I understand that general principle of changing one's mind when new information comes through, but that's only valid if the information isn't bullshit.

In this case the new "information" is bullshit.  Real balls would have been to reject the new information as bullshit- but oh what a shit storm that would create, wouldn't it?  So he backed down instead.

Its disappointing because Foster played in the NSL, he did have close interactions with us "wogs", did he never witness any whites as victims of racism? How is that possible FFS the game he played was called wogball. It would take him one phone call to one of the white "wogs" he played with to learn if it is true that whites can't suffer racism.

I understand that general principle of changing one's mind when new information comes through, but that's only valid if the information isn't bullshit.

In this case the new "information" is bullshit.  Real balls would have been to reject the new information as bullshit- but oh what a shit storm that would create, wouldn't it?  So he backed down instead.

It’s disappointing because Foster played in the NSL, he did have close interactions with us "wogs", did he never witness any whites as victims of racism? How is that possible FFS the game he played was called wogball. It would take him one phone call to one of the white "wogs" he played with to learn if it is true that whites can't suffer racism.

I think the point here is that is it racist or offensive to be called “white”? For me personally I’m not offended, but you may be. I would argue that the majority of white people would not be offended or consider it racist to be called “white”. It has no history or connections with anything derogatory or offensive apart from being more easily sunburnt,  a movie about not being able to jump, not being good at dancing, or having  a smaller……

I agree that the new information is bullshit (no argument here) but to him it obviously isnt thats my point... 

How can he possibly claim  that given his history of playing "wogball"  and then his deep history of defending the marginalization of the game and the millions of wogs who kept it alive?  Its inconceivable.

I think the point here is that is it racist or offensive to be called “white”? For me personally I’m not offended, but you may be. I would argue that the majority of white people would not be offended or consider it racist to be called “white”. It has no history or connections with anything derogatory or offensive apart from being more easily sunburnt,  a movie about not being able to jump, not being good at dancing, or having  a smaller…

The young Matildas were outplayed. Couldn't string 2 passes, couldn't keep the ball. Absolutely painful to watch. This is like watching the Socceroos vs Bangladesh. This is U20 level already they re not that young why is the difference of level  so big?  This is like watching some amateur blonde girls running around with no football skills.

judging by this, Japan might soon be technically as far ahead as the matildas as their male side is ahead of of the socceroos...

They did beat Spain 4-0 and were always one of the favourites for the World Cup before losing to Sweden. It's possible they already are. 

It was quite one sided

Wonder what they are doing different to us? Fully pro female division? Female academies? Female u20s for j league clubs?

*Basic first touch
*Pass & move (create a triangle)
*Pressing & Anti pressing
*Winning 2nd ball
*Positioning of the players without the ball
*One touch football
*Winning the ball back after losing ball possession 

The young Matildas today not only lacking all these basic skills but some of  them are out of shape. 

She didn't simply say "white".  

"Stupid white bastard" is the allegation.

As for the history or connections of being white, "white" does not equal Anglo Celtic.   White Europeans are diverse historically, culturally, linguistically, genetically.   Some were oppressors.  Others were oppressed.  Some conquered, others were conquered. Some kept slaves, others were enslaved.  Some murdered millions, others were murdered.

The idea that whites can't be victims of racism is one if, not the, stupidist things I've heard. 

Those oppressed or murdered was not only because they were white, it was because generally they were done by other white people. These were done because of their religion or their race or different ideologies, not because of the colour of their skin.
The Blacks were oppressed because they were black.

HUGE Difference.

During Australia 'No Black immigration policy', when British, Greeks, Italians, Chinese, Lebanese flooded this country, no blacks were allowed.
Blacks were not allowed to vote, to swim in the same swimming pools, go to the same bars as white people.

In America another country with huge immigration, they had segregation in Schools, universities, toilets, public transport because of the colour of their skin. 

turns out she spent the night in the slammer for it... I understand she might have been embarrassed but she surely had to let someone at the FA know.

Blacks enslaved and oppressed other blacks for centuries, just as whites did to other whites. They did it because one group of blacks was more powerful than the other group of blacks, same as the Europans oppressing other Europeans (and Asians against other Asians)..   The Anglos/French/Spanish/Belgian whites oppressed blacks because they were technologically inferior, and they did it with the help of other blacks! Their skin color was irrrelevant.   Racism is universal.

There never has been a No Black Immigration Policy.  There was The White Australia Policy.  In actual fact the aim of the law was to limit non-white (particularly Asian) immigration to Australia, to help keep Australia ‘British’. (https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/immigration-and-citizenship/immigration-restriction-act-1901).

When the Greeks, Italians, Chinese, Lebanese flooded this country, they were never treated equally as British immigrants until decades later.  Dagoes. wops, wogs, greasers, chinks.  They also had absolutely nothing to do with black slavery, oppression  and government policy.

Blacks enslaved and oppressed other blacks for centuries, just as whites did to other whites. They did it because one group of blacks was more powerful than the other group of blacks, same as the Europans oppressing other Europeans (and Asians against other Asians)..   The Anglos/French/Spanish/Belgian whites oppressed blacks because they were technologically inferior, and they did it with the help of other blacks! Their skin color was irrrelevant.   Racism is universal.

There never has been a No Black Immigration Policy.  There was The White Australia Policy.  In actual fact the aim of the law was to limit non-white (particularly Asian) immigration to Australia, to help keep Australia ‘British’. (https://www.naa.gov.au/explore-collection/immigration-and-citizenship/immigration-restriction-act-1901).

When the Greeks, Italians, Chinese, Lebanese flooded this country, they were never treated equally as British immigrants until decades later.  Dagoes. wops, wogs, greasers, chinks.  They also had absolutely nothing to do with black slavery, oppression  and government policy.

You seem pretty worked up about this.

What would you like to see happen to Kerr?

(a) Fine?
(b) Jail?
(c) Stripped of the captaincy?
(d) Banned from the team?
(e) all lefty wokies to admit they've created a giant monster that's come back to bite them in the arse?
(f) complete destruction of western society and a ground up rebuild to occur based on conservative and right wing philosophy?
(g) All of the above

or

(h) Slap on the wrist?
(i) Dismissal of charges?

Now don't be shy. Balls in your court fella.

turns out she spent the night in the slammer for it... I understand she might have been embarrassed but she surely had to let someone at the FA know.

I think a jail term is ridiculous but it IS British law mate so whats good for one type of racism should also apply to another... 

A fine and a ban from playing for a while would make sense to me. She cant be stripped of the captaincy when she isnt the captain and as for endorsements and contracts with sponsors thats up to them I suppose, if they are happy to champion the "white is evil" cause then they wont do a thing about it. If she is found guilty Chelsea will drop her like a hot potato I predict... and she may have trouble finding another club in England ... they tend to take this sort of thing seriously over there.

She's the presumptive captain of Australia when she returns.

I feel like this Kerr thing is like a lightning rod for the 'good for goose, good for the gander' people to 'get one back' on the 'libtards' and 'feminazis' and they're loving every minute of it.

I understand that general principle of changing one's mind when new information comes through, but that's only valid if the information isn't bullshit.

This is laughable. I mean it's easily 'proven' by the fact of our giant African intake post WW1 and post WW2.

Just because something isn't written down doesn't mean it didn't exist.

Of course there was no 'no black policy' because the whole idea of letting 'blacks' in was so ridiculous there was no point having a policy for it. Having a 'no black policy' was equivalent to having a 'no unicorn policy'.