Redcarded
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1K,
Visits: 0
|
Canberra/Queenbeyan has a higher population and greater density than any of the other proposed regional teams like north queensland. If you are worried about attendance having a low population spread out over a huge area just isnt going to work. Actew I think would give corporate support in a millisecond. High rate of sports participation means more people willing to go to games. Already has a rivally with Sydney because always being in their shadow. Rogic is from there. Cool team name - Capital Punishment. Oh, please not another NZteam. We cut them a line with the phoenix, any more and it will have to be the ANZ league and we would have to absorb their country into Australia as a state.
|
|
|
|
VedranFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.3K,
Visits: 0
|
tbitm wrote:Cappuccino wrote:People criticising Wollongong's NSL crowds are forgetting that they're better than most NSL teams... average crowds took a huge jump from the NSL to the A-League. Within a few years with solid growth I can easily see a Wollongong team averaging 10k+. Gotta fact check this. Firstly I think when only 1 team cities that are broad based and played in the same stadium moving from NSL to A-League should be considered when doing a like for like comparison when talking about any future Wollongong team. *note, i picked the highest average for a season each NSL team had that I could find Jets 01/02 averaged 9383 and all time a-league average is 10,480 Glory 01/02 averaged 12,801 and all time a-league average is 8,588United 03/04 averaged 12,568 and all time average a-league is 10,911 I fail to see any Wollongong team getting a significant jump just by being in the A-League compared to their prime support in the NSL and when they won 2 championships in a row. Also aren't CCM having troubles because of a lack of corporate support? How is Wollongong going to be better at this when they have the Dragons and Hawks to compete with in getting local corporate support? First point - Glory averaged 14k+ in 1998/99. As for Wollongong, alot has changed since those days. First off, the club would be based at WIN Stadium now which has had vast improvements in the last few years, compared to what it was back then - and when they played there and not at Brandon Park, which was a bit of a dump really, they drew 10k+ to a final against South. I don't think it would really have much bearing on a new club, back then Wolves were competing with an actual Wollongong Rugby League team (Steelers) and the NBL team were bigger I think? Anyway there are heaps of examples of that being overcome, SFC and WSW put together average more than all the old Sydney NSL clubs put together. Brisbane Roar average 3 times what Strikers ever got. Victory and Heart are both bigger than any Melbourne NSL sides. Canberra only ever got between 2-5k in the NSL, and I think we can comfortably expect 8k+ and same for Wollongong.
|
|
|
williamn
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Villaboy wrote:would love to see the cash from the sale of WSW put into a team in between Liverpool and Campbeltown. Stadium could be an issue, but that might even be the impetus for a boutique football stadium in Sydney south west. I think WSW could handle the competition for support. I also think that if it doesnt happen quickly, it will be very hard to place a club in that region in the future, and we would end up with a similar situation to MV/MH. if done correctly, i can see it being a hit. would draw support from the bankstown region which along with campbelltown are two regions where wsw hasnt fully swept.
|
|
|
Villaboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
would love to see the cash from the sale of WSW put into a team in between Liverpool and Campbeltown. Stadium could be an issue, but that might even be the impetus for a boutique football stadium in Sydney south west. I think WSW could handle the competition for support. I also think that if it doesnt happen quickly, it will be very hard to place a club in that region in the future, and we would end up with a similar situation to MV/MH.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
I don't see why not, we claim them all anyway :lol:
|
|
|
thupercoach
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:paladisious wrote: From the facebook page, looks like it'll be a lot easier to add an Auckland team now according to CNN! It's a well known fact that NZ is just an Australian state. Does that mean we can replace Lucas Neill with Winston Reid?
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
paladisious wrote: From the facebook page, looks like it'll be a lot easier to add an Auckland team now according to CNN! It's a well known fact that NZ is just an Australian state.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
 From the facebook page, looks like it'll be a lot easier to add an Auckland team now according to CNN!
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Just posting an earlier article Quote:Sam Malcolmson: Phoenix will rise, but we need an Auckland team
Despite their struggles I'm convinced the Phoenix will soon be a force in the A-league again. More importantly, though, I believe the time is right for the A-league administration and New Zealand Football to consider establishing a new franchise in Auckland.
Yes, I can hear the cry that the Kingz and the Knights were dismal failures. But the A-league has progressed as a professional organisation since those embarrassing days. A new franchise will also learn from those mistakes and the success of the Phoenix in their infancy. There are enough well-heeled business people in Auckland to relish this challenge.
Phoenix coach Ernie Merrick is on the right track with the attractive style of soccer they are playing, and even a 25 per cent success rate from the strikers would have them in the top four. Once Merrick can offload a few players and sign his own, they will be title challengers.
The standard of the A-league has dropped this season but such is its closeness and unpredictability that I agree with Merrick's prediction that the Phoenix will make the playoffs.
My major concern is the poor crowds - the last two home games have attracted only around 6000 spectators. That is a big problem when you consider that last Sunday's game was played on a beautiful evening, with a late kickoff making it attractive for families during the school holidays.
That match against Sydney City highlighted that the Phoenix are really a Wellington team. Only four New Zealanders started the game and one of those, Andrew Durante, is a recently naturalised Australian.
This is not a criticism, but an observation that the pathway to professional soccer for New Zealand youngsters is restricted.
Added to that, the national league is a dismal competition and interest sparks only for the O-league, where Auckland and Waitakere have represented New Zealand well.
An Auckland A-league team, based at North Harbour Stadium, would offer more opportunities for our youngsters as well as reinvigorating the world's number one game in the country's biggest city.
Auckland's population of 1.5 million must surely be able to maintain a successful and popular A-league team. It would also be easier to attract high quality overseas foundation players and coaches to a multi-cultural city like Auckland.
How about Ryan Nelsen as the coach and a player such as one of the Manchester United legends Ryan Giggs and Paul Scholes as the marquee signing who would double as assistant coach. Happy New Year, and be safe in 2014. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/soccer-football/news/article.cfm?c_id=86&objectid=11178575&ref=rss
|
|
|
tbitm
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Cappuccino wrote:People criticising Wollongong's NSL crowds are forgetting that they're better than most NSL teams... average crowds took a huge jump from the NSL to the A-League. Within a few years with solid growth I can easily see a Wollongong team averaging 10k+. Gotta fact check this. Firstly I think when only 1 team cities that are broad based and played in the same stadium moving from NSL to A-League should be considered when doing a like for like comparison when talking about any future Wollongong team. *note, i picked the highest average for a season each NSL team had that I could find Jets 01/02 averaged 9383 and all time a-league average is 10,480 Glory 01/02 averaged 12,801 and all time a-league average is 8,588 United 03/04 averaged 12,568 and all time average a-league is 10,911 I fail to see any Wollongong team getting a significant jump just by being in the A-League compared to their prime support in the NSL and when they won 2 championships in a row. Also aren't CCM having troubles because of a lack of corporate support? How is Wollongong going to be better at this when they have the Dragons and Hawks to compete with in getting local corporate support?
|
|
|
liverpoolfan2010
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Would love to see fury back but not the fury that was on life support in there last season a competitive one.
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Also, no new franchise with a sugar daddy to finance it like clive
Only the FFA were suckers to buy into Clive and his empty blue seats
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Cappuccino wrote:People criticising Wollongong's NSL crowds are forgetting that they're better than most NSL teams... average crowds took a huge jump from the NSL to the A-League. Within a few years with solid growth I can easily see a Wollongong team averaging 10k+.
For me I think the next two logical places for expansion are Wollongong (as the Wolves) and Townsville, as long as the Fury manage to fulfill their current plans for community engagement, membership etc.
13th team has to be Ipswich, probably about ten years down the track (for the next expansion phase). From there I think any one of Canberra, Auckland and Geelong are options. Also fair enough but one has to wonder how and when the next biggest market (Gold Coast) will come in and at what expense ie poor crowds. It has to be the next most lucrative market for TV rights and FFA sponsorship but at what expense and will it happen irrespective of the others mentioned?
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Cappuccino
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 683,
Visits: 0
|
People criticising Wollongong's NSL crowds are forgetting that they're better than most NSL teams... average crowds took a huge jump from the NSL to the A-League. Within a few years with solid growth I can easily see a Wollongong team averaging 10k+.
For me I think the next two logical places for expansion are Wollongong (as the Wolves) and Townsville, as long as the Fury manage to fulfill their current plans for community engagement, membership etc.
13th team has to be Ipswich, probably about ten years down the track (for the next expansion phase). From there I think any one of Canberra, Auckland and Geelong are options.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
clivesundies wrote: New teams will only happen in areas with a population of 1 mill + so more derbies. A 2nd team in Brisbane is a done deal, if you look at what has been done with qld NPL you will see where the new team will be.
Did they come 8th?
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
clivesundies wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:Fair enough on those crowd figures (not like I google crowd stats but I was attending games in 2000/01 when they were challenging for the title), but that was while they were playing out of Brandon Park Park not WIN stadium which is much more central and easier to get to. Brandon Park was a shit hole to be honest.
Let's example past failures CGU, and NF.
GCU:
2009–10 5,297 2010–11 3,419 2011–12 3,438
NF:
2009–10 6,358 2010–11 4,245
Hardly better, considering the hype and money pumped into the A-League on there years between inception and 2009.
The fact is Wollongong has a strong local league, would probably represent the rest of the Shoalhaven area (92,000+ people and one of the fastest growing areas in NSW) and MAY have some appeal for southern Sydney people disaffected by the dreadful play style of SFC.
And ask yourself how many supposed loyal SFC supporters have or will jump over to the WSW bandwagon.
The south coast region has a really strong football/ethnic euro culture, much more so than any 2nd QLD team.
New teams will only happen in areas with a population of 1 mill + so more derbies. A 2nd team in Brisbane is a done deal, if you look at what has been done with qld NPL you will see where the new team will be. Ipswich? If so I worry about that as it is a stronger rugby league area than football and the NRL have plans for a team there too. Congested market?
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
A16Man
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL.In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact. :lol: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't have the statistics on me, but those figures above look like the average crowds of most NSL clubs (one or two clubs aside). Well you would hardly call them "solid crowds of 6K" :d No, but I never claimed they were. I was just pointing out that Wollongong didn't have "the worst crowds in the NSL." But close to the worst and fair enough, but others did say solid crowds of 6K which is even more over the top and I responded to them. How can you say crowds around the average were close to the worst? That's an extremely leading way to put it.
|
|
|
clivesundies
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Double Edged Sword wrote:Fair enough on those crowd figures (not like I google crowd stats but I was attending games in 2000/01 when they were challenging for the title), but that was while they were playing out of Brandon Park Park not WIN stadium which is much more central and easier to get to. Brandon Park was a shit hole to be honest.
Let's example past failures CGU, and NF.
GCU:
2009–10 5,297 2010–11 3,419 2011–12 3,438
NF:
2009–10 6,358 2010–11 4,245
Hardly better, considering the hype and money pumped into the A-League on there years between inception and 2009.
The fact is Wollongong has a strong local league, would probably represent the rest of the Shoalhaven area (92,000+ people and one of the fastest growing areas in NSW) and MAY have some appeal for southern Sydney people disaffected by the dreadful play style of SFC.
And ask yourself how many supposed loyal SFC supporters have or will jump over to the WSW bandwagon.
The south coast region has a really strong football/ethnic euro culture, much more so than any 2nd QLD team.
New teams will only happen in areas with a population of 1 mill + so more derbies. A 2nd team in Brisbane is a done deal, if you look at what has been done with qld NPL you will see where the new team will be.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL.In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact. :lol: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't have the statistics on me, but those figures above look like the average crowds of most NSL clubs (one or two clubs aside). Well you would hardly call them "solid crowds of 6K" :d No, but I never claimed they were. I was just pointing out that Wollongong didn't have "the worst crowds in the NSL." But close to the worst and fair enough, but others did say solid crowds of 6K which is even more over the top and I responded to them.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
A16Man
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL.In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact. :lol: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't have the statistics on me, but those figures above look like the average crowds of most NSL clubs (one or two clubs aside). Well you would hardly call them "solid crowds of 6K" :d No, but I never claimed they were. I was just pointing out that Wollongong didn't have "the worst crowds in the NSL."
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
A16Man wrote:paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL.In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact. :lol: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't have the statistics on me, but those figures above look like the average crowds of most NSL clubs (one or two clubs aside). Well you would hardly call them "solid crowds of 6K" :d
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
A16Man
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL.In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact. :lol: Let's not get ahead of ourselves. I don't have the statistics on me, but those figures above look like the average crowds of most NSL clubs (one or two clubs aside).
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:I think Wollongong would work, but I wouldn't expect a "big" club out of it.
I also see benefit in them because you would have SFC, WS, NUJ, CC all within travelling distance.
I would hope eventually SEQ to have a similar set up.
There's already 3 clubs in NSW. FFA can't afford to leave the third biggest state with only one team when Qld has the largest participation rate in the land, has mens, womens and youth team that have been successful second to none and we keep churning out Socceroos ad nauseum. Tassie doesn't have the population to create any meaningful interest, WA and SA are run by ALF who give no support to sockah and Victoria are just retards having the lowest participation rate in the country and controlled by an ALF state and media. No one is more worthy than Qld. That's why I included a QLD team in my edited post above. OK well done. If it's Queensland I'd like to see a club somewhere well North of Brisbane in a catchment area that young inspiring footballers can look up to and engage with before they become Socceroos. It's a must have for football to capitalize on its best potential in the land. A properly run club will easily get your 10K average, even if it's back in Townsville.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Double Edged Sword
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 473,
Visits: 0
|
Fair enough on those crowd figures (not like I google crowd stats but I was attending games in 2000/01 when they were challenging for the title), but that was while they were playing out of Brandon Park Park not WIN stadium which is much more central and easier to get to. Brandon Park was a shit hole to be honest.
Let's example past failures CGU, and NF.
GCU:
2009–10 5,297 2010–11 3,419 2011–12 3,438
NF:
2009–10 6,358 2010–11 4,245
Hardly better, considering the hype and money pumped into the A-League on there years between inception and 2009.
The fact is Wollongong has a strong local league, would probably represent the rest of the Shoalhaven area (92,000+ people and one of the fastest growing areas in NSW) and MAY have some appeal for southern Sydney people disaffected by the dreadful play style of SFC.
And ask yourself how many supposed loyal SFC supporters have or will jump over to the WSW bandwagon.
The south coast region has a really strong football/ethnic euro culture, much more so than any 2nd QLD team.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
paulc wrote:Iridium1010 wrote:I think Wollongong would work, but I wouldn't expect a "big" club out of it.
I also see benefit in them because you would have SFC, WS, NUJ, CC all within travelling distance.
I would hope eventually SEQ to have a similar set up.
There's already 3 clubs in NSW. FFA can't afford to leave the third biggest state with only one team when Qld has the largest participation rate in the land, has mens, womens and youth team that have been successful second to none and we keep churning out Socceroos ad nauseum. Tassie doesn't have the population to create any meaningful interest, WA and SA are run by ALF who give no support to sockah and Victoria are just retards having the lowest participation rate in the country and controlled by an ALF state and media. No one is more worthy than Qld. That's why I included a QLD team in my edited post above.
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:I think Wollongong would work, but I wouldn't expect a "big" club out of it.
I also see benefit in them because you would have SFC, WS, NUJ, CC all within travelling distance.
I would hope eventually SEQ to have a similar set up.
There's already 3 clubs in NSW. FFA can't afford to leave the third biggest state with only one team when Qld has the largest participation rate in the land, has mens, womens and youth team that have been successful second to none and we keep churning out Socceroos ad nauseum. Tassie doesn't have the population to create any meaningful interest, WA and SA are run by ALF who give no support to sockah and Victoria are just retards having the lowest participation rate in the country and controlled by an ALF state and media. No one is more worthy than Qld.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
I think Wollongong would work, but I wouldn't expect a "big" club out of it.
I also see benefit in them because you would have SFC, WS, NUJ, CC all within travelling distance.
I would hope eventually SEQ to have a similar set up.
Wollongong and Western Brisbane/Ipswich(if they get a stadium) are currently my top 2 expansion spots, but as always it depends on who bids when the FFA opens up to expansion, it needs to go to the most viable bid.
Edited by iridium1010: 28/12/2013 04:45:31 PM
|
|
|
paulc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Iridium1010 wrote:Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 You beat me to it. I was just about to say my recollection was that the Gong had the worst crowds in the NSL. In today's market they would struggle to get anything near CCM type of crowds, let alone make an impact.
In a resort somewhere
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Double Edged Sword wrote:The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have. Quote:Wollongong City/Wollongong Wolves
1995/96 - 2,873 1996/97 - 4,701 - As Wollongong Wolves 1997/98 - 5,567 1998/99 - 3,560 1999/00 - 4,939 2000/01 - 5,104 2001/02 - 3,403 2002/03 - 3,025 2003/04 - 2,569 Edited by iridium1010: 28/12/2013 04:30:37 PM
|
|
|
Double Edged Sword
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 473,
Visits: 0
|
The only viable option is Wollongong. Was a very successful NSL club with solid crowd (around 6k in the old stadium). Both northern QLD teams have proven flops both financially and on the table, it's time to go back to a club that will have an impact, much like Wanders have.
|
|
|