The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese


The Australian Politics thread: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese

Author
Message
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
ozboy wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.

Rather than say 'on average', can't I talk unqualified like batfink?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

-PB




how's your day going chester?????

glorious weather here in god's country, after those winds last night and a 4 hours power outage
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.

Rather than say 'on average', can't I talk unqualified like batfink?


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.

Rather than say 'on average', can't I talk unqualified like batfink?


you are unqualified alright.....;) :-"
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.

Rather than say 'on average', can't I talk unqualified like batfink?
Edited
9 Years Ago by ozboy
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
imonfourfourtwo wrote:
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.


well you must be old and vote conservative.....;)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
imonfourfourtwo
imonfourfourtwo
Pro
Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.

I'm young and I buy newspapers. Admittedly it is a $15 annual subscription of the digital version, but it's still the same newspaper you find in the newsagents nonetheless.
Edited
9 Years Ago by imonfourfourtwo
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.


pmsl
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
thupercoach wrote:
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?

Costing Labor a pretty penny, unlike the free Liberal advertising from News Corp. Then again, I guess News Corp are only preaching to the converted, considering its old people who buy printed news and vote conservative.
Edited
9 Years Ago by ozboy
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
ozboy wrote:

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
How are Obama's spin doctors going at making Kevvie look presidential?
Edited
9 Years Ago by thupercoach
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0



same reason they go on about Abbotts suppository gaffe.....they are both as boring as batshit......




wait for it.....the door's open...
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
ozboy
ozboy
World Class
World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)World Class (7K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0

Because your mates at Liberal Election Marketing HQ, a.k.a News Corp, deemed it be so.
Edited
9 Years Ago by ozboy
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0


Because the Australian public are becoming as stupid/spoonfed as Americans are and naturally our media outlets look to America for what to do.

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
lukerobinho
lukerobinho
Legend
Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)Legend (11K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K, Visits: 0
Why the fuck is this news ?

http://www.news.com.au/national-news/federal-election/pm8217s-son-marcus-rudd-smokes-cigar-in-facebook-photo/story-fnho52ip-1226695862730
Edited
9 Years Ago by lukerobinho
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
Why are people still responding to batfink? :lol:

-PB



oh look it's chester and spike again.....LOL

[youtube]UVNHcob3oJg[/youtube]
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
Does it matter if it's a Federal asset or a state asset.....??????????????? still an asset of the people..............!!!!!


What election are we talking about? Federal. So State Governments have nothing to do with this discussion.


:shock: :shock: ](*,) ](*,)
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
Why are people still responding to batfink? :lol:

-PB

The same reason you breath in through your nose after you fart. You know it's going to be bad but you're still curious to see just HOW bad.

Why were people so quick to bash Rudd for having prepped notes for the debate? What's wrong with the man having done some preparation so he doesn't look like a Jaymes Diaz sized twat?


From what I've read when he approached the lectern he had nothing in his hands and he wrote the notes once he got there?

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
thupercoach
thupercoach
World Class
World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)World Class (8.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K, Visits: 0
afromanGT wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
Why are people still responding to batfink? :lol:

-PB

The same reason you breath in through your nose after you fart. You know it's going to be bad but you're still curious to see just HOW bad.

Why were people so quick to bash Rudd for having prepped notes for the debate? What's wrong with the man having done some preparation so he doesn't look like a Jaymes Diaz sized twat?
I'm ok with the notes, the whole debate thing is pretty ridiculous anyway.

I think it surprised people though because Rudd is usually so damn slick when he is speaking publicly.
Edited
9 Years Ago by thupercoach
afromanGT
afromanGT
Legend
Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)Legend (77K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K, Visits: 0
paulbagzFC wrote:
Why are people still responding to batfink? :lol:

-PB

The same reason you breath in through your nose after you fart. You know it's going to be bad but you're still curious to see just HOW bad.

Why were people so quick to bash Rudd for having prepped notes for the debate? What's wrong with the man having done some preparation so he doesn't look like a Jaymes Diaz sized twat?
Edited
9 Years Ago by afromanGT
Roar_Brisbane
Roar_Brisbane
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
That sig Notor. =d> =d> =d>

Edited by Roar_Brisbane: 13/8/2013 01:07:28 AM
Edited
9 Years Ago by Roar_Brisbane
Carlito
Carlito
Legend
Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)Legend (28K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K, Visits: 0
Chris Pyne just :lol: made himself look arrogant on qanda . Also the journi who asked. Rhys Muldoon do you like freedom is very gutter in my opinion
Edited
9 Years Ago by MvFCArsenal16.8
notorganic
notorganic
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K, Visits: 0
Leigh Sales was a fucking pussycat with Matt Damon tonight. Shame ABC, Shame!
Edited
9 Years Ago by notorganic
paulbagzFC
paulbagzFC
Legend
Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)Legend (45K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K, Visits: 0
Why are people still responding to batfink? :lol:

-PB

https://i.imgur.com/batge7K.jpg

Edited
9 Years Ago by paulbagzFC
DB-PGFC
DB-PGFC
Amateur
Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)Amateur (507 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 499, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
LNP gain power clean up the mess get the budget back on track and do all the hard yards
then


They don't do any hard yards, they just sell every public asset they can get their hands on.

Imagine how much all the gold Costello sold for rock bottom prices would be worth now.

Or how much Telstra would be making for the Government having already built a FTTN network in early 2000 followed by an NBN style FTTP, out of general revenue, if Howard had structurally seperated the wholesale and retail aspects of Telstra instead of fucking it up badly.

Or how much all the airports they sold would be raking in right now.


uuummmm sell public assests like Anna bligh did????????????????? and bobby carr???????????

every time Labor get in we go to shit in a handbag........simple fact.....deal with it....



Edited
9 Years Ago by DB-PGFC
macktheknife
macktheknife
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
Quote:
Does it matter if it's a Federal asset or a state asset.....??????????????? still an asset of the people..............!!!!!


What election are we talking about? Federal. So State Governments have nothing to do with this discussion.
Edited
9 Years Ago by macktheknife
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
LNP gain power clean up the mess get the budget back on track and do all the hard yards
then


They don't do any hard yards, they just sell every public asset they can get their hands on.

Imagine how much all the gold Costello sold for rock bottom prices would be worth now.

Or how much Telstra would be making for the Government having already built a FTTN network in early 2000 followed by an NBN style FTTP, out of general revenue, if Howard had structurally seperated the wholesale and retail aspects of Telstra instead of fucking it up badly.

Or how much all the airports they sold would be raking in right now.


uuummmm sell public assests like Anna bligh did????????????????? and bobby carr???????????

every time Labor get in we go to shit in a handbag........simple fact.....deal with it....


I hate all sales of public assets to private corporations, it destroys the capability of the Government to secure vital infrastructure, to ensure said infrastructure isn't left to rot in the ground by profit driven private corporations, and to build and expand in areas that do not deliver what a private company would consider appropriate returns.

Also, Anna Bligh & Bob Carr don't have anything to do with selling Federal Government assets.

Labor might send everything to shit according to you, although this Government managed to get us through the GFC unscathed, unlike all the countries using the Liberals preferred policy of austerity, but at least they aren't selling the assets that can make money and/or provide services to the nation.

batfink wrote:
as far as utilities making money...IF the State Labor party had of built the roads for themselves they would be raking in $350 million a year in NSW, and the resident of sydney would be paying tolls fot a long time less or the very least for reinvestment in further projects....so in bounces both ways MAC


Like I said, I hate PPP's on new infrastructure and the selling of existing infrastructure.

It does bounce both ways, but the Liberal Government have the track record in this area and it's a very poor one, both in terms of outcomes achieved through sell-offs (EG Completely fucking up the Telstra sale), and in terms of what was gained through the same (EG: Selling our gold at rock bottom prices, or giving up the massive monopoly profits that owning our Airports gave the Government).


Does it matter if it's a Federal asset or a state asset.....??????????????? still an asset of the people..............!!!!!

...i would have to say that Labor's record is no better...however i digress......

i would argue that when the ALP are in power these utilities get loaded up with union power and the get heavier and heavier with more and more people required to achieve the same result and that's where the privatising drive comes from because productivity dives in the arse......

i mentioned Bobby Carr trying to sell off the electricity utility in NSW wales some time ago....they also deregulated the industry at the same time...the end result was that at that time deaths in the industry Australia wide were running at around 12-13 a year....after the deregulation the deaths have increased to 4 times that level.....

when Carr was preparing the utility for sale he sacked large numbers of inspectors,linesmen,high voltage workers and turner off all of the maintenance to make the utility more attractive on paper for the sale......so what resulted was a massive accumulation of works required to get the network...(poles & wires & transformers) back up to the level prior to the sale attempt.... he failed to sell the utility..........so after this government who came after Carr were left with huge problems getting the network back up to scratch.....

so what is required is balance.....yes i know stupid batfink rants about balance all the time...but i run my life and my business on the KISS method....Keep It Simple Stupid......

you drink to much you get a hangover.....balance required...
you screw to much you get lovers balls....enjoyable but balance required...
was it newtons law???? every action has an equal and opposite reaction????? not sure but something like that......




Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
macktheknife
macktheknife
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
LNP gain power clean up the mess get the budget back on track and do all the hard yards
then


They don't do any hard yards, they just sell every public asset they can get their hands on.

Imagine how much all the gold Costello sold for rock bottom prices would be worth now.

Or how much Telstra would be making for the Government having already built a FTTN network in early 2000 followed by an NBN style FTTP, out of general revenue, if Howard had structurally seperated the wholesale and retail aspects of Telstra instead of fucking it up badly.

Or how much all the airports they sold would be raking in right now.


uuummmm sell public assests like Anna bligh did????????????????? and bobby carr???????????

every time Labor get in we go to shit in a handbag........simple fact.....deal with it....


I hate all sales of public assets to private corporations, it destroys the capability of the Government to secure vital infrastructure, to ensure said infrastructure isn't left to rot in the ground by profit driven private corporations, and to build and expand in areas that do not deliver what a private company would consider appropriate returns.

Also, Anna Bligh & Bob Carr don't have anything to do with selling Federal Government assets.

Labor might send everything to shit according to you, although this Government managed to get us through the GFC unscathed, unlike all the countries using the Liberals preferred policy of austerity, but at least they aren't selling the assets that can make money and/or provide services to the nation.

batfink wrote:
as far as utilities making money...IF the State Labor party had of built the roads for themselves they would be raking in $350 million a year in NSW, and the resident of sydney would be paying tolls fot a long time less or the very least for reinvestment in further projects....so in bounces both ways MAC


Like I said, I hate PPP's on new infrastructure and the selling of existing infrastructure.

It does bounce both ways, but the Liberal Government have the track record in this area and it's a very poor one, both in terms of outcomes achieved through sell-offs (EG Completely fucking up the Telstra sale), and in terms of what was gained through the same (EG: Selling our gold at rock bottom prices, or giving up the massive monopoly profits that owning our Airports gave the Government).
Edited
9 Years Ago by macktheknife
imonfourfourtwo
imonfourfourtwo
Pro
Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)Pro (2.9K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K, Visits: 0
batfink wrote:
as far as utilities making money...IF the State Labor party had of built the roads for themselves they would be raking in $350 million a year in NSW, and the resident of sydney would be paying tolls fot a long time less or the very least for reinvestment in further projects....so in bounces both ways MAC


Agreed. Private Public partnerships just make things far more expensive as the government pays millions (potentially billions) of dollars extra in interest repayments to their private partners. This debate is going on right now in Victoria where the state government is putting all other infrastructure projects on hold for basically a decade while they go ahead with the eastern link to Flemington (hardly the west). Spending billions of dollars on a road that less than twenty percent of Eastern Freeway drivers would use is a huge waste of money and PPP would just make that worse.
Edited
9 Years Ago by imonfourfourtwo
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
as far as utilities making money...IF the State Labor party had of built the roads for themselves they would be raking in $350 million a year in NSW, and the resident of sydney would be paying tolls fot a long time less or the very least for reinvestment in further projects....so in bounces both ways MAC
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
batfink
batfink
Legend
Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)Legend (10K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
Quote:
LNP gain power clean up the mess get the budget back on track and do all the hard yards
then


They don't do any hard yards, they just sell every public asset they can get their hands on.

Imagine how much all the gold Costello sold for rock bottom prices would be worth now.

Or how much Telstra would be making for the Government having already built a FTTN network in early 2000 followed by an NBN style FTTP, out of general revenue, if Howard had structurally seperated the wholesale and retail aspects of Telstra instead of fucking it up badly.

Or how much all the airports they sold would be raking in right now.


uuummmm sell public assests like Anna bligh did????????????????? and bobby carr???????????

every time Labor get in we go to shit in a handbag........simple fact.....deal with it....
Edited
9 Years Ago by batfink
macktheknife
macktheknife
Legend
Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)Legend (16K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K, Visits: 0
Quote:
LNP gain power clean up the mess get the budget back on track and do all the hard yards
then


They don't do any hard yards, they just sell every public asset they can get their hands on.

Imagine how much all the gold Costello sold for rock bottom prices would be worth now.

Or how much Telstra would be making for the Government having already built a FTTN network in early 2000 followed by an NBN style FTTP, out of general revenue, if Howard had structurally seperated the wholesale and retail aspects of Telstra instead of fucking it up badly.

Or how much all the airports they sold would be raking in right now.
Edited
9 Years Ago by macktheknife
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search