humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Notorganic seems to me one of the more amenable chaps on this forum.
|
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:notorganic wrote:He needs to understand that he can't replicate Sagan, nobody can. Except for Jodie Foster in Contact in the scene where she wore his turtleneck. I didn't mind that film, not great but not bad, then someone gave me his copy of the book. Sagan was a good writer.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Notorganic seems to me one of the more amenable chaps on this forum. frist of all how dare yo u
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:paladisious wrote:notorganic wrote:He needs to understand that he can't replicate Sagan, nobody can. Except for Jodie Foster in Contact in the scene where she wore his turtleneck. I didn't mind that film, not great but not bad, then someone gave me his copy of the book. Sagan was a good writer. Never read any of his books actually. I was thinking I should get them the other day. The McConaissance also helps when trying to get people to take the film seriously now I guess :lol: Edited by paladisious: 22/3/2014 01:37:56 AM
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:the conversation evolved from there. Was expecting you to deny that too :lol:
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts.
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. The world flooded once and some dude had to quickly grab a pair of each animal. Checkmate atheists and climate change deniers.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. The world flooded once and some dude had to quickly grab a pair of each animal. Checkmate atheists and climate change deniers. That wacky pre-biblical climate change.
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. The world flooded once and some dude had to quickly grab a pair of each animal. Checkmate atheists and climate change deniers. That wacky pre-biblical climate change. I'm pro life! pro climate change! And pro unicorns just like the good book says!
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:afromanGT wrote:Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. The world flooded once and some dude had to quickly grab a pair of each animal. Checkmate atheists and climate change deniers. That wacky pre-biblical climate change. I'm pro life! pro climate change! And pro unicorns just like the good book says!
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Getting back on topic, and not really in space (but used there). A few years ago I read solar cell efficiency was about 18%. No I see that it is about 21.5%.
So for every square meter of sunlight that hits us we are extracting just under a quarter of the available energy. Seeing as we have a large number of climate buffs on here obviously getting that figure up to 80% will make a huge dent in climate change. And for climate change deniers,,, ehhh what could it hurt in pushing this technology to its limits.
If you are young and interested in science, then follow solar - it is your path to $$$$$$$$$$ in the future.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all
|
|
|
Glenn - A-league Mad
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Despite which way the evidence reads, I think it is reasonable to say burning fossil fuel is detrimental to human health. If governments legislate (like Germany) to promote renewable and clean sources of energy than if they reach there goal mankind would benefit on the whole. Maybe we are fucking the environment, maybe we aren't, but either way renewable energy is not going to be detrimental to society.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all Except that according to Milankovitch Cycles we should be experiencing global cooling, not warming.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all Except that according to Milankovitch Cycles we should be experiencing global cooling, not warming. yes, we're heading into a cooling cycle may explain why the fraudsters are keen to get their world tax done ASAP there's been no warming for the past 15 years some of us will remember a certain BBC article from the year 2000 which predicted there'd never be snow in the UK again in winter. that article still exists however its been since scrubbed from an embarrassed BBC after recent winters in that region resulting in record snowfalls.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Glenn - A-league Mad wrote:Despite which way the evidence reads, I think it is reasonable to say burning fossil fuel is detrimental to human health. If governments legislate (like Germany) to promote renewable and clean sources of energy than if they reach there goal mankind would benefit on the whole. Maybe we are fucking the environment, maybe we aren't, but either way renewable energy is not going to be detrimental to society. and yet Germany care so much about climate change and burning fossil fuels they're phasing out their nuclear power plants and replacing with natural gas. :roll: either way, a tradeable world tax will not reduce pollution. it only moves it somewhere else, and unfortunately the tax is not on actual pollution. if you want to reduce pollution, you legislate to cap it with no option to trade it. however that wont make any bankers wealthier will it #-o
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all Except that according to Milankovitch Cycles we should be experiencing global cooling, not warming. yes, we're heading into a cooling cycle may explain why the fraudsters are keen to get their world tax done ASAP there's been no warming for the past 15 years some of us will remember a certain BBC article from the year 2000 which predicted there'd never be snow in the UK again in winter. that article still exists however its been since scrubbed from an embarrassed BBC after recent winters in that region resulting in record snowfalls. We've been going through a cooling phase since the cycle peaked around 8,000 BCE. It's a roughly 22,000 year cycle. So we should be entering the coolest phase of the cycle. Instead the climate is warming. Your argument is invalid.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Please make a climate change thread and battle it out there.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
u4486662 wrote:Please make a climate change thread and battle it out there. Yes please. I've just found this thread and the first pages were great but now it's turned to shit.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all Except that according to Milankovitch Cycles we should be experiencing global cooling, not warming. yes, we're heading into a cooling cycle may explain why the fraudsters are keen to get their world tax done ASAP there's been no warming for the past 15 years some of us will remember a certain BBC article from the year 2000 which predicted there'd never be snow in the UK again in winter. that article still exists however its been since scrubbed from an embarrassed BBC after recent winters in that region resulting in record snowfalls. We've been going through a cooling phase since the cycle peaked around 8,000 BCE. It's a roughly 22,000 year cycle. So we should be entering the coolest phase of the cycle. Instead the climate is warming. Your argument is invalid. thats complete rubbish you're making this up
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:afromanGT wrote:ricecrackers wrote:tbitm wrote:ricecrackers wrote:actually in the USA they've at near record lows in the number of tornado and hurricane events over the past year or so some parts of the planet are becoming more benign
the news media like to hype up fearmongering though If that's true, it would appear that some sort of change has happened to the climate :-k climate changes naturally, always has no one is disputing that True, but those changes were traditionally triggered by significant events. Y'know, things like volcanic eruptions or meteor impacts. climate changes with or without such catastrophic events orbital variation such as Milankovitch cycles means the climate is constantly changing gradually over 1000's of years the current climate variations are well within the bounds of those cycles. there is absolutely no evidence of anything out of the ordinary occurring at all Except that according to Milankovitch Cycles we should be experiencing global cooling, not warming. yes, we're heading into a cooling cycle may explain why the fraudsters are keen to get their world tax done ASAP there's been no warming for the past 15 years some of us will remember a certain BBC article from the year 2000 which predicted there'd never be snow in the UK again in winter. that article still exists however its been since scrubbed from an embarrassed BBC after recent winters in that region resulting in record snowfalls. We've been going through a cooling phase since the cycle peaked around 8,000 BCE. It's a roughly 22,000 year cycle. So we should be entering the coolest phase of the cycle. Instead the climate is warming. Your argument is invalid. thats complete rubbish you're making this up See the new climate change thread I started. Lets move this discussion there.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
xkcd wrote:Here's a question to give you a sense of scale: Which of the following would be brighter, in terms of the amount of energy delivered to your retina: 1: A supernova, seen from as far away as the Sun is from the Earth, or 2: The detonation of a hydrogen bomb pressed against your eyeball? Can you hurry up and set it off? This is heavy.Applying the physicist rule of thumb suggests that the supernova is brighter. And indeed, it is ... by nine orders of magnitude. Edited by paladisious: 23/3/2014 01:34:15 PM
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
http://space-facts.comThe sun is so massive, that even though there is a 10km difference in diameter between the poles and the equator, it is still the most perfect sphere known to nature. Edited by u4486662: 23/3/2014 11:34:01 PM
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
NASA wrote:The gantry arms begin to close around the Soyuz TMA-12M spacecraft to secure the rocket, as seen in this long exposure photograph, at the launch pad on Sunday, March 23, 2014, at the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan. Launch of the Soyuz rocket is scheduled for March 26 and will send Expedition 39 Soyuz Commander Alexander Skvortsov of the Russian Federal Space Agency, Roscosmos, Flight Engineer Steven Swanson of NASA, and Flight Engineer Oleg Artemyev of Roscosmos on a six-month mission aboard the International Space Station. 
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Great discoveries of 2013.
[youtube]-iizm7PpnUs[/youtube]
|
|
|
playmaker11
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
[youtube]BMNLsQCy-Nc[/youtube]
By now, American Samoa must have realised that Australias 22-0 win over Tonga two days earlier was no fluke.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Wired wrote:Astronomers Surprised to Find Asteroid With RingsBY ADAM MANN  For the first time ever, astronomers have discovered a ring system surrounding an asteroid. The finding is a complete surprise to planetary scientists, who are yet unsure exactly how such rings could have formed. The cosmic bling was found around an object named Chariklo, which orbits in a region between Saturn and Uranus. At 155 miles across, or about the length of Massachusetts, Chariklo is the largest known asteroid in its neighborhood. Looking to get a better idea of its exact size and shape, astronomers trained their telescopes on the giant space rock as it passed in front on a distant star in June 2013. As Chariklo performed its eclipse, researchers noticed something odd: The star’s light flickered just a bit immediately before and after Chariklo’s pass. The reason for this darkening was the asteroid’s two dense rings, which had briefly blocked the starlight. The thicker inner ring is about four miles wide, while the thinner outer ring is a little less than two miles. Spectroscopic analysis of the starlight also revealed that the rings are composed partially of water ice. The ice rings reflect light like a mirror, a property that helps explain an earlier anomalous finding regarding Chariklo. After the asteroid was discovered in 1997, its brightness mysteriously dropped off and only came back again in 2008. What apparently happened was that, as Chariklo moved through its orbit, its ring system turned edge-on when viewed from Earth. As they turned back to face us with their flat side, they reflected light toward our planet and Chariklo’s brightness grew by 40 percent. There are only four other known ring systems in our solar system — around Jupiter, Uranus, Neptune and, most dramatically, Saturn — and all the other ones have formed around planets. Astronomers aren’t yet sure if Chariklo’s ring system makes it unique among asteroids. In recent decades, more than 10 other objects in its neighborhood have been searched using a technique similar to Chariklo’s stellar eclipse but have not shown any rings. The asteroid’s rings might have formed when another slightly smaller object slammed into its surface, kicking up a huge amount of debris that settled into rings held in place by gravity. Alternatively, Chariklo could have a tiny companion asteroid orbiting around it. Micrometeorite impacts on the tiny companion’s surface might dislodge fragments that turned into a ring around Chariklo. Thin rings around an object will tend to spread out, making their edges fuzzy. Chariklo’s rings appear to have very sharp edges, which might indicate that they contain itty-bitty shepherd moons — just a few miles wide — whose gravitational influence pries open the lane between the two rings and confines their edges. Such shepherd moon are how planets like Uranus keep their thin rings so sharp. But many-ringed Saturn also has a few very thin rings that aren’t maintained by shepherd moons, suggesting that this explanation could turn out to be wrong. Perhaps studying Chariklo’s simple ring system further could help astronomers understand the behavior of larger rings in the solar system.
|
|
|
playmaker11
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:Researchers have discovered a deep saltwater ocean on one of the many small moons that orbit Saturn, leading scientists to conclude it is the most likely place in the solar system for extraterrestrial life to be found. Gravitational field measurements taken by Nasa's Cassini space probe revealed that a 10km-deep ocean of water, larger than Lake Superior, lurks beneath the icy surface of Enceladus at the moon's south pole. David Stevenson, a planetary scientist at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, said the body of water was so large it "may extend halfway or more towards the equator in every direction. It might even extend all the way to the north." The presence of a saltwater ocean a billion kilometres from Earth more than satisfies Nasa's long-held mantra of "follow the water" to find signs of alien life, but water is not the only factor that makes Enceladus such a promising habitat. The water is in contact with the moon's rocky core, so elements useful for life, such as phosphorus, sulfur and potassium, will leach into the ocean. http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/apr/03/ocean-enceladus-alien-life-water-saturn-moon
By now, American Samoa must have realised that Australias 22-0 win over Tonga two days earlier was no fluke.
|
|
|
afromanGT
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 77K,
Visits: 0
|
I've always been confused by this whole "things necessary for life" like in an infinitely possible universe only the things we need for life could possibly be used for it.
|
|
|
u4486662
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K,
Visits: 0
|
afromanGT wrote:I've always been confused by this whole "things necessary for life" like in an infinitely possible universe only the things we need for life could possibly be used for it. I was also confused by this notion until it was explained to me that most common substances in the universe are hydrogen, helium, carbon and oxygen which, apart from the inert helium are the primary substances that make up life on earth. So the theory then is that the most likely type of life found outside of the earth will also be carbon based and hence require the same substances, like water, to exist. If you know what I mean.
|
|
|