|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I suspect the judges that let Pell off 'enjoyed the limelight in one of the hottest cases' of that year. 'It’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that *they* were influenced by external factors such as the * #notallmen* movement and * MRA * activism in the legal system.' Gee it's easy to play this game. You can pretty much distort any finding.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Lehrman may well be a cockhead. But that doesn't make this decision right.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children So the SEVEN Judges of the High Court stood up for him too? I don't stand up for HIM, I stand up for his RIGHT to be tried under the legal system everyone is entitled to.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I suspect the judges that let Pell off 'enjoyed the limelight in one of the hottest cases' of that year. 'It’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that *they* were influenced by external factors such as the * #notallmen* movement and * MRA * activism in the legal system.' Gee it's easy to play this game. You can pretty much distort any finding. haha. All 50 MRA's influenced SEVEN High Court Judges. C'mon, you're better than that!
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. Or like Judge Vasta that got sued when he imprisoned a man wrongly? Sure. On appeal a case was overturned. In other news a man was mistakenly convicted. Really there's no other solution than to tear down the whole stinking edifice. Clearly it's fucked and not fit for purpose. its happened twice in a what a few years to two different men involving FOUR eminent Judges....
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I suspect the judges that let Pell off 'enjoyed the limelight in one of the hottest cases' of that year. 'It’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that *they* were influenced by external factors such as the * #notallmen* movement and * MRA * activism in the legal system.' Gee it's easy to play this game. You can pretty much distort any finding. It would definitely be a massive stretch because though those things might exist in nominally some dark recesses of the internet, they have nowhere near the scope, visibility, influence, organisation, corporate power and funding as metoo and feminist activism, with many documented examples of social and political discourse and legal reforms. It's not realistic that ALL seven judges would be influenced, but it's certainly possible that judge Lee was influenced/ On the balance of probabilities I do find that Justice Lee fucked over BL.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night...
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... It also came down to Justice Lee finding her claim that she suddenly woke up with BL on top of her as having a "ring of truth" , despite bounding through security about 20 minutes earlier, and freely admitting he thought she bullshitted for large parts of her testimony. But no, that part, he found she was telling the truth lol.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children So the SEVEN Judges of the High Court stood up for him too? I don't stand up for HIM, I stand up for his RIGHT to be tried under the legal system everyone is entitled to. this sounds a lot like 'I don't defend what you say but I defend your right to say it'...except when someone says something you don't like
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right?
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch!
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. Or like Judge Vasta that got sued when he imprisoned a man wrongly? Sure. On appeal a case was overturned. In other news a man was mistakenly convicted. Really there's no other solution than to tear down the whole stinking edifice. Clearly it's fucked and not fit for purpose. its happened twice in a what a few years to two different men involving FOUR eminent Judges.... Like I said. Tear down the whole stinking edifice. It's cooked, it's done, it's over. Bring on the court of Enzo the 'Learned' and Rusty the 'Retarded'. Court is now is session. Please rise for Judge Big Brain.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch! How did she get naked? Did he manage to put her dress all the way off while she was passed out on the couch, as opposed to simply lifting up her dress? In all probability she removed it herself, either in the presence of him which infers she too was “hellbent” on having sex, or she removed it herself for some unspecified reason. She actively pursued the lie that he pushed the dress up around her waist because that was conducive to her claim that she was raped, contrary to if she admitted she removed the dress herself.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children So the SEVEN Judges of the High Court stood up for him too? I don't stand up for HIM, I stand up for his RIGHT to be tried under the legal system everyone is entitled to. this sounds a lot like 'I don't defend what you say but I defend your right to say it'...except when someone says something you don't like Like when, exactly. One example will do.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch! How did she get naked? Did he manage to put her dress all the way off while she was passed out on the couch, as opposed to simply lifting up her dress? In all probability she removed it herself, either in the presence of him which infers she too was “hellbent” on having sex, or she removed it herself for some unspecified reason. She actively pursued the lie that he pushed the dress up around her waist because that was conducive to her claim that she was raped, contrary to if she admitted she removed the dress herself.
Are you thick? He said he never touched her. He said they entered the office and he went one way and she went another. Then when security popped in later she was starkers. How many women do you know that when they're in an office or somewhere else that's not a bedroom strip off naked before going to sleep? Do you sit down on the couch at night and go 'I could nod off here. Hang on, better get all my kit off first.' So yeah. The judge (you know, that showboating misandrist prick) thinks it was more likely than not that he took her dress off and climbed on top of her.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage?
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch! They both lied. They were both up for it until they weren't. The dress could have been removed by her, him or both. In one possibility it was removed without her consent by him but that's not the only. He then leaves. She falls asleep naked. She's then found naked in the Ministers office by the seco with "her vagina visible to the seco" because she didn't wear underpants that night Ooops..career over...think!...think!..I was...raped. Did she consent.? Depends on how drunk she waas. Seco's say not that much. She says otherwise. If she had his dick inside her then he obviously would have known that she could very well get a medical that would have confirm that and a semen swab would identify him. He would be stupid beyond belief to say that he never stuck his dick inside her if he did.
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
Mincab +x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch! How did she get naked? Did he manage to put her dress all the way off while she was passed out on the couch, as opposed to simply lifting up her dress? In all probability she removed it herself, either in the presence of him which infers she too was “hellbent” on having sex, or she removed it herself for some unspecified reason. She actively pursued the lie that he pushed the dress up around her waist because that was conducive to her claim that she was raped, contrary to if she admitted she removed the dress herself.
Are you thick? He said he never touched her. He said they entered the office and he went one way and she went another. Then when security popped in later she was starkers. How many women do you know that when they're in an office or somewhere else that's not a bedroom strip off naked before going to sleep? Do you sit down on the couch at night and go 'I could nod off here. Hang on, better get all my kit off first.' So yeah. The judge (you know, that showboating misandrist prick) thinks it was more likely than not that he took her dress off and climbed on top of her. I’m not saying they didn’t have sex. Im saying she is person most likely to have taken her kit off, in anticipation of having sex. Especially when you look at the context of them having hooked up in the club, taken the Uber ride together, and entered into parliamentary suite together, they weren’t there to chill on the couch and discuss Plato. They were there to fuck, both of them. So for rape to have occurred, you have to believe that the women who breezed past security all smiles, within 15-30 minutes was in a near comatose state, unable to be roused from her stupor despite her having her dress pulled up over her shoulders and head and pulling on her hair, and only came to when she noticed he was stuffing his dick inside of her. And then was too “waterlogged” (lol) to do anything about it. Sure , it’s possible , but it’s a fucking stretch. The most likely explanation is they hooked up in da club, when back to PH to fuck, got starkers, fucked on the couch as was the plan, BH crashed on the couch and BL being the dick he is left her there to rot without concern for her welfare. Then the next day, faced with the shame of what happened, and the end of her parliamentary career and possible employment , she started to form the narrative in her own mind that she was raped, initially as a defence mechanism to cope with the shame, and later as a way to cash in and punish the LNP for downgrading her employment.That’s the most likely, most probable explanation that ties up most of the loose ends, but also the one least likely to be canvassed by a male judge who values his reputation .
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? Well we do know he enabled paedos by moving them to other parishes where they abused more kids. It’s fact. He’s admitted to that, testimony has said that and church records do.
You’re basically on here punching a key board sticking up for cretins.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? You want me to goon to bat for a paedos (or their enablers) like you are doing? No thanks
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? You want me to goon to bat for a paedos (or their enablers) like you are doing? No thanks You should be equally outraged at the the government education departments..but strangely you're not. In one example 4 teacher pedos abused 109 school kids. Where's your outrage calling for the bullet of those who covered that up?
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable. You are more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. Your bark is truly bigger than your bite, muz. When you’ve been outclassed and outsmarted you have this habit of resorting to petty schoolyard name calling.
As for the hundreds of hours of testimony , thousands of pages of documents, highly qualified, decorated judges, respected industry professionals of the highest calibre , it was the same in the Pell case. They fucked that up big time. In fact I suspect it was worse than that, the judges were actively influenced by what was happening in the media with respect to Pell’s reputation more generally. They couldn’t seperate their disdain for the man from their professional judgement. To do so is a rare human trait and can’t be found in any qualification or years of experience.
As for Lee, it’s definitely not a stretch to suggest that he was influenced by external factors such as the metoo movement and feminist activism in the legal system. I imagine it would be difficult for a judge to hand down a decision that would see him ostracised by most of his colleagues for the remainder of his professional career.
Muz is the man-child dummy spitting rattle thrower who cannot handle things not fitting his world view Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. And it all came down to : The victim didn't pull her her dress up exposing her vagina when someone entered the room. Oh and where were her underpants..oh she didn't wear any that night... He testified he didn't touch her. Which means she passed out drunk on the couch but, get this, not before getting naked. Uh huh. Oh no, the 'slut' didn't wear underpants. (Like shit tonnes of girls that go out in tight dresses at night.) Let me clutch my pearls. What horrific slutty behaviour from this harlot. Clearly deserves a dick up her. The bitch! . If she had his dick inside her then he obviously would have known that she could very well get a medical that would have confirm that and a semen swab would identify him. But she was t-t-t-traumatised. Because when rape victims lie about visiting doctors, change their testimony constantly to fit the facts, conjure false memories and get all sorts of details wrong about what took place where, when and how during, its not because they are full of shit and it never happened, its because trauma made them do it. Isnt it interesting theres no way to tell the difference between a false rape complainant and a genuine rape victim. You could have a woman claim she was raped, do nothing about it for 30 years, get the dates, location and every detail wrong, and all she has to do is pull the Trauma card and in an instant her bullshit is converted to truth.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? You want me to goon to bat for a paedos (or their enablers) like you are doing? No thanks You should be equally outraged at the the government education departments..but strangely you're not. In one example 4 teacher pedos abused 109 school kids. Where's your outrage calling for the bullet of those who covered that up? they should be punished in the same manner as your favourite paedo should've been
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
really hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/appalling-rape-myth-bruce-lehrmann-relied-on-to-win/news-story/70bf0f59e36e0ae512b8ccdda9cf8e73
“A common tactic deployed by defence barristers in rape trials is that the victim is lying, despite the statistics for false reports of rape being incredibly low. This same tactic was deployed by Mr Lehrmann’s barristers in this case. “
Here is a prime example of how feminists and progressives manipulate data to inject their twisted man hating BS into the legal progression. While it’s true statistics for fake rape reports are “incredibly low” it’s also true that rape convictions are incredibly low. In fact in only a few percent of rape complaints lead to criminal convictions. Can we surmise then that because rape convictions are incredibly low that rape is largely a myth? or is it more likely that rape is notoriously difficult to prove and prosecute? Likewise false rape complaints are also difficult to prove , so they are rarely if ever prosecuted, and police are rarely interested in investigating them, therefore they tend not to be captured at all for statistical purposes. It’s simply false and a lie to conflate low fake rape allegation statistics with incidence of fake rape allegations. The data simply does not exist. In fact, if 90%~ of rape complaints fail, how can you be sure they were not falsely reported?
The fact is women lie and bullshit all the time. They are prone to conducting their sexual violence through gossip, smear and fake complaints, rather than physically. There’s no reason to believe that BH didn’t fake her rape complaint, but feminists want you to believe that all rape complaints should be believed prima facie rather than requiring any kind of substantiating evidence. So when a rape complaint has the classical hallmarks of appearing to be faked, those false memories, lies and inconsistencies can simply be rationalised away with the “ I was traumatised card” and together with the incredibly low statistics for false rape allegations, it means any man is danger of being convicted for a rape allegation that is ostensibly absurd. It’s an incredibly dangerous time for men and a fair, impartial legal system that is being destroyed by ideology and agendas.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/appalling-rape-myth-bruce-lehrmann-relied-on-to-win/news-story/70bf0f59e36e0ae512b8ccdda9cf8e73
“A common tactic deployed by defence barristers in rape trials is that the victim is lying, despite the statistics for false reports of rape being incredibly low. This same tactic was deployed by Mr Lehrmann’s barristers in this case. “
Here is a prime example of how feminists and progressives manipulate data to inject their twisted man hating BS into the legal progression. While it’s true statistics for fake rape reports are “incredibly low” it’s also true that rape convictions are incredibly low. In fact in only a few percent of rape complaints lead to criminal convictions. Can we surmise then that because rape convictions are incredibly low that rape is largely a myth? or is it more likely that rape is notoriously difficult to prove and prosecute? Likewise false rape complaints are also difficult to prove , so they are rarely if ever prosecuted, and police are rarely interested in investigating them, therefore they tend not to be captured at all for statistical purposes. It’s simply false and a lie to conflate low fake rape allegation statistics with incidence of fake rape allegations. The data simply does not exist. In fact, if 90%~ of rape complaints fail, how can you be sure they were not falsely reported?
The fact is women lie and bullshit all the time. They are prone to conducting their sexual violence through gossip, smear and fake complaints, rather than physically. There’s no reason to believe that BH didn’t fake her rape complaint, but feminists want you to believe that all rape complaints should be believed prima facie rather than requiring any kind of substantiating evidence. So when a rape complaint has the classical hallmarks of appearing to be faked, those false memories, lies and inconsistencies can simply be rationalised away with the “ I was traumatised card” and together with the incredibly low statistics for false rape allegations, it means any man is danger of being convicted for a rape allegation that is ostensibly absurd. It’s an incredibly dangerous time for men and a fair, impartial legal system that is being destroyed by ideology and agendas.
Lol. Log off dickhead.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? You want me to goon to bat for a paedos (or their enablers) like you are doing? No thanks You should be equally outraged at the the government education departments..but strangely you're not. In one example 4 teacher pedos abused 109 school kids. Where's your outrage calling for the bullet of those who covered that up? they should be punished in the same manner as your favourite paedo should've been You're a fucking disgrace.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Yea that's because you're too fucking stupid. To dumb it down so you're peanut brain can understand, the earlier central point was that the justice system has been politicized. Our Judges who are supposed to be above the politics, the media, their own biases and prejuduces and are anything but. Pell's wrongful imprisonment was an example. You insinuated that it wasthe political right that was responsible for the Catholic Church failures to protect children from pedo priests Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Same crime, different justice. If you can't keep up, then log off.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/news-life/appalling-rape-myth-bruce-lehrmann-relied-on-to-win/news-story/70bf0f59e36e0ae512b8ccdda9cf8e73
“A common tactic deployed by defence barristers in rape trials is that the victim is lying, despite the statistics for false reports of rape being incredibly low. This same tactic was deployed by Mr Lehrmann’s barristers in this case. “
Here is a prime example of how feminists and progressives manipulate data to inject their twisted man hating BS into the legal progression. While it’s true statistics for fake rape reports are “incredibly low” it’s also true that rape convictions are incredibly low. In fact in only a few percent of rape complaints lead to criminal convictions. Can we surmise then that because rape convictions are incredibly low that rape is largely a myth? or is it more likely that rape is notoriously difficult to prove and prosecute? Likewise false rape complaints are also difficult to prove , so they are rarely if ever prosecuted, and police are rarely interested in investigating them, therefore they tend not to be captured at all for statistical purposes. It’s simply false and a lie to conflate low fake rape allegation statistics with incidence of fake rape allegations. The data simply does not exist. In fact, if 90%~ of rape complaints fail, how can you be sure they were not falsely reported?
The fact is women lie and bullshit all the time. They are prone to conducting their sexual violence through gossip, smear and fake complaints, rather than physically. There’s no reason to believe that BH didn’t fake her rape complaint, but feminists want you to believe that all rape complaints should be believed prima facie rather than requiring any kind of substantiating evidence. So when a rape complaint has the classical hallmarks of appearing to be faked, those false memories, lies and inconsistencies can simply be rationalised away with the “ I was traumatised card” and together with the incredibly low statistics for false rape allegations, it means any man is danger of being convicted for a rape allegation that is ostensibly absurd. It’s an incredibly dangerous time for men and a fair, impartial legal system that is being destroyed by ideology and agendas.
Agreed. Good post.
|
|
|
|