sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe left has completely lost the plot re Kavanaugh in the US. I knew they were already demented but this latest round of shenanigans proves they have completely broken with reality and forsaken any kind of moral fortitude. Can you imagine if the Right in Australia acted like such imbeciles? There would be riots on every street corner, mass demonstrations, hunger strikes, it would be total chaos and anarchy. I'd say part of the problem is that American's tend to put people in power based on their political beliefs (alliances) and support, more so than their experience / resume. The whole system seems a lot more politicised in America than Australia. Could be that our Justices are appointed by the GG (a politically neutral party) compared to the US who are appointed by the President (and generally who align with their political views). The whole system in America seems more aligned with ensuring the President is surrounded by "yes" men/women than actually good governance.
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThe left has completely lost the plot re Kavanaugh in the US. I knew they were already demented but this latest round of shenanigans proves they have completely broken with reality and forsaken any kind of moral fortitude. Can you imagine if the Right in Australia acted like such imbeciles? There would be riots on every street corner, mass demonstrations, hunger strikes, it would be total chaos and anarchy. Love a good Rusty rant. Cheers Russ.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
The left has completely lost the plot re Kavanaugh in the US. I knew they were already demented but this latest round of shenanigans proves they have completely broken with reality and forsaken any kind of moral fortitude. Can you imagine if the Right in Australia acted like such imbeciles? There would be riots on every street corner, mass demonstrations, hunger strikes, it would be total chaos and anarchy.
|
|
|
Vanlassen
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOmg how amazing is Jacinta Adern! How incredible of her to juggle being a woman, a wife and mother while running the country! And how kind and compassionate was her offer to take a whopping 150 refugees from Manus! Can you imagine if Tony Abbott offered to resettle 150 refugees from a foreign country? Not a chance, those nasty conservatives would be too busy denying foreigners the right to buy property with their racist anti immigration platform grrrr.. Wow . You're so bitter . There's Blindy following a party and then there's idiots like you Who's Blindy?
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xOmg how amazing is Jacinta Adern! How incredible of her to juggle being a woman, a wife and mother while running the country! And how kind and compassionate was her offer to take a whopping 150 refugees from Manus! Can you imagine if Tony Abbott offered to resettle 150 refugees from a foreign country? Not a chance, those nasty conservatives would be too busy denying foreigners the right to buy property with their racist anti immigration platform grrrr.. Wow . You're so bitter . There's Blindy following a party and then there's idiots like you
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Omg how amazing is Jacinta Adern! How incredible of her to juggle being a woman, a wife and mother while running the country! And how kind and compassionate was her offer to take a whopping 150 refugees from Manus! Can you imagine if Tony Abbott offered to resettle 150 refugees from a foreign country? Not a chance, those nasty conservatives would be too busy denying foreigners the right to buy property with their racist anti immigration platform grrrr..
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Geez what's with all these foreign nannies lol? Do we need to do a campaign like stop the boats? -PB
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xMr Dutton said that his intervention was a "discretionary and humanitarian act" for someone with "ongoing needs" and that the decision was in the "interests of Australia as a humane and generous society". I honestly felt sick in the stomach the first time I read this. After all the nastiness against people truly in need... He, and people who agree/enjoy his work, openly like trolling whoever is to their left on the political spectrum. After all, whatever happens in his political career, he is entitled to a life-long pension. The arrogance is astounding but not surprising when you accept that most people are insufferable, self-interested c*nts. I agree see exhibit A  but it was actually written in his decision to approve her visa which he's tried to keep hidden. Maybe it was still a little "easter egg" in case it was still found. Regardless, he's in a marginal seat and this sort of "extreme" (just for you rusty :kiss:) trolling is not going to play to well. Especially when the main thing that people are going to see is rich donors getting favours from him.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
+xMr Dutton said that his intervention was a "discretionary and humanitarian act" for someone with "ongoing needs" and that the decision was in the "interests of Australia as a humane and generous society". I honestly felt sick in the stomach the first time I read this. After all the nastiness against people truly in need... He, and people who agree/enjoy his work, openly like trolling whoever is to their left on the political spectrum. After all, whatever happens in his political career, he is entitled to a life-long pension. The arrogance is astounding but not surprising when you accept that most people are insufferable, self-interested c*nts.
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Mr Dutton said that his intervention was a "discretionary and humanitarian act" for someone with "ongoing needs" and that the decision was in the "interests of Australia as a humane and generous society". I honestly felt sick in the stomach the first time I read this. After all the nastiness against people truly in need...
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Having worked in State Government for numerous years I see this as a common occurrence. As the old saying goes "it's not what you know, but who you know".
I've had to alter whole reports based on scientific rigour because of a Minister's personal preference (which was due to a powerful community member pressuring them). These reports were regularly audited by the EPA and green groups ... they never asked about these particular reports though.
Also found regularly that it is who yells the loudest is heard (i.e. the majority might be agreement with a decision so therefore don't speak up, but someone opposed to it is usually more vocal ... therefore Ministers more likely to bend to their will, than the silent majority).
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Wow, and in other completely shocking news Peter Dutton overruled Border Force advice when granting au pair's visa after AFL boss emailed his officeUpdated Peter Dutton overruled advice from a senior Australian Border Force (ABF) official when he allowed a French nanny to escape deportation after being lobbied by AFL boss Gillon McLachlan. Key points:- Peter Dutton used his ministerial discretion to grant Alexandra Deuwel a visitor visa in 2015
- She had been detained after telling Border Force officials she intended to work, which breached her visitor visa
- The family she was to work for contacted Mr Dutton's office via AFL boss Gillon McLachlan to "have this injustice resolved"
An email trail leaked by a whistleblower to Labor senator Kimberley Kitching shows Mr Dutton approved the release of 27-year-old Alexandra Deuwel despite being told there was detail "which does not support the Minister intervening". Ms Deuwel arrived at Adelaide Airport on Emirates Airline Flight 440 on October 31, 2015, and was arrested by ABF officials after saying she intended to work, which was in breach of her visitor visa. Officials cancelled her visa on the spot, deciding she was a "non-genuine visitor". She told officials she intended working "voluntarily" for Adelaide pastoralists Callum and Skye Maclachlan at their Barossa Valley farm. Emails reveal she told officials she would "receive free accommodation for three months in return for helping with this family's children, cooking and riding their horses". "She stated that her main goal in coming to Australia is to [do] volunteer work. Client claimed she had made an appointment with the South Australian volunteer officer to seek volunteer work," a bureaucrat wrote. "Client was given an opportunity to comment on why her visa should not be cancelled. In response she stated that she was doing volunteer work only for this family and was not being paid so her visa should not be cancelled." Callum MacLachlan is the second-cousin of AFL boss Gillon McLachlan. They spell their surnames differently. The pastoralist's father, Hugh MacLachlan, has donated $150,000 to the Liberal Party over the past 20 years. AFL boss forwarded email about 'misunderstanding'Representations were made by the AFL boss on behalf of his cousin to Mr Dutton's chief of staff Craig Maclachlan — no relation — to release Ms Deuwel, who was being held at the Adelaide Immigration Transit Accommodation, pending her deportation. Gillon McLachlan's office forwarded to the Minister's chief of staff an email from Callum and Skye MacLachlan. "There has clearly been a misunderstanding that she was intending to work for us when she is here to spend time with our family, as we consider her to be family," the couple wrote. "We live in the Barossa Valley on farm and have four kids who will be devastated not to see her. "A girl of outstanding character and integrity. She also made many friends in Adelaide and will spend time with them. "What can we do to have this injustice resolved and have her tourist visa reinstated before she flies out tonight?"
Mr Dutton used his ministerial discretion to grant Ms Deuwel a visitor visa on November 1, 2015. But this was not before the Minister had received form advice from senior ABF executives to the contrary. Border Force Commander states detail 'does not support intervention'Assistant Commissioner of Strategic Border Command Clive Murray advised that Ms Deuwel had been "previously counselled" in May 2015 about breaching her visa conditions "and there may be some financial liability to the [department] if the removal does not proceed as the airline has been formally served". Ms Deuwel had last been in Australia on May 3 as a holder of a tourist visa, having worked for the MacLachlan family as an au pair in 2013 and 2014. "SBC (Strategic Border Command) will be providing detail which does not support the Minister intervening," Assistant Commissioner Murray said.
Nevertheless, Mr Dutton intervened and granted Ms Deuwel a three-month visa — but with conditions. "The Minister has also asked that, if he intervenes to grant a visa, that the client be very strongly counselled that they cannot work, even do volunteer or in-kind work, and that their visa would be liable for cancellation should they do so," a departmental bureaucrat wrote. Documents released under Freedom of Information and marked 'Sensitive: Personal' dated November 1, 2015, show Mr Dutton wrote in relation to the case that "it would be in the public interest" to grant the woman a three-month tourist visa. Mr Dutton said that his intervention was a "discretionary and humanitarian act" for someone with "ongoing needs" and that the decision was in the "interests of Australia as a humane and generous society". Dutton says administrative process has been followedThe Minister this week said he received "hundreds" of representations on individual migration matters from members of the public, organisations, and other MPs. "There are long-standing intervention powers provided to Ministers to consider and deal with these representations," Mr Dutton said. "These powers were the same under the former Labor government. "I consider cases on their merits. Any suggestions cases are determined on any other basis, including whether I knew the individual who referred the matter, is completely ridiculous.
"There is an administrative process to be followed and it has been followed in every instance." Senator Kitching said the email trail showed the intervention was "anything but routine or all above board". "This whole affair is as dodgy as it gets," she said. "The Australian Border Force advised against the Minister intervening, and warned his intervention could have unknown financial consequences. "Why did Dutton act against Border Force advice? Why did he expose the Australian taxpayer to this financial risk? Why did he put the integrity of his department and our borders at risk at the behest of a Liberal party donor?"
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
If one is in England, the mainstream media across a range of outlets is definitely more progressive/left leaning than in Australia.
I felt like I was well informed on Brexit.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xWhat do you mean Marconi? The media “shitshow” has been everywhere, across all channels and platfoms.. Its no less febrile than when Gillard knifed Rudd, all media agencies love a scandal, and political knifings are among the best there is. Lefties seem to have this fascination with Murdoch, i dont understand it. Murdochs most widely distributed asset is news.com.au, which is about as left as the SMH. Just because its “news corp” doenst mean its default right wing, its editors are certainly left of centre. It doesnt matter though, the left are convinced that everything under the news corp umbrella must be conservative right wing, otherwise its defeats their theory that Murdoch is master manipulator of the free world.The most widely circulated news websites are ABC, ninemsn, Dialy Mail, SMH and the Guardian, so basically all six top websites are left or left of centre.In other words quit crying like babies and quit your Murdoch paranoia. I'm a political activist over a range of issues. Murdoch's press is unbelievably right wing in Australia. In the UK because the Times is competing with the Independent, Observer and Guardian, he can't get away with elucidating the right wing agenda promulgated in the Australian that agrees with almost everything the ruling class advocate - manifesting in the Libs, big corporations, big banks and the Institute Of Public Affairs. What about Fairfax and ABC press? They're "unbelievably" left wing, correct? Or are they perfectly objective and representative of all sides of politics? Can you name me a single conservative right wing commentator or presenter on any Fairfax or ABC? Why is there such paranoia about Murdoch when in your own backyard you're about as politically diverse as a stick? You and I live in completely different worlds. The Fairfax media is considerably right wing when it comes to industrial issues. They have no end of resources: 1. To pour resources and provide maximum into the very rare occasions there is a corrupt union official. 2. They never elucidate the instances of right wing unions doing nothing for the membership. 3. Before the current laws had been changed, they provided plenty of bad press for unions who worked hard to improve conditions for members. 4. They've also provided scant coverage over the pernicious effects of the IPA/Liberal government changing laws so that federal public servants can't demonstrate or protest about unfair working conditions. Or that they can be, and have been, sacked for liking an article critical of the government on Facebook. 5. They have also provided scant coverage of the Morrison Coalition govt's attempt to trial the Cashless Welfare Card or Indue Debit Card. This is a heinous act, but has been given scant coverage anywhere in the media. 6. They've provided scant coverage of the pernicious influence of the Institute Of Public Affairs in Australian politics. 7. They've committed few resources in Murdoch's meddling in Australian politics. 8. In terms of political instability and internal implosion, the Liberals under Abbott/Turnbull/Morrison have been constantly fracturing - the same as the Rudd/Gullard epoch in government in the ALP. The difference is Fairfax constantly attacked Labor's internal machinations taking precedence over many of the positive ideological reforms like; the buildings in schools program, the insulation initiative to save power, the mooted emissions trading scheme, the increased taxation on mining companies to pay their fair share of tax, and Rudd's inanity in insulating Australia from the GFC through paying money to private citizens to spend. In all this, Fairfax constantly questioned ALP stability over praising the positive intent and inherent value of the reforms. Meanwhile policyless Abbott was given an easy time by the Fairfax media. The ABC: 1. On a personal level, Lee Sales, loves Turnbull (not Morrison). She gave Turnbull some very easy interviews when he was first elected as PM. 2. On a personal level, Lee Sales, was very frosty with ACTU leader, Sally McManus. 3. The 24 hour ABC news station constantly has right wing guests on panels, more than those left of centre. Yes David Marr, who is frequently a panelist, is left of centre, but it seems like the new Lib controlled ABC is restricting news content and making it more conservative than it was. IMO it was a centrist media outlet. People I know who've worked there in the past liked being criticised from both sides of politics - they consider it means they must be doing their jobs properly - being impartial and independent.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYeah but whether you call the SMH and Guardian 'left-leaning' and the Australian 'right-leaning' you'd have to agree the crap that spews out of Sky News, 2GB and the Telegraph is a whole step up in partisan 'journalism'. Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A. Australia has to resist the "Fox-ification' (for want of a better word) of the media. Without exaggeration it's a dead set danger to democracy.
Mate the biggest danger to democracy are folks like you who want to shut down every opinion you disagree with and marginalise them as extreme fringe alt right bordering on nazism and fascism. Currently its boycotts, sacking and protests, tomorrow it will be jail and re education-camp, soon you will exterminating all conservatives in order to "protect vulnerable minorities from racist violent fascists". Even sections of Antifa, whose actions are condoned if not outright supported by the media, are adopting military style aggression as part of their broader strategy to right fascism (aka Republic voters). Surely you can't sit there with a straight face Rusty and tell me the rightish side of politics is not over-represented when it comes to screeching opinions. And I'm talking 'screeching opinions' not just right wing columnists like Janet Albrechtson who is actually very measured. Screeching harpies would include Miranda Devine, Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Paul Murray, Ross Cameron etc. The list goes on and on. Who have the left got that carry on like fucking idiots? David Marr?
Chris Uhlmann, Clem Ford, Waleed Aly, Catherine Deveny, Mike Carlton, Yassmin Abeid, David Marr et al. Can you believe that Clementine Ford actually gets to go around to schools preaching man hating bile to children, or that Yassmin Abeid gets her own TV show despite consorting with terrorist sympathises and disparaging Anzacs? In many cases the lefty influence is much moire insidious as they have a far greater reach than the radio shock jocks of pay TV pundits who appeal to a rusted on niche.
Yes there's lefty wankers in the media but they're not carrying on day in, day out like the flogs listed above. I mean just have a go at Media Watch last night and watch Ray Hadley's piece to camera where he slags the fuck out of Turnbull and tells him to piss off. I mean like him or hate but show some friggin common decency and respect to a bloke who was just running the country. Could you say the same for Abbott but of course you would waffle on about what a terrible PM he was and how he deserved his fate.
And don't start me on the k hunt that asked Gillard if her boyfriend was a homosexual. Farks sake. Blokes like you that only see in black and white are part of the problem. The more people screech, the more partisan the commentary, the more people separate into different ideaological camps the less chance we have of ever having a decent outcome regards any issue. There are shades of grey everywhere and that includes politics. Nothing happens in a vacuum. The reason people like Bolt, Latham exist is because mainstream media fails to address the "grey areas" such as immigration, overpopulation, African crime, Indigenous domestic assaults, child abuse etc. We need people like this to shine a light on whats really going on in the country, as the left are too fearful of raising these issues lest someone mght take offence and let fly accusations of racism. The left would prefer social decay and depravity rather than risk harming their reputations.
I mean have a crack at Hannity or Fox and Friends on Fox News and tell me they're not part of the problem. Trump could cut a child's throat on TV and Hannity would suck his cock and tell the public that there's nothing to see here. We can't have this sort of thing happen in Australia.
Its already happening on a grand scale. Look at the American mainstream press in respect to Trump. Trump has copped more criticism and flack in two years of presidency than every other president put together, perhaps with the exception of Bush. There is nothing he can do right, every remark , bodily movement and unconscious twitch is scrutinised, dissected, and churned out for public ridicule. Even when he's sleeping body he's apparently plotting to kill all black people and become global dictator of earth. Remember than time when he STOOD BEHIND Hillary? Apparentlh that was a serious thing and he posed a legit risk to her safety.
I am suppose I am free enough in my own mind to see bias in all corners of politics and media, but I have noticed the left in particular seem incapable of admitting there is bias in their corner. Its seems almost an affront to their intellectual and moral prestige to suggest that they too might occasionally be wrong. Yeah, ok, this is going nowhere. It's like Fierravanti-Wells claiming that Turnbull is part of the left. Their perspective is skewed and nothing you say is going to change it. Its no different to claiming Abetz, Bernadi, Dutton etc are part of the "extreme right". Their perspective is skewed and nothing you is going to change it. Even Greens think they are the centre and the Labor party is right wing. Even Adolt Hitler, Pol Pot, Darth Vader think they are the center. Everyone thinks they are the centre and everyone else is the deluded one. Have literally never seen the Greens try and claim that, or anyone else. -PB Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of Victoriahttps://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/july/.../waleed.../inside-tony-abbott-s-min...
... Kevin Rudd, on the 7.30 program, who called him “one of the most extreme right-wing conservative leaders or politicians that the Liberal Party has thrown up ”.
https://www.crikey.com.au/.../turnbull-the-last-of-the-neoliberals-leads-for-now-a-dee... 7 days ago - The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by ... Another extreme right-winger, the IPA's John Roskam, also ...
https://www.afr.com/.../the-long-stony-road-of-liberal-party-division-in-nsw-2016012... Jan 30, 2016 - Michael Photios: Darth Vader to the NSW right of the Liberal Party. ... also members of the Liberal Party) or, just as egregiously, "extreme right".
https://theaimn.com/right-left-invasion-neo-liberal-agenda/ Jul 13, 2017 - We all know Rupert Murdoch runs the Liberal Party. ..... The LNP have gone extreme right wing and Labor has gone right wing it seems to me, ...
Where are the Greens in any of that? -PB Dont you dare make me pull out the old google search.. I dare you. Ok go. -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWell I agree with Rusty that the media shitshow has been everywhere, at least where I’ve been looking. Just on the abc, its interesting that the right will complain the ABC is too left wing, however if you go on Twitter or the r/Australia which are leftist shit shows, they’re complaining that the ABC is too right wing, which was in full force during this weeks q&a ep.I agree with what sakorny is saying on the abc. It just goes to show how fucking nuts and crazy the left are doesnt it, that they would argue an organisation which is dominated entirely by leftists, socialists and liberals (small l) is too right wing. But this just proves my earlier theory, that according to the left, even the centre is considered too right.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYeah but whether you call the SMH and Guardian 'left-leaning' and the Australian 'right-leaning' you'd have to agree the crap that spews out of Sky News, 2GB and the Telegraph is a whole step up in partisan 'journalism'. Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A. Australia has to resist the "Fox-ification' (for want of a better word) of the media. Without exaggeration it's a dead set danger to democracy.
Mate the biggest danger to democracy are folks like you who want to shut down every opinion you disagree with and marginalise them as extreme fringe alt right bordering on nazism and fascism. Currently its boycotts, sacking and protests, tomorrow it will be jail and re education-camp, soon you will exterminating all conservatives in order to "protect vulnerable minorities from racist violent fascists". Even sections of Antifa, whose actions are condoned if not outright supported by the media, are adopting military style aggression as part of their broader strategy to right fascism (aka Republic voters). Surely you can't sit there with a straight face Rusty and tell me the rightish side of politics is not over-represented when it comes to screeching opinions. And I'm talking 'screeching opinions' not just right wing columnists like Janet Albrechtson who is actually very measured. Screeching harpies would include Miranda Devine, Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Paul Murray, Ross Cameron etc. The list goes on and on. Who have the left got that carry on like fucking idiots? David Marr?
Chris Uhlmann, Clem Ford, Waleed Aly, Catherine Deveny, Mike Carlton, Yassmin Abeid, David Marr et al. Can you believe that Clementine Ford actually gets to go around to schools preaching man hating bile to children, or that Yassmin Abeid gets her own TV show despite consorting with terrorist sympathises and disparaging Anzacs? In many cases the lefty influence is much moire insidious as they have a far greater reach than the radio shock jocks of pay TV pundits who appeal to a rusted on niche.
Yes there's lefty wankers in the media but they're not carrying on day in, day out like the flogs listed above. I mean just have a go at Media Watch last night and watch Ray Hadley's piece to camera where he slags the fuck out of Turnbull and tells him to piss off. I mean like him or hate but show some friggin common decency and respect to a bloke who was just running the country. Could you say the same for Abbott but of course you would waffle on about what a terrible PM he was and how he deserved his fate.
And don't start me on the k hunt that asked Gillard if her boyfriend was a homosexual. Farks sake. Blokes like you that only see in black and white are part of the problem. The more people screech, the more partisan the commentary, the more people separate into different ideaological camps the less chance we have of ever having a decent outcome regards any issue. There are shades of grey everywhere and that includes politics. Nothing happens in a vacuum. The reason people like Bolt, Latham exist is because mainstream media fails to address the "grey areas" such as immigration, overpopulation, African crime, Indigenous domestic assaults, child abuse etc. We need people like this to shine a light on whats really going on in the country, as the left are too fearful of raising these issues lest someone mght take offence and let fly accusations of racism. The left would prefer social decay and depravity rather than risk harming their reputations.
I mean have a crack at Hannity or Fox and Friends on Fox News and tell me they're not part of the problem. Trump could cut a child's throat on TV and Hannity would suck his cock and tell the public that there's nothing to see here. We can't have this sort of thing happen in Australia.
Its already happening on a grand scale. Look at the American mainstream press in respect to Trump. Trump has copped more criticism and flack in two years of presidency than every other president put together, perhaps with the exception of Bush. There is nothing he can do right, every remark , bodily movement and unconscious twitch is scrutinised, dissected, and churned out for public ridicule. Even when he's sleeping body he's apparently plotting to kill all black people and become global dictator of earth. Remember than time when he STOOD BEHIND Hillary? Apparentlh that was a serious thing and he posed a legit risk to her safety.
I am suppose I am free enough in my own mind to see bias in all corners of politics and media, but I have noticed the left in particular seem incapable of admitting there is bias in their corner. Its seems almost an affront to their intellectual and moral prestige to suggest that they too might occasionally be wrong. Yeah, ok, this is going nowhere. It's like Fierravanti-Wells claiming that Turnbull is part of the left. Their perspective is skewed and nothing you say is going to change it. Its no different to claiming Abetz, Bernadi, Dutton etc are part of the "extreme right". Their perspective is skewed and nothing you is going to change it. Even Greens think they are the centre and the Labor party is right wing. Even Adolt Hitler, Pol Pot, Darth Vader think they are the center. Everyone thinks they are the centre and everyone else is the deluded one. Have literally never seen the Greens try and claim that, or anyone else. -PB Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of Victoriahttps://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/july/.../waleed.../inside-tony-abbott-s-min...
... Kevin Rudd, on the 7.30 program, who called him “one of the most extreme right-wing conservative leaders or politicians that the Liberal Party has thrown up ”.
https://www.crikey.com.au/.../turnbull-the-last-of-the-neoliberals-leads-for-now-a-dee... 7 days ago - The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by ... Another extreme right-winger, the IPA's John Roskam, also ...
https://www.afr.com/.../the-long-stony-road-of-liberal-party-division-in-nsw-2016012... Jan 30, 2016 - Michael Photios: Darth Vader to the NSW right of the Liberal Party. ... also members of the Liberal Party) or, just as egregiously, "extreme right".
https://theaimn.com/right-left-invasion-neo-liberal-agenda/ Jul 13, 2017 - We all know Rupert Murdoch runs the Liberal Party. ..... The LNP have gone extreme right wing and Labor has gone right wing it seems to me, ...
Where are the Greens in any of that? -PB Dont you dare make me pull out the old google search..
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x"Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A." Did you watch Q+A on Monday night lol? -PB No I didnt. Does Tony Jones now identify as conservative? Go and have a gander at the panel. -PB These are guests, not presenters or journalists.
|
|
|
Glory Recruit
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Well I agree with Rusty that the media shitshow has been everywhere, at least where I’ve been looking.
Just on the abc, its interesting that the right will complain the ABC is too left wing, however if you go on Twitter or r/Australia which are leftist shit shows, they’re complaining that the ABC is too right wing, which was in full force during this weeks q&a ep.
I agree with what sakorny is saying on the abc.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
What informs our unexpected new prime minister? A year hidden among the Pentecostal faithful gave me some insights Prime minister Scott Morrison speaks during a cabinet meeting at Parliament House in Canberra, 28 August 2018. ‘To hear Morrison espouse his own faith associations is to be reminded of megachurch marketing techniques’ Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP When Scott Morrison announces that he’s standing behind you, you might want to make sure his hands are empty. It was only a week ago that then-treasurer Morrison was hugging Australia’s Liberal party then-PM Malcolm Turnbull at a media call and pledging allegiance to his embattled captain. Asked if he himself had any leadership ambitions, the member for Cook responded: “Me? This is my leader,” and embracing the man, “I’m ambitious for him.” Turnbull had survived a leadership vote against rival Peter Dutton, 48-35. Less than a week later, Turnbull was finished and Morrison’s slimmer margin of 45-40 had seen off Dutton and he became PM. Morrison’s established political character is thus. As immigration minister in the Abbott government he took to Australia’s brutal policies towards refugees and asylum-seekers with vim. In 2014, he was condemned for his “callous disregard” for detainees – video surfaced of him “directly threatening” those seeking sanctuary from fatal persecution elsewhere. As social services minister in 2015, he convinced the Greens to support an over $2bn cut to the pension in a welfare-shredding spree. He opposed marriage equality and refused to vote with the popular will after the resounding “yes” vote in the postal survey. Morrison is a proud and public worshipper at the Horizon Church, which, like Hillsong, is Pentecostal He is a neoliberal and as treasurer he has governed neoliberally. Wage growth in Australia is stagnant, underemployment is rife. One of his earliest speeches was to condemn welfare recipients as the “taxed nots”, yet the policy he was most committed to pursue was the $65bn tax cuts for corporate Australia, including $17bn for the banks – the banks that are now recommended for criminal charges, from a banking royal commission Morrison described as a “populist whinge”. Australian politics: subscribe by email Read more Who is such a person to lead this country? Well, if his own propaganda’s to be believed, a very holy man. Morrison spoke of his “personal faith in Jesus Christ” in his 2008 maiden speech, in which he also thanked pastors Brian Houston and Leigh Cameron of what has been described as a “money machine”, the Hillsong Church, for their “great assistance” to him. Citing Houston as “a mentor”, Morrison is a proud and public worshipper at the Horizon Church, which, like Hillsong, is Pentecostal, and similarly an “American-style mega-church ... where the gospel of prosperity is preached in an auditorium that can accommodate over 1,000 evangelicals” as described in a 2012 profile of Morrison in the Monthly. Drilling down into what constitutes the “prosperity doctrine” of these Protestant sects provides some context for neoliberal Jesusing, Scott Morrison-style. Walking away from materialism is something we humble Catholics understand as a “counsel of perfection” – Christ’s instruction in Matthew 19:21 is literally “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.” But the theology of megachurches like Morrison’s inverts these values. Here, the message is that earthly riches result as a recognition of God’s favour. It’s an apologia for wealth and privilege and delivered with some pomp – as I learned when I spent a year hidden in his mentor Houston’s Hillsong congregation. Yes, in a collection of carefully chosen pastel outfits, I squatted among the Hillsong faithful for a year, researching a “Christian drag” act cabaret. To hear Morrison espouse his own faith associations is to be reminded of megachurch marketing techniques – the deliberately chosen, good-looking “greeters” deployed to lead the nervous and the lonely to their seats, rock stadium theatrics concurrent with a “collection plate” that took your credit card details, and hand-on-heart gestural sermonising of the prosperity doctrine’s seductive heresies. The biblical pretext cited for material wealth as a sanctification of a blessed elect was provided by bible passages like Joel 2:23-25 and Proverbs 3:10 that my own tradition reads in the precisely opposite way. The idea was to parody my discoveries, but there’s little one can add to scripts that read “Speak your faith, start seeing miracles ... Owner of your first home! Best-selling author ... Businessman who is prosperous and fruitful! Speak it into being! Speak it into being! Speak it into being! Amen!” – which is authentic Hillsong, by the way. An arena-show marriage of God and mammon was affected with triumphal choruses, syncopated clapping, marching drums, and always – always – the exhortation to consider wealth as an earned blessing of niche piety, something within reach if more donations were handed over, more church-brand merchandise bought. At a service’s conclusion, business directories were handed out. The encouragement was strong that God’s favour should remain in-house. Scott Morrison vows to move on from spill and make Australia 'even greater' Read more “You cannot serve both God and money,” said Jesus in the Sermon on the Mount. “The best form of welfare is a job,” said Morrison as treasurer, when shown that his own 2015 budget punished the poor most of all. Sure, it’s hypocritical, but hypocrisy underwrites the “new” political stability in Australia in many forms. Morrison memorialised his prime ministerial ascension – in the modern way – with a speech made to social media, captioned “I’m on your side”. The political corpse of the last person to enjoy a similar pledge from Morrison is presently rolling down the Parliament House hill with multiple stab wounds. Australians have every right to analyse just what informs our unexpected – and unelected – new leader’s gall. -PB
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x"Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A." Did you watch Q+A on Monday night lol? -PB No I didnt. Does Tony Jones now identify as conservative? Go and have a gander at the panel. -PB
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYeah but whether you call the SMH and Guardian 'left-leaning' and the Australian 'right-leaning' you'd have to agree the crap that spews out of Sky News, 2GB and the Telegraph is a whole step up in partisan 'journalism'. Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A. Australia has to resist the "Fox-ification' (for want of a better word) of the media. Without exaggeration it's a dead set danger to democracy.
Mate the biggest danger to democracy are folks like you who want to shut down every opinion you disagree with and marginalise them as extreme fringe alt right bordering on nazism and fascism. Currently its boycotts, sacking and protests, tomorrow it will be jail and re education-camp, soon you will exterminating all conservatives in order to "protect vulnerable minorities from racist violent fascists". Even sections of Antifa, whose actions are condoned if not outright supported by the media, are adopting military style aggression as part of their broader strategy to right fascism (aka Republic voters). Surely you can't sit there with a straight face Rusty and tell me the rightish side of politics is not over-represented when it comes to screeching opinions. And I'm talking 'screeching opinions' not just right wing columnists like Janet Albrechtson who is actually very measured. Screeching harpies would include Miranda Devine, Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Paul Murray, Ross Cameron etc. The list goes on and on. Who have the left got that carry on like fucking idiots? David Marr?
Chris Uhlmann, Clem Ford, Waleed Aly, Catherine Deveny, Mike Carlton, Yassmin Abeid, David Marr et al. Can you believe that Clementine Ford actually gets to go around to schools preaching man hating bile to children, or that Yassmin Abeid gets her own TV show despite consorting with terrorist sympathises and disparaging Anzacs? In many cases the lefty influence is much moire insidious as they have a far greater reach than the radio shock jocks of pay TV pundits who appeal to a rusted on niche.
Yes there's lefty wankers in the media but they're not carrying on day in, day out like the flogs listed above. I mean just have a go at Media Watch last night and watch Ray Hadley's piece to camera where he slags the fuck out of Turnbull and tells him to piss off. I mean like him or hate but show some friggin common decency and respect to a bloke who was just running the country. Could you say the same for Abbott but of course you would waffle on about what a terrible PM he was and how he deserved his fate.
And don't start me on the k hunt that asked Gillard if her boyfriend was a homosexual. Farks sake. Blokes like you that only see in black and white are part of the problem. The more people screech, the more partisan the commentary, the more people separate into different ideaological camps the less chance we have of ever having a decent outcome regards any issue. There are shades of grey everywhere and that includes politics. Nothing happens in a vacuum. The reason people like Bolt, Latham exist is because mainstream media fails to address the "grey areas" such as immigration, overpopulation, African crime, Indigenous domestic assaults, child abuse etc. We need people like this to shine a light on whats really going on in the country, as the left are too fearful of raising these issues lest someone mght take offence and let fly accusations of racism. The left would prefer social decay and depravity rather than risk harming their reputations.
I mean have a crack at Hannity or Fox and Friends on Fox News and tell me they're not part of the problem. Trump could cut a child's throat on TV and Hannity would suck his cock and tell the public that there's nothing to see here. We can't have this sort of thing happen in Australia.
Its already happening on a grand scale. Look at the American mainstream press in respect to Trump. Trump has copped more criticism and flack in two years of presidency than every other president put together, perhaps with the exception of Bush. There is nothing he can do right, every remark , bodily movement and unconscious twitch is scrutinised, dissected, and churned out for public ridicule. Even when he's sleeping body he's apparently plotting to kill all black people and become global dictator of earth. Remember than time when he STOOD BEHIND Hillary? Apparentlh that was a serious thing and he posed a legit risk to her safety.
I am suppose I am free enough in my own mind to see bias in all corners of politics and media, but I have noticed the left in particular seem incapable of admitting there is bias in their corner. Its seems almost an affront to their intellectual and moral prestige to suggest that they too might occasionally be wrong. Yeah, ok, this is going nowhere. It's like Fierravanti-Wells claiming that Turnbull is part of the left. Their perspective is skewed and nothing you say is going to change it. Its no different to claiming Abetz, Bernadi, Dutton etc are part of the "extreme right". Their perspective is skewed and nothing you is going to change it. Even Greens think they are the centre and the Labor party is right wing. Even Adolt Hitler, Pol Pot, Darth Vader think they are the center. Everyone thinks they are the centre and everyone else is the deluded one. Have literally never seen the Greens try and claim that, or anyone else. -PB Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of Victoriahttps://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/july/.../waleed.../inside-tony-abbott-s-min...
... Kevin Rudd, on the 7.30 program, who called him “one of the most extreme right-wing conservative leaders or politicians that the Liberal Party has thrown up ”.
https://www.crikey.com.au/.../turnbull-the-last-of-the-neoliberals-leads-for-now-a-dee... 7 days ago - The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by ... Another extreme right-winger, the IPA's John Roskam, also ...
https://www.afr.com/.../the-long-stony-road-of-liberal-party-division-in-nsw-2016012... Jan 30, 2016 - Michael Photios: Darth Vader to the NSW right of the Liberal Party. ... also members of the Liberal Party) or, just as egregiously, "extreme right".
https://theaimn.com/right-left-invasion-neo-liberal-agenda/ Jul 13, 2017 - We all know Rupert Murdoch runs the Liberal Party. ..... The LNP have gone extreme right wing and Labor has gone right wing it seems to me, ...
Where are the Greens in any of that? -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-19/greens-slam-new-safe-schools-program-as-caving-in-to-right/8454646The Tasmanian Greens have accused the Government of "caving to the extreme Right". "[We have] a Liberal government here that's taking it's orders from hard-right senators like Eric Abetz," Ms O'Connor said.https://www.themercury.com.au/...abetz.../6fedba32cd7439c3c4b552ebaae119a6Jun 1, 2017 - Senator Eric Abetz says the Hobart City Council should deal with “the issues actually impacting ... “I don't care for his extreme right wing politics. This is simple cultural warfare by the extreme right within the Liberals, and it's no surprise to see the likes of Andrew Nikolic and Andrew Hastie involved. Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews nailed it when he said "I don’t think these extreme Liberals are actually offended by the structure of the program, or the teachers who lead it. https://www.crikey.com.au/2010/.../abbott-to-the-lunatic-fringe-its-ok-im-one-of-you/ Feb 4, 2010 - Tony Abbott's decision to meet Lord Monckton was contemptible -- but ... he has been hired to do: dog-whistle to the extreme right of the party.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
If you're not going to read then there's no point discussing
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWhat do you mean Marconi? The media “shitshow” has been everywhere, across all channels and platfoms.. Its no less febrile than when Gillard knifed Rudd, all media agencies love a scandal, and political knifings are among the best there is. Lefties seem to have this fascination with Murdoch, i dont understand it. Murdochs most widely distributed asset is news.com.au, which is about as left as the SMH. Just because its “news corp” doenst mean its default right wing, its editors are certainly left of centre. It doesnt matter though, the left are convinced that everything under the news corp umbrella must be conservative right wing, otherwise its defeats their theory that Murdoch is master manipulator of the free world.The most widely circulated news websites are ABC, ninemsn, Dialy Mail, SMH and the Guardian, so basically all six top websites are left or left of centre.In other words quit crying like babies and quit your Murdoch paranoia. I'm a political activist over a range of issues. Murdoch's press is unbelievably right wing in Australia. In the UK because the Times is competing with the Independent, Observer and Guardian, he can't get away with elucidating the right wing agenda promulgated in the Australian that agrees with almost everything the ruling class advocate - manifesting in the Libs, big corporations, big banks and the Institute Of Public Affairs. What about Fairfax and ABC press? They're "unbelievably" left wing, correct? Or are they perfectly objective and representative of all sides of politics? Can you name me a single conservative right wing commentator or presenter on any Fairfax or ABC? Why is there such paranoia about Murdoch when in your own backyard you're about as politically diverse as a stick? I know the ABC has had numerous independent audits done on it for a belief it is "left wing", but I believe all have come back saying it is "balanced". I think the problem people have with the ABC is that it largely based on facts, rather than perceived notions (which many "left and right wing" media companies will use). This is reflected in the sensationalised headlines these media outlets will use in relation to more direct ones that the ABC tend to use. Most media outlets are looking to create a story, whereas I find ABC more than most times are looking to tell the story. Not sure about Fairfax ... I can't keep up with who owns what. Its up to you decide whether you believe the results of the "independent audit", especially one that was conducted by a notorious lefty in Ray Martin. It would be no different to Andrew Bolt doing an "independent audit" of the impartiality of the Daily Telegraph and then concluding it is bias free and factual, and then hoping its reader base being stupid enough to actually believe it. At the end of the day there's a reason why ABC is loved by lefties and loathed by conservatives. It goes towards your values as a person whether you are willing to admit bias or hide behind a politicised "audit" in order to retain the ideological control of a taxpayer funded organisation. That the ABC refrains from sensationalist headlines doesn't ipso facto prove its content is factual or bias free, its bias is clearly evident in its elevation and treatment of issues such as asylum seekers, environment, refugees, energy policy, gay marriage, Catholic Church criticism and the obvious lack of discussion of issues that concern conservatives such as immigration, overpopulation, economic growth , defence, crime statistics etc. There is also the slight issue of not a single conservative right wing commentator or journalist represented across any of its news or opinion departments, but this fact is usually ignored or blamed on spurious excuses such as lack of job applications. Just last week I remember an article on ABC about immigration (was quite neutral in the end weighing up pros and cons), economic growth is regularly discussed on there (again it is not seen as the be all to end all, which reflects society's regarding checks and balances), similarly so are defence issues, and so too are crime statistics. Also overpopulation is an extreme left wing issue (all the "greenies" at my uni always banged on about this) ... most arguments for increased population are based on economic growth (so you can see how overpopulation issues are generally a "left wing" issue). The difference is, as I said, they don't sensationalise these. They look at the statistics and analyse them (instead of simply throwing them out there). They'll look at why is crime is up or a certain minority is over represented in the statistics, rather than simply "implying" or saying that their race, religion, ethnicity, culture etc. is the reason for the statistic. It is far easier for the population to simply blame something simple for the statistics than to actually analyse and study them. I remember at work about 10 years ago green groups were up in arms because the area of old growth forest was decreased in a report. The report explained that the decrease was due to an improvement in modelling, on-field investigations, more accurate / precise data capture / mapping and altering the criteria (in accordance with green group requests). However, they only saw the decrease in numbers and accused us of trying to cut down more old growth forests ... this fitted their narrative. You're wasting your time. True ... however perhaps someone else reading these comments with a similar mindset may think twice about their preconceived opinions. Unfortunately for too many ignorance is bliss ... Im sorry but bias exists within all of us. I can admit it exists within myself, I am prepared to admit that Sky and News Corp is right leaning. I'm not gonna sit here and put up some pathetic sorry defense about how the Australian is perfectly balanced because analyses facts and uses statistics to supports its claims, its by and large right wing outlet as evidenced by its reader base and comments section (of which I am a frequent contributor). The difference is, especially on SKy you will find left wing contributors who have regular appearance, if not host their own shows. With ABC there is no right wing or conservative representation, a few pissy articles on immigration and population do not prove there isnt a bias agianst consevatives, conscious or otherwise. But if you want to be a head up your ass lefty who cannot even acknowledge fallibility and you have conquered the scourge of bias congratulations to you. Ignorance is bliss.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of VictoriaTHAT WAS THE LITERAL HEADLINE !!!! ON THE VICTORIA LABOR WEBSITE. NOT FAR RIGHT, NOT HARD RIGHT, E X T R E M E RIGHT. Mcjules : but but but but but but but but but but but but ....
|
|
|
sokorny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWhat do you mean Marconi? The media “shitshow” has been everywhere, across all channels and platfoms.. Its no less febrile than when Gillard knifed Rudd, all media agencies love a scandal, and political knifings are among the best there is. Lefties seem to have this fascination with Murdoch, i dont understand it. Murdochs most widely distributed asset is news.com.au, which is about as left as the SMH. Just because its “news corp” doenst mean its default right wing, its editors are certainly left of centre. It doesnt matter though, the left are convinced that everything under the news corp umbrella must be conservative right wing, otherwise its defeats their theory that Murdoch is master manipulator of the free world.The most widely circulated news websites are ABC, ninemsn, Dialy Mail, SMH and the Guardian, so basically all six top websites are left or left of centre.In other words quit crying like babies and quit your Murdoch paranoia. I'm a political activist over a range of issues. Murdoch's press is unbelievably right wing in Australia. In the UK because the Times is competing with the Independent, Observer and Guardian, he can't get away with elucidating the right wing agenda promulgated in the Australian that agrees with almost everything the ruling class advocate - manifesting in the Libs, big corporations, big banks and the Institute Of Public Affairs. What about Fairfax and ABC press? They're "unbelievably" left wing, correct? Or are they perfectly objective and representative of all sides of politics? Can you name me a single conservative right wing commentator or presenter on any Fairfax or ABC? Why is there such paranoia about Murdoch when in your own backyard you're about as politically diverse as a stick? I know the ABC has had numerous independent audits done on it for a belief it is "left wing", but I believe all have come back saying it is "balanced". I think the problem people have with the ABC is that it largely based on facts, rather than perceived notions (which many "left and right wing" media companies will use). This is reflected in the sensationalised headlines these media outlets will use in relation to more direct ones that the ABC tend to use. Most media outlets are looking to create a story, whereas I find ABC more than most times are looking to tell the story. Not sure about Fairfax ... I can't keep up with who owns what. Its up to you decide whether you believe the results of the "independent audit", especially one that was conducted by a notorious lefty in Ray Martin. It would be no different to Andrew Bolt doing an "independent audit" of the impartiality of the Daily Telegraph and then concluding it is bias free and factual, and then hoping its reader base being stupid enough to actually believe it. At the end of the day there's a reason why ABC is loved by lefties and loathed by conservatives. It goes towards your values as a person whether you are willing to admit bias or hide behind a politicised "audit" in order to retain the ideological control of a taxpayer funded organisation. That the ABC refrains from sensationalist headlines doesn't ipso facto prove its content is factual or bias free, its bias is clearly evident in its elevation and treatment of issues such as asylum seekers, environment, refugees, energy policy, gay marriage, Catholic Church criticism and the obvious lack of discussion of issues that concern conservatives such as immigration, overpopulation, economic growth , defence, crime statistics etc. There is also the slight issue of not a single conservative right wing commentator or journalist represented across any of its news or opinion departments, but this fact is usually ignored or blamed on spurious excuses such as lack of job applications. Just last week I remember an article on ABC about immigration (was quite neutral in the end weighing up pros and cons), economic growth is regularly discussed on there (again it is not seen as the be all to end all, which reflects society's regarding checks and balances), similarly so are defence issues, and so too are crime statistics. Also overpopulation is an extreme left wing issue (all the "greenies" at my uni always banged on about this) ... most arguments for increased population are based on economic growth (so you can see how overpopulation issues are generally a "left wing" issue). The difference is, as I said, they don't sensationalise these. They look at the statistics and analyse them (instead of simply throwing them out there). They'll look at why is crime is up or a certain minority is over represented in the statistics, rather than simply "implying" or saying that their race, religion, ethnicity, culture etc. is the reason for the statistic. It is far easier for the population to simply blame something simple for the statistics than to actually analyse and study them. I remember at work about 10 years ago green groups were up in arms because the area of old growth forest was decreased in a report. The report explained that the decrease was due to an improvement in modelling, on-field investigations, more accurate / precise data capture / mapping and altering the criteria (in accordance with green group requests). However, they only saw the decrease in numbers and accused us of trying to cut down more old growth forests ... this fitted their narrative. You're wasting your time. True ... however perhaps someone else reading these comments with a similar mindset may think twice about their preconceived opinions. Unfortunately for too many ignorance is bliss ...
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xYeah but whether you call the SMH and Guardian 'left-leaning' and the Australian 'right-leaning' you'd have to agree the crap that spews out of Sky News, 2GB and the Telegraph is a whole step up in partisan 'journalism'. Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A. Australia has to resist the "Fox-ification' (for want of a better word) of the media. Without exaggeration it's a dead set danger to democracy.
Mate the biggest danger to democracy are folks like you who want to shut down every opinion you disagree with and marginalise them as extreme fringe alt right bordering on nazism and fascism. Currently its boycotts, sacking and protests, tomorrow it will be jail and re education-camp, soon you will exterminating all conservatives in order to "protect vulnerable minorities from racist violent fascists". Even sections of Antifa, whose actions are condoned if not outright supported by the media, are adopting military style aggression as part of their broader strategy to right fascism (aka Republic voters). Surely you can't sit there with a straight face Rusty and tell me the rightish side of politics is not over-represented when it comes to screeching opinions. And I'm talking 'screeching opinions' not just right wing columnists like Janet Albrechtson who is actually very measured. Screeching harpies would include Miranda Devine, Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Paul Murray, Ross Cameron etc. The list goes on and on. Who have the left got that carry on like fucking idiots? David Marr?
Chris Uhlmann, Clem Ford, Waleed Aly, Catherine Deveny, Mike Carlton, Yassmin Abeid, David Marr et al. Can you believe that Clementine Ford actually gets to go around to schools preaching man hating bile to children, or that Yassmin Abeid gets her own TV show despite consorting with terrorist sympathises and disparaging Anzacs? In many cases the lefty influence is much moire insidious as they have a far greater reach than the radio shock jocks of pay TV pundits who appeal to a rusted on niche.
Yes there's lefty wankers in the media but they're not carrying on day in, day out like the flogs listed above. I mean just have a go at Media Watch last night and watch Ray Hadley's piece to camera where he slags the fuck out of Turnbull and tells him to piss off. I mean like him or hate but show some friggin common decency and respect to a bloke who was just running the country. Could you say the same for Abbott but of course you would waffle on about what a terrible PM he was and how he deserved his fate.
And don't start me on the k hunt that asked Gillard if her boyfriend was a homosexual. Farks sake. Blokes like you that only see in black and white are part of the problem. The more people screech, the more partisan the commentary, the more people separate into different ideaological camps the less chance we have of ever having a decent outcome regards any issue. There are shades of grey everywhere and that includes politics. Nothing happens in a vacuum. The reason people like Bolt, Latham exist is because mainstream media fails to address the "grey areas" such as immigration, overpopulation, African crime, Indigenous domestic assaults, child abuse etc. We need people like this to shine a light on whats really going on in the country, as the left are too fearful of raising these issues lest someone mght take offence and let fly accusations of racism. The left would prefer social decay and depravity rather than risk harming their reputations.
I mean have a crack at Hannity or Fox and Friends on Fox News and tell me they're not part of the problem. Trump could cut a child's throat on TV and Hannity would suck his cock and tell the public that there's nothing to see here. We can't have this sort of thing happen in Australia.
Its already happening on a grand scale. Look at the American mainstream press in respect to Trump. Trump has copped more criticism and flack in two years of presidency than every other president put together, perhaps with the exception of Bush. There is nothing he can do right, every remark , bodily movement and unconscious twitch is scrutinised, dissected, and churned out for public ridicule. Even when he's sleeping body he's apparently plotting to kill all black people and become global dictator of earth. Remember than time when he STOOD BEHIND Hillary? Apparentlh that was a serious thing and he posed a legit risk to her safety.
I am suppose I am free enough in my own mind to see bias in all corners of politics and media, but I have noticed the left in particular seem incapable of admitting there is bias in their corner. Its seems almost an affront to their intellectual and moral prestige to suggest that they too might occasionally be wrong. Yeah, ok, this is going nowhere. It's like Fierravanti-Wells claiming that Turnbull is part of the left. Their perspective is skewed and nothing you say is going to change it. Its no different to claiming Abetz, Bernadi, Dutton etc are part of the "extreme right". Their perspective is skewed and nothing you is going to change it. Even Greens think they are the centre and the Labor party is right wing. Even Adolt Hitler, Pol Pot, Darth Vader think they are the center. Everyone thinks they are the centre and everyone else is the deluded one. Have literally never seen the Greens try and claim that, or anyone else. -PB Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of Victoriahttps://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/july/.../waleed.../inside-tony-abbott-s-min...
... Kevin Rudd, on the 7.30 program, who called him “one of the most extreme right-wing conservative leaders or politicians that the Liberal Party has thrown up ”.
https://www.crikey.com.au/.../turnbull-the-last-of-the-neoliberals-leads-for-now-a-dee... 7 days ago - The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by ... Another extreme right-winger, the IPA's John Roskam, also ...
https://www.afr.com/.../the-long-stony-road-of-liberal-party-division-in-nsw-2016012... Jan 30, 2016 - Michael Photios: Darth Vader to the NSW right of the Liberal Party. ... also members of the Liberal Party) or, just as egregiously, "extreme right".
https://theaimn.com/right-left-invasion-neo-liberal-agenda/ Jul 13, 2017 - We all know Rupert Murdoch runs the Liberal Party. ..... The LNP have gone extreme right wing and Labor has gone right wing it seems to me, ...
Classic Gish Gallop :laugh: Briefly: 1. yeah i know but but but but but but but but... (insert bullshit excuses) 2. yeah i know but but but but but but but but... (insert bullshit excuses) 3. yeah i know but but but but but but but but... (insert bullshit excuses) 4. yeah i know but but but but but but but but... (insert bullshit excuses) 5. yeah i know but but but but but but but but... (insert bullshit excuses) Rusty, if you're going to link articles please read them first. Corrected
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xYeah but whether you call the SMH and Guardian 'left-leaning' and the Australian 'right-leaning' you'd have to agree the crap that spews out of Sky News, 2GB and the Telegraph is a whole step up in partisan 'journalism'. Its only "crap" because you disagree with it. Its no worse than the crap that spews out of the ABC, QandA, Guardian, Project etc. At least with Sky and News Corp there is a broad representation across the political spectrum, unlike the ABC and Guardian where there is not a single conservative/right wing voice represented other than the occasional stitch up appearance on Q and A. Australia has to resist the "Fox-ification' (for want of a better word) of the media. Without exaggeration it's a dead set danger to democracy.
Mate the biggest danger to democracy are folks like you who want to shut down every opinion you disagree with and marginalise them as extreme fringe alt right bordering on nazism and fascism. Currently its boycotts, sacking and protests, tomorrow it will be jail and re education-camp, soon you will exterminating all conservatives in order to "protect vulnerable minorities from racist violent fascists". Even sections of Antifa, whose actions are condoned if not outright supported by the media, are adopting military style aggression as part of their broader strategy to right fascism (aka Republic voters). Surely you can't sit there with a straight face Rusty and tell me the rightish side of politics is not over-represented when it comes to screeching opinions. And I'm talking 'screeching opinions' not just right wing columnists like Janet Albrechtson who is actually very measured. Screeching harpies would include Miranda Devine, Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt, Alan Jones, Ray Hadley, Paul Murray, Ross Cameron etc. The list goes on and on. Who have the left got that carry on like fucking idiots? David Marr?
Chris Uhlmann, Clem Ford, Waleed Aly, Catherine Deveny, Mike Carlton, Yassmin Abeid, David Marr et al. Can you believe that Clementine Ford actually gets to go around to schools preaching man hating bile to children, or that Yassmin Abeid gets her own TV show despite consorting with terrorist sympathises and disparaging Anzacs? In many cases the lefty influence is much moire insidious as they have a far greater reach than the radio shock jocks of pay TV pundits who appeal to a rusted on niche.
Yes there's lefty wankers in the media but they're not carrying on day in, day out like the flogs listed above. I mean just have a go at Media Watch last night and watch Ray Hadley's piece to camera where he slags the fuck out of Turnbull and tells him to piss off. I mean like him or hate but show some friggin common decency and respect to a bloke who was just running the country. Could you say the same for Abbott but of course you would waffle on about what a terrible PM he was and how he deserved his fate.
And don't start me on the k hunt that asked Gillard if her boyfriend was a homosexual. Farks sake. Blokes like you that only see in black and white are part of the problem. The more people screech, the more partisan the commentary, the more people separate into different ideaological camps the less chance we have of ever having a decent outcome regards any issue. There are shades of grey everywhere and that includes politics. Nothing happens in a vacuum. The reason people like Bolt, Latham exist is because mainstream media fails to address the "grey areas" such as immigration, overpopulation, African crime, Indigenous domestic assaults, child abuse etc. We need people like this to shine a light on whats really going on in the country, as the left are too fearful of raising these issues lest someone mght take offence and let fly accusations of racism. The left would prefer social decay and depravity rather than risk harming their reputations.
I mean have a crack at Hannity or Fox and Friends on Fox News and tell me they're not part of the problem. Trump could cut a child's throat on TV and Hannity would suck his cock and tell the public that there's nothing to see here. We can't have this sort of thing happen in Australia.
Its already happening on a grand scale. Look at the American mainstream press in respect to Trump. Trump has copped more criticism and flack in two years of presidency than every other president put together, perhaps with the exception of Bush. There is nothing he can do right, every remark , bodily movement and unconscious twitch is scrutinised, dissected, and churned out for public ridicule. Even when he's sleeping body he's apparently plotting to kill all black people and become global dictator of earth. Remember than time when he STOOD BEHIND Hillary? Apparentlh that was a serious thing and he posed a legit risk to her safety.
I am suppose I am free enough in my own mind to see bias in all corners of politics and media, but I have noticed the left in particular seem incapable of admitting there is bias in their corner. Its seems almost an affront to their intellectual and moral prestige to suggest that they too might occasionally be wrong. Yeah, ok, this is going nowhere. It's like Fierravanti-Wells claiming that Turnbull is part of the left. Their perspective is skewed and nothing you say is going to change it. Its no different to claiming Abetz, Bernadi, Dutton etc are part of the "extreme right". Their perspective is skewed and nothing you is going to change it. Even Greens think they are the centre and the Labor party is right wing. Even Adolt Hitler, Pol Pot, Darth Vader think they are the center. Everyone thinks they are the centre and everyone else is the deluded one. Have literally never seen the Greens try and claim that, or anyone else. -PB Liberals Lurch To The Extreme Right Continues | Premier of Victoriahttps://www.themonthly.com.au/issue/2013/july/.../waleed.../inside-tony-abbott-s-min...
... Kevin Rudd, on the 7.30 program, who called him “one of the most extreme right-wing conservative leaders or politicians that the Liberal Party has thrown up ”.
https://www.crikey.com.au/.../turnbull-the-last-of-the-neoliberals-leads-for-now-a-dee... 7 days ago - The Liberal Party is now entirely unmoored from economic ideology, swamped by ... Another extreme right-winger, the IPA's John Roskam, also ...
https://www.afr.com/.../the-long-stony-road-of-liberal-party-division-in-nsw-2016012... Jan 30, 2016 - Michael Photios: Darth Vader to the NSW right of the Liberal Party. ... also members of the Liberal Party) or, just as egregiously, "extreme right".
https://theaimn.com/right-left-invasion-neo-liberal-agenda/ Jul 13, 2017 - We all know Rupert Murdoch runs the Liberal Party. ..... The LNP have gone extreme right wing and Labor has gone right wing it seems to me, ...
Classic Gish Gallop :laugh: Briefly: 1. Labor Premier claiming a lurch (indicating a direction) to the extreme right not that they're extreme right yet 2. Rudd called him the most extreme in relation to the other Liberal PMs. I don't think that's inaccurate. 3. John Roksam is an IPA goon and while strongly linked to the Liberal Party he's not a member of the government 4. The AFR article actually derides the use of extreme left and extreme right :laugh: 5. The quote was from the comment section, who takes that stuff seriously Rusty, if you're going to link articles please read them first.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xWhat do you mean Marconi? The media “shitshow” has been everywhere, across all channels and platfoms.. Its no less febrile than when Gillard knifed Rudd, all media agencies love a scandal, and political knifings are among the best there is. Lefties seem to have this fascination with Murdoch, i dont understand it. Murdochs most widely distributed asset is news.com.au, which is about as left as the SMH. Just because its “news corp” doenst mean its default right wing, its editors are certainly left of centre. It doesnt matter though, the left are convinced that everything under the news corp umbrella must be conservative right wing, otherwise its defeats their theory that Murdoch is master manipulator of the free world.The most widely circulated news websites are ABC, ninemsn, Dialy Mail, SMH and the Guardian, so basically all six top websites are left or left of centre.In other words quit crying like babies and quit your Murdoch paranoia. I'm a political activist over a range of issues. Murdoch's press is unbelievably right wing in Australia. In the UK because the Times is competing with the Independent, Observer and Guardian, he can't get away with elucidating the right wing agenda promulgated in the Australian that agrees with almost everything the ruling class advocate - manifesting in the Libs, big corporations, big banks and the Institute Of Public Affairs. What about Fairfax and ABC press? They're "unbelievably" left wing, correct? Or are they perfectly objective and representative of all sides of politics? Can you name me a single conservative right wing commentator or presenter on any Fairfax or ABC? Why is there such paranoia about Murdoch when in your own backyard you're about as politically diverse as a stick? I know the ABC has had numerous independent audits done on it for a belief it is "left wing", but I believe all have come back saying it is "balanced". I think the problem people have with the ABC is that it largely based on facts, rather than perceived notions (which many "left and right wing" media companies will use). This is reflected in the sensationalised headlines these media outlets will use in relation to more direct ones that the ABC tend to use. Most media outlets are looking to create a story, whereas I find ABC more than most times are looking to tell the story. Not sure about Fairfax ... I can't keep up with who owns what. Its up to you decide whether you believe the results of the "independent audit", especially one that was conducted by a notorious lefty in Ray Martin. It would be no different to Andrew Bolt doing an "independent audit" of the impartiality of the Daily Telegraph and then concluding it is bias free and factual, and then hoping its reader base being stupid enough to actually believe it. At the end of the day there's a reason why ABC is loved by lefties and loathed by conservatives. It goes towards your values as a person whether you are willing to admit bias or hide behind a politicised "audit" in order to retain the ideological control of a taxpayer funded organisation. That the ABC refrains from sensationalist headlines doesn't ipso facto prove its content is factual or bias free, its bias is clearly evident in its elevation and treatment of issues such as asylum seekers, environment, refugees, energy policy, gay marriage, Catholic Church criticism and the obvious lack of discussion of issues that concern conservatives such as immigration, overpopulation, economic growth , defence, crime statistics etc. There is also the slight issue of not a single conservative right wing commentator or journalist represented across any of its news or opinion departments, but this fact is usually ignored or blamed on spurious excuses such as lack of job applications. Just last week I remember an article on ABC about immigration (was quite neutral in the end weighing up pros and cons), economic growth is regularly discussed on there (again it is not seen as the be all to end all, which reflects society's regarding checks and balances), similarly so are defence issues, and so too are crime statistics. Also overpopulation is an extreme left wing issue (all the "greenies" at my uni always banged on about this) ... most arguments for increased population are based on economic growth (so you can see how overpopulation issues are generally a "left wing" issue). The difference is, as I said, they don't sensationalise these. They look at the statistics and analyse them (instead of simply throwing them out there). They'll look at why is crime is up or a certain minority is over represented in the statistics, rather than simply "implying" or saying that their race, religion, ethnicity, culture etc. is the reason for the statistic. It is far easier for the population to simply blame something simple for the statistics than to actually analyse and study them. I remember at work about 10 years ago green groups were up in arms because the area of old growth forest was decreased in a report. The report explained that the decrease was due to an improvement in modelling, on-field investigations, more accurate / precise data capture / mapping and altering the criteria (in accordance with green group requests). However, they only saw the decrease in numbers and accused us of trying to cut down more old growth forests ... this fitted their narrative. Far out man, you're right. It must just be all in our MY head. All those singular articles absolutely provide conclusive proof that I'm wrong. I was avid reader of abc.net.au and watcher of Q and A until I just gave up. Clearly the problem was me and my inherent white man patriarchal fascist bias rather than the infallible ABC who can do no wrong. ^^^ It probably is.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|