jdbbshdvjksb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:Promotion and relegation is the only way; that the best will succceed, innovation and hardwork rewarded with promotion. The lazy and second-rate punished with relegation. The sooner the better Then when a Franchise falls over there's no need to prop it up.
|
|
|
|
jdbbshdvjksb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Arthur wrote:The path we are on now with our National Domestic Competition, in the form of the A-League and our State Competitions in the form of the NPL, are nothing but restrictive practices designed to develop brands and revenues. And thats all good if thats all the consensus wants. For the casual fans spectators and football consumers, the HAL really is little more than a pastime along the other lines of entertainment such as the movies, threatre , AFL and NRL. Consensus suggest that it's 1 fan, 1 vote HAL is actually run on $1, 1 vote
|
|
|
Arthur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Australia the FFA and the football public need to make a choice The path we are on now with our National Domestic Competition, in the form of the A-League and our State Competitions in the form of the NPL, are nothing but restrictive practices designed to develop brands and revenues. And thats all good if thats all the consensus wants. For the casual fans spectators and football consumers, the HAL really is little more than a pastime along the other lines of entertainment such as the movies, threatre , AFL and NRL. Expansion is now talked of in terms of "markets", football markets, geographic markets, TV markets, economic viability, etc. etc. So far the choice is the status quo, and thats fine too. On the other hand this football consensus we now have cannot go on about a non-existent football development model of the local player. The local player is not developing to world wide standards, as we began to acheive in the recent past. The best entertainment in the HAL is not on the pitch its off the pitch with the active support. And even now the marketing gurus of the FFA and franchises are not sure they want that. We have a soccer media that is doing the game a dis-service this article being another example, http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/blog/2014/09/24/key-successful-league-expansion . If we really aspire to be a power football nation then we are not going about it the right way. WIthout a true football pyramid based on promotion and relegation we will never; - develop youth domestically to the senior international standards required to be successful on the international stage and world cups, players will only develop so far in the current domestic system - develop football clubs on par with the best in the world the HAL franchises have the show (the match day event)but not the go (match performance) - develop a National Team to compete at World level and by that I mean winning Asian nation Cups and finishing top 4 at the World Cup We are labouring under a cartel system, that is centralised, rationalised and controlled to create an "equal" environment one that is anti-competitive and promotes football mediocrity. Promotion and relegation is the only way; that the best will succceed, innovation and hardwork rewarded with promotion. The lazy and second-rate punished with relegation. That doesn't mean promotion is based solely on the points table but it is the first assesment. Edited by Arthur: 25/9/2014 12:53:34 PMEdited by Arthur: 25/9/2014 12:59:56 PMEdited by Arthur: 25/9/2014 01:15:33 PM
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league Would love to hear how one loses ones ethnic ties... Are we proposing that those of Greek ancestry, willing to work for free, be passed over in order to bring in staff of a non-Greek heritage? Or that the traditional strip be changed in order to reduce the Helenic 'vibe'? I went to Edensor Park on Tuesday night as a SFC fan, it was a great night, this club so steep with history, the club & land brought & build by the ethnic Croatian community. This club produced a lot of our great socceroos, including both coaches on the sideline. We as football fans should be proud of their history as they & many clubs like them build football in this country. The atmosphere was good the tension was there between the fans during the game as per any game between set of fans at a football game. I have no issue with this club existing in it's current form, the color & the passion is there, however, for any innocent bystander this was an ethnic Croatian club in every sense, it would struggle to gain wider acceptance of the community. Now is this an issue, no if you accept that you will go down there hear Croatian spoken, hear Croatian songs being sung by the fans & eat Croatian food (I too come from an ethnic background & love all the variety of foods in Australia). Now if I had Japanese background or African background or a dinky di Aussie, would I accept this or would I rather a more multi cultural team like WSW? This is the question to all perceived mono ethnicity clubs around Australia.
|
|
|
Nate
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
TheSelectFew wrote:Al Qaeda is even fighting against ISIL sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo....... Competition is such a pest!
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Why do we care were the money comes from? As long as the bills are clean who gives a shit.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) So during the Balkans wars, were you in favor of all the Balkan clubs & clubs from the same region like Greece, which would have affected Sth Melbourne, not participate, because it was not good for the game. Whilst I don't agree with the worries about UAE ownership and the issues in the Gulf - I think you need to think about what you are saying... South, Knights, etc, are owned by Australians rather than foreign nationals which renders your point somewhat idiotic. I was using my idiotic point to meet his idiotic point. As you yourself mentioned UAE ownership has nothing to do with the issues in the Gulf. Edited by robbos: 25/9/2014 10:56:56 AM
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
Al Qaeda is even fighting against ISIL sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo.......
|
|
|
Nate
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
The Frenchman wrote:southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) I think you'll also find that the UAE is a part of the new coalition fighting against ISIL alongside the USA and of course Australia. Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar are also a part of this coalition. Tbf, most of those are there in a sort of "keep your enemies closer" sort of role :P
|
|
|
SoccerLogic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 652,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:SoccerLogic wrote:
You've (possibly deliberately?) missed my point. Just explaining why some people consider A-League teams a bit plastic. This doesn't mean the NSL, and wouldn't implicate the entire NSL. Regardless of what community clubs represented they were and are still community clubs that have the right to be upset about relegation.
Not understanding your logic here. So you are saying that Central Coast Mariners is not a community club, even though they represent a region & all is welcome irrelevant of gender, religion, nationality or culture, yet a club that seems to favor just one nationality is a community club. Don't get me wrong I went to Edensor Park on Wednesday night & understood what the ethnic Croatian community brought to football in the country & the passion they have for their club. However, having followed football in Australia for 40 years, SFC is the first local team I have followed. I'm not saying I see A-League clubs as plastic. Just explaining why some people see them that way - especially at inception. In my original out I pointed out Fury as proving some teams can survive for community interests as opposed to corporate interests.
|
|
|
The Frenchman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) I think you'll also find that the UAE is a part of the new coalition fighting against ISIL alongside the USA and of course Australia. Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Qatar are also a part of this coalition.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league Would love to hear how one loses ones ethnic ties... Are we proposing that those of Greek ancestry, willing to work for free, be passed over in order to bring in staff of a non-Greek heritage? Or that the traditional strip be changed in order to reduce the Helenic 'vibe'?
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) So during the Balkans wars, were you in favor of all the Balkan clubs & clubs from the same region like Greece, which would have affected Sth Melbourne, not participate, because it was not good for the game. Whilst I don't agree with the worries about UAE ownership and the issues in the Gulf - I think you need to think about what you are saying... South, Knights, etc, are owned by Australians rather than foreign nationals which renders your point somewhat idiotic. correct, we want Australians running our clubs.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) So during the Balkans wars, were you in favor of all the Balkan clubs & clubs from the same region like Greece, which would have affected Sth Melbourne, not participate, because it was not good for the game. Whilst I don't agree with the worries about UAE ownership and the issues in the Gulf - I think you need to think about what you are saying... South, Knights, etc, are owned by Australians rather than foreign nationals which renders your point somewhat idiotic.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;) So during the Balkans wars, were you in favor of all the Balkan clubs & clubs from the same region like Greece, which would have affected Sth Melbourne, not participate, because it was not good for the game.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
SoccerLogic wrote:
You've (possibly deliberately?) missed my point. Just explaining why some people consider A-League teams a bit plastic. This doesn't mean the NSL, and wouldn't implicate the entire NSL. Regardless of what community clubs represented they were and are still community clubs that have the right to be upset about relegation.
Not understanding your logic here. So you are saying that Central Coast Mariners is not a community club, even though they represent a region & all is welcome irrelevant of gender, religion, nationality or culture, yet a club that seems to favor just one nationality is a community club. Don't get me wrong I went to Edensor Park on Wednesday night & understood what the ethnic Croatian community brought to football in the country & the passion they have for their club. However, having followed football in Australia for 40 years, SFC is the first local team I have followed.
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
robbos wrote:southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict. same region, Arab tensions, not good for the game;)
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
southmelb wrote:The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game. Last time I looked UAE was not involved in the conflict.
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
The Frenchman wrote:WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company. yes but the clubs influence is extremely foreign, sheik ownership, Arab sponsorship (etihad)...with everything that's going on now in the Middle East we don't need that in our game.
|
|
|
The Frenchman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
WaMackie wrote:MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company. I think you'll find Melbourne City FC is a registered Australian company.
|
|
|
WaMackie
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
MCMH wrote:Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league You're owned by a sheik? At least South Melbourne is registered as an Australian company.
|
|
|
GloryPerth
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
patjennings wrote:melbourne_terrace wrote: Central Coast/North Sydney Charlesworth constantly teasing with the idea of moving to North Sydney is insulting to fans. Either move the team to North Sydney Oval/Brookvale or can the idea and concentrate on making Gosford work, no half arsed solutions.
CCM are going nowhere. Charlesworth may not be/ is not be the best communicator. However, he is about to start the next $26million stage at Tuggerah. Sure he wants to attract more Sydney based sponsorship and fans - but the base will remain at Tuggerah and the vast majority of games will remain at CCS. Indeed and just to cap-off, in bumping the 'Mighty Mariners' (:) ) thread, I saw it had ended with this pleasant discussion and I think this view from 'Chris V', a Northern Suburbs Sydneysider, just caps off the discussion and in no uncertain terms, reflects the wisdom of the Mariners direction - that they need to remain and keep building in their CC Locale and at their 'Home Fortress' of Bluetongue (Hopefully it's ok, me quoting these two, from the thread): Fitzy72 wrote:ChrisV wrote:Fitzy72 wrote: I have never met a member of the club from Sydney. We're involved in one of the Academy underage teams and all the times we've been to matches in Sydney and spoken to parents there, no one has ever mentioned being a Mariners supporter / member. It sounds like a crock.
You haven't talked to the right people, or don't get around much. I've always been a CCM member, but live in the upper Sydney suburbs. Was a Northern Spirit supporter in the NSL days and followed Laurie/Hutcho/Wiko etc to CCM. I know a few who did the same. Still live in Sydney and hate Nth Sydney Oval and that other shite place on the Northern beaches where Spirit played. We should never leave Bluetongue. It is a beautiful place to go (and easier to get to than Nth Sydney Oval, even from where I live). Call me Mr 10% Edited by ChrisV: 14/5/2014 11:43:40 PM Fair play to you mate, delighted to have you on board, bring your friends. Edited by GloryPerth: 25/9/2014 03:27:41 AM
|
|
|
aussie scott21
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
This whole A2 thing is tough. Should it be for potential promotion/relegation or football development? I don't see how you can say 'geographically' located and not want Adelaide (but include Cairns).
My A-League is Melbourne City Sydney West Sydney Brisbane Perth Adelaide Newcastle Central Coast Wellington Canberra Athletic- 3rd Melbourne Wollongong Wolves- 3rd Sydney Ipswich FC- Brisbane Strikers Auckland City
A2 1 x SA 1 x ACT 1 x NNSW 3 x Sydney 3 x VIC 3 x QLD Sorry TAS & WA...... NO DICE (I'd even question NNSW and perhaps have a second SA :) for a derby ) I would suggest this is a pro/rel league downwards not upwards. The top 6 play some kind of finals. Where they are joined by WA & TAS winners
The bottom 6 playoff against the winner & teams from their original federation over 2 legs. eg. if the 3 sydney teams finished bottom 6, the lowest finisher would play the winner from the NPL, the 2nd lowest the 2nd place etc. This is so you retain the geographic - if the 3 Sydney teams finish top 6, tuff titties for the NSW NPL winner that year
I'd include all the clubs. Not pick and choose.
Or you could have a fixed league and wait for all the complaints from different clubs.
*** In this scenario the winner of a2 could play the winner of a-league at home for "The League Cup" to kick off the season.
*** By the time this happened a new FFA Cup sponsorship deal might be on the cards, so if 12 a-league teams, means hopefully a round of 32 where non hal/a2 meet. The 16 winners + 12 HAL + 4 a2 semi finalists
***** Eventually the aim would be to grow the a2 to 16 teams through sponsorship/tv deals adding 2 x WA 1 x TAS 1 x SA (or NNSW)
***** I dream of the 6 matches all to be played the same kickoff time on Saturday afternoons (so clubs don't have lighting issues). So SBS or ABC or whoever could have a match of the round plus crosses to goals ala FFA Cup.
Edited by scott21: 25/9/2014 04:38:40 AM
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourne_terrace wrote: Central Coast/North Sydney Charlesworth constantly teasing with the idea of moving to North Sydney is insulting to fans. Either move the team to North Sydney Oval/Brookvale or can the idea and concentrate on making Gosford work, no half arsed solutions.
CCM are going nowhere. Charlesworth may not be/ is not be the best communicator. However, he is about to start the next $26million stage at Tuggerah. Sure he wants to attract more Sydney based sponsorship and fans - but the base will remain at Tuggerah and the vast majority of games will remain at CCS.
|
|
|
The Frenchman
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't know why people persist with this nonsense. No existing teams that were NSL clubs that have it have had ethnic ties will ever be admitted into the hal. I'd even go as far to say no existing teams will ever be admitted, it's not within the interest of the game to have existing teams admitted. There will only be new teams with new identities. I don't know why it's so hard for some people to understand. Also unless market dynamics and/or major population or demographic changes happen none of the teams from a city of under half a million will come into existence. From what gallop has said in the past even that will be a stretch. Get used to it, we have a numbers man in charge.
|
|
|
MCMH
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 344,
Visits: 0
|
Unless South Melbourne lose their ethnic ties they can't be injected into the A league
|
|
|
SoccerLogic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 652,
Visits: 0
|
williamn wrote:melbourne_terrace wrote:I've seen Roar articles with better ideas.
A League (14 Teams) Melbourne City Sydney West Sydney Brisbane Perth Adelaide Newcastle Central Coast Wellington Canberra Athletic Wollongong Wolves Ipswich FC Auckland City
A2 (12 Teams) Palm Beach Sharks Townsville Fury FNQ Heat Brisbane Strikers South Melbourne Geelong Dandenong/South East Melbourne Sutherland Sharks St George Sydney United 58 South-west sydney or Blacktown South Hobart
i like this list, just a couple changes i'd do. i think whether ccm stay in gosford or move to north sydney will determine the fate for south. if there is a team in the north with north in its name, it would make it really tempting to bring in a south sydney side which could create a really interesting north vs south divide which would almost be as good as east and west given there is a distinguishable difference in the lifestyle of someone from chatswood/manly/ryde as opposed to someone from hurstville/sutherland/revesby Edited by williamn: 24/9/2014 10:27:23 PM Hobart is too small a market. Only 800 turned up for the NPL finals match. Keep the league geographically close and limit it to realistic expansion areas using short term licenses to allow for club turnover at FFA discretion. 1. Northern Fury 2. Palm Beach 3. North Sydney 4. South Sydney 5. Woolongong 6. Canberra 7. South Melbourne 8. Melbourne Knights/Geelong
|
|
|
melbourne_terrace
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
williamn wrote:melbourne_terrace wrote:I've seen Roar articles with better ideas.
A League (14 Teams) Melbourne City Sydney West Sydney Brisbane Perth Adelaide Newcastle Central Coast Wellington Canberra Athletic Wollongong Wolves Ipswich FC Auckland City
A2 (10 Teams) Palm Beach Sharks Townsville Fury FNQ Heat South Melbourne Geelong Dandenong/South East Melbourne Sutherland Sharks St George Sydney United 58 Brisbane Strikers South Hobart
i like this list, just a couple changes i'd do. i think whether ccm stay in gosford or move to north sydney will determine the fate for south. if there is a team in the north with north in its name, it would make it really tempting to bring in a south sydney side which could create a really interesting north vs south divide which would almost be as good as east and west given there is a distinguishable difference in the lifestyle of someone from chatswood/manly/ryde as opposed to someone from hurstville/sutherland/revesby Can agree with all that, although as much as I like the Idea, I'd question South Hobarts ability to step up to a national level without severe help from their State association. The Cairns suggestion was that FNQ Heat did go up, but changed their name. The existing club has strong business and local council links and are pushing for a new stadium and academy so it makes sense, I just hate the bland regional names like "Northern" "Western" "FNQ" when in this case it's a team playing in Cairns, backed by Cairns business, with players based in Cairns, it really should be called Cairns. I can't agree with the logic that you don't have a relevant name that the majority of the fans identify with like "Cairns" just because some bloke from Mareeba or Innsifail might not decide to come to one game a year.
Viennese Vuck
|
|
|
SoccerLogic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 652,
Visits: 0
|
nickk wrote:SoccerLogic wrote:A16Man wrote:Everyone criticises new 'plastic' franchises but I don't see the fuss. They might feel like that when new but in 10-20 years they'll be clubs rich in history.
I don't think clubs like WSW, Victory, Newcastle, Adelaide etc are seen as plastic. They all had to start at some point. I think the issue lies in why these teams started as opposed to when. Privately owned, for profit consortium owned licenses replacing non-for-profit community clubs aren't going to make everyone happy. The ease at which these clubs have folded and disappeared doesn't help the cause and reflect bad intentions. i.e. Knights were simply there to round out the league and capture the Kiwi market - not football. Gold Coats disappeared and the owner appeared more interested in himself - not football. Heart lost their colours, kits and core identity in a single off-season at the whim of new owners despite winning over the licence on a football purist platform. Thankfully the reemergence of fury gives us some hope. Edited by SoccerLogic: 24/9/2014 07:42:45 PM Which were the community clubs in the NSL. Northern Spirit privately owned. Necastle United owned by Con Perth Glory owned by Tana. Adelaide United owned by Gordon Pickard. Football Kingz privately owned , rebranded as the Knights. Parramatta Power run by Parramatta leagues club in order to get Parramatta upgraded. Brisbane Strikers they were part owned by an Englishman at one stage, I thought they were also owned by the Queensland football federation, Clem Jones. Wollongong Wolves don't know. Ethnic clubs are not community clubs they only represent a small minority not the general communtiy. South Melbourne,Sydney Olympic,Marconi,Melbourne KNights, Sydney United. Fury I think are a rugby league plant like Parramatta, did the community demand a team return to the A-league so quickly or did the rugby league guys figure no A-league team no stadium money. You've (possibly deliberately?) missed my point. Just explaining why some people consider A-League teams a bit plastic. This doesn't mean the NSL, and wouldn't implicate the entire NSL. Regardless of what community clubs represented they were and are still community clubs that have the right to be upset about relegation.
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
melbourne_terrace wrote:I've seen Roar articles with better ideas.
A League (14 Teams) Melbourne City Sydney West Sydney Brisbane Perth Adelaide Newcastle Central Coast Wellington Canberra Athletic Wollongong Wolves Ipswich FC Auckland City
A2 (12 Teams) Palm Beach Sharks Townsville Fury FNQ Heat Brisbane Strikers South Melbourne Geelong Dandenong/South East Melbourne Sutherland Sharks St George Sydney United 58 South-west sydney or Blacktown South Hobart
i like this list, just a couple changes i'd do. i think whether ccm stay in gosford or move to north sydney will determine the fate for south. if there is a team in the north with north in its name, it would make it really tempting to bring in a south sydney side which could create a really interesting north vs south divide which would almost be as good as east and west given there is a distinguishable difference in the lifestyle of someone from chatswood/manly/ryde as opposed to someone from hurstville/sutherland/revesby Edited by williamn: 24/9/2014 10:27:23 PM
|
|
|