns - non-partisan fact hot heads - non-partisan fact deeply divided partisan country - non-partisan fact. So none of those statements are left or right wing. As for the statement 'a race baiting president' that's factual. Refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides. (Reluctantly changed course 2 days after the fact.) And given the opportunity to denounce white supremacists at the last debate refused to do so. It's not my fault your bloke is a race baiting, dog whistling prick. Here's an article about his form. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/the-end-of-denial/614194/Also an excerpt from a book on Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/woodward-book-trump-charlottesville/index.htmlTrump's August 2017 remarks concluding there was "blame on both sides" for the violence was a stunning moment early in his presidency that ignited a backlash over his views on race and consumed the White House for days. The new revelations may reopen that debate.
In the book, Woodward describes how then-White House staff secretary Rob Porter worked with Trump to write a second speech to try to repair his initial comments about violence at the marches.
Porter tried to convince the President he needed to clarify his remarks. But Trump appeared to resist, according to the book, repeatedly saying: "I don't know about this. ... This doesn't feel right to me."
Eventually, Trump agreed, and two days later in a televised speech he denounced racism, the "KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups." Woodward describes how White House aides were relieved, and chief of staff John Kelly encouraged staff to tell the President what a good job he did.
But then Trump turned on the TV.
One Fox News commentator gave Trump praise but also added, "That's almost an admission of 'Okay, I was wrong.'" Then Fox News correspondent Kevin Corke said: "Some 48 hours into the biggest domestic challenge of his young presidency, Mr. Trump has made a course correction."
Trump exploded at the coverage, Woodward reports. "That was the biggest fucking mistake I've made," the President told Porter. "You never make those concessions. You never apologize. I didn't do anything wrong in the first place. Why look weak?" https://www.factcheck.org/2020/02/trump-has-condemned-white-supremacists/Trump Has Condemned White SupremacistsTrump drew criticism for his condemnation of “hatred, bigotry and violence on many sides” after a rally organized by a white nationalist in Charlottesville in 2017, and for saying there were “very fine people on both sides.” But, contrary to Biden’s claim, the president twice specifically condemned white supremacists and neo-Nazis, and he has repeated that condemnation since.
Trump has said his “very fine people” comment referred not to white supremacists and neo-Nazis but to “people that went because they felt very strongly about the monument to Robert E. Lee — a great general, whether you like it or not.”This is what Trump ACTUALLY said "You had some very bad people in that group, but you also had people that were very fine people, on both sides. ... I saw the same pictures as you did. You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name. ... So you know what, it's fine. You're changing history. You're changing culture. And you had people — and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally — but you had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally Condemned totally So what you wrote, Muz, is completely flat out false, but I do not hold you accountable for parroting mischievous, deliberately misleading information that is designed purely to damage the president, for as Jesus once said, forgive them Father, for they know what what they do. But I do hold you accountable for acquainting yourself with evil, leftist propaganda that seeks to seeks to mislead and misinform people for purely political purposes. It proves that you have indeed allowed yourself to be brainwashed and mindfucked by the twisted ghouls o the left and are no longer capable of rational thought.
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
You're a loser that's fallen for the culture wars lol Grow the fuck up. -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
To be honest I actually didn't even know who was on what side of that argument in that article. It was a commentary on the availability of guns and the potential for things to go south when shit goes down. But if you like Rus. A plethora of guns - non-partisan fact hot heads - non-partisan fact deeply divided partisan country - non-partisan fact. So none of those statements are left or right wing. As for the statement 'a race baiting president' that's factual. Refused to disavow white nationalists in Charlottsville saying that were good people on both sides. (Reluctantly changed course 2 days after the fact.) And given the opportunity to denounce white supremacists at the last debate refused to do so. It's not my fault your bloke is a race baiting, dog whistling prick. Here's an article about his form. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/09/the-end-of-denial/614194/Also an excerpt from a book on Trump. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/04/politics/woodward-book-trump-charlottesville/index.htmlTrump's August 2017 remarks concluding there was "blame on both sides" for the violence was a stunning moment early in his presidency that ignited a backlash over his views on race and consumed the White House for days. The new revelations may reopen that debate.
In the book, Woodward describes how then-White House staff secretary Rob Porter worked with Trump to write a second speech to try to repair his initial comments about violence at the marches.
Porter tried to convince the President he needed to clarify his remarks. But Trump appeared to resist, according to the book, repeatedly saying: "I don't know about this. ... This doesn't feel right to me."
Eventually, Trump agreed, and two days later in a televised speech he denounced racism, the "KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists and other hate groups." Woodward describes how White House aides were relieved, and chief of staff John Kelly encouraged staff to tell the President what a good job he did.
But then Trump turned on the TV.
One Fox News commentator gave Trump praise but also added, "That's almost an admission of 'Okay, I was wrong.'" Then Fox News correspondent Kevin Corke said: "Some 48 hours into the biggest domestic challenge of his young presidency, Mr. Trump has made a course correction."
Trump exploded at the coverage, Woodward reports. "That was the biggest fucking mistake I've made," the President told Porter. "You never make those concessions. You never apologize. I didn't do anything wrong in the first place. Why look weak?"
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
I think everyone needs to calm down and stand down...
|
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Ahhhh so it was the Trump supporters fault he got shot dead, because he’s a “hot head”, and it’s Trump’s fault because he’s a “race baiting” president? But it’s not the private security guards fault who pulled the trigger, even though he espoused left wing anti Trump views. Ah I see what’s going on here:
Left wing = good, moral and innocent
Right wing = bad, immoral, race baiting, hot head, guilty
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
But Trump supporters don't like Fauci so I'm not sure who it is they're appealing too lol -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Trump with some Soviet era style propaganda. https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/in-brazen-manipulation-trump-campaign-twists-fauci-comment-to-suggest-praise-of-president-20201012-p5644e.html"The comments attributed to me without my permission in the GOP campaign ad were taken out of context from a broad statement I made months ago about the efforts of federal public health officials," Fauci in a statement provided to CNN when asked if he agreed to be featured in the ad.
Things must be desperate when you have to falsely attribute statements to make you look good. Presumably TDS's if he was doing a bang up job there'd be loads of positive statements to cherry pick?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Looks like it was a security guard with a news crew who shot the guy. Not saying he deserved to be shot but why the fuck would you use bear mace like that. How stupid could you get?
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+xA plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong? Another season of Keeping up with the Kardashians? -PB
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
A plethora of guns, a race baiting president, hot heads and a deeply divided partisan country. What could possibly go wrong?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xOk. I thought Trump was pushing Barr for this investigation material to be released but Barr said it won’t be ready before the Election Day. Or am I mixing things up? It makes no difference anyway. It's all lies. The Russians hacked the DNC and ran a disinformation campaign and tried to influence the election in 2016. They were also heavily involved in brexit. There's more than enough evidence, independently verified, by multiple agencies and organisations, public and private, that confirm this is what happened. Only someone with TDS would take the word of Russia over the collective investigations of these multiple agencies and organisations. Enzo's best gambit here is a bloke who hasn't worked for the CIA since 1990 who has put out a theory not backed by everyone in his own group on a website that is far from credible. This is what wilful ignorance looks like folks. The point I wanted to make is that with Trump in charge for 3.5 years, he has found nothing. The point is you can't find anything until the files are released. But doesn’t the AG have full access to those records? Yes . They do have access to the files If that’s the case, then if there was something damning, it would be released by now but Barr is saying they might get it done post election...
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|