Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. Think it was a fair call during the Ashes. From memory his red ball form had been mediocre and they aren't the conditions for Starc in general. It's the last place you want someone spraying the new ball around. Although in hindsight, he might have been very useful in that match where we couldn't get the last wicket. That's the thing about him, releases pressure but can take wickets out of nowhere. Very good in specific conditions. I think it is perplexing that the most successful bowler in the World Cup did not play most Tests against England, because his bowling didn't adhere to coach devised game plans for success in England. I just wonder where the selectors will go with a player like Warner now he has had a long career, with an average of somewhere near 60 at home and I was told 25 away, today.
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. why funny? he was terrible. like awful... like even with a good 2018 he still ranked 19th ;) Starc has redeemed himself, in the recent Test series against Pakistan, and, in the series against Sri Lanka earlier this year.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI think starc is the best bowler in the world on a wicket where a draw is highly likelyHowever, if a draw is super unlikely we have much better options because his average is higher than others. How much world cricket do you watch? In all seriousness? You're saying he is a road warrior. As roads lead to draws, dustbowls and green vipers do not. And the best suited to roads. But roads only occur in NZ and Aus. So that makes Starc the best bowler for Aus, except, he isn't. Cummins is clearly outbowling him as did Rabada, Bumrah and many more. I do agree he is a fine road warrior, though. But the best? I seriously question that... No need to lose your manners As to backing up my claim, if a draw is a danger you care more about strike rates than average. of all current players above around 20 test matches only Rabada has a higher strike rate. Starc has one of the lowest strike rates of all time but an average in the mid to high 20s which makes him decent but not outstanding on helpful pitches. Cummins might overtake him but its too early to tell if his stats are warped by a small sample size. Where exactly do you allege that I lost my manners? old chum? And I am certain that I said Rabada was better than Starc on roads, SR or everage right? ;) He is right? :) Where's Bumnrah -d dont tell me Bumrah is behind Starc in Aus... now way. I havve to check SO I checked Bumrah has Starc beat on average and SR in Aus. Shalll I check Rabada too? Or you admit Starc aint all that now against what I said... politely... Just checked, Rabada has Starc easily beat in Aus... vs Warner and Smith even... :) So where are you going with this Starc is the best on roads argument????? Politely you are wrong. And I said you were wrong poilitely without losing my manners. But now I have confirmed all stats. I just knew SA and India thrashed you there in Aus. :) SHall I do Cummins in Aus too? Oh heck why not... Wait up Cummins has the much superior average 22.7 vs 26.8 bvut a slithly worse sr of 48.2 vs 47.7. Im taking CUmmins on those numbers. But you know - there is a half ball strike rate argument to be had... LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL Rabada and Bumrah eat starc in Aus and ask for more sir :) The 9th best strike rates of all time for any player with more than 30 tests is nothing to be sneezed at. Bumrah and Cummins might over take him. With Rabada in Australia you are going off small statistics but there is an argument that he his better in those conditions given his impressive career strike rate but too early to comment on Bumrah
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI think starc is the best bowler in the world on a wicket where a draw is highly likelyHowever, if a draw is super unlikely we have much better options because his average is higher than others. How much world cricket do you watch? In all seriousness? You're saying he is a road warrior. As roads lead to draws, dustbowls and green vipers do not. And the best suited to roads. But roads only occur in NZ and Aus. So that makes Starc the best bowler for Aus, except, he isn't. Cummins is clearly outbowling him as did Rabada, Bumrah and many more. I do agree he is a fine road warrior, though. But the best? I seriously question that... No need to lose your manners As to backing up my claim, if a draw is a danger you care more about strike rates than average. of all current players above around 20 test matches only Rabada has a higher strike rate. Starc has one of the lowest strike rates of all time but an average in the mid to high 20s which makes him decent but not outstanding on helpful pitches. Cummins might overtake him but its too early to tell if his stats are warped by a small sample size. And I am certain that I said Rabada was better than Starc on roads, SR or everage right? ;) He is right? :) Where's Bumnrah -d dont tell me Bumrah is behind Starc in Aus... now way. I havve to check SO I checked Bumrah has Starc beat on average and SR in Aus. Shalll I check Rabada too? Or you admit Starc aint all that now against what I said... politely... Just checked, Rabada has Starc easily beat in Aus... vs Warner and Smith even... :) So where are you going with this Starc is the best on roads argument????? Politely you are wrong. And I said you were wrong poilitely without losing my manners. But now I have confirmed all stats. I just knew SA and India thrashed you there in Aus. :) SHall I do Cummins in Aus too? Cummins has the much superior average 22.7 vs 26.8 bvut a slithly worse sr of 48.2 vs 47.7. Im taking CUmmins on those numbers. But you know - there is a half ball strike rate argument to be had... Rabada and Bumrah eat starc in Aus :)
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI think starc is the best bowler in the world on a wicket where a draw is highly likelyHowever, if a draw is super unlikely we have much better options because his average is higher than others. How much world cricket do you watch? In all seriousness? You're saying he is a road warrior. As roads lead to draws, dustbowls and green vipers do not. And the best suited to roads. But roads only occur in NZ and Aus. So that makes Starc the best bowler for Aus, except, he isn't. Cummins is clearly outbowling him as did Rabada, Bumrah and many more. I do agree he is a fine road warrior, though. But the best? I seriously question that... No need to lose your manners As to backing up my claim, if a draw is a danger you care more about strike rates than average. of all current players above around 20 test matches only Rabada has a higher strike rate. Starc has one of the lowest strike rates of all time but an average in the mid to high 20s which makes him decent but not outstanding on helpful pitches. Cummins might overtake him but its too early to tell if his stats are warped by a small sample size.
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI think starc is the best bowler in the world on a wicket where a draw is highly likelyHowever, if a draw is super unlikely we have much better options because his average is higher than others. How much world cricket do you watch? In all seriousness? You're saying he is a road warrior. As roads lead to draws, dustbowls and green vipers do not. And the best suited to roads. But roads only occur in NZ and Aus. So that makes Starc the best bowler for Aus, except, he isn't. Cummins is clearly outbowling him as did Rabada, Bumrah and many more. I do agree he is a fine road warrior, though. But the best? I seriously question that...
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
I think starc is the best bowler in the world on a wicket where a draw is highly likely
However, if a draw is super unlikely we have much better options because his average is higher than others.
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. why funny? he was terrible. like awful... like even with a good 2018 he still ranked 19th ;)
|
|
|
flyslip
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 192,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. Think it was a fair call during the Ashes. From memory his red ball form had been mediocre and they aren't the conditions for Starc in general. It's the last place you want someone spraying the new ball around. Although in hindsight, he might have been very useful in that match where we couldn't get the last wicket. That's the thing about him, releases pressure but can take wickets out of nowhere. Very good in specific conditions. I think Shane Warne made the good point that yes, he’s expensive, but he’s not in the team to be a line and length bowler. Cummins, Hazlewood, Pattinson & Siddle do that. Starc gives you that X factor where he can come in with raw pace and blast a few short balls or Yorkers and mix things up a bit. Fair observations. He's a certainty to be in our starting 11 against the kiwis, injury permitting. Can be invaluable on our flattish wickets.
|
|
|
ThingyBob
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 243,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. Think it was a fair call during the Ashes. From memory his red ball form had been mediocre and they aren't the conditions for Starc in general. It's the last place you want someone spraying the new ball around. Although in hindsight, he might have been very useful in that match where we couldn't get the last wicket. That's the thing about him, releases pressure but can take wickets out of nowhere. Very good in specific conditions. I think Shane Warne made the good point that yes, he’s expensive, but he’s not in the team to be a line and length bowler. Cummins, Hazlewood, Pattinson & Siddle do that. Starc gives you that X factor where he can come in with raw pace and blast a few short balls or Yorkers and mix things up a bit.
|
|
|
flyslip
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 192,
Visits: 0
|
+xFunny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes. Think it was a fair call during the Ashes. From memory his red ball form had been mediocre and they aren't the conditions for Starc in general. It's the last place you want someone spraying the new ball around. Although in hindsight, he might have been very useful in that match where we couldn't get the last wicket. That's the thing about him, releases pressure but can take wickets out of nowhere. Very good in specific conditions.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Funny that Starc with this amazing strike rate, and who has done very well in this series against Pakistan, was dropped for most of The Ashes.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xScreamer from Paine to dismiss Ifkithar off Starc! Pak 5-89! Starc the recipient of three very poor shots. If he is not mopping up cheap tail wickets he is getting gifts to lift his wicket tally. Meanwhile CA and the media are gushing all over him. Is this a question of Starc being a much better bowler in Aus than England? Hence, the domestic attention? I know we've seen a lot of the likes of Warner and Starc overseas, tempering our judgement. I seem to remember Starc bowling quite well in the Subcontinent, but I could be wrong. Starc is a real enigma. On song he can rip thru a side with sheer pace. Then he produces a spell where he has trouble landing the ball on the cut surface.. ala Mitch Johnson. Like Johnson he gets a lot of his wickets with bad balls but he can produce the unplayable spell that can net him a brace such as we saw in the first innings tho several of those were due to poor batting or rather impatient batting. I love watching Starc bowl. I always sense something exciting is going to happen when he is tossed the ball. I heard he has the 2nd highest strike rate in history! I’ve just read something like this for those who have taken 200 wickets.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xScreamer from Paine to dismiss Ifkithar off Starc! Pak 5-89! Starc the recipient of three very poor shots. If he is not mopping up cheap tail wickets he is getting gifts to lift his wicket tally. Meanwhile CA and the media are gushing all over him. Is this a question of Starc being a much better bowler in Aus than England? Hence, the domestic attention? I know we've seen a lot of the likes of Warner and Starc overseas, tempering our judgement. I seem to remember Starc bowling quite well in the Subcontinent, but I could be wrong. Starc is a real enigma. On song he can rip thru a side with sheer pace. Then he produces a spell where he has trouble landing the ball on the cut surface.. ala Mitch Johnson. Like Johnson he gets a lot of his wickets with bad balls but he can produce the unplayable spell that can net him a brace such as we saw in the first innings tho several of those were due to poor batting or rather impatient batting. I love watching Starc bowl. I always sense something exciting is going to happen when he is tossed the ball. I heard he has the 2nd highest strike rate in history!
|
|
|
ThingyBob
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 243,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xScreamer from Paine to dismiss Ifkithar off Starc! Pak 5-89! Starc the recipient of three very poor shots. If he is not mopping up cheap tail wickets he is getting gifts to lift his wicket tally. Meanwhile CA and the media are gushing all over him. Is this a question of Starc being a much better bowler in Aus than England? Hence, the domestic attention? I know we've seen a lot of the likes of Warner and Starc overseas, tempering our judgement. I seem to remember Starc bowling quite well in the Subcontinent, but I could be wrong. Starc is a real enigma. On song he can rip thru a side with sheer pace. Then he produces a spell where he has trouble landing the ball on the cut surface.. ala Mitch Johnson. Like Johnson he gets a lot of his wickets with bad balls but he can produce the unplayable spell that can net him a brace such as we saw in the first innings tho several of those were due to poor batting or rather impatient batting. I love watching Starc bowl. I always sense something exciting is going to happen when he is tossed the ball.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOn TV they just showed how Josh H’s balls nearly all hit the same spot of good line and length about the size of a hanky against right handed batters. Impressive! Send the clip to Mike.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xRizwan clean bowled Hazlewood. I think Rizwan played down the wrong line under lights. 9-235 under lights with only 1 wicket to go playing against the new ball. I saw a little tail in DC. Beaut delivery. Lyon stole the quicks thunder. His 5 for came out of nowhere. Some poor execution and two clever balls.. specially the one that removed Yasir Shah. Starc stole the first innings.. Hazlewood the second. Cummins a rather quiet game. Now for the Black Caps in 10 days. Another day/niter me thinks. There was some criticism of the pink ball from pace bowlers. They think it gets too soft too quickly and needs more work. Do you think H bowled better than Lyon in the second dig, Baggers? I definitely like the pink ball Tests and think if the ball is easy to play during daylight hours, it compensates by doing more at dusk. Paine said he has difficulty not with direction, but depth of the pink ball when catching. He said the ball hits the gloves slower or quicker than he anticipates. He attributed the pink ball's unique characteristics to some of the dropped catches. IMO the pink ball is a another variable just like different types of pitches are prepared in different countries. The Pinkie is a worry. Great under lites but benign in daylite hours. Were most of those dropped catches in daytime. I am willing to say they were. Starc said the pinkie had characteristics more of the white ball when bowled at day. One bloke that will never bag the pinkie is Hazlewood. He has always produced during the twilite under lites with it and did again here. The two that removed Babar and Ul-Huq on Sunday evening were masterful balls. It was that spell that IMO knocked any remaining fite out of Pakistan.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xScreamer from Paine to dismiss Ifkithar off Starc! Pak 5-89! Starc the recipient of three very poor shots. If he is not mopping up cheap tail wickets he is getting gifts to lift his wicket tally. Meanwhile CA and the media are gushing all over him. Is this a question of Starc being a much better bowler in Aus than England? Hence, the domestic attention? I know we've seen a lot of the likes of Warner and Starc overseas, tempering our judgement. I seem to remember Starc bowling quite well in the Subcontinent, but I could be wrong. Starc is a real enigma. On song he can rip thru a side with sheer pace. Then he produces a spell where he has trouble landing the ball on the cut surface.. ala Mitch Johnson. Like Johnson he gets a lot of his wickets with bad balls but he can produce the unplayable spell that can net him a brace such as we saw in the first innings tho several of those were due to poor batting or rather impatient batting.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xRizwan clean bowled Hazlewood. I think Rizwan played down the wrong line under lights. 9-235 under lights with only 1 wicket to go playing against the new ball. I saw a little tail in DC. Beaut delivery. Lyon stole the quicks thunder. His 5 for came out of nowhere. Some poor execution and two clever balls.. specially the one that removed Yasir Shah. Starc stole the first innings.. Hazlewood the second. Cummins a rather quiet game. Now for the Black Caps in 10 days. Another day/niter me thinks. There was some criticism of the pink ball from pace bowlers. They think it gets too soft too quickly and needs more work. Do you think H bowled better than Lyon in the second dig, Baggers? I definitely like the pink ball Tests and think if the ball is easy to play during daylight hours, it compensates by doing more at dusk. Paine said he has difficulty not with direction, but depth of the pink ball when catching. He said the ball hits the gloves slower or quicker than he anticipates. He attributed the pink ball's unique characteristics to some of the dropped catches. IMO the pink ball is a another variable just like different types of pitches are prepared in different countries.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI expected Pakistan to be tough to beat after destroying Australia A in the practice, lead up match. Yep. We were ruthless. It has to be said Pakistan erred bringing such an inexperienced bowling attack here. Davey Warner wont mind tho.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xRizwan clean bowled Hazlewood. I think Rizwan played down the wrong line under lights. 9-235 under lights with only 1 wicket to go playing against the new ball. I saw a little tail in DC. Beaut delivery. Lyon stole the quicks thunder. His 5 for came out of nowhere. Some poor execution and two clever balls.. specially the one that removed Yasir Shah. Starc stole the first innings.. Hazlewood the second. Cummins a rather quiet game. Now for the Black Caps in 10 days. Another day/niter me thinks.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xJust missed a bit of the game. Did Lyon take wickets 3,4 and 5 bowling from around the wicket to right hand batters? To answer my own question - yes. Shane Warne identified that when GOAT bowls around the wicket he gets more body thrust and drive in his action. Ostensibly, this imparts more spin and loop on the ball.
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
Paine is just saying how difficult it can be to field with the pink ball under lights. He responded to a question about what they can do better and said field better than yesterday under lights.
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
I expected Pakistan to be tough to beat after destroying Australia A in the practice, lead up match.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Just missed a bit of the game.
Did Lyon take wickets 3,4 and 5 bowling from around the wicket to right hand batters?
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xGot to agree that Paine is a very good keeper (especially to spin) and Captain. Good batting average for a keeper also. A shame about the injuries or he might have had the keeping job many years ago. Not very good with drs though. Not being brilliant with DRS is not sufficient reason to replace a captain doing well - surely? Who wants him replaced? Even if we did, we haven't got anyone near as good behind the stumps to replace him with. Some on this forum have called for him to be replaced. They think he hasn’t made enough runs, even though he had the third highest batting average of any keeper a few Tests ago, and, he is easily the best keeper -and - captain.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Cummins runs Abbas out.
Australia 2-0 in the series.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Abbas run out!
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Rizwan clean bowled Hazlewood.
I think Rizwan played down the wrong line under lights.
9-235 under lights with only 1 wicket to go playing against the new ball.
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xScreamer from Paine to dismiss Ifkithar off Starc! Pak 5-89! Starc the recipient of three very poor shots. If he is not mopping up cheap tail wickets he is getting gifts to lift his wicket tally. Meanwhile CA and the media are gushing all over him. Is this a question of Starc being a much better bowler in Aus than England? Hence, the domestic attention? I know we've seen a lot of the likes of Warner and Starc overseas, tempering our judgement. I seem to remember Starc bowling quite well in the Subcontinent, but I could be wrong. He did well in Aussie's disaster tour to SL in 2016. He kept attacking the stumps and went well. The rest of the team had a horror tour.
|
|
|