Sydney Stadium Stuff


Sydney Stadium Stuff

Author
Message
melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
sydneyfc1987 wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Davo1985 wrote:
sydneyfc1987 wrote:
Davo1985 wrote:
highkick05 wrote:
That whole stadium blueprint is really quite a shit idea. Why do we need MORE multi-sport venues for AFL and Olympics.

My opinion. Soccer needs separate stadium not a multi-sport. Multi-Sport would always be larger stadium , AFL can use it, Rugby can use it, olympic sports can use it.

Soccer needs rectangle with higher seat angles . It's not the typical stadium , you couldn't just make an any old stadium for it.


Yeah and that photo shows a 65k seat stadium which would probably look very much like suncorp. higher seat angles etc.

I just don't agree with the 65k seater in size. I think they should knock the current one down and rebuild it into a 50k seater with a full roof. Steeper seating etc and be prime for football and league, rugby.



Edited by highkick05: 4/5/2015 02:07:03 AM


Edited by davo1985: 4/5/2015 03:05:35 PM


Yep. What tennant will ever need 65k anyway? Unless they plan to move State of Origin/big Socceroos/Wallabies games there the place will never be full.

50k would be perfect, but Iguess they can't justify building a brand new stadium for an extra 5k seats


That's exactly what they want to do. The State government want the economic benefit of having these games near the city. 84k is too big anyway. Sydney only barely sold out State of Origin recently, the wallabies and Union in general is up shit creek and Football doesn't have enough premium games in a year to justify 84k.

Edited by melbourne_terrace: 4/5/2015 07:02:22 PM


So if this eventuates what becomes of ANZ? Knock it down and build more apartments?

Edited by sydneyfc1987: 4/5/2015 10:07:06 PM


We can only hope.

Sydney needs an 80k seater stadium. We've been through this. It doesn't matter where it is. It just needs one. Not a 65k seater.


For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?

Viennese Vuck

Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
four42
four42
Hacker
Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 312, Visits: 0
A16Man wrote:
four42 wrote:
They aren't building for today, they are building for 20-35 years down the track, it's a once in a generation project.

Phew. I was getting a bit nervous when I didn't see cranes and bull dozers in Moore Park this morning.

think you missed the point there mate.

what stadium capacity is needed now may be completely different in 10-20yrs time, they have to design with future needs in mind, not present.
four42
four42
Hacker
Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 312, Visits: 0
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.
rbs
rbs
Amateur
Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)Amateur (504 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 439, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.
melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
rbs wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.


Neither are annual events and the Bledisloe hasn't got close to selling out ANZ in years and has had decreasing interest each year.

Viennese Vuck

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
sydneyfc1987 wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Davo1985 wrote:
sydneyfc1987 wrote:
Davo1985 wrote:
highkick05 wrote:
That whole stadium blueprint is really quite a shit idea. Why do we need MORE multi-sport venues for AFL and Olympics.

My opinion. Soccer needs separate stadium not a multi-sport. Multi-Sport would always be larger stadium , AFL can use it, Rugby can use it, olympic sports can use it.

Soccer needs rectangle with higher seat angles . It's not the typical stadium , you couldn't just make an any old stadium for it.


Yeah and that photo shows a 65k seat stadium which would probably look very much like suncorp. higher seat angles etc.

I just don't agree with the 65k seater in size. I think they should knock the current one down and rebuild it into a 50k seater with a full roof. Steeper seating etc and be prime for football and league, rugby.



Edited by highkick05: 4/5/2015 02:07:03 AM


Edited by davo1985: 4/5/2015 03:05:35 PM


Yep. What tennant will ever need 65k anyway? Unless they plan to move State of Origin/big Socceroos/Wallabies games there the place will never be full.

50k would be perfect, but Iguess they can't justify building a brand new stadium for an extra 5k seats


That's exactly what they want to do. The State government want the economic benefit of having these games near the city. 84k is too big anyway. Sydney only barely sold out State of Origin recently, the wallabies and Union in general is up shit creek and Football doesn't have enough premium games in a year to justify 84k.

Edited by melbourne_terrace: 4/5/2015 07:02:22 PM


So if this eventuates what becomes of ANZ? Knock it down and build more apartments?

Edited by sydneyfc1987: 4/5/2015 10:07:06 PM


We can only hope.

Sydney needs an 80k seater stadium. We've been through this. It doesn't matter where it is. It just needs one. Not a 65k seater.


For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?

It sells out about 4-5 times per year. There are probably about 4-5 other times when it has more than 60k in it. There are events that occur on occasion but not necessarily every year that sell the stadium out. Over the last few years these events have included: Asian cup final, All stars games, World cup qualifiers, British and Irish lions tour matches. etc

How many times a year does the MCG sell out? I bet it gets more than 80k in it several times per year, but actually to 100,000?

The boxing day test for the ashes got to 91, 000 and even the world cup final only got to 93, 000.

Australia needs a football ground with 80k seats somewhere.
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
rbs wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.


Neither are annual events and the Bledisloe hasn't got close to selling out ANZ in years and has had decreasing interest each year.


Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 2009 in Sydney is 78,707.
Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 1999 in Sydney is 81,497

yes,they have had attendances drop below 70k for the past 2 years,but that is more reflective of the current state of the Wallabies team,not the actual code.A few wins and it will change.

Anyway,point remains.Including Football and the Rugby codes,Sydney requires an 80k stadium.





Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:15:10 PM
A16Man
A16Man
World Class
World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)World Class (5.3K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.2K, Visits: 0
four42 wrote:
A16Man wrote:
four42 wrote:
They aren't building for today, they are building for 20-35 years down the track, it's a once in a generation project.

Phew. I was getting a bit nervous when I didn't see cranes and bull dozers in Moore Park this morning.

think you missed the point there mate.

what stadium capacity is needed now may be completely different in 10-20yrs time, they have to design with future needs in mind, not present.

:lol: I know, just taking the piss
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.


Its technically not privately owned.Its a long term government asset.
It operates on a BOOT scheme,which means,Build,own,operate,transfer.
In other words,its a 30 year lease that expires in 2030.It will then be handed back to the NSW Government.
Which makes the $150 Million payout mentioned from the government even more stupid considering they will get it for FREE in 2030.
You have to keep the stakeholders(ANZ) interest in the investment strong,considering they only have another 15 years left.



Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:36:02 PM
Eldar
Eldar
Pro
Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)Pro (4.4K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
rbs wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.


Neither are annual events and the Bledisloe hasn't got close to selling out ANZ in years and has had decreasing interest each year.


Having an 80k seater rectangular stadium ensures that Sydney can host the big events like games against Chelsea, Man U and the big Socceroo matches. Otherwise they would be played in Melbourne on a cricket ground.

Beaten by Eldar

melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
Dantm wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
rbs wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.


Neither are annual events and the Bledisloe hasn't got close to selling out ANZ in years and has had decreasing interest each year.


Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 2009 in Sydney is 78,707.
Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 1999 in Sydney is 81,497

yes,they have had attendances drop below 70k for the past 2 years,but that is more reflective of the current state of the Wallabies team,not the actual code.A few wins and it will change.

Anyway,point remains.Including Football and the Rugby codes,Sydney requires an 80k stadium.





Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:15:10 PM


You sound like the ARU, totally ignorant on the decline of the game thanks to an obsession with beating NZ and failure to expand beyond a private school base. Only once in the last 5 years has the Bledisloe got more than 70k attending, with a LOT of free tickets being handed out.

Viennese Vuck

u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
In fact, this year, ANZ may sell out 3 times in one week. With State of origin, then Tottenham v Sydney then Chelsea v Sydney.

Although the Tottenham game may not sell out. Probably still a decent crowd though.
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
melbourne_terrace wrote:
Dantm wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:
rbs wrote:
melbourne_terrace wrote:

For what? Apart from Origin and maybe the NRL GF, what annual event even get's close to selling out 80k?


All-Stars v Man Utd drew 83k, along with the Wallabies v Lions.

The Bledisloe Cup regularly draws between 60-80k.


Neither are annual events and the Bledisloe hasn't got close to selling out ANZ in years and has had decreasing interest each year.


Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 2009 in Sydney is 78,707.
Average Bledisloe Cup attendance since 1999 in Sydney is 81,497

yes,they have had attendances drop below 70k for the past 2 years,but that is more reflective of the current state of the Wallabies team,not the actual code.A few wins and it will change.

Anyway,point remains.Including Football and the Rugby codes,Sydney requires an 80k stadium.





Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:15:10 PM


You sound like the ARU, totally ignorant on the decline of the game thanks to an obsession with beating NZ and failure to expand beyond a private school base. Only once in the last 5 years has the Bledisloe got more than 70k attending, with a LOT of free tickets being handed out.


2013 (68,765)and 2014 (68,627) are the only 2 years since the Bledisloe Cup moved from Moore Park to Homebush in 1999 that the attendances were BELOW 70k.
Considering the National Team is currently ranked 6th,then it does have a bearing on the interest.

I dont give a shit about the ARU or Rugby in general,but I would not right Rugby off as in a state of decline,especially considering the form of the Wallabies.





Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 02:19:43 PM
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
In fact, this year, ANZ may sell out 3 times in one week. With State of origin, then Tottenham v Sydney then Chelsea v Sydney.

Although the Tottenham game may not sell out. Probably still a decent crowd though.


Already 60,000 sold for the Tottenham game.

Pretty safe that there will be at least 6 events above 65k in 2015
-Asian Cup Final
-State of Origin
-FC vs Tottenham
-FC vs Chelsea
-SoO
-NRL GF

65k Capacity is too small for the largest stadium in Sydney.

Ideal set up

Homebush -80,000 (Reconfiguired as per recent plans)
Moore Park-50,000 (New Stadium)
Parramatta -35,000 (New Stadium)
u4486662
u4486662
World Class
World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)World Class (8.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.8K, Visits: 0
Dantm wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
In fact, this year, ANZ may sell out 3 times in one week. With State of origin, then Tottenham v Sydney then Chelsea v Sydney.

Although the Tottenham game may not sell out. Probably still a decent crowd though.


Already 60,000 sold for the Tottenham game.

Pretty safe that there will be at least 6 events above 65k in 2015
-Asian Cup Final
-State of Origin
-FC vs Tottenham
-FC vs Chelsea
-SoO
-NRL GF

65k Capacity is too small for the largest stadium in Sydney.

Ideal set up

Homebush -80,000 (Reconfiguired as per recent plans)
Moore Park-50,000 (New Stadium)
Parramatta -35,000 (New Stadium)

Those events will/had more than 75k. And most will be 83k. Plus the Bledisloe cup which will be about 70k.
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
u4486662 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
u4486662 wrote:
In fact, this year, ANZ may sell out 3 times in one week. With State of origin, then Tottenham v Sydney then Chelsea v Sydney.

Although the Tottenham game may not sell out. Probably still a decent crowd though.


Already 60,000 sold for the Tottenham game.

Pretty safe that there will be at least 6 events above 65k in 2015
-Asian Cup Final
-State of Origin
-FC vs Tottenham
-FC vs Chelsea
-SoO
-NRL GF

65k Capacity is too small for the largest stadium in Sydney.

Ideal set up

Homebush -80,000 (Reconfiguired as per recent plans)
Moore Park-50,000 (New Stadium)
Parramatta -35,000 (New Stadium)

Those events will/had more than 75k. And most will be 83k. Plus the Bledisloe cup which will be about 70k.


Forgot to add in Bledisloe.Had SoO x 2,which there is only 1 this year in Sydney.
70k at least,considering it will precede the 2015 Rugby World Cup
nickk
nickk
World Class
World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)World Class (5.6K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.5K, Visits: 0
Dantm wrote:
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.


Its technically not privately owned.Its a long term government asset.
It operates on a BOOT scheme,which means,Build,own,operate,transfer.
In other words,its a 30 year lease that expires in 2030.It will then be handed back to the NSW Government.
Which makes the $150 Million payout mentioned from the government even more stupid considering they will get it for FREE in 2030.
You have to keep the stakeholders(ANZ) interest in the investment strong,considering they only have another 15 years left.
Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:36:02 PM


The ANZ stadium operators instead of owners ,they were talking about how they needed a new upgrade to keep the stadium operating. Thats what made me think they were the ones with a plan about apartments and they owned the place. So that must be just hot air.
It turns out though it Singleton and Harvey who want to get rid of it.

Quote:

The key is Parramatta. If the government agrees to significantly increase its capacity, the ANZ operators could demand the government pay out the remaining 17 years on their lease and run the stadium itself.

It has leverage to force this outcome under an agreement signed in 1996 with the government before the stadium was built. It compels the government to “negotiate in good faith” with ANZ to ensure there is no “material adverse effect” if the government lifts the capacity above 25,000 of any stadium within 50km of Homebush.

If the government took back ANZ, one option would be to knock down Allianz and build a new 70,000-seat stadium at Moore Park and then turn ANZ Stadium into apartments.

In one further twist, a consortium led by Page, Gerry Harvey and John Singleton are about to take possession of the Entertainment Quarter next to Allianz and they have big plans.

When I recently asked Singleton to name one thing that could be done to improve Sydney, his response was short: “Blow up Homebush”.

So if they upgrade Parramatta over 25k then the clause is activated.
Singleton also has an ulterior motive to get rid of ANZ, he thinks if he gets rid of Homebush then a Central Coast team can be made.

Edited by nickk: 5/5/2015 03:08:42 PM
four42
four42
Hacker
Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)Hacker (319 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 312, Visits: 0
Dantm wrote:
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.


Its technically not privately owned.Its a long term government asset.
It operates on a BOOT scheme,which means,Build,own,operate,transfer.
In other words,its a 30 year lease that expires in 2030.It will then be handed back to the NSW Government.
Which makes the $150 Million payout mentioned from the government even more stupid considering they will get it for FREE in 2030.
You have to keep the stakeholders(ANZ) interest in the investment strong,considering they only have another 15 years left.



Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:36:02 PM
Yes, I realise that but allocating any funds to a ANZ stadium upgrade would still be a case of public money going towards infrastructure used to derive private profits. Its up to it's operators to fund an upgrade that benefits them.
Dantm
Dantm
Fan
Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)Fan (77 reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 74, Visits: 0
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.


Its technically not privately owned.Its a long term government asset.
It operates on a BOOT scheme,which means,Build,own,operate,transfer.
In other words,its a 30 year lease that expires in 2030.It will then be handed back to the NSW Government.
Which makes the $150 Million payout mentioned from the government even more stupid considering they will get it for FREE in 2030.
You have to keep the stakeholders(ANZ) interest in the investment strong,considering they only have another 15 years left.



Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:36:02 PM
Yes, I realise that but allocating any funds to a ANZ stadium upgrade would still be a case of public money going towards infrastructure used to derive private profits. Its up to it's operators to fund an upgrade that benefits them.


Cannot agree.

There is only 15 years left on the lease.
At some point,the current operators will stop investing in an asset that they will have to hand back.
This is not your normal run of the mill private consortium owning and operating and asset of their own.
As it stands,investing in ANZ while there is 15 years remaining is still viable.
The longer you leave it,the less likely any business with contribute.
In 2030,you could be left with a run down mess.

Due to the ownership transfer in 2030,its in the NSW state government interest to contribute to ANZ,especially if they want a decent asset when they regain ownership,but also if they are serious about attracting major events to Sydney and NSW.


Davo1985
Davo1985
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K, Visits: 1
Eldar wrote:
The idea for a 65k seater at Moore Park is that the government wants to bring events in to the city so attending will become an event that involves spending money in the city before and after the game as opposed to spending time getting to an event in the middle of nowhere then getting home. It is an attempt to make attending sport more like it is in Melbourne. If they build the stadium right i.e tight rectangular with steep rake, comfort and amenities and protection from the elements, then it could encourage a greater attendance culture in Sydney.

I think it is the right decision to refuse more money to ANZ which isn't a great location or a great stadium. SFS and Parra are much better locations and better integrated into their communities.

I think SFS will work if the transport is fixed, which could well happen if the Western motorway eventually connects to the M2/Eastern Distributer, if light rail is built and if adequate parking and traffic flow is addressed.

Hopefully it doesn't become overused by low drawing Rugby League games to the point where a degraded pitch prevents it from being a world class stadium.


I'm sure this will happen, however luckily most of the a-league season is during the rugby/nrl off season so shouldn't really be a major problem.
Davo1985
Davo1985
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K, Visits: 1
melbourne_terrace wrote:
slbenfica82 wrote:

Melbourne needs something like this, a second rectangular venue. AAMI Park is not only getting too small, but it hosts all of A-league, NRL and Super Rugby. A second venue needs to be thought about now.


The impending annexation of the durka dome by the AFL and MV's current lease expiring when they take over means this is going to become a issue sooner rather than later.

The only way that we'll get a second venue though is if we join forces with League and Union and sell the idea to the State Government of Melbourne getting more Major Events. The Rebels are bleeding cash and just as likely to fold in 5 years, the Storm aren't going to get any bigger and City is a farce so MV ground sharing with someone is out.

If we proposed a new 40-50k stadium then we would need a lot more events than 13-18 MV home games to justify Government expenditure.

Realistically we could propose hosting the following:
1 State of Origin (every 3 years)
1-2 Union Internationals
1 League International
At least 2 Football Internationals
At least 2 Major Football Friendlies

They would really need to hammer the point that the prospect of a AFL owned Docklands and not having a dedicated Rectangular venue will harm Melbourne's chances of hosting these events


Actually Melb City might be your only hope. If Victory and City combine forces they may be able to get a stadium deal over the line in the next few years, especially if CFG decide to partly finance the project themselves.

Davo1985
Davo1985
Pro
Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)Pro (4.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.6K, Visits: 1
nickk wrote:
Dantm wrote:
four42 wrote:
Dantm wrote:
Since 2009,there has been 26 sporting events over 65k at ANZ Stadium.
That doesnt include the amount of concerts.

Sydney needs a venue larger than 65k.

Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 12:44:37 PM
ANZ isn't going anywhere, it didn't get funding because it's privately owned & there's nothing drastically wrong with it as a multipurpose stadium that needs gov funding. I think it's a three stadium network the gov is planning for with Parra, Moore Park & ANZ.


Its technically not privately owned.Its a long term government asset.
It operates on a BOOT scheme,which means,Build,own,operate,transfer.
In other words,its a 30 year lease that expires in 2030.It will then be handed back to the NSW Government.
Which makes the $150 Million payout mentioned from the government even more stupid considering they will get it for FREE in 2030.
You have to keep the stakeholders(ANZ) interest in the investment strong,considering they only have another 15 years left.
Edited by dantm: 5/5/2015 01:36:02 PM


The ANZ stadium operators instead of owners ,they were talking about how they needed a new upgrade to keep the stadium operating. Thats what made me think they were the ones with a plan about apartments and they owned the place. So that must be just hot air.
It turns out though it Singleton and Harvey who want to get rid of it.

Quote:

The key is Parramatta. If the government agrees to significantly increase its capacity, the ANZ operators could demand the government pay out the remaining 17 years on their lease and run the stadium itself.

It has leverage to force this outcome under an agreement signed in 1996 with the government before the stadium was built. It compels the government to “negotiate in good faith” with ANZ to ensure there is no “material adverse effect” if the government lifts the capacity above 25,000 of any stadium within 50km of Homebush.

If the government took back ANZ, one option would be to knock down Allianz and build a new 70,000-seat stadium at Moore Park and then turn ANZ Stadium into apartments.

In one further twist, a consortium led by Page, Gerry Harvey and John Singleton are about to take possession of the Entertainment Quarter next to Allianz and they have big plans.

When I recently asked Singleton to name one thing that could be done to improve Sydney, his response was short: “Blow up Homebush”.

So if they upgrade Parramatta over 25k then the clause is activated.
Singleton also has an ulterior motive to get rid of ANZ, he thinks if he gets rid of Homebush then a Central Coast team can be made.

Edited by nickk: 5/5/2015 03:08:42 PM


Singo and Gerry want to get rid of ANZ because they bought fox studios for $80mil with the idea of turning it into a new better entainment area. And with stadiums all around them it would be ideal. Business as usual..
Eastern Glory
Eastern Glory
Legend
Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)Legend (21K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 20K, Visits: 0
macktheknife wrote:
paulbagzFC wrote:
pv4 wrote:
I feel like EG posted this in ET or Rumour Mill months ago.

Interesting stuff..


And was shot down for it lol.

-PB


IIRC he had two parts to his rumour (I went looking for the thread but couldn't find it), one was that ANZ would get knocked down (which I gave no chance), and the other that SFS would get knocked down. Which I thought was a possibility.

Yeah, was something along those lines. My source was an ARU chief.
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Quote:
More high comedy in Sydney's stadium wars

Allianz Stadium is never full now, so why on earth would you knock it down and replace it with a bigger version at Moore Park?
Allianz Stadium is never full now, so why on earth would you knock it down and replace it with a bigger version at Moore Park? Getty Images

Share on twitter
Share on Google Plus
by Joe Aston
I tell you what: this brouhaha over funding for Sydney's sports facilities has more angles than a tool shop!

Former NSW Liberal leader John Brogden will shortly hand down his report to sports minister Stuart Ayres on the matter, although cabinet has already read most of it in The Daily Telegraph.

On Monday, the Sydney tabloid's John Lehmann revealed a confidential plan to spend $800 million on a new 65,000-seat stadium (with underground parking) at Moore Park; demolish nearby Allianz Stadium and spend $100 million building a smaller venue on the site; demolish and build a new Parramatta Stadium for $400 million; and to spend zilch on ANZ Stadium in Homebush, other than to pay the operator $135 million to hand it back to the government.

Where to start?

Illustration:
Illustration: Rod Clement
Well first, at $800 million, Darryl Kerrigan would say, they've got to be dreaming. The new Perth Stadium doesn't even open until 2018 and is already costing $1.2 billion, even without a car park beneath. And if you can't cobble together a greenfield project for under 10 figures, good luck flattening Parramatta and bringing it back to life for less than half that much dosh.

Second, who in Sydney is going to cop this? Can you imagine the apoplexy at The Sydney Morning Herald, where "urban development" means a cycleway here or there and the odd pop-up shops selling second-hand sandals, when they realise yet another slab of parkland is being bulldozed for rugby league hooligans from whoop whoop who've never filled Allianz which was custom built for them in the first place? And the Elizabeth Farrelly columns in memory of the tranquil, bucolic Kippax fields, once framed by Moreton Bay Figs and swarming with doped-out housos and their pitbulls, now ruined by an invasion of roided-up yobbos in their Canterbury get-up.

And what about the Telegraph, the newspaper synonymous with "a fair go" for Western Sydney? It'll be DEFCON 1 in editor Paul Whittaker's office, surely, if $900 million is spent east of Central Station – even if it is such a nice stroll from Holt Street. They'll be organising a rally down Mt Druitt's main drag. Whittaker will give a rousing speech (by phone).

Remember, Sydney will never be Melbourne. Melbourne's sporting precinct, like its CBD, is in the centre of greater Melbourne. Moore Park, like Sydney's CBD, borders the east of greater Sydney. It's not like for like. And unlike Melbourne, Sydney is genuinely a four-code town.

So why knock down Allianz and build a larger version next door? Because the hot dogs are below par? That's like buying a new car because the ashtray's full in the old one. Earth to Brogden: change the caterers and get Scotty Cam on the case – whack a roof on her and she'll be a beauty.

As we said, Allianz is never full. The average crowd for NRL matches there in the past five years is just 16,000. The Roosters struggle to pull in 12,000 and that's only after Nick Politis has done them all a solid price on a demo Ford Falcon.

If this new venue goes ahead, the NRL will need to play three games there every weekend to pay the lease – meaning Easts, Souths, Wests, St George and Canterbury will all be in the frame to relocate from the Homebush fan base. Then there'll be Waratahs, Wallabies Tests and the Swans and Australian and NSW cricket next door at the SCG. In other words, three to four events within a square mile every weekend of the year. Look at Anzac Parade and Moore Park Road and now imagine downtown Jakarta on the last Friday of Ramadan. Carnage.

We can't wait to see the horror on the faces of the educated and urbane (just ask them) residents of Centennial Park, Paddington and Woollahra (including Whittaker) when The Footy Show fanatics clog their roads and steal their God-given on-street parking. David Leckie is going to need a helipad on the roof of his joint just to get from Lang Road to Bistro Moncur for a caprese salad.

http://www.afr.com/brand/rear-window/more-high-comedy-in-sydneys-stadium-wars-20150506-ggvmpa


aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Quote:
NSW
David Gallop slams Sport Minister Stuart Ayres’ oval exodus plan for Homebush

7 minutes ago
EXCLUSIVE Andrew ClennellThe Daily Telegraph


A large crowd looks on during a Wests Tigers v Melbourne Storm NRL game at Leichhardt Oval.
FOOTBALL Federation Australia boss David Gallop has criticised Sport Minister Stuart

Ayres’ vision to downgrade Sydney’s suburban grounds and take everything to Moore Park and Homebush as “overly simplistic”.

And the chief executive of South Sydney Rabbitohs, John Lee, says Mr Ayres should follow the lead of Premier Mike Baird’s father Bruce, who decided as Olympics minister that Homebush was the place for Sydney’s major stadium, not Moore Park.

Mr Ayres outlined his vision for Sydney’s stadiums at a Committee for Sydney forum at News Corp Australia headquarters on Tuesday night, including that a new stadium be built at Moore Park on Centennial Park and Moore Park trust land.


The Daily Telegraph revealed earlier this year that the government would sell the Land and Property Information Service to pay for the stadiums.
Government sources said yesterday this was at odds with the Premier and Cabinet’s decision last year that a new stadium should be built on existing SCG land.

In Mr Ayres’ vision he described the death of the suburban NRL ground. He also said the current Sydney Football Stadium should be torn down and a new 55,000-seat $800 million stadium built on Centennial and Moore Park trust land.



When Mr Ayres was asked about whether any more money would be forthcoming for the likes of Kogarah and Brookvale Oval, as the government spends $1.6 billion on Moore Park, a new Parramatta stadium, a new indoor stadium and ANZ Stadium at Homebush, the minister indicated it would be not.

“My strong focus here is making sure that we’ve got a network that we can sustain,” Mr Ayres said.

“There are 31 tier 2 stadiums in Australia and 15 of them are in Sydney. We have far too many tier 2 facilities that requires ongoing investment from the public.

“It [the investment] doesn’t come from the franchises that hire them, it can’t be sustained by local government.

“We’ve got to concentrate our investment.

“Where we thought about where you invest at . . you’ve got to build into a precinct.

“Will it mean that state governments don’t invest in suburban grounds that don’t have multi-use? “That’s the harsh reality of where we’re getting to here. But as a minister whose responsible for assets that are owned by the state, that’s where my priority’s going to be.”



Minister for port Stuart Ayres.


But Mr Gallop, the former NRL boss, who heard Mr Ayres speak, said yesterday: “To argue that Sydney can copy the AFL model in Melbourne, where 9 clubs share two main venues, is overly simplistic.

“The difference is that the MCG and Etihad Stadium are literally surrounded by railway and tram lines. It’s easy to get to and from the game from anywhere in Melbourne.

“Some people in the debate around stadium rationalisation in Sydney underestimate the difference in geography and ease of transport between Sydney and Melbourne.

“Light rail services in Sydney will help, but the couch and HDTV makes it an easy option to stay home if it is a long way to the ground and you have been sitting in traffic or on public transport all week in Sydney.”

Mr Lee said that Mr Ayres was wrong in thinking the city could have two big stadiums and “in 1991 the Premier’s Dad” had been part of a team that decided Western Sydney and Homebush was the best place for investment.


In Mr Ayres’ vision he described the death of the suburban NRL ground.
He said a refurbishment of the Sydney Football Stadium was preferable.

“They looked at Moore Park and they looked at Homebush and the answer was [Homebush].

“Anyone who understands Sydney and stadiums would understand the big events of Sydney need to be near two things — the people who want to enter and the transport.

“Moore Park can only handle 11,000 an hour on public transport, Homebush delivers 55,000 people an hour on bus and train.

“The die was cast in 1991 with Bruce Baird.”


Mr Ayres told the Committee for Sydney function that first he will spend $300-350 million on the new Parramatta stadium, then $800 million on Moore Park, then the rest of the $1.6 billion the government has set aside will go on a new indoor stadium and Homebush.

However, there is one other stadium he wants to build when the others are finished. An outer west stadium. Which would most likely be in his electorate of Penrith.

The government intends to spend $100-200 million on buying back ANZ Stadium at Homebush from its private operator.

Premier Mike Baird is understood to be a greater supporter of the Homebush facility than Mr Ayres.

The Daily Telegraph revealed earlier this year that the government would sell the Land and Property Information Service to pay for the stadiums.


Mr Ayres outlined his vision for Sydney’s stadiums at a Committee for Sydney forum at News Corp Australia headquarters on Tuesday night.
Originally published as Boot sunk into minister’s oval plan


http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/david-gallop-slams-sport-minister-stuart-ayres-oval-exodus-plan-for-homebush/news-story/e37c375926e192d605fb19fd5b14260e
Slobodan Drauposevic
Slobodan Drauposevic
Legend
Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)Legend (14K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K, Visits: 0
That photo is absolute wank :lol:
aussie scott21
aussie scott21
Legend
Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)Legend (20K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K, Visits: 0
Draupnir wrote:
That photo is absolute wank :lol:

Yes I was forced to include it. Bravo to the editor.
melbourne_terrace
melbourne_terrace
Legend
Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)Legend (12K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K, Visits: 0
1.I hate these fkn shared stadiums model that the AFL started. Suburban grounds and the spread of venues across the city are what make NRL games great, it is so boring in Melbourne with every footy team sharing the same venue and no one wants to go watch club footy at homebush.

2. Homebush would be better off demolished than redeveloped. There is so much wrong with it as a venue.

3. Clearly states that there is no more money for suburban stadiums for club footy, especially if the venue only has one major club. Except for his own footy club off course, they don't have to follow the rules because #upthepanthers. State politicians ffs.


Viennese Vuck

HeyItsRobbie
HeyItsRobbie
World Class
World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)World Class (6.8K reputation)

Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K, Visits: 0
come on wheres the new pirtek development photos?

i demand concept art
GO


Select a Forum....























Inside Sport


Search