Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIt' s more a question of why couldn' t the FA persuade its own broadcast / "commercial " partner to outbid Seven for the rights ? Or has C10 already given up on the Soccer , and looking to cut its losses ? No different to any other country in the world. Packages are sold off for all different competitions with the highest bidder getting them. Yes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... An excellent point. I assumed a top priority focus for Ten/Paramount was women's football, with the jewel being the WWC. Maybe they've realize they've paid $200 million for a pup? Im confused Enzo... a "pup"? Isn't Sir Frank Lowy's golden dream of an Aleague the bright shiny league the whole professional sporting world should aspire too? It hasn't been Frank Lowy's A-League since 2015. You have to keep up.
|
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... If Optus won the bid, but were forced to show some games on FTA due to anti-siphoning rules, perhaps they refused to negotiate with CH10 as they are a rival Football broadcaster?
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMaybe I say this more in hope ... but if 7 outbid everyone else they must have spent a lot and will need a return on investment so do a good job... Ahahaha How many Billions did they spend on the AFL rights again ? This would be absolute chicken feed ...
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xIt' s more a question of why couldn' t the FA persuade its own broadcast / "commercial " partner to outbid Seven for the rights ? Or has C10 already given up on the Soccer , and looking to cut its losses ? No different to any other country in the world. Packages are sold off for all different competitions with the highest bidder getting them. Yes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... An excellent point. I assumed a top priority focus for Ten/Paramount was women's football, with the jewel being the WWC. Maybe they've realize they've paid $200 million for a pup? Im confused Enzo... a "pup"? Isn't Sir Frank Lowy's golden dream of an Aleague the bright shiny league the whole professional sporting world should aspire too? It hasn't been Frank Lowy's A-League since 2015. You have to keep up. I tried "Keep Up" but nothing on the site to interest me. So are you saying the Aleague itself is different to how Frank Lowy, the white knight of Australian football, set it up? Isn't it still a bunch of foreign owned franchises in a closed of league? Same same really?
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Who would have thought there would be so many Channel 7 apologists and supporters on here .. .
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWho would have thought there would be so many Channel 7 apologists and supporters on here .. . You might have been one of us if they bid for the rights to the Australian 2022 Men's World Cup.... Poor "Sir" Frank, he must be cursing the plebs turffed him out of soccer again and won a WC bid on their very first try.... wwwaaaahhhhh, wwwaaaaahhhhhhh ....
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... If Optus won the bid, but were forced to show some games on FTA due to anti-siphoning rules, perhaps they refused to negotiate with CH10 as they are a rival Football broadcaster? thats adorable.
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
The old FFA did much of the planning for the WWC bid. No doubt their experience was instrumental to the ultimate success of the bid.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe old FFA did much of the planning for the WWC bid. No doubt their experience was instrumental to the ultimate success of the bid. Ahhh I see , so they spent their final moments planning for the WWC bid but strangely DIDNT have anything to do with awarding licenses to WU and Macarthur and souring the Foxtel deal???? Did they mark they days on their Melbourne Knights calander off one by one?
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
It would seem to me that in the circumstances it would have been appropriate for the old FFA to have continued the planning for the WWC bid.
But much very much unlikely that they would have been involved in any major decision making on the expansion licences, given they were in "caretaker mode" .
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xNobody screws soccer like seven, right? And Optus too for that matter. Optus screwed the last world cup but it was hardly intentional. And Sevens awful treatment of the game was decades ago. They have clearly bid for the world cup here as they know it'll be a ratings success. This is a good thing and I encourage anybody to explain how it isn't Optus technical glitchs was bad timing but they at least corrected it And compensated all those who stayed with them as I have and to this day. I have no issue paying more and even a Fox subscriber still, people whinge not affording it more than anything else. Rapted OS has the rights for watching EPL is still a joy and they have the best coverage/intel and play backs so easy plus the other comps..... FTA is important for many - 7 is better than nothing I guess not that I'll use FTA much but I'll giggle hearing if anything gayfl is dripped through with dippa commentating lol but the big one is as mentioned, the big aplm investor not making sure getting the co rights to broadcast here. They obviously didn't want to up 7's bid lol..... That boardroom at silverlake must be full of bent over executives with vaso in front of their nose's haha
Love Football
|
|
|
SUTHERLANDBEAR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt' s more a question of why couldn' t the FA persuade its own broadcast / "commercial " partner to outbid Seven for the rights ? Or has C10 already given up on the Soccer , and looking to cut its losses ? No different to any other country in the world. Packages are sold off for all different competitions with the highest bidder getting them. Yes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... Maybe the unfriendly match times put a bit of a dampner on their bidding. Budget is also another one. Thirdly it may have been a blind bid. Anyhoo what the fuck does it matter who is televiing it as long as it is telivised live and commercial free.
|
|
|
Davstar
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... If Optus won the bid, but were forced to show some games on FTA due to anti-siphoning rules, perhaps they refused to negotiate with CH10 as they are a rival Football broadcaster? they advertise the AL during PL matches and highlights on the optus sports app
these Kangaroos can play football - Ange P. (Intercontinental WC Play-offs 2017)
KEEP POLITICS OUT OF FOOTBALL
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIt' s more a question of why couldn' t the FA persuade its own broadcast / "commercial " partner to outbid Seven for the rights ? Or has C10 already given up on the Soccer , and looking to cut its losses ? No different to any other country in the world. Packages are sold off for all different competitions with the highest bidder getting them. Yes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... Maybe the unfriendly match times put a bit of a dampner on their bidding. Budget is also another one. Oh, so is THAT why they have already bounced the ALM to a secondary channel after just 1 year of the contract ? And is THAT why they have already bounced the ALW from their channels to paramount after just 1 year of the contract ? Gee , how hard up are they for money ?? Maybe we should all make a small donation to help them keep the lights on over there ...
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xIt would seem to me that in the circumstances it would have been appropriate for the old FFA to have continued the planning for the WWC bid.But much very much unlikely that they would have been involved in any major decision making on the expansion licences, given they were in "caretaker mode" . Thank Christ they didnt, we would have ended up with another cartoon kangaroo commercial, an embarrassing attempt at bribery and watching the World cup on Channel 7 next year (being played in another country) .... Well done to the all new (with a handful of parasitic old hangers on) FA
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIt' s more a question of why couldn' t the FA persuade its own broadcast / "commercial " partner to outbid Seven for the rights ? Or has C10 already given up on the Soccer , and looking to cut its losses ? No different to any other country in the world. Packages are sold off for all different competitions with the highest bidder getting them. Yes. But why weren' t c10 the highest bidder ? They have already sunk money into australian football . The WWC rights would be chicken feed. Wouldn' t it have made sense for them to have the rights ? Yet C7, a channel with no investment in the game, were allowed to outbid them ... Maybe the unfriendly match times put a bit of a dampner on their bidding. Budget is also another one. Oh, so is THAT why they have already bounced the ALM to a secondary channel after just 1 year of the contract ? And is THAT why they have already bounced the ALW from their channels to paramount after just 1 year of the contract ? Gee , how hard up are they for money ?? Maybe we should all make a small donation to help them keep the lights on over there ... Paulie your spaces are getting bigger every post ... FFS your gonna break your keyboard.... hahahahahahahahahah Ah re megale, you make me laugh.
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
I believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 .
Well done old FFA .
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Nobody- besides you - gives 2 fucks
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
@ Balin Trev
I wasn' t the one who brought up the old administration. So obviously someone else does ...
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 . Well done old FFA . Better on the spacing .... WD :) So, early 2019 eh. 3-4 months after the Aleague expansion bids were awarded? Hmm so caretaker mode for expansion, but still "at the helm" for the WC bid? Haahahaha you goose, The OLD FFA is exactly the same as the new FA --- same old dildos. Fat Nick, Dopey Greg, the gangs still mostly still there just your toxic Lowy family are finally gone.... WOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOO
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xNobody- besides you - gives 2 fucks Leave Paulie alone Trev, the resort flooded.....
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 . Well done old FFA . The OLD FFA is exactly the same as the new FA If that' s the case , why did they even bother ...
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 . Well done old FFA . so caretaker mode for expansion, but still "at the helm" for the WC bid? I' ve previously explained . Have you confused dates / timeframes ? The new FFA took over in later 2018, by which time much of the WWC planning work would have needed to have been substantially progressed .
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 . Well done old FFA . The OLD FFA is exactly the same as the new FA If that' s the case , why did they even bother ... Same reason why you would take the rubbish out to the council bins even if the kitchen bin is still half full.. Something really smelly about that last bit of trash.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI believe that planning for the WWC bid would have already been well progressed by the time the new FFA took over , as completed bid registrations were originally due for submission in early 2019 . Well done old FFA . so caretaker mode for expansion, but still "at the helm" for the WC bid? I' ve previously explained . Have you confused dates / timeframes ? The new FFA took over in later 2018, by which time much of the WWC planning work would have needed to have been substantially progressed . Can you send me a Melbourne Knights calendar? Ill check the dates again.
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Time to blow the dust off this old beauty... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcWVLmCmhto
|
|
|
Remote Control
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.4K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
At least they can't cross promote the AFLW. But watch the Sherrins interfere
|
|
|