Oh come on. I'm by no means a Trump sympathiser and understand why some people might dislike him. That's fine, but let's at least use facts when discussing his policies.

Like most people I was genuinely fearful that Trump's not insubstantial ego and blunt manner would be a foreign policy disaster, leading to endless invasions. To my surprise, his administration have defied the war mongering Deep State neo-cons and hawks. Given who owns 90% of the US media, I can now see why they hate him so much.

North Korea don’t seem to be a problem anymore. One of the first countries he visited was Saudi Arabia, After this, the Saudis arrested around 300 officials involved in human trafficking. Saudi Arabia is notorious for paedophilia and child trafficking, although I'm sure it hasn't completely solved the problem. The neocons baited him to invade Iran but thankfully common sense prevailed. Now they're pulling troops out of Afghanistan. Perhaps a bit late, but a step in the right direction. 

Compare this to Obama. I had such high hopes that he would help unite humanity, but completed his 8 years as the greatest disappointment of my lifetime. His administration bombed at least 7 countries and interfered in the politics of many others such as Ukraine, seemingly trying to create WW3 with Russia. Don't even mention the Bushes. Pure evil, with the MSM not even questioning the invasion of Iraq. 

The media never mention Trump's achievements such as the dramatic increase in arrests of paedophiles and human traffickers, as well as fighting criminal gangs such as MS-13, but I've never seen a President in my lifetime openly hated by the media even before entering the White House. Anyone who can't see this is either blind or part of the system.

I love this term "trump derangement syndrome". The conservatives that use it seem oblivious to the fact it can also be used to describe those who stand by the president despite it becoming painfully clear his end game is to divide the nation. 

I am still firm in my belief that Trump was elected on the back of a backlash against liberal PC/identity politics bullshit that even older liberals detest. These divisions are not Trumps fault,  but that doesn't change the fact that the man is literally cancer of America, seeking to exacerbate said divisions to the point of destroying the nation so he can rule over the ashes.

I love this term "trump derangement syndrome". The conservatives that use it seem oblivious to the fact it can also be used to describe those who stand by the president despite it becoming painfully clear his end game is to divide the nation. 

I am still firm in my belief that Trump was elected on the back of a backlash against liberal PC/identity politics bullshit that even older liberals detest. These divisions are not Trumps fault,  but that doesn't change the fact that the man is literally cancer of America, seeking to exacerbate said divisions to the point of destroying the nation so he can rule over the ashes.

Bit from Column A, bit from Column B.  

Hilary was a terrible candidate & tainted from her husband plus her own corrupt dealings however the fact that she got a free run from her own party plus her media darlings & still couldn't win is quite frankly hilarious.  I can see why they've been shreiking like little bitches for 4 years & soon to be another 4 despite the fact that Trump doesn't do himself many favours the past 6 months.   

I love this term "trump derangement syndrome". The conservatives that use it seem oblivious to the fact it can also be used to describe those who stand by the president despite it becoming painfully clear his end game is to divide the nation. 

I am still firm in my belief that Trump was elected on the back of a backlash against liberal PC/identity politics bullshit that even older liberals detest. These divisions are not Trumps fault,  but that doesn't change the fact that the man is literally cancer of America, seeking to exacerbate said divisions to the point of destroying the nation so he can rule over the ashes.

And on another matter this 'the Trump is the enemy of the people' schtick they love to run with is straight out of the playbook of the biggest despot of modern history.

Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Kruschev, Pol pot, Pinochet, Redondo, Amin and the rest of them all took aim at the capitalists either directly or indirectly.

Frankly it's embarassing to democracy and decency that the President is copping it as he is.  It's only a matter of time before a republican is lynched in the US.

A strong robust democracy demands a strong robust, argumentative government  prepared to ask tough uncomfortable questions without being insulted by the media for doing so.

And on another matter this 'the media is the enemy of the people' schtick he loves to run with is straight out of the playbook of the biggest despots of modern history.

Mao, Hitler, Mussolini, Stalin, Kruschev, Pol pot, Pinochet, Redondo, Amin and the rest of them all took aim at the media either directly or indirectly.

Frankly it's embarassing to democracy and decency that the media is copping it as they are.  It's only a matter of time before a journalist is lynched in the US.

A strong robust democracy demands a strong robust, argumentative media prepared to ask tough uncomfortable questions without being insulted by the president for doing so.

If Trump wants to be treated like an actual human being instead of being treated like the petulant child he behaves as perhaps he should start acting like one.

Yep.

So long as people swallow and perpetuate the rhetoric that there are only two types of people and put
EVERY
SINGLE
ISSUE
into a box of either right or left because it's easier to process complex problems if you bat it to one side and move on then you may as well.

This style of politics is the problem not your actual politics. 

Is Trump even right wing or just Trump wing? Does he have a single political motivation other than self-aggrandising?
I truly suspect not. 
It's possibly even sadder that the traditional "right" rallies behind him than it is the "left" rallies against him.

No it isnt sad.  Trump says stupid things from time to time but he’s actually done a lot of good things.  Republicans tend to value the economy as the most important metric and so on front Trump gets a tick.  So while the economy is ticking along nicely they are prepared to forgive some of his more cringeworthy and foolish statements, such as the one about injecting hand sanitiser into your blood stream.  But you have to balance the stupid shit he says with the positive things he does, such as standing up to China, opening dialogue with NK, achievement lowest unemployment and black unemployment rate for decades, exiting from Syria, etc etc.  Can you imagine if Obama opened dilalogue with Nk?  He’d probably get a nobel peace prize.  Democrats and leftists are less interested in tangibles like GDP growth and military and more interested in feelings and symbols, that’s why they place high value on things like stirring speeches, appearances, attending rallies and mandating inclusive language that make people feel good.

I’m no massive fan of the President prior to 2016 I wouldnt have voted for him as I fell for some of the leftist propaganda about how he was going to start a nuclear war with NK and destroy the economy, but as you can see performed reasonably well on an economic and military front at least.  So unfortunately most of your statement is full of baloney even though you try to appear balanced.

Just remember Rus it's the right that carry out acts of domestic terrorism at a rate of 10 to 1.

If anyone gets lynched it'll be a Democrat well before a Republican.

Bit from Column A, bit from Column B.  

Hilary was a terrible candidate & tainted from her husband plus her own corrupt dealings however the fact that she got a free run from her own party plus her media darlings & still couldn't win is quite frankly hilarious.  I can see why they've been shreiking like little bitches for 4 years & soon to be another 4 despite the fact that Trump doesn't do himself many favours the past 6 months.   

It was actually a republican who was shot and nearly killed by a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2017.😅.  

It was actually a republican who was shot and nearly killed by a Bernie Sanders supporter in 2017.😅.  

The conservatives/ liberals that use it seem oblivious to the fact it can also be used to describe those who stand by the president despite it becoming painfully clear his end game is to divide the nation.

The above sentence could've been applied to at least the previous two presidents as well. During the Bush administration, pretty much all the same criticisms were levelled at GWB (racist, fascist, dangerous moron, only got where he did because of daddy etc) with the addition of being a warmonger. Then you had 8 years of Obama and it was the more paranoid right factions turn (Muslim sympathiser/ race-baiter/ communist/ looking to rule America by divide and conquer etc)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabby_Giffords

https://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/09/us/politics/09giffords.html

Do try and keep up.

“Records show that Loughner was registered as an independent and voted in 2006 and 2008, but not in 2010.”

😂😂😂

If only rusty was a black man in America how his tube would change.

-PB