Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. Muz, Im 100% behind the sentiment however wouldn't go asking questions you dont want the answers too bud... Not many copies of Animal Farm and Dr Zhivago floating around in China or North Korea these days either :) +x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThis is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what?
There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah.
I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation.
I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me.
Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from.
Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him.
Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news.
Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '.
When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents.
Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '.
are you okay with the government enforcing online censorship or not?
Are you arguing for kiddie material? What are you talking about?
|
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
you can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah....
It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids.
However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things if they're two totally different things then why introduce to the discussion in this thread? can you not stay on topic?
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I'm aware of this. You people are actually a danger to society as you all end up causing violence. Its the only way you can enforce your 'ideas' onto others as your arguments lack merit.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things if they're two totally different things then why introduce to the discussion in this thread? can you not stay on topic? Ok, lets get back on topic. What's your take on this bill?
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things if they're two totally different things then why introduce to the discussion in this thread? can you not stay on topic? Do you know what commas are for and what the sentence was describing?
I know I am speaking English as a third/fourth language and I don’t always check my Sentence structure or grammar, but your compression of basic language and nuances is really bad.
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things if they're two totally different things then why introduce to the discussion in this thread? can you not stay on topic? Ok, lets get back on topic. What's your take on this bill? I'm not a fan of it.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]This is extremely subjective and allows for potential political and corporate interference in the democratic process. No, it's not merely potential. We can see the consequences of this law by seeing how other larger democracies are heading down the path of totalitarianism-in-action, where the jack boot is to stamp out anything that goes against what those in authority deem to be truth. -- Canada, U.S., U.K. western Europe etc. Australia is already Far Left in its Media and Education system, so it is a given that the products of that society will make laws based on Far Left ideology, chief among which is stamping out any information that goes against their ideology. e.g. In the U.S., if conservative parents object to sexualised books being given to young children in school, those conservative parents are deemed as domestic terrorists. We see in virtually all the western world how Far Left (masquerading as Centre-Left) are showing their true colours of the type of people who were attracted to Soviet Communism and CCCP style so-called democracy-in-name-only. We are now in a culture that cancels (dystopian re-branding of censorship) anything they disagree with, and so it is a natural consequence that people like that will want to enshrine censorship in the law.Young people no longer believe in the famous maxim, "I might disagree with you, but will fight for your right to speak your opinion". Australia deserves this fate, because they voted Labor/Greens. There's only one side of politics banning books and, spoiler alert, it's not your commo, pinko, lefty mob. Maybe you need to sit on the room of mirrors for a while chump. Are you for this bill or not? I'm in Corsica so this might be an anathema to you but I haven't been following it closely enough to comment with 100% certainty. I'm still waiting for you to make your case. (To be fair I may have missed it.) Care to comment on which side of politics is banning books and why that's OK? You have the internet. We don't use smoke signals anymore so this excuse for avoidance of the question doesn't fly. Sure. Let me pause my holiday to get myself familiar with a highly complicated tranche of government policy. Sounds like fun. Should I familiarise myself with any other goings on that you think are important? You seem to have the time to familiarise yourself with a lot of other goings on here, not to mention post on this forum. I see you being evasive because you're caught in a conundrum, being a true believer and all. A true believer in what? There no conundrum. I don't have an opinion just like I don't have an opinion on the Kurds, the Houtis or Hezbollah. I'm not across it except I believe it has bipartisan support and has something to do with getting rid of rank, outright mis/disinformation. I understand you like black and white opinions and things like sophisticated arguments, considering the nuance and minutiae, escapes you but it's quite important to someone like me. Lupi 33, if you want to dialogue with Muz, you need to understand where Muz is coming from. Muz totally believes 100% of everything that the Mainstream Media tells him, zero questions asked. Muz defines "misinformation" as anything which contradicts what the 6 o'clock news and morning breakfast shows tell him. Hence, even if Leftist governments and Big Tech censored Australian into a Soviet Gulag, it would not affect Muz a single bit, since 100% of Muz's opinions are in lock step with the Media. So Muz personally would not be inconvenienced by any censorship whatsoever - because any opinion Muz might want to express would be in 100% alignment with the television news. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. When you answer that I might engage with your pathetic ramblings. People like Muz represent the mob who would deal with opposing information by BANNING, CENSORSHIP, FINES, and JAIL for Muz's opponents. Sorry mate, remind me again which side of politics is banning books? You know..... ' engaging in censorship '. As for under-age children, I am in favour of banning materials from schools that are regarded as inappropriate for young children. In who's opinion? Evangelical christians? Because who says what you think (they think) is appropriate is in line with what I think, or anyone else thinks, is appropriate. Who made you the ground poohbah of what is and isn't appropriate? I also like that it's not illegal material, or false/disinformation material he wants to ban, only things that are 'inappropriate', which is an incredibly hilarious yardstick to gauge. Ask 100 people on the street what that is and you'd get 100 different answers, unless you asked 100 evangelical Christians that is. so you're conflating illegal images with 'false/disinformation' (judged by whom) as one and the same? Is this one of the talking points at your local Antifa workshop? I am not mixing anything. Re-read the sentence, they are two totally different things if they're two totally different things then why introduce to the discussion in this thread? can you not stay on topic? Ok, lets get back on topic. What's your take on this bill? I'm not a fan of it. Bravo. A thorough and comprehensive debunking. Why did this run to 6 pages?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can tsf, the fork in the road between Communism/Leftist/Totalitarianism versus Democracy - is the issue of personal freedom. Of course, in this Fallen world, most people - including you and me - use personal freedoms in a damaging way. But nonetheless, there is something written on every person's heart that they desire Freedom. That is because that is the way that God designed and Created us to desire freedom. Freedom is the hallmark of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Galatians 5:1 - "For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery." Thus, true-Christianity sets people free; false-Christianity is characterised by crushing people's freedoms. This is why Totalitarian and Communist regimes are anti-Christian, and characterised by crushing freedoms - all in the name of helping people. tsf, just because you say you're Communist, it doesn't have to be that way forever. Many conservatives start off their young years as Leftists, then mature with wisdom and go to the Right. Even I was Left when I was young - although I came to the light sooner than most people. (And I'm not saying the political-Right is the full answer, because they're just as messed up as the Left). Coming back to the point of this thread: I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats to determine what is, and what isn't, misinformation. And they will decide the question of misinformation from their ideology. It is totally opposite to a free-market of ideas where the best reasoning prevails. Rather, it is a westernised version of Stalinism where only the Pravda newspaper is authorised to give information, and anything that contracts Pravda is deemed misinformation by the State. We are now at a late stage in this transition of Democracy to Communism where people in the UK and US are being jailed for expressing views contrary to the State. Remember, in the recorded history of the world across 6,000 years, we happen to be living at the back end of a few short hundreds of years where there has been freedom. And if you think this freedom will automatically continue, you do not study history. MOST PEOPLE in history are like tsf and Muz - they want to forcefully silence their critics. WHY? In order to help people. The motive is good. But the method is evil.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health?
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? To take a big picture: when a society is filled with a majority of morally-upright people, the people do these things as a consequence of their moral uprightness. Moral decay is a widely accepted symptom of the fall of once-great civilisations. But after a majority of people adopt the lifestyle of moral decay, no amount of laws can save that civilisation. I'm speaking in terms of the rise and fall of a civilisation over hundreds of years. We are now at the tail end of the western civilisation characterised by freedom of speech, massive technological advancement (which requires freedom of scientific inquiry, rather than censorship of any scientist who goes against the consensus). tsf and Muz: take heed of this quote: "It’s easy for all scientists to be in consensus when the ones who disagree are silenced."And, at this tail end of this western civilisation, the people who are attacking its foundations are those who - in their own demented minds - think they are doing the best to help people. For example, in the Soviet Communist Revolution, it was driven by idealistic, atheistic young people thinking they were doing the best for Russia. Such people are characterised by crowd-followers, easily manipulated by slogans, because such people inherently do not think deeply. They mock and jeer, rather than engage in a search for truth. (Muz and tsf, if you'd like to meet such people, to the mirror). Think. In the Communist revolutions, why is it that intellectuals are the ones sent to the Gulags? Because the mob, comprised of people like tsf and Muz, inwardly loathe those people who think and operate from facts and evidence.
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health"
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? To take a big picture: when a society is filled with a majority of morally-upright people, the people do these things as a consequence of their moral uprightness. Moral decay is a widely accepted symptom of the fall of once-great civilisations. But after a majority of people adopt the lifestyle of moral decay, no amount of laws can save that civilisation. I'm speaking in terms of the rise and fall of a civilisation over hundreds of years. We are now at the tail end of the western civilisation characterised by freedom of speech, massive technological advancement (which requires freedom of scientific inquiry, rather than censorship of any scientist who goes against the consensus). tsf and Muz: take heed of this quote: "It’s easy for all scientists to be in consensus when the ones who disagree are silenced."And, at this tail end of this western civilisation, the people who are attacking its foundations are those who - in their own demented minds - think they are doing the best to help people. For example, in the Soviet Communist Revolution, it was driven by idealistic, atheistic young people thinking they were doing the best for Russia. Such people are characterised by crowd-followers, easily manipulated by slogans, because such people inherently do not think deeply. They mock and jeer, rather than engage in a search for truth. (Muz and tsf, if you'd like to meet such people, to the mirror). Think. In the Communist revolutions, why is it that intellectuals are the ones sent to the Gulags? Because the mob, comprised of people like tsf and Muz, inwardly loathe those people who think and operate from facts and evidence. yes would suffice.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" I know crazy right! That's seven months of child support the poor bloke has to pay her...right? Cause it's an actual baby. Do they backtrack that stuff? But I guess you believe that the men should be paying child support from the 'second of conception'. No wonder every women is waiting until the day before the baby drops to get the procedure done, they want to milk the last dollar out of blokes possible! Madness
|
|
|
johnsmith
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" I know crazy right! That's seven months of child support the poor bloke has to pay her...right? Cause it's an actual baby. Do they backtrack that stuff? But I guess you believe that the men should be paying child support from the 'second of conception'. No wonder every women is waiting until the day before the baby drops to get the procedure done, they want to milk the last dollar out of blokes possible! Madness Ladies and Gents, tsf is un-masking the dark soul of Communism. People are treated as meat production. To the communist, if the person is not viable, kill them off before they're born, or kill them off when they're old. This is the mentality that drives the bringing of legislation by Leftist politicians. People like tsf are drawn to Leftist politicians because of the way he thinks, as show in his quote. Whereas civilisations based on the Judeo-Christian ethic are based on appreciating human life as inherently sacred. That is why Christianity respects every human life. tsf is the product of a Leftist education industry and a Leftist Media and Entertainment industry. tsf never thought through his worldview. He just went with the crowd he happened to be in during his formative years. Both Right and Left are deeply flawed, and if one trusts the System, it will surely disappoint. The only one Who does not disappoint is the Lord Jesus Christ.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" I know crazy right! That's seven months of child support the poor bloke has to pay her...right? Cause it's an actual baby. Do they backtrack that stuff? But I guess you believe that the men should be paying child support from the 'second of conception'. No wonder every women is waiting until the day before the baby drops to get the procedure done, they want to milk the last dollar out of blokes possible! Madness . The only one Who does not disappoint is the Lord Jesus Christ. amen brother
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" I know crazy right! That's seven months of child support the poor bloke has to pay her...right? Cause it's an actual baby. Do they backtrack that stuff? But I guess you believe that the men should be paying child support from the 'second of conception'. No wonder every women is waiting until the day before the baby drops to get the procedure done, they want to milk the last dollar out of blokes possible! Madness keep talking...
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" Sure. Because that happens all the time. Any retard would know that that sort of thing only happens when there is imminent danger to the mother or the baby or both. Stop being a fucking idiot.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" I know crazy right! That's seven months of child support the poor bloke has to pay her...right? Cause it's an actual baby. Do they backtrack that stuff? But I guess you believe that the men should be paying child support from the 'second of conception'. No wonder every women is waiting until the day before the baby drops to get the procedure done, they want to milk the last dollar out of blokes possible! Madness Whereas civilisations based on the Judeo-Christian ethic are based on appreciating human life as inherently sacred. That is why Christianity respects every human life. Grabbed this from online. (Because you know 'sacred'.)
Just to name a few notable instances, God killed:
- Everybody in Sodom and Gomorrah
- The firstborn children of non-Jewish Egyptians
- The Egyptian army when pursuing Moses and the Israelites.
- False prophets, along with their families.
- 14,000 Israeli followers of those prophets
- 24,00 Israelites for sexual immorality
- Up to 50,000 Israelites for looking into the Ark of the Covenant
- 42 youths for making fun of Elisha’s bald head (sent two bears to maul them to death)
- Everybody on Earth (except for one family) in a massive global flood
and God killed a lot of people in the Bible.
There are 160 separate killing sprees in the Bible for which God is to blame. He either commits them directly, or they are carried out by assistance or approval. For 107 of those, the Holy Bible provides us the number of people that died. If we count all these Holy killings, we end up with a total of 2,821,364 deaths.[1]
However, this doesn't include the 53 other great killings of which the Bible unfortunately leaves us in the dark about how many people exactly died. For example the moment when God decided to drown all life on earth in a flood, except for one human family and a few of all animal species on one boat to repopulate the world again afterwards. According to the estimations of Steve Wells, writer of the book “Drunk With Blood: God’s Killings In The Bible”, God’s kill count comes closer to 25 million when these killings are included as well. [2]
The total amount of killings that Satan committed is 10.
Kill counts by God per book in the Bible:
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
158 instances of God doling out some 'smiting'. https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html?m=1My favourite is God sending bears to rip 42 children to pieces for ripping the piss out of a follically challenged bloke. ----------------------------------------//--------------------------------------- A few examples of how God puts His victims to death: God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians: A few examples of how God puts His victims to death:
God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians:
“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers:
“Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering:
“… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague:
"Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill:
“Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them:
“The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone:
“Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers: “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering: “… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague: "Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill: “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them: “The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone: “Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces: “From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can All true Christians are communists :) Welcome to the cause tovarisch..
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x158 instances of God doling out some 'smiting'. https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html?m=1My favourite is God sending bears to rip 42 children to pieces for ripping the piss out of a follically challenged bloke. ----------------------------------------//--------------------------------------- A few examples of how God puts His victims to death: God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians: A few examples of how God puts His victims to death:
God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians:
“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers:
“Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering:
“… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague:
"Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill:
“Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them:
“The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone:
“Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers: “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering: “… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague: "Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill: “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them: “The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone: “Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces: “From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god! hahahaha this was amazing.... thanks for the chuckle.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x158 instances of God doling out some 'smiting'. https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html?m=1My favourite is God sending bears to rip 42 children to pieces for ripping the piss out of a follically challenged bloke. ----------------------------------------//--------------------------------------- A few examples of how God puts His victims to death: God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians: A few examples of how God puts His victims to death:
God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians:
“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers:
“Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering:
“… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague:
"Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill:
“Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them:
“The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone:
“Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers: “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering: “… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague: "Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill: “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them: “The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone: “Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces: “From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god! hahahaha this was amazing.... thanks for the chuckle. I'm still laughing at being called a 'communist'. I have my own small consultancy that I've run for 20 years and although I'm a bit of a lefty I do like money. I'm so conflicted.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x158 instances of God doling out some 'smiting'. https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html?m=1My favourite is God sending bears to rip 42 children to pieces for ripping the piss out of a follically challenged bloke. ----------------------------------------//--------------------------------------- A few examples of how God puts His victims to death: God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians: A few examples of how God puts His victims to death:
God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians:
“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers:
“Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering:
“… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague:
"Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill:
“Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them:
“The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone:
“Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers: “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering: “… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague: "Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill: “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them: “The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone: “Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces: “From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god! hahahaha this was amazing.... thanks for the chuckle. I'm still laughing at being called a 'communist'. I have my own small consultancy that I've run for 20 years and although I'm a bit of a lefty I do like money. I'm so conflicted. You MUST be in the Politburo .... hahahahahahahah some of the shit I read on here is really entertaining I have to say.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x158 instances of God doling out some 'smiting'. https://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html?m=1My favourite is God sending bears to rip 42 children to pieces for ripping the piss out of a follically challenged bloke. ----------------------------------------//--------------------------------------- A few examples of how God puts His victims to death: God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians: A few examples of how God puts His victims to death:
God “smote” 1,000,000 Ethiopians:
“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers:
“Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering:
“… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague:
"Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill:
“Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them:
“The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone:
“Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces:
“From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god!“So the Lord smote the Ethiopians before Asa, and before Judah; and the Ethiopians fled. And Asa and the people that were with him pursued them unto Gerar: and the Ethiopians were overthrown, that they could not recover themselves; for they were destroyed before the Lord, and before his host; and they carried away very much spoil.” 2 Chronicles 14:12-13
God burns two teenagers: “Aaron’s sons Nadab and Abihu took their censers, put fire in them and added incense; and they offered unauthorized fire before the Lord, contrary to his command. So fire came out from the presence of the Lord and consumed them, and they died before the Lord.” Leviticus 10:1-2
God demands a whole town to be burned as a burnt offering: “… you must attack that town and completely destroy all its inhabitants, as well as all the livestock. Then you must pile all the plunder in the middle of the street and burn it. Put the entire town to the torch as a burnt offering to the LORD your God. That town must remain a ruin forever; it may never be rebuilt. Keep none of the plunder that has been set apart for destruction. Then the LORD will turn from his fierce anger and be merciful to you.” Deuteronomy 13:13-19
God creates a plague: "Behold, the Lord will bring a great plague on your people, your children, your wives, and all your possessions, and you yourself will have a severe sickness with a disease of your bowels, until your bowels come out because of the disease, day by day.’" 2 Chronicles 21:14-15
God orders human helpers to kill: “Then I heard the LORD say to the other men, “Follow him through the city and kill everyone whose forehead is not marked. Show no mercy; have no pity! Kill them all – old and young, girls and women and little children. But do not touch anyone with the mark. Begin your task right here at the Temple.” So they began by killing the seventy leaders. “Defile the Temple!” the LORD commanded. “Fill its courtyards with the bodies of those you kill! Go!” So they went throughout the city and did as they were told.” Ezekiel 9:5-7
God kills 27,000 Syrians by making a wall fall on them: “The rest of them escaped to the city of Aphek, where the wall collapsed on twenty-seven thousand of them. And Ben-Hadad fled to the city and hid in an inner room.” 1 Kings 20:30
God makes a lion kill someone: “Meanwhile, the LORD instructed one of the group of prophets to say to another man, “Strike me!” But the man refused to strike the prophet. Then the prophet told him, “Because you have not obeyed the voice of the LORD, a lion will kill you as soon as you leave me.” And sure enough, when he had gone, a lion attacked and killed him.” 1 Kings 20:35-36
God lets two shebears shred 42 children to pieces: “From there Elisha went up to Bethel. While he was on his way, some small boys came out of the city and jeered at him. “Go up baldhead,” they shouted, “go up baldhead!” The prophet turned and saw them, and he cursed them in the name of the Lord. Then two shebears came out of the woods and tore forty two of the children to pieces.” 2 Kings 2:23-24
God truly is a sweet and all-loving god! hahahaha this was amazing.... thanks for the chuckle. I'm still laughing at being called a 'communist'. I have my own small consultancy that I've run for 20 years and although I'm a bit of a lefty I do like money. I'm so conflicted. You MUST be in the Politburo .... hahahahahahahah some of the shit I read on here is really entertaining I have to say. Somehow caring about others and wanting the world to be a better place gets conflated with being some sort of 'Stalinist' who wants people thrown in the Gulag. Apropos of nothing I am currently sitting on a ferry from Bastia, Corsica to Livorno, Italy. Pick up a car from Pisa this afternoon, drive to Trieste, pick the kids up and head into Croatia. Yewwwwww!
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" Sure. Because that happens all the time. Any retard would know that that sort of thing only happens when there is imminent danger to the mother or the baby or both. Stop being a fucking idiot. well since you're a retard then you tell me... how do you actually know what goes on in practice? you're obviously not aware of how lucrative the baby organ business is and what incentives that provides...
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x[quote]you can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can I am against the censorship Bill because it gives the power to a few government bureaucrats . Just to be clear, you're against government intervention with social media companies but you're for government intervention when it comes to women's health? murdering a 7 month term baby = "women's health" Sure. Because that happens all the time. Any retard would know that that sort of thing only happens when there is imminent danger to the mother or the baby or both. Stop being a fucking idiot. well since you're a retard then you tell me... how do you actually know what goes on in practice? you're obviously not aware of how lucrative the baby organ business is and what incentives that provides... 'baby organ business'....... There's been a lot of dumb shit written in this forum over the years but this might be the dumbest thing I've ever read here. And that really is saying something because johnsmith also posts here. Let me guess you're an adrenochrome conspiracy adherent. Am I close?
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xyou can save your breath with the childish left antifa blah blah.... It's not an insult. I am a die-hard communist, so far left that I am almost coming out the right side. So far left that even Stalin would think I'm too extreme. If I had my way we'd skip the gulags and just solve problems the easier way. I yearn for the days of a soviet union on steroids. However if you don't want to save your breath, you're welcome to please sweet talk me with all the far left marxist stuff you can All true Christians are communists :) Welcome to the cause tovarisch.. ![Warrior Priest, member of the Greek resistance, with fellow partisan c.1943 [507x704] : r/HistoryPorn](https://i.redd.it/t02x2f2d8fi91.jpg) Comrade!
|
|
|