Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xCan you please expand on this because, generally speaking, your NSL fanbois will tell you anyone and everyone were welcome.
I can give but a single data point: I was trialling with a Capital City "big" Club in the late 70s (had no real hope of anything, I was crap, but the coaches were really welcoming and encouraging). After training one day I was confronted by 3 angry 2nd team players who spoke (shouted) at me, but only in the language of their forefathers. A player who I had been training with raced up and interpreted. The angry chaps were accusing me of being the agent of a foreign government, interspersed with accusations of being an agent of ASIO. Death threats (genuine) were made and they left. My friend indicated it would be best if I dropped out and never attended a game even as a spectator. I took the advice. As a spectator at other Clubs I was never once rejected or spoken to in anything other than the most welcoming terms. After game visits to the Club were always brilliant no matter the ethnicity or non-ethnicity of the Club's founders and sponsors. Wow that's an incredible, almost unbelievable, story. Sorry this happened to you and hope you didn't let this experience influence your opinion of all migrants to Australia? Could you tell me which big city club in the late 70s had players who couldn't speak English? Most of the children of European migrants would probably have had a better handle on English than their parent's mother tongues by the late 70s, so I'm curious to know? Unless you trialled for a Vietnamese, Cambodian or Thai club?? They would have been the wave of newly arrived migrants of the time who probably couldn't threaten you in English and needed a translator? No. You have misunderstood. All the players spoke Oz English no accent normally. The three that confronted me chose not to on that one occasion. They spoke in the language of Club's founders ethnicity. At the time I was very confused but not initially alarmed at all. It was only when my training mate explained what was going on that I genuinely felt "bloody scared". One of the guys blood was really up and he was genuinely arced up. Looking back, maybe they tried to trap me into revealing that I could understand? Why? I dunno. Just had no warning, no clue, no idea and I never, ever even thought of returning. They were probably the first genuinely blood-up threat I had ever faced. Very confused, followed by shit scared, but still confused, was how I left the field. As for affecting views of recent migrants? LOL no. I happily went to every NSL and State League game (and club house) I could get too after. Never, ever had so much as anything but a big smile and welcome wherever I went. Yes, there were games I left early as a few dickheads started throwing shit around, but really, that was actually so rare in my personal experience that it wasn't a problem. The shit that went down at the U20 youth World Cup in Sydney OTOH should have seen Australia banned for decades. Hey mate that's disgusting behaviour and I hate that you had to experience it on a football pitch...or anywhere else for that matter Thanks for taking the time to explain btw. With the U20 WC was that the time they formed a swastika in the stands against Israel? I despise that nationalistic, racist garbage but you're right, a few really rotten apples shouldn't paint the whole picture....
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xRandom question: i know nsl crowd averages were around 4-5k. Were any of south melbourne, melbourne croatia, sydney croatia etc getting much more than that on average back then? Does it matter? That was 18 years ago my dude. Big derbies back in the NSL days used to get large (for the time and for the grounds the matches were played at) crowds but not even close to what peak Aleague did.... Its amazing what mainstream media acceptance and a professional broadcast deal can do..... More worrying is the NSL took a decade to reach the same amount of decline the Aleague dropped too over 3-4 years. NSL tried suger rush marquees, too, it tried expansion and contraction to stem the bleeding also... One thing it didnt do properly is have an open pyramid from the grassroots to the top, open and fair for all. With incentive and appropriate funding allocation to develop from the grassroots up. ..... It stared dying once its initial group of fans started walking away .... sound familiar? I mean I'm curious how the top clubs were doing at their peak for season crowd averages Mate, their "peak" was 25 years ago, a time before the internet, and streaming, were the population of Australia was 6 or 7 million less than it is now. A time when the league was broadcast on fta television ( at 1am in the morning) and any mention of the word "soccer" was often followed closely by the words "go back to your own country" Where most grounds didn't have seats and the average Joe blow fan couldn't afford a flight to Brisbane or Perth because Ansett and Qantas certainly didn't do the Jetstar early bird $50 specials. Tha fact that derbies and finals got crowds better than 1/2 of Aleague games today should tell you what you need to know. f you want to do some spreadsheets , or analyse the data as some indication of who did what and when...,its pointless, as a reflection of today's reality in my opinion as once well supported clubs have been decimated by Lowys vengeance all these years but knock yourself out ozfootball,is your friend. http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSL.shtml The one thing missing from Ozfootball is season crowd averages. They have pretty good records on individual crowds but nothing collated. The NSL averaged 3-4000 for most of its existence, arcing up a little higher to 5000+ in the late 1990s when Perth Glory and Northern Spirit were packing them in, then cratering again in the early 2000s. Sometimes derbies for the traditional clubs got relatively big attendances, sometimes not. I remember going to Olympic vs Marconi at Leichhardt Oval in 1996 and being dazzled by the size of the crowd, unprecedented in my experience. In reality, it was a smidge under 12,000, which is only slightly above the all-time A-League average crowd in the pre-Covid era. I did a rough spreadsheet totalling attendances for the last 3 seasons of the NSL. Season 2001/2 Average attendance 5166 Season 2002/3 Average attendance 3853 Season 2003/4 Average attendance 4121 Over those 3 seasons the average attendance for each club in descending order was: Adelaide United 12568 1 season only Perth Glory 10844 Newcastle 5957 South Melbourne 5935 Sydney Olympic 4110 Melbourne Knights 3743 Sydney United 3328 Northern Spirit 3042 Parramatta 3000 Wollongong 2999 Brisbane 2728 NZ Kingz 2586 Marconi 2549 oh nice! Marconi seemed a bigger club back in the early 90s, perhaps their performances were poor. If South Melbourne get around those numbers again you would have to think they should be promoted. Of course they have lost a lot of support due to the npl system, I'd be surprised if they couldn't get some of it back. The rest are really what I hope are crowd averages in a 2nd division. I think having crowds in the top division twice the crowds in the 2nd division are pretty normal around the world? Grazor, 1st v 2nd NPL VIC on a pretty cold Saturday night at Lakeside this weekend.... Total stab in the dark but about 1800-2000 in attendance for what its worth... https://twitter.com/smfcmike/status/1548638674937450496?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet pretty decent! Thanks for the info!
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
The FFA Cup shows what is possible with football in this country. I am legitimately so excited so see the second and maybe even third tier of football advance the game.
|
|
|
Hillbilly55
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 564,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe FFA Cup shows what is possible with football in this country. I am legitimately so excited so see the second and maybe even third tier of football advance the game. Yes, the game last night showed that there isn't that big a gap between the APL and NPL, so the NSD should be a viable entity from the get go. And the third tier also makes sense. On a different note, how good is the Victorian NPL. Several teams coming through the Australia Cup look good. Maybe fighting the angst of the AFL dominated media etc gives the teams there added strength and purpose.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe FFA Cup shows what is possible with football in this country. I am legitimately so excited so see the second and maybe even third tier of football advance the game. I heard a filthy rumour last weekend........ NSD start date now pushed out to March 2024 or maybe 2025 or ........... not sure of the model yet, still "consulting" with stakeholders. Apparently the APL were popping champagne corks this week....... I hope it happens in your life time bud, Im in my 40s and I dont think Ill get to see it in mine :(
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThe FFA Cup shows what is possible with football in this country. I am legitimately so excited so see the second and maybe even third tier of football advance the game. I heard a filthy rumour last weekend........ NSD start date now pushed out to March 2024 or maybe 2025 or ........... not sure of the model yet, still "consulting" with stakeholders. Apparently the APL were popping champagne corks this week....... I hope it happens in your life time bud, Im in my 40s and I dont think Ill get to see it in mine :( This thread was started in 2017 with the NSD to kick off in 2018. I wanna see it happen (and it will), but it will take ages. For the record, I seem to recall various announcements about Football Australia being about to create a national cup a good 2 or 3 years before the FFA cup started.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Only one person had the clout to get this off the ground, early on when he had all the "stakeholders" by the short and curlies. It didn't happen then, and now with: - dozens of stakeholders to appease, plus - the APL and A-League clubs being more powerful than ever,
well, let's just say, it involves many more degrees and levels of fine tuning, lobbying, bludgeoning and duchessing - in no particular order.
And, if it does get off the ground - there are really no guarantees that it will look anything like many were hoping.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOnly one person had the clout to get this off the ground, early on when he had all the "stakeholders" by the short and curlies. It didn't happen then, and now with: - dozens of stakeholders to appease, plus - the APL and A-League clubs being more powerful than ever, well, let's just say, it involves many more degrees and levels of fine tuning, lobbying, bludgeoning and duchessing - in no particular order. And, if it does get off the ground - there are really no guarantees that it will look anything like many were hoping. The only guarantee is that the financial investment of a bunch of foreigners will be protected above everything.....
|
|
|
SWandP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xCan you please expand on this because, generally speaking, your NSL fanbois will tell you anyone and everyone were welcome.
I can give but a single data point: I was trialling with a Capital City "big" Club in the late 70s (had no real hope of anything, I was crap, but the coaches were really welcoming and encouraging). After training one day I was confronted by 3 angry 2nd team players who spoke (shouted) at me, but only in the language of their forefathers. A player who I had been training with raced up and interpreted. The angry chaps were accusing me of being the agent of a foreign government, interspersed with accusations of being an agent of ASIO. Death threats (genuine) were made and they left. My friend indicated it would be best if I dropped out and never attended a game even as a spectator. I took the advice. As a spectator at other Clubs I was never once rejected or spoken to in anything other than the most welcoming terms. After game visits to the Club were always brilliant no matter the ethnicity or non-ethnicity of the Club's founders and sponsors. Wow that's an incredible, almost unbelievable, story. Sorry this happened to you and hope you didn't let this experience influence your opinion of all migrants to Australia? Could you tell me which big city club in the late 70s had players who couldn't speak English? Most of the children of European migrants would probably have had a better handle on English than their parent's mother tongues by the late 70s, so I'm curious to know? Unless you trialled for a Vietnamese, Cambodian or Thai club?? They would have been the wave of newly arrived migrants of the time who probably couldn't threaten you in English and needed a translator? No. You have misunderstood. All the players spoke Oz English no accent normally. The three that confronted me chose not to on that one occasion. They spoke in the language of Club's founders ethnicity. At the time I was very confused but not initially alarmed at all. It was only when my training mate explained what was going on that I genuinely felt "bloody scared". One of the guys blood was really up and he was genuinely arced up. Looking back, maybe they tried to trap me into revealing that I could understand? Why? I dunno. Just had no warning, no clue, no idea and I never, ever even thought of returning. They were probably the first genuinely blood-up threat I had ever faced. Very confused, followed by shit scared, but still confused, was how I left the field. As for affecting views of recent migrants? LOL no. I happily went to every NSL and State League game (and club house) I could get too after. Never, ever had so much as anything but a big smile and welcome wherever I went. Yes, there were games I left early as a few dickheads started throwing shit around, but really, that was actually so rare in my personal experience that it wasn't a problem. The shit that went down at the U20 youth World Cup in Sydney OTOH should have seen Australia banned for decades. Hey mate that's disgusting behaviour and I hate that you had to experience it on a football pitch...or anywhere else for that matter Thanks for taking the time to explain btw. With the U20 WC was that the time they formed a swastika in the stands against Israel? I despise that nationalistic, racist garbage but you're right, a few really rotten apples shouldn't paint the whole picture.... No. First big "event". The initial group of four playing in Sydney was Australia, England, Argentina and Cameroon. England beat Cameroon in the first game with two dodgy as shit diving penaltys (iirc) in a game Cameroon dominated. The match was at the Cricket Ground No2 Oval where the SFS now stands. It was 2 matches, one ticket, in one night. There was a large "English Supporters" group all decked out as "bovver boys" who were singing and jumping around seeming noisy but harmless, at one end. Next to them on the South East side were the Argentine supporters with drums, horns, banners and streamers. There would have been maybe 500ish in each group and they were side by side more or less. Australia beat Argentina 2-1 after yet another dive was awarded a penalty against the home side. At the end of the game, the crowd started to disperse slowly through the narrow exits when all hell broke loose. The "English" fans suddenly advanced on the Argentine crowd chanting "Argentina you're out" while throwing bottles, sticks, bins, and anything they could rip up really. I was (with mates) maybe 20 metres away from the clash line desperately seeking shelter as rocks and bottles starting hitting people and buildings around us. A massive surge erupted at the exits and people were screaming and trying to run over other people. The Argentine men seemed to form a barrier in front of the "boys" and just stood there soaking it up before the line was charged. At that point, hell was loose on earth. I stood back to back with my mates and we just stood and tried to survive and help people get by. I saw an old couple, seemingly in their 60s or 70s go up a wall and over a barbed wire barrier. They got hung up but didn't care just kept going. Bottles smashing, people screaming. And I mean the kind of screams of mortal terror that Hollywood can't emulate. It's a horrible sound that still makes me choke. As soon as we could, we backed around and went over the fence on to the field. There was about a dozen cops who had formed a ring near the south-east side. A couple of others were charging into the mess and dragging out the badly injured and laying them in the middle of the ring for protection. There was an "English" supporter with a corner flag who was trying to skewer the wounded. The papers reported the next day that many had been stabbed. I don't know because I didn't hang round to chat. Ran to the western side and found a way out. Across the park and we ran to all the way to Central listening to the sirens and finally calmed down. Next match there was a ring of riot police 2 metres apart right round the ground watching the crowd. Perfect behaviour! Comes the semis and England was knocked out by Qatar at the SCG. Hardly a cop there. Pitch invasion with the "bovver boys" using bottles, fists and boots in an attack on the Qatari players as they tried to get away. A couple of England players tried to protect them, so they were attacked too. Oddly enough, this crowd behaviour did not enhance our game in the eyes of the wider public. How the fuck we ever deserved a chance again after that disgrace I will never know. Now the zinger. A lot of effort by the Sydney Journos was put in to find out who was involved and of course to beat it up and muck rake. (They were probably entitled this one time). It was reported and interviews were published in the papers, and on air, that a large number of the "hooligans" were just local lads who thought it might be fun to emulate the problems that were tearing the English Leagues apart at the time. I don't know. I don't care. But the living memory of those and one other occasion (also Sydney) make me just shake my head when I hear people complain of too much police presence at big games. It doesn't upset me at all.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xCan you please expand on this because, generally speaking, your NSL fanbois will tell you anyone and everyone were welcome.
I can give but a single data point: I was trialling with a Capital City "big" Club in the late 70s (had no real hope of anything, I was crap, but the coaches were really welcoming and encouraging). After training one day I was confronted by 3 angry 2nd team players who spoke (shouted) at me, but only in the language of their forefathers. A player who I had been training with raced up and interpreted. The angry chaps were accusing me of being the agent of a foreign government, interspersed with accusations of being an agent of ASIO. Death threats (genuine) were made and they left. My friend indicated it would be best if I dropped out and never attended a game even as a spectator. I took the advice. As a spectator at other Clubs I was never once rejected or spoken to in anything other than the most welcoming terms. After game visits to the Club were always brilliant no matter the ethnicity or non-ethnicity of the Club's founders and sponsors. Wow that's an incredible, almost unbelievable, story. Sorry this happened to you and hope you didn't let this experience influence your opinion of all migrants to Australia? Could you tell me which big city club in the late 70s had players who couldn't speak English? Most of the children of European migrants would probably have had a better handle on English than their parent's mother tongues by the late 70s, so I'm curious to know? Unless you trialled for a Vietnamese, Cambodian or Thai club?? They would have been the wave of newly arrived migrants of the time who probably couldn't threaten you in English and needed a translator? No. You have misunderstood. All the players spoke Oz English no accent normally. The three that confronted me chose not to on that one occasion. They spoke in the language of Club's founders ethnicity. At the time I was very confused but not initially alarmed at all. It was only when my training mate explained what was going on that I genuinely felt "bloody scared". One of the guys blood was really up and he was genuinely arced up. Looking back, maybe they tried to trap me into revealing that I could understand? Why? I dunno. Just had no warning, no clue, no idea and I never, ever even thought of returning. They were probably the first genuinely blood-up threat I had ever faced. Very confused, followed by shit scared, but still confused, was how I left the field. As for affecting views of recent migrants? LOL no. I happily went to every NSL and State League game (and club house) I could get too after. Never, ever had so much as anything but a big smile and welcome wherever I went. Yes, there were games I left early as a few dickheads started throwing shit around, but really, that was actually so rare in my personal experience that it wasn't a problem. The shit that went down at the U20 youth World Cup in Sydney OTOH should have seen Australia banned for decades. Hey mate that's disgusting behaviour and I hate that you had to experience it on a football pitch...or anywhere else for that matter Thanks for taking the time to explain btw. With the U20 WC was that the time they formed a swastika in the stands against Israel? I despise that nationalistic, racist garbage but you're right, a few really rotten apples shouldn't paint the whole picture.... No. First big "event". The initial group of four playing in Sydney was Australia, England, Argentina and Cameroon. England beat Cameroon in the first game with two dodgy as shit diving penaltys (iirc) in a game Cameroon dominated. The match was at the Cricket Ground No2 Oval where the SFS now stands. It was 2 matches, one ticket, in one night. There was a large "English Supporters" group all decked out as "bovver boys" who were singing and jumping around seeming noisy but harmless, at one end. Next to them on the South East side were the Argentine supporters with drums, horns, banners and streamers. There would have been maybe 500ish in each group and they were side by side more or less. Australia beat Argentina 2-1 after yet another dive was awarded a penalty against the home side. At the end of the game, the crowd started to disperse slowly through the narrow exits when all hell broke loose. The "English" fans suddenly advanced on the Argentine crowd chanting "Argentina you're out" while throwing bottles, sticks, bins, and anything they could rip up really. I was (with mates) maybe 20 metres away from the clash line desperately seeking shelter as rocks and bottles starting hitting people and buildings around us. A massive surge erupted at the exits and people were screaming and trying to run over other people. The Argentine men seemed to form a barrier in front of the "boys" and just stood there soaking it up before the line was charged. At that point, hell was loose on earth. I stood back to back with my mates and we just stood and tried to survive and help people get by. I saw an old couple, seemingly in their 60s or 70s go up a wall and over a barbed wire barrier. They got hung up but didn't care just kept going. Bottles smashing, people screaming. And I mean the kind of screams of mortal terror that Hollywood can't emulate. It's a horrible sound that still makes me choke. As soon as we could, we backed around and went over the fence on to the field. There was about a dozen cops who had formed a ring near the south-east side. A couple of others were charging into the mess and dragging out the badly injured and laying them in the middle of the ring for protection. There was an "English" supporter with a corner flag who was trying to skewer the wounded. The papers reported the next day that many had been stabbed. I don't know because I didn't hang round to chat. Ran to the western side and found a way out. Across the park and we ran to all the way to Central listening to the sirens and finally calmed down. Next match there was a ring of riot police 2 metres apart right round the ground watching the crowd. Perfect behaviour! Comes the semis and England was knocked out by Qatar at the SCG. Hardly a cop there. Pitch invasion with the "bovver boys" using bottles, fists and boots in an attack on the Qatari players as they tried to get away. A couple of England players tried to protect them, so they were attacked too. Oddly enough, this crowd behaviour did not enhance our game in the eyes of the wider public. How the fuck we ever deserved a chance again after that disgrace I will never know. Now the zinger. A lot of effort by the Sydney Journos was put in to find out who was involved and of course to beat it up and muck rake. (They were probably entitled this one time). It was reported and interviews were published in the papers, and on air, that a large number of the "hooligans" were just local lads who thought it might be fun to emulate the problems that were tearing the English Leagues apart at the time. I don't know. I don't care. But the living memory of those and one other occasion (also Sydney) make me just shake my head when I hear people complain of too much police presence at big games. It doesn't upset me at all. Jesus Christ...... sounds like a battlefield. Seen a few similar incidents down here but thankfully not that many... Guys complaining about police today never had to stand behind police horses with coppers in full riot gear to watch a game between their legs... heheheheheheh Yeah the Coca Cola Cup in 81 right? I have a real hazy recollection of Dad taking me to Olympic Park down here to see Brazil v Italy ...
|
|
|
SWandP
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xCan you please expand on this because, generally speaking, your NSL fanbois will tell you anyone and everyone were welcome.
I can give but a single data point: I was trialling with a Capital City "big" Club in the late 70s (had no real hope of anything, I was crap, but the coaches were really welcoming and encouraging). After training one day I was confronted by 3 angry 2nd team players who spoke (shouted) at me, but only in the language of their forefathers. A player who I had been training with raced up and interpreted. The angry chaps were accusing me of being the agent of a foreign government, interspersed with accusations of being an agent of ASIO. Death threats (genuine) were made and they left. My friend indicated it would be best if I dropped out and never attended a game even as a spectator. I took the advice. As a spectator at other Clubs I was never once rejected or spoken to in anything other than the most welcoming terms. After game visits to the Club were always brilliant no matter the ethnicity or non-ethnicity of the Club's founders and sponsors. Wow that's an incredible, almost unbelievable, story. Sorry this happened to you and hope you didn't let this experience influence your opinion of all migrants to Australia? Could you tell me which big city club in the late 70s had players who couldn't speak English? Most of the children of European migrants would probably have had a better handle on English than their parent's mother tongues by the late 70s, so I'm curious to know? Unless you trialled for a Vietnamese, Cambodian or Thai club?? They would have been the wave of newly arrived migrants of the time who probably couldn't threaten you in English and needed a translator? No. You have misunderstood. All the players spoke Oz English no accent normally. The three that confronted me chose not to on that one occasion. They spoke in the language of Club's founders ethnicity. At the time I was very confused but not initially alarmed at all. It was only when my training mate explained what was going on that I genuinely felt "bloody scared". One of the guys blood was really up and he was genuinely arced up. Looking back, maybe they tried to trap me into revealing that I could understand? Why? I dunno. Just had no warning, no clue, no idea and I never, ever even thought of returning. They were probably the first genuinely blood-up threat I had ever faced. Very confused, followed by shit scared, but still confused, was how I left the field. As for affecting views of recent migrants? LOL no. I happily went to every NSL and State League game (and club house) I could get too after. Never, ever had so much as anything but a big smile and welcome wherever I went. Yes, there were games I left early as a few dickheads started throwing shit around, but really, that was actually so rare in my personal experience that it wasn't a problem. The shit that went down at the U20 youth World Cup in Sydney OTOH should have seen Australia banned for decades. Hey mate that's disgusting behaviour and I hate that you had to experience it on a football pitch...or anywhere else for that matter Thanks for taking the time to explain btw. With the U20 WC was that the time they formed a swastika in the stands against Israel? I despise that nationalistic, racist garbage but you're right, a few really rotten apples shouldn't paint the whole picture.... No. First big "event". The initial group of four playing in Sydney was Australia, England, Argentina and Cameroon. England beat Cameroon in the first game with two dodgy as shit diving penaltys (iirc) in a game Cameroon dominated. The match was at the Cricket Ground No2 Oval where the SFS now stands. It was 2 matches, one ticket, in one night. There was a large "English Supporters" group all decked out as "bovver boys" who were singing and jumping around seeming noisy but harmless, at one end. Next to them on the South East side were the Argentine supporters with drums, horns, banners and streamers. There would have been maybe 500ish in each group and they were side by side more or less. Australia beat Argentina 2-1 after yet another dive was awarded a penalty against the home side. At the end of the game, the crowd started to disperse slowly through the narrow exits when all hell broke loose. The "English" fans suddenly advanced on the Argentine crowd chanting "Argentina you're out" while throwing bottles, sticks, bins, and anything they could rip up really. I was (with mates) maybe 20 metres away from the clash line desperately seeking shelter as rocks and bottles starting hitting people and buildings around us. A massive surge erupted at the exits and people were screaming and trying to run over other people. The Argentine men seemed to form a barrier in front of the "boys" and just stood there soaking it up before the line was charged. At that point, hell was loose on earth. I stood back to back with my mates and we just stood and tried to survive and help people get by. I saw an old couple, seemingly in their 60s or 70s go up a wall and over a barbed wire barrier. They got hung up but didn't care just kept going. Bottles smashing, people screaming. And I mean the kind of screams of mortal terror that Hollywood can't emulate. It's a horrible sound that still makes me choke. As soon as we could, we backed around and went over the fence on to the field. There was about a dozen cops who had formed a ring near the south-east side. A couple of others were charging into the mess and dragging out the badly injured and laying them in the middle of the ring for protection. There was an "English" supporter with a corner flag who was trying to skewer the wounded. The papers reported the next day that many had been stabbed. I don't know because I didn't hang round to chat. Ran to the western side and found a way out. Across the park and we ran to all the way to Central listening to the sirens and finally calmed down. Next match there was a ring of riot police 2 metres apart right round the ground watching the crowd. Perfect behaviour! Comes the semis and England was knocked out by Qatar at the SCG. Hardly a cop there. Pitch invasion with the "bovver boys" using bottles, fists and boots in an attack on the Qatari players as they tried to get away. A couple of England players tried to protect them, so they were attacked too. Oddly enough, this crowd behaviour did not enhance our game in the eyes of the wider public. How the fuck we ever deserved a chance again after that disgrace I will never know. Now the zinger. A lot of effort by the Sydney Journos was put in to find out who was involved and of course to beat it up and muck rake. (They were probably entitled this one time). It was reported and interviews were published in the papers, and on air, that a large number of the "hooligans" were just local lads who thought it might be fun to emulate the problems that were tearing the English Leagues apart at the time. I don't know. I don't care. But the living memory of those and one other occasion (also Sydney) make me just shake my head when I hear people complain of too much police presence at big games. It doesn't upset me at all. Jesus Christ...... sounds like a battlefield. Seen a few similar incidents down here but thankfully not that many... Guys complaining about police today never had to stand behind police horses with coppers in full riot gear to watch a game between their legs... heheheheheheh Yeah the Coca Cola Cup in 81 right? I have a real hazy recollection of Dad taking me to Olympic Park down here to see Brazil v Italy ... Yeah that was right. Was actually called World Youth Championship or such I think. Some fantastic games. Qatar was the big surprise, belted by Germany in the final though. Maybe didn't recover after the attack. The other team to note was the rise of Cameroon. They looked to have a big future. :) Anyway this is now way off topic. Some 2nd Div update news would be fantastic. Good to see Brisbane City in action again this week. Been a long time since their NSL days. Must be busting to get serious again.
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xRandom question: i know nsl crowd averages were around 4-5k. Were any of south melbourne, melbourne croatia, sydney croatia etc getting much more than that on average back then? Does it matter? That was 18 years ago my dude. Big derbies back in the NSL days used to get large (for the time and for the grounds the matches were played at) crowds but not even close to what peak Aleague did.... Its amazing what mainstream media acceptance and a professional broadcast deal can do..... More worrying is the NSL took a decade to reach the same amount of decline the Aleague dropped too over 3-4 years. NSL tried suger rush marquees, too, it tried expansion and contraction to stem the bleeding also... One thing it didnt do properly is have an open pyramid from the grassroots to the top, open and fair for all. With incentive and appropriate funding allocation to develop from the grassroots up. ..... It stared dying once its initial group of fans started walking away .... sound familiar? I mean I'm curious how the top clubs were doing at their peak for season crowd averages Mate, their "peak" was 25 years ago, a time before the internet, and streaming, were the population of Australia was 6 or 7 million less than it is now. A time when the league was broadcast on fta television ( at 1am in the morning) and any mention of the word "soccer" was often followed closely by the words "go back to your own country" Where most grounds didn't have seats and the average Joe blow fan couldn't afford a flight to Brisbane or Perth because Ansett and Qantas certainly didn't do the Jetstar early bird $50 specials. Tha fact that derbies and finals got crowds better than 1/2 of Aleague games today should tell you what you need to know. f you want to do some spreadsheets , or analyse the data as some indication of who did what and when...,its pointless, as a reflection of today's reality in my opinion as once well supported clubs have been decimated by Lowys vengeance all these years but knock yourself out ozfootball,is your friend. http://www.ozfootball.net/ark/NSL/NSL.shtml The one thing missing from Ozfootball is season crowd averages. They have pretty good records on individual crowds but nothing collated. The NSL averaged 3-4000 for most of its existence, arcing up a little higher to 5000+ in the late 1990s when Perth Glory and Northern Spirit were packing them in, then cratering again in the early 2000s. Sometimes derbies for the traditional clubs got relatively big attendances, sometimes not. I remember going to Olympic vs Marconi at Leichhardt Oval in 1996 and being dazzled by the size of the crowd, unprecedented in my experience. In reality, it was a smidge under 12,000, which is only slightly above the all-time A-League average crowd in the pre-Covid era. I did a rough spreadsheet totalling attendances for the last 3 seasons of the NSL. Season 2001/2 Average attendance 5166 Season 2002/3 Average attendance 3853 Season 2003/4 Average attendance 4121 Over those 3 seasons the average attendance for each club in descending order was: Adelaide United 12568 1 season only Perth Glory 10844 Newcastle 5957 South Melbourne 5935 Sydney Olympic 4110 Melbourne Knights 3743 Sydney United 3328 Northern Spirit 3042 Parramatta 3000 Wollongong 2999 Brisbane 2728 NZ Kingz 2586 Marconi 2549 oh nice! Marconi seemed a bigger club back in the early 90s, perhaps their performances were poor. If South Melbourne get around those numbers again you would have to think they should be promoted. Of course they have lost a lot of support due to the npl system, I'd be surprised if they couldn't get some of it back. The rest are really what I hope are crowd averages in a 2nd division. I think having crowds in the top division twice the crowds in the 2nd division are pretty normal around the world? Including the final NSL season isn't all that representative because in that year, most of the clubs knew they were dead ducks. Besides Adelaide, Perth and South (in that order) bumping the averages, the other clubs were pulling very low attendances. The stench of death was everywhere that year outside Perth and Adelaide which were confident they would be included in a new league (although a big hiccup occurred later for AU after the season was run). South thought they were a strong chance and were really pushing in that year as well. Parra also pushed but besides spending big on their squad, there was nothing much going for them. Some of the clubs were quietly putting together a bid and investing nothing in the season itself (Newcastle United etc). Clubs like Spirit just wanted shit to be over.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Update on the nsd750k liscense fee is around 3 times the running cost in the aafc proposal does anyone know the details? Where they wanting clubs to spend 500k in wages or is the 750k a gift to the ffa?
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Yep from the AAFC back in Feb 22 Participation Fees (incl. travel) 50-60 160-200 210-260 < thats the figure quoted.
Love Football
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xUpdate on the nsd750k liscense fee is around 3 times the running cost in the aafc proposal does anyone know the details? Where they wanting clubs to spend 500k in wages or is the 750k a gift to the ffa? If true, probably a one-off 'Bond' type payment Part of the AAFC criteria is the financial stability of participants.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xUpdate on the nsd750k liscense fee is around 3 times the running cost in the aafc proposal does anyone know the details? Where they wanting clubs to spend 500k in wages or is the 750k a gift to the ffa? If true, probably a one-off 'Bond' type payment Part of the AAFC criteria is the financial stability of participants. So it basically makes a kitty where if a club needs bailing out it can be drawn on?
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xUpdate on the nsd750k liscense fee is around 3 times the running cost in the aafc proposal does anyone know the details? Where they wanting clubs to spend 500k in wages or is the 750k a gift to the ffa? If true, probably a one-off 'Bond' type payment Part of the AAFC criteria is the financial stability of participants. So it basically makes a kitty where if a club needs bailing out it can be drawn on? Read the twitter comments under that link. There's a fairly good discussion going on there.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
REading through that twitter discussion, most are confusing what looks like a one-off payment with annual operating costs. They are two different things, and they should not be confused at all. How much should such a one-off payment be worth? Well, how long is a piece of string? There is a risk that the FA looks at this as a bit of a money making venture. 12 x $750,000 = $9 million The FA aren't going to say no to a $9mill cash injection.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xREading through that twitter discussion, most are confusing what looks like a one-off payment with annual operating costs. They are two different things, and they should not be confused at all. How much should such a one-off payment be worth? Well, how long is a piece of string? There is a risk that the FA looks at this as a bit of a money making venture. 12 x $750,000 = $9 million The FA aren't going to say no to a $9mill cash injection. Might not be cash. If it's only a Stability thing, bank guarantee or equivalent. Note this just a rumour atm
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xREading through that twitter discussion, most are confusing what looks like a one-off payment with annual operating costs. They are two different things, and they should not be confused at all. How much should such a one-off payment be worth? Well, how long is a piece of string? There is a risk that the FA looks at this as a bit of a money making venture. 12 x $750,000 = $9 million The FA aren't going to say no to a $9mill cash injection. Might not be cash. If it's only a Stability thing, bank guarantee or equivalent. Note this just a rumour atm Yes, good point, could well be the case.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
Personally Im not against a one off license fee of 750k. It aligns with the club licensing parameters JJ wants to implement and, if used as a "kitty" to market the league, possible financial bonus for performance etc etc could be a good pool of funds... Any new club promoted into the top tier would need to pay the 750K as well as have all other criteria in place before promotion...... not a bad thing in my books. Anyway, the way I read it it is more the opening salvo of negotiations, will be plenty of back and forth before a figure is settled on I guess. At least it sort of seems like maybe something is happening.....
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]Have the geographical spread people actually looked at a population map of Australia? 1/3 of Australians live in Greater Sydney or Melbourne.
Half the places you dummies suggest can't even keep a team in the NPL and you think they'll last longer then a season in an NSD lol. 40% actually which means 60% of the population doesn't live in Sydney or Melbourne and those 60% have as much right as anyone else to be represented in the NSD. Looking at regional population centres the places that might be able to support a club are:- Queensland could have a club in Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. New South Wales could have a club in Newcastle and Wollongong. ACT could have a club in Canberra. Victoria could have a club in Geelong. Tasmania could have a club in Hobart. Say 5 of them get up then there is the 5 mainland state capitals to share the remaining 7 or 9 spots in the competition. Geographical spread isn't a stupid idea at all in fact the opposite is the case if we want to grow the game across the whole country. His point is still valid. 40% concentrated in two cities is one thing, 60% spread across a whole continent is something else again. Anyway, this idea that a certain place "deserves" a team is actually part of the problem.In a full pyramid, the only team that deserves anything is whoever can earn it on the pitch. I take it then that you don't think that any clubs in Sydney or Melbourne deserve to be in the NSD because of the population concentration there. When you are starting a competition and there has been no opportunity for clubs to show football merit to win a spot then it is normal to accept bids that are in the best interests of the success of the competition. What constitutes "the best interest of the competition" needs to be transparent in the bid documents so everyone can shape their bid accordingly. Once the competition is up and running and P/R is in play then football merit along with the other requirements to obtain and hold a licence will decide who is promoted. Western United and Macarthur Rams are what you get when you try and geographically 'represent' an area. Friggin basket cases both of them. Despite Melbourne Storm being in the NRL for decades they are yet to even have a miniscule toehold in Victoria besides expat NSWelshman and Bananas going to their matches. Ditto taking the State of Origin and the Wallabies to places like Perth, Adelaide and Melbourne. Waste of time that has done nothing to grow the game and has simply denied fans the opportunity to see these matches in states where people actually play the game. My take is invite bidders and take the best 12, 14, 16 teams that meet the criteria and go from there. It's inevitable that the wealthier clubs are going to have a head start and they're going to be predominantly from major centres and so what?. Given all things being equal on paper between 2 competing bidders then maybe, MAYBE, think about geographical representation. No bidding Page 23 "Widest Feasible Geographic spread " & qualification through Competitive football matches 'bidding' as in meeting the minimum competition requirements with regards lighting, ground, financials to suport team, sponsorships, media etc and then selecting the best 'bidders' from them. Sorry , When you said bidding I thought you meant bidding. Meeting the licensing. criteria is a simple Yes or No, there is no Best Bid. This is fundamental to P&R. Once you meet the minimum criteria, the only bid you can make is on the park. As it should be. How do you get the fist 12 teams from all the different NPLs without "bidding" to/from within the AAFC? Fair question and one that will be the most challenging to answer fairly. The licencing criteria will (should) be fairly stringent so I am guessing it will automatically rule out 3/4 of the clubs in NPL as it stands... of the remaining 30 or 40 I reckon only half would be in any position (right now) to want to or be able to compete nationally. I think it will be something along the lines of allocating a geographically component to selection ie 3 from VIC, 3 from NSW, 2 x from SA, 2 x from QLD, 1 from WA, ACT, TAS and NNSW and then, based on applications, award the first seasons participation to the strongets clubs based on criteria... after that its dog eat dog........ happy days. Think what you like. The AAFC document is there and it clearly states you qualify by playing football. SMFC may think being 'the biggest' will get them in but they will need to change the AAFC partner groups stated aims in order to do so. They should perhaps spend the sponsorship cash on better players ? ...umm OK Nobody supports the AAFC and the wonderful work they have done so far more than me champ but when they become the football federation in this country and are tasked with setting up and administering this league then perhaps you can perhaps point to their WHITE PAPER PROPOSAL as your "source material" until then nobody outside of the FA has any idea what the selection process for the NST will be..... AAFC is a bunch of clubs, loby group if you will, wanting this to happen. /quote] Sure, FA can try and implement a different way on these clubs, or none at all. But until then this is the only NSD model proposal we know about. http://www.australianfootballclubs.org.au/uploads/9/8/8/1/9881717/aafc_nsd_final_report__22.02.22_.pdfBTW , I don't care if SMFC are 'the biggest' I only care that all teams earn their place on the field. Sorry if your fingers were burnt trying to buy yourselves a spot in the AL, but maybe its time to stop screaming racism every time you don't get your own way. Its not about getting my own way..... you are arguing against someone that agrees with you ffs...... listen to yourself. I don't want to be "granted" a spot at the NSD table either, I'd much rather compete for it... The point is to START IT.... There have to be 12 or 14 or 16 clubs in year one of this league yeah? The AAFC members are approx 30 something NPL clubs that got together and decided on a model they see as being achievable.. Some of those 30 clubs reason financially they can put their hand up to play nationally right now, others want to know what the league will look like and want to know what sort of changes they need to make to be able to get to a level that they can compete..... Outside the 15-20 AAFC clubs that want to start in 2023, there are another 150 odd NPL clubs who may want to be in it too but have been waiting, non committed on the sidelines for the FA ( not the AAFC, or South Melbourne Hellas or FTBL forumites) to release details of league structure and define what the application process will be... Could be 40 or 50 clubs that want to compete, how do you decide??? ....... . You don't care if SMFC are the biggest but you throw your jealous little jabs criticising a club whose ambitions exceeds the racist limitations imposed on it by a filthy apphartheid system . A system that is failing Australian soccer, the Socceroos, the Matildas, the grassroots, and everyone that loves the game. Thank God after 17 years, it is finally coming to an end. AAFC chairman Nick Galatas and original founding/steering committee chairman Tom Kalas were both South Melbourne FC board members first mate.... Where do you think the push for the second division comes from primarily? Blah Blah Blah Whoever you are, Win the NPL 1 round to go and 6 points clear of second. No NPL finals series thanks to the Silverlake cheque having bounced or something ..... now what?
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]Have the geographical spread people actually looked at a population map of Australia? 1/3 of Australians live in Greater Sydney or Melbourne.
Half the places you dummies suggest can't even keep a team in the NPL and you think they'll last longer then a season in an NSD lol. 40% actually which means 60% of the population doesn't live in Sydney or Melbourne and those 60% have as much right as anyone else to be represented in the NSD. Looking at regional population centres the places that might be able to support a club are:- Queensland could have a club in Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast. New South Wales could have a club in Newcastle and Wollongong. ACT could have a club in Canberra. Victoria could have a club in Geelong. Tasmania could have a club in Hobart. Say 5 of them get up then there is the 5 mainland state capitals to share the remaining 7 or 9 spots in the competition. Geographical spread isn't a stupid idea at all in fact the opposite is the case if we want to grow the game across the whole country. His point is still valid. 40% concentrated in two cities is one thing, 60% spread across a whole continent is something else again. Anyway, this idea that a certain place "deserves" a team is actually part of the problem.In a full pyramid, the only team that deserves anything is whoever can earn it on the pitch. I take it then that you don't think that any clubs in Sydney or Melbourne deserve to be in the NSD because of the population concentration there. When you are starting a competition and there has been no opportunity for clubs to show football merit to win a spot then it is normal to accept bids that are in the best interests of the success of the competition. What constitutes "the best interest of the competition" needs to be transparent in the bid documents so everyone can shape their bid accordingly. Once the competition is up and running and P/R is in play then football merit along with the other requirements to obtain and hold a licence will decide who is promoted. Western United and Macarthur Rams are what you get when you try and geographically 'represent' an area. Friggin basket cases both of them. Despite Melbourne Storm being in the NRL for decades they are yet to even have a miniscule toehold in Victoria besides expat NSWelshman and Bananas going to their matches. Ditto taking the State of Origin and the Wallabies to places like Perth, Adelaide and Melbourne. Waste of time that has done nothing to grow the game and has simply denied fans the opportunity to see these matches in states where people actually play the game. My take is invite bidders and take the best 12, 14, 16 teams that meet the criteria and go from there. It's inevitable that the wealthier clubs are going to have a head start and they're going to be predominantly from major centres and so what?. Given all things being equal on paper between 2 competing bidders then maybe, MAYBE, think about geographical representation. No bidding Page 23 "Widest Feasible Geographic spread " & qualification through Competitive football matches 'bidding' as in meeting the minimum competition requirements with regards lighting, ground, financials to suport team, sponsorships, media etc and then selecting the best 'bidders' from them. Sorry , When you said bidding I thought you meant bidding. Meeting the licensing. criteria is a simple Yes or No, there is no Best Bid. This is fundamental to P&R. Once you meet the minimum criteria, the only bid you can make is on the park. As it should be. How do you get the fist 12 teams from all the different NPLs without "bidding" to/from within the AAFC? Fair question and one that will be the most challenging to answer fairly. The licencing criteria will (should) be fairly stringent so I am guessing it will automatically rule out 3/4 of the clubs in NPL as it stands... of the remaining 30 or 40 I reckon only half would be in any position (right now) to want to or be able to compete nationally. I think it will be something along the lines of allocating a geographically component to selection ie 3 from VIC, 3 from NSW, 2 x from SA, 2 x from QLD, 1 from WA, ACT, TAS and NNSW and then, based on applications, award the first seasons participation to the strongets clubs based on criteria... after that its dog eat dog........ happy days. Think what you like. The AAFC document is there and it clearly states you qualify by playing football. SMFC may think being 'the biggest' will get them in but they will need to change the AAFC partner groups stated aims in order to do so. They should perhaps spend the sponsorship cash on better players ? ...umm OK Nobody supports the AAFC and the wonderful work they have done so far more than me champ but when they become the football federation in this country and are tasked with setting up and administering this league then perhaps you can perhaps point to their WHITE PAPER PROPOSAL as your "source material" until then nobody outside of the FA has any idea what the selection process for the NST will be..... AAFC is a bunch of clubs, loby group if you will, wanting this to happen. /quote] Sure, FA can try and implement a different way on these clubs, or none at all. But until then this is the only NSD model proposal we know about. http://www.australianfootballclubs.org.au/uploads/9/8/8/1/9881717/aafc_nsd_final_report__22.02.22_.pdfBTW , I don't care if SMFC are 'the biggest' I only care that all teams earn their place on the field. Sorry if your fingers were burnt trying to buy yourselves a spot in the AL, but maybe its time to stop screaming racism every time you don't get your own way. Its not about getting my own way..... you are arguing against someone that agrees with you ffs...... listen to yourself. I don't want to be "granted" a spot at the NSD table either, I'd much rather compete for it... The point is to START IT.... There have to be 12 or 14 or 16 clubs in year one of this league yeah? The AAFC members are approx 30 something NPL clubs that got together and decided on a model they see as being achievable.. Some of those 30 clubs reason financially they can put their hand up to play nationally right now, others want to know what the league will look like and want to know what sort of changes they need to make to be able to get to a level that they can compete..... Outside the 15-20 AAFC clubs that want to start in 2023, there are another 150 odd NPL clubs who may want to be in it too but have been waiting, non committed on the sidelines for the FA ( not the AAFC, or South Melbourne Hellas or FTBL forumites) to release details of league structure and define what the application process will be... Could be 40 or 50 clubs that want to compete, how do you decide??? ....... . You don't care if SMFC are the biggest but you throw your jealous little jabs criticising a club whose ambitions exceeds the racist limitations imposed on it by a filthy apphartheid system . A system that is failing Australian soccer, the Socceroos, the Matildas, the grassroots, and everyone that loves the game. Thank God after 17 years, it is finally coming to an end. AAFC chairman Nick Galatas and original founding/steering committee chairman Tom Kalas were both South Melbourne FC board members first mate.... Where do you think the push for the second division comes from primarily? Blah Blah Blah Whoever you are, Win the NPL 1 round to go and 6 points clear of second. No NPL finals series thanks to the Silverlake cheque having bounced or something ..... now what? Go the top of the queue As long as you meet the other criteria
|
|
|
bohemia
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xREading through that twitter discussion, most are confusing what looks like a one-off payment with annual operating costs. They are two different things, and they should not be confused at all. How much should such a one-off payment be worth? Well, how long is a piece of string? There is a risk that the FA looks at this as a bit of a money making venture. 12 x $750,000 = $9 million The FA aren't going to say no to a $9mill cash injection. Well, the two are connected. The whole point of providing a surety up front is to safeguard the whole competition against mid season failures that can pull the whole thing down. Think NSL days with all those 3-0 walkovers. If they can't afford the up front fee, they probably have to rethink their participation before they sign up. That said, FFA will need to negotiate on the fee if it turns out they're pitching too hard.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.reddit.com/r/Aleague/comments/ws46m7/interesting_post_from_south_melbourne_in_regards/Hahahahah these plastics are so hilarious on Reddit. South advertised an EOI for junior coaches and all the munchers came out of the basement screaming about how we should never be let in because we think we are better than the franchises. Hahahahahahah their whiny little rants are so delicious.... There is one of them, a Navajo chief or something who's actually screen name is "fuck South Melbourne" hahahahahahahah
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.reddit.com/r/Aleague/comments/ws46m7/interesting_post_from_south_melbourne_in_regards/Hahahahah these plastics are so hilarious on Reddit. South advertised an EOI for junior coaches and all the munchers came out of the basement screaming about how we should never be let in because we think we are better than the franchises. Hahahahahahah their whiny little rants are so delicious.... There is one of them, a Navajo chief or something who's actually screen name is "fuck South Melbourne" hahahahahahahah It's a bit like the deep South of Amierica, blinded by racist rage.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
TBH in the bigger picture for our game period it just bleeds ignorance.......
Love Football
|
|
|
bettega
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Bumping this again, because it's extraordinary that this article is 5 years old - written by the late Michael Cockerill! They were aiming for a start date of 2018. Yep, you heard that right. It soon became 2020, but COVID hit, so we could excuse that for a couple of years. I could have sworn I then heard 2022, but no, we are 75% through 2022. Doesn't really look like they could get it up for 2023, but I guess it's still possible.
I think the reasons for the delay are two-fold: 1. an ongoing concern about the cost of running a national comp 2. various stakeholders putting forward conflicting models (and that includes stakeholders who arguably, should not really have a say in how the NSD is structured.
The other cautionary part of this tale is that the FA has started referring to it as the 2nd "tier". So yeh, that's acceptable nomenclature, but a tiny bit of critical thinking would suggest that the change in terms used is no accident.
|
|
|
numklpkgulftumch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBumping this again, because it's extraordinary that this article is 5 years old - written by the late Michael Cockerill! They were aiming for a start date of 2018. Yep, you heard that right. It soon became 2020, but COVID hit, so we could excuse that for a couple of years. I could have sworn I then heard 2022, but no, we are 75% through 2022. Doesn't really look like they could get it up for 2023, but I guess it's still possible. I think the reasons for the delay are two-fold: 1. an ongoing concern about the cost of running a national comp 2. various stakeholders putting forward conflicting models (and that includes stakeholders who arguably, should not really have a say in how the NSD is structured. The other cautionary part of this tale is that the FA has started referring to it as the 2nd "tier". So yeh, that's acceptable nomenclature, but a tiny bit of critical thinking would suggest that the change in terms used is no accident. FA have to approve it and are currently 19 months into their ponderings with still no sign of a choice of model. FA board is responsible for how fast it happens.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBumping this again, because it's extraordinary that this article is 5 years old - written by the late Michael Cockerill! They were aiming for a start date of 2018. Yep, you heard that right. It soon became 2020, but COVID hit, so we could excuse that for a couple of years. I could have sworn I then heard 2022, but no, we are 75% through 2022. Doesn't really look like they could get it up for 2023, but I guess it's still possible. I think the reasons for the delay are two-fold: 1. an ongoing concern about the cost of running a national comp 2. various stakeholders putting forward conflicting models (and that includes stakeholders who arguably, should not really have a say in how the NSD is structured. The other cautionary part of this tale is that the FA has started referring to it as the 2nd "tier". So yeh, that's acceptable nomenclature, but a tiny bit of critical thinking would suggest that the change in terms used is no accident. FA have to approve it and are currently 19 months into their ponderings with still no sign of a choice of model. FA board is responsible for how fast it happens. Pretty much this..... A few small hints dropped here and there about an announcement just before the Aleague launch... lets see?.
|
|
|