paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Aussie4ever4 wrote:AJohn wrote:I'll support a team called Cockburn just for the commentary
"They're on the counter now, they could catch Cockburn napping"
Edited by AJohn: 12/2/2013 02:30:26 PM Lol pronounced coburn Are you sure? ;)
|
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote:Aussie4ever4 wrote:AJohn wrote:I'll support a team called Cockburn just for the commentary
"They're on the counter now, they could catch Cockburn napping"
Edited by AJohn: 12/2/2013 02:30:26 PM Lol pronounced coburn Are you sure? ;) Lol thought i had to watch 27minutes then. Ajohn wrote:Ruin the fantasy why don't you Kinda how like kiwis call blackburn, bluckburn. Nvm shit joke, and you arnt even kiwi, why are you doing this to me?
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:South Coast could yet have the opportunity to play in the A-League under a Football Federation Australia blueprint to be announced by chief executive David Gallop Wednesday morning.
Under the new structure, the elite national competition will use a promotion and relegation system involving the champion club of Australia’s state league clubs.
The Mercury has learned the NSW Premier League titleholder would enter an eight-team cup competition to be established next year.
Then within five years, the cup winner would advance to a promotion-relegation playoff against the bottom-placed A-League team.
The FFA is also poised to develop a number of pathway initiatives and financial incentives to help bridge the gap between the top two tiers in Australia, as part of a long-term plan to be consistently competitive in the Asian confederation.
Former A-League player and Wolves captain Jacob Timpano said with careful management, South Coast could return to being a national powerhouse once again.
‘‘It is a big gap [between A-League and NSW Premier League] in all aspects professionally,’’ he said.
‘‘But it would be great for it to be bridged and there be a lot more common ground.
‘‘There’s a history of success for Wollongong players, in national teams, playing in overseas leagues and as a club at the elite level in Australia.
‘‘If there were the structures in place, there’s no doubt we could build a squad of predominantly homegrown talent.
‘‘So any plans like this would be a massive thing for South Coast football.’’
The Mercury understands the original FFA plan involved branding the cup competition as the ‘‘Australian Premier League’’, however, the move hit a road block because the naming rights are held by lawn bowls.
The leagues of each state and territory will be set a timeframe for involvement in the cup competition, with NSW set to be among the first included next year.
The FFA has been under pressure from the Asian Football Confederation for some time about developing a promotion and relegation system.
There will be a strict set of criteria in place before a team is promoted to the A-League, however, South Coast’s chances are enhanced by the availability of WIN Stadium as a venue.
State league clubs would receive significant financial windfalls if one of their players is recruited to an A-League club.
It will be enforced that each state league club has full-time technical directors and A-licence coaches, as well as highly qualified coaches for their junior programs.
In 2000 and 2001, the then Wollongong Wolves won the National Soccer League titles and they also won the 2008 NSW Premier League crown, before falling on difficult financial times.
The rebuilding process has led South Coast to an elimination final last year, after being second on the NSWPL standings for much of the season.
Football South Coast general manager Bill Kostandas said a focus would need to remain on enhancing the pathways for talented juniors.
Kostandas heads the unified South Coast governing body, which was a key component in any future moves to enter the A-League or W-League competitions.
‘‘If this comes to fruition it would have many benefits,’’ he said.
‘‘We’ll wait and see what is announced [today], but this could help produce the region’s next Socceroo and prospects of them staying in the region for longer.
See your ad here ‘‘Structually, I don’t believe there would need to be a lot of change in what Football South Coast already has in place.
‘‘There are technical directors and skilled coaches already involved at all levels, both within Football South Coast and the Wolves.
‘‘A lot of people have worked hard to develop the pathways towards the opportunities the Wolves provide in the NSW Premier League, so any plans to enhance that would be welcomed.’’ http://www.illawarramercury.com.au/story/1296664/wolves-could-move-into-a-league-under-new-changes/?cs=12
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
AJohn wrote:I'd want a team in the league called Cockburn just for the commentary
"They're on the counter now, they could catch Cockburn napping"
Edited by AJohn: 12/2/2013 02:31:13 PM
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
petszk wrote:AJohn wrote:I'd want a team in the league called Cockburn just for the commentary
"They're on the counter now, they could catch Cockburn napping"
Edited by AJohn: 12/2/2013 02:31:13 PM  Ah, the Cockburn Cocks.
|
|
|
tbitm
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Since populations is going to be a factor in where the next team or teams go because it is important to take tv deals and attendances into consideration. I thought it would be good to see each areas current population and projected future populations.
Wollongong (Wollongong/Shellharbour/Kiama In 1998, With a population of 264,128, the Wollongong Wolves averaged 5,567 in their NSL when they came 6th place. Currently, the population is around 292,136 In 2017, The next likely time for expansion, the population is estimated to be about 303,630 In 2022, 318,574 in 2030, 343,891
Canberra (Canberra/Queanbeyan) In 1996, with a population of around 297,300, the Canberra Cosmos averaged 3,176 when they came last in the NSL. Currently, The population is around 422,249 In 2017, 455,113 In 2022, 499,813 In 2030, 580,644
Geelong Currently, the population is around 227,699 In 2017, 241,957 In 2022, 261,042 In 2030, 294,758
Aukland In 2001, with a population of 1,022,616, the Football Kingz averaged 6,620 when they came 8th in the NSL. Currently the population is around 1,530,315 In 2017, 1,624,221 In 2022, 1,749,747 In 2030, 1,971,077
Tasmania Currently the population is around 513,024 In 2017, 517,141 In 2022, 522,333 In 2030, 530,748
Townsville In 2010, with a population of 181,743, North Queensland Fury averaged 6,723 when they came 7th in the A-League. Currently the population is around 186,310 In 2017, 203,254 In 2022, 226,617 In 2030, 269,712
Also the reason why i chose those years for each cities former teams is because those years were their best attendance wise that i could find.
Also Aussie4ever4, could you put this in your first post for future reference by any chance?
|
|
|
zutto09
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 554,
Visits: 0
|
At least spell Auckland right next time.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Done with special thanks at bottom.
Wollongong crowds since 1993, missing 1994/95.
2003/04 Wollongong Wolves 2.569 2002/03 Wollongong Wolves 3.025 2001/02 Wollongong Wolves 3.403 2000/01 Wollongong Wolves 5.104 1999/00 Wollongong Wolves 4.939 1998/99 Wollongong Wolves 3.560 1997/98 Wollongong Wolves 5.567 1996/97 Wollongong Wolves 4.701 1995/96 Wollongong City 2.873 1993/94 Wollongong City 2.089
Edited by aussie4ever4: 20/2/2013 12:32:05 AM
|
|
|
JayEss
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Would love to see Wollongong and Canberra included in an expansion.
Also, this might be a stupid question that has probably been mentioned before, but could a youth player (U-21?) entry draft style system work here in the A-League?
It might help find some raw gems and stop players from seeping through the cracks.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
One also needs to consider the area a club can draw from not just the immediate area. A North Queensland franchise for example, should be able to draw further than just Townsville for if done correctly as Queensland is the most decentralized state in Australia. Fury were run somewhat incompetently, so this has to improve as I'm confident the area can be a success story for football.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
i might be dreaming too early but if canberra cosmos and wollongong wolves were the next 2 sides, this is how id like to see their draws, derived in a way so that their fan-base can develop properly before they have away matches against teams in near-by areas, as has occured with the wanderers. and also a lesson from nqf and gcu, dont have the two expansion clubs play against each other early on in the season:
canberra cosmos r1: jets (away) r2: roar (home) r3: perth (away) r4: ccm (home) r5: jets (away) r6: sydney fc (home) r7: victory (home)
wollongong wolves r1: perth glory (home) r2: adelaide (away) r3: sydney fc (home) r4: wellington phoenix (away) r5: melbourne victory (home) r6: heart (away) r7: wanderers (home)
Edited by williamn: 5/3/2013 02:30:32 PM
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
I like pg round 1, NSL gf rematch.
|
|
|
AJohn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Definitely no Dunedin.
The next four teams should be Canberra, Wollongong, NQ and Auckland.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
AJohn wrote:Definitely no Dunedin.
The next four teams should be Canberra, Wollongong, NQ and Auckland. The ground at Dunedin is spectacular and a right size and shape. Shame if football can't utilize it. I don't know if two more teams in NSW is the answer.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
kapow!
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
tbitm wrote:Since populations is going to be a factor in where the next team or teams go because it is important to take tv deals and attendances into consideration. I thought it would be good to see each areas current population and projected future populations.
Wollongong (Wollongong/Shellharbour/Kiama In 1998, With a population of 264,128, the Wollongong Wolves averaged 5,567 in their NSL when they came 6th place. Currently, the population is around 292,136 In 2017, The next likely time for expansion, the population is estimated to be about 303,630 In 2022, 318,574 in 2030, 343,891
Canberra (Canberra/Queanbeyan) In 1996, with a population of around 297,300, the Canberra Cosmos averaged 3,176 when they came last in the NSL. Currently, The population is around 422,249 In 2017, 455,113 In 2022, 499,813 In 2030, 580,644
Geelong Currently, the population is around 227,699 In 2017, 241,957 In 2022, 261,042 In 2030, 294,758
Aukland In 2001, with a population of 1,022,616, the Football Kingz averaged 6,620 when they came 8th in the NSL. Currently the population is around 1,530,315 In 2017, 1,624,221 In 2022, 1,749,747 In 2030, 1,971,077
Tasmania Currently the population is around 513,024 In 2017, 517,141 In 2022, 522,333 In 2030, 530,748
Townsville In 2010, with a population of 181,743, North Queensland Fury averaged 6,723 when they came 7th in the A-League. Currently the population is around 186,310 In 2017, 203,254 In 2022, 226,617 In 2030, 269,712
Also the reason why i chose those years for each cities former teams is because those years were their best attendance wise that i could find.
Also Aussie4ever4, could you put this in your first post for future reference by any chance? You left out the gold coast. Increasing the TV deal is the only consideration for a independent competition. Gold coast, auckland and another team from melbourne and sydney would be the obvious choices.
|
|
|
The Jaf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 156,
Visits: 0
|
Canberra and the Gold Coast need to be the next two. Canberra has a large, growing population and a viable local football community to support a club. Plus is only a few hours drive from Sydney ensuring good away support in both directions.
I was tossing up between Gold Coast and Wollongong for the next spot after that but am leaning more towards GC.
Yes, GCU were a debacle for reasons that we all know and that I won't go into but the lessons learned are already being applied to WSW. Spectacularly so.
We need GC in before Wollongong for two main reasons:
a) TV deal. GC is almost double the size of Wollongong already. With population growth averaging 13k a year, they represent far greater value to the next TV rights deal in terms of eyeballs on TV screens.
b) Junior development. SE Queensland needs another junior to professional development pathway and is woefully underserviced with a single team in Brisbane.
Give it a few more years, then have the FFA start laying the groundwork for GC and Canberra to help boost the next TV deal. These two cities alone will provide another 1M+ people to the A-Leagues reach.
Anyway, whilst I'm slightly more in favour of GC than Wollongong, if in a few years time the FFA deams that they're still not ready, I won't lose too much sleep if the FFA plumps for Wollongong instead.
Calls for Aucklands inclusion are seriously premature until such a time as Wellington are sustainable or New Zealand/Oceania joins the AFC.
Edited by The Jaf: 5/3/2013 04:46:04 PM
|
|
|
spado
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
We've all be rehashing the same of arguments for various expansion teams ever since the A-league started. So I am going to ask something new:
How does the new element of WSW fans traveling affect the mix?
Given that a large portion of WSW fans appear willing to travel when it is within reach, does the chance of Canberra and Wollongong entering the A-league increase due to the fact that at least twice a season (if the draw worked out) they could have a sell-out crowd with a fantastic atmosphere to build on and grow the game?
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Didn't Gcu have high stadium rent, they need a much lower cost deal or a new stadium completely. Either way the next teams should be the most viable bid not choosing one city over the other purely for the city they're from, for example if NQ are ready then bring them in, don't wait for Canberra.
|
|
|
GGfortythree
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Geelong?
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
gabgabgab39 wrote:Geelong? Geelong!
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
spado wrote:We've all be rehashing the same of arguments for various expansion teams ever since the A-league started. So I am going to ask something new:
How does the new element of WSW fans traveling affect the mix?
Given that a large portion of WSW fans appear willing to travel when it is within reach, does the chance of Canberra and Wollongong entering the A-league increase due to the fact that at least twice a season (if the draw worked out) they could have a sell-out crowd with a fantastic atmosphere to build on and grow the game? Two good crowds a season is a tough reason to include a team in the competition. The same argument could be used to add any number of new sides in Melbourne - safe in the knowledge that Victory will provide a good 15,000 extra bodies at any derby game.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
That's a good list of 18 teams, easily enough for a decent single division home and away round.
Please, no more conferences at the top level.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
williamn wrote:what i think/would like to see happen: 2016/17 12 teams: 33 rounds play every team 3x 2018/19 14 teams: 30 rounds, play every team 2x +play 4 opposition a 3rd time (including all the derbies a 3rd time round just like they do in the afl) 2022/23 16 teams: 30 rounds play every team 2x and there we have a beautiful 16 team competition with an 8 team finals system featuring (all present + canberra, wollongong, tasmania, geelong, auckland, northern fury) just in the time to watch the qatari summer sweatathon
Edited by williamn: 12/2/2013 02:58:33 PM For a straight 'start-up' franchise expansion - I'd like to see them make an announcement about the new teams 18-24 months before the start of the season... Then bring in all 6 new sides in one go. This way the new teams have plenty of time to recruit - plus when the season starts, they will be able to battle it out with each other as much as they battle with the rest of the league (that said, the way WSW have gone this season proves that a new team can be plenty competitive).
|
|
|
GCU till I die
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 472,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:(that said, the way WSW have gone this season proves that a new team can be plenty competitive). Anyone can be 'competitive', espescially as most teams turnover about half their squad each year. Every club is just the salary cap spread over 23 players, only the shirt colour is different. We've all played fantasy football.
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
11. canberra cosmos/united/capitals 12. wollongong wolves 13. tasmania united 14. northern fury 15. geelong city / dandenong thunder (rebranded to represent SE suburbs) 16. auckland city/knights 17. south melbourne 18. gold coast dragons/redbull/(new fancy name)
|
|
|
Brisbane Ro
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
williamn wrote:18. gold coast dragons/redbull/(new fancy name) Gold Coast Crimewaves?
|
|
|
shallow hal wants a gal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
I'd like to see Canberra and nth Queensland come in next.
The aus capital needs to be represented in the a league. But the name should be cosmos, maybe just Canberra city or Canberra utd. Kit should be all white with a dark green stripe Down the left side of the shirt, vertically. Kinda like the socceroos kit.
|
|
|
GDeathe
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.1K,
Visits: 0
|
the next spot is going to a team called: NPL Champion Qualification is the next big thing
|
|
|
milan_7
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.4K,
Visits: 0
|
For kits, refer to the new MLS kits. Absolutely gorgeous.
|
|
|
chillbilly
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.2K,
Visits: 0
|
11.mvfc.11 wrote:Eastern conference: Melbourne Victory Adelaide United Perth Glory Melbourne Heart Canberra Tasmania Woolongong South Melbourne Geelong.
Western conference; Sydney FC Central Coast Newcastle Jets Brisbane Roar Wellington Phoenix Western Sydney Wanderers North Queensland Auckland Gold Coast.
Everyone plays each other twice, with a third game against each team in your conference, home/away alternating year by year. Saves an extra trip to NZ for Perth and vice-versa, as well as keeping the NZ teams close by for extra matches, evening up the flying distance.
Extra matches likely against local rivals, meaning better matches, better attendances and better ratings. More away trips available to fans, instead of extra games to exotic locations.
Top 3 from each conference play a finals series. Negates the champions or premiers aspect, as now there will only be one national champion, and 2 conference champions.
You got your eastern and western titles the wrong way around. I think that model is highly unfair on Wollongong who would have to drive an hour to Sydney to catch a plane to Perth just so that Sydney and Western Sydney have to one more time in a season. You also cut out all their and possibly local rivals so they don't have they have less opportunities to have larger crowds buoyed by away travelling support.
|
|
|