moofa
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Can this thread be moved to Extra time when only talking about AFL/NRL. Good for when A-league is on and Socceroos are playing but no relevance here atm
|
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
moofa wrote:Can this thread be moved to Extra time when only talking about AFL/NRL. Good for when A-league is on and Socceroos are playing but no relevance here atm The A-League is still on there was a game on Saturday, and another this weekend, and don't forget there are clubs still in the ACL, plenty to talk about
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
As I predicted, after round 1 AFL ratings taking a nose dive (just didn't expect it so soon)!!
Sunday 15 April 2012 1 LIVE: NRL SHARKS V EELS FOX SPORTS 2 257,000
2 LIVE: AFL NORTH MELBOURNE V GEELONG FOX FOOTY 227,000
3 LIVE: NRL WARRIORS V RABBITOHS FOX SPORTS 2 179,000 4 LIVE: AFL GWS V WEST COAST FOX FOOTY 153,000
5 LIVE: AFL HAWTHORN V ADELAIDE FOX SPORTS 1 124,000
6 LIVE: AFL: AFTER THE BOUNCE FOX FOOTY 103,000
7 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 101,000
8 MODERN FAMILY FOX8 95,000
9 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 77,000
10 MODERN FAMILY FOX8 69,000
|
|
|
Glorynator
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 605,
Visits: 0
|
Any stats from CCM v Glory? Or did I not see the post
|
|
|
Mister Football
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:As I predicted, after round 1 AFL ratings taking a nose dive (just didn't expect it so soon)!!
Sunday 15 April 2012 1 LIVE: NRL SHARKS V EELS FOX SPORTS 2 257,000
2 LIVE: AFL NORTH MELBOURNE V GEELONG FOX FOOTY 227,000
3 LIVE: NRL WARRIORS V RABBITOHS FOX SPORTS 2 179,000 4 LIVE: AFL GWS V WEST COAST FOX FOOTY 153,000
5 LIVE: AFL HAWTHORN V ADELAIDE FOX SPORTS 1 124,000
6 LIVE: AFL: AFTER THE BOUNCE FOX FOOTY 103,000
7 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 101,000
8 MODERN FAMILY FOX8 95,000
9 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 77,000
10 MODERN FAMILY FOX8 69,000 Fox Footy the no. 1 Fox channel for the third week running. Can't do much better than that.
|
|
|
playmaker11
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 12K,
Visits: 0
|
Which football are you referring to in your username?
By now, American Samoa must have realised that Australias 22-0 win over Tonga two days earlier was no fluke.
|
|
|
TimmyJ
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Not a good week for the NRL either Ozboy. usually more they get a couple over 300k. Nice of you to pick on them too.
Is 15k for NRL in melbourne correct?. I know it is a big ask but is it possible to see what origin rated in melbourne FTA or fox? Would be rather curious as I really thought the NRL was making inroads here (well before whole salary cap thing anyways)
What were the ratings from last years AL grand final and are we expecting to be beat them this year?
|
|
|
Joe Davola
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:As I predicted, after round 1 AFL ratings taking a nose dive (just didn't expect it so soon)!!
Sunday 15 April 2012 5 LIVE: AFL HAWTHORN V ADELAIDE FOX SPORTS 1 124,000 Wow - this really is a shocking Foxtel ratings result for AFL, isn't it? And, both teams are heavily supported in strong AFL States.
|
|
|
Roar_Brisbane
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
TimmyJ wrote:Not a good week for the NRL either Ozboy. usually more they get a couple over 300k. Nice of you to pick on them too.
Is 15k for NRL in melbourne correct?. I know it is a big ask but is it possible to see what origin rated in melbourne FTA or fox? Would be rather curious as I really thought the NRL was making inroads here (well before whole salary cap thing anyways)
What were the ratings from last years AL grand final and are we expecting to be beat them this year? The NRL would rely heavily on free to air figures. Generally the best games are on Friday night where fox has no coverage or is heavily delayed.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
what ratings did A-league get?
|
|
|
skeptic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Glory Recruit wrote:what ratings did A-league get? It seems among the hair pulling, tongue poking and knee deep bullshite, they have been forgotten. Top 20 Program Rankings - Subscription - Overnight Figures Saturday 14th April 1 LIVE: NRL STORM V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 286,000 2 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V TITANS FOX SPORTS 2 259,000 3 LIVE: AFL GOLD COAST V ESSENDON FOX SPORTS 1 178,000 4 LIVE: AFL FREMANTLE V LIONS FOX FOOTY 170,000 5 LIVE: AFL RICHMOND V MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY 155,000 6 LIVE: AFL BULLDOGS V ST KILDA FOX FOOTY 127,000 7 LIVE: AFL PORT ADELAIDE V SYDNEY FOX SPORTS 1 118,000 8 LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE PRELIM FINAL FOX SPORTS 1 109,0009 NRL ROOSTERS V COWBOYS FOX SPORTS 2 97,000 10 LIVE: NRL SATURDAY FOX SPORTS 2 82,000 11 LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: BRUMBIES V REBELS FOX SPORTS 3 81,000 12 LIVE: AFL: NAB BEFORE THE BOUNCE FOX FOOTY 80,000 13 STORAGE WARS A&E 79,000 14 STORAGE WARS A&E 68,000 15 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 66,000 16 AUCTIONEER$ A&E 66,000 17 DORA THE EXPLORER Nick Jr. 62,000 18 DORA THE EXPLORER Nick Jr. 60,000 19 PAWN STARS A&E 60,000 20 LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: CRUSADERS V STORMERS FOX SPORTS 3 59,000 Week 15: 8 - 14 April 2012 Top 10 Sport Broadcasts 1 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V PANTHERS FOX SPORTS 2 Mon 19:00 336 2 LIVE: AFL GEELONG V HAWTHORN FOX FOOTY Mon 15:00 335 3 LIVE: AFL CARLTON V COLLINGWOOD FOX FOOTY Fri 19:30 329 4 LIVE: NRL STORM V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 17:30 286 5 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V TITANS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 19:30 259 6 LIVE: NRL COWBOYS V STORM FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 19:00 242 7 LIVE: NRL RAIDERS V WARRIORS FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 14:00 196 8 LIVE: AFL ST KILDA V GOLD COAST FOX FOOTY Sun 16:36 179 9 LIVE: AFL GOLD COAST V ESSENDON FOX SPORTS 1 Sat 19:30 178 10 LIVE: AFL NORTH MELBOURNE V GWS FOX FOOTY Sun 13:07 174
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
oh wow idk about other finals but that seems a healthy rating? was expecting 70k
Thanks skeptic:) could i trouble you on getting the western forces ratings=o?
|
|
|
agga78
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
109k thats a great rating number for sport with a 10th of the tv money those other hmm sports get, even though it was a final this is probably two of the lowest tv drawing teams we could have and to get 109k is great numbers.
|
|
|
silent gas dirigible
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 231,
Visits: 0
|
skeptic wrote:Glory Recruit wrote:what ratings did A-league get? It seems among the hair pulling, tongue poking and knee deep bullshite, they have been forgotten. Top 20 Program Rankings - Subscription - Overnight Figures Saturday 14th April 1 LIVE: NRL STORM V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 286,000 2 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V TITANS FOX SPORTS 2 259,000 3 LIVE: AFL GOLD COAST V ESSENDON FOX SPORTS 1 178,000 4 LIVE: AFL FREMANTLE V LIONS FOX FOOTY 170,000 5 LIVE: AFL RICHMOND V MELBOURNE FOX FOOTY 155,000 6 LIVE: AFL BULLDOGS V ST KILDA FOX FOOTY 127,000 7 LIVE: AFL PORT ADELAIDE V SYDNEY FOX SPORTS 1 118,000 8 LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE PRELIM FINAL FOX SPORTS 1 109,0009 NRL ROOSTERS V COWBOYS FOX SPORTS 2 97,000 10 LIVE: NRL SATURDAY FOX SPORTS 2 82,000 11 LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: BRUMBIES V REBELS FOX SPORTS 3 81,000 12 LIVE: AFL: NAB BEFORE THE BOUNCE FOX FOOTY 80,000 13 STORAGE WARS A&E 79,000 14 STORAGE WARS A&E 68,000 15 THE SIMPSONS FOX8 66,000 16 AUCTIONEER$ A&E 66,000 17 DORA THE EXPLORER Nick Jr. 62,000 18 DORA THE EXPLORER Nick Jr. 60,000 19 PAWN STARS A&E 60,000 20 LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: CRUSADERS V STORMERS FOX SPORTS 3 59,000 Week 15: 8 - 14 April 2012 Top 10 Sport Broadcasts 1 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V PANTHERS FOX SPORTS 2 Mon 19:00 336 2 LIVE: AFL GEELONG V HAWTHORN FOX FOOTY Mon 15:00 335 3 LIVE: AFL CARLTON V COLLINGWOOD FOX FOOTY Fri 19:30 329 4 LIVE: NRL STORM V BULLDOGS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 17:30 286 5 LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V TITANS FOX SPORTS 2 Sat 19:30 259 6 LIVE: NRL COWBOYS V STORM FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 19:00 242 7 LIVE: NRL RAIDERS V WARRIORS FOX SPORTS 2 Sun 14:00 196 8 LIVE: AFL ST KILDA V GOLD COAST FOX FOOTY Sun 16:36 179 9 LIVE: AFL GOLD COAST V ESSENDON FOX SPORTS 1 Sat 19:30 178 10 LIVE: AFL NORTH MELBOURNE V GWS FOX FOOTY Sun 13:07 174 Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend.
|
|
|
silent gas dirigible
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 231,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition.
|
|
|
agga78
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. That would be for SANZAR not just Australian Rugby Union, there is no way they are worth that, I would think within a couple years A league football should be knocking off their ratings. Hopefully Foxtel and or channel 10 see a big future for football, if we are given real tv money we could have a much better standard and even more entertaining competition than we have now.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :)
|
|
|
Blackmac79
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
what does gyfox honestly expect from our next tv deal?
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL?
|
|
|
silent gas dirigible
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 231,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL? This is what I was thinking; it seems that HAL and super rugby ratings are more or less comparable (wherein the lowest rating HAL game possibly equals graveyard south african time zone games in the SR). The big international rugby games are arguably hotter properties than socceroos games at the moment, but this therefore might comprise the $100M differential.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Blackmac79 wrote:what does gyfox honestly expect from our next tv deal? More than we get now. :) I hope. Its not an area that I have any expertise in but with NRL tipped for $1.4b and 20/20 being renegotiated we will get whats left I reckon.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
silent gas dirigible wrote:ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL? This is what I was thinking; it seems that HAL and super rugby ratings are more or less comparable (wherein the lowest rating HAL game possibly equals graveyard south african time zone games in the SR). The big international rugby games are arguably hotter properties than socceroos games at the moment, but this therefore might comprise the $100M differential. Sorry disagree with you. Apples for apples time zones, Socceroos World Cup tv ratings utterly thump Wallabies World Cup tv ratings. Socceross are a more valuable commodity than the Wallabies
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL? 3 Bledisloe Cup games a year all over 400k rating and 3 against South Africa at a bit less is what gives the ARU its big pay day.
|
|
|
ozboy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL? 3 Bledisloe Cup games a year all over 400k rating and 3 against South Africa at a bit less is what gives the ARU its big pay day. Which I would have thought more than allows for a potential $121M differential. Let's see what the 3 upcoming WCQs in Australia rate.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Its not tri-nations anymore:p argentina joined the comp:)
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:ozboy wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:Gyfox wrote:silent gas dirigible wrote:
Interesting to see that the HAL is more or less punching its weight compared to Super Rugby. From memory, their TV deal netted them in excess of $400M, although this is obviously boosted by the inclusion of marquee Wallaby matches.
$421m over 5 years according to an academic article I was reading over the weekend. Is it outlandish to suggest that soccer has a legitimate claim to something approaching this figure next tv deal? Providing of course that Socceroos games aren't siphoned off to FTA, where, presumably, SBS would pick them up for nothing in the absence of competition. Just a correction. The $421 was our share of the SuperRugby broadcast deal. I don't know whether Tri nations is included in that. Bledisloe Cup is huge. If we had a Uruguay qualifier every year it would help. :) Really? If so, why isn't $300m/5 years acceptable for Socceross/HAL? 3 Bledisloe Cup games a year all over 400k rating and 3 against South Africa at a bit less is what gives the ARU its big pay day. Which I would have thought more than allows for a potential $121M differential. Let's see what the 3 upcoming WCQs in Australia rate. Union in Sydney is the big end of the town, GPS old boys fraternity sport.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Glory Recruit wrote:Its not tri-nations anymore:p argentina joined the comp:) I knew there was talk of that. Good that it has happened. International Union is by far the best Union to watch.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah but im still a big supporter of force:)
|
|
|
silent gas dirigible
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 231,
Visits: 0
|
Gyfox wrote:Blackmac79 wrote:what does gyfox honestly expect from our next tv deal? More than we get now. :) I hope. Its not an area that I have any expertise in but with NRL tipped for $1.4b and 20/20 being renegotiated we will get whats left I reckon. With Foxtel's profits expected to reach $1.1B next year (up on $930M this year), hopefully there'll be enough left in the pie to keep us going for a while.
|
|
|