Does it weekly with his boat arrival "reports"

-PB

Re Gonski, if state govts reduce their own funding it will be a mess. It's hard to trust the fed govt will get it right.

If this isn't worrying people there's something wrong with them.

The latest ASIO leak looks like it will disappear into the air as quickly as it arose today. I guess the Kangaroos winning the World Cup
has deadened the proles senses again. We deserve what we get under Abbott.

http://m.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/policy/australian-spies-shared-information-on-citizens-snowden-document-reveals/story-fn59nm2j-1226773385640

The suppressing of information about boat arrivals is worrying me.

What they're talking about in this article does not. How about this for a completely plausible explanation:
1. He had a pretty comprehensive personal site tonyabbott.com.au and it was filled with content referring to him being in opposition.
2. Rather than spending money and resources on fixing it all up a decision was to have the Liberal party website maintain the info

Then from the article right at the end


Besides, the guy had no obligation to maintain transcripts of his speeches and interviews.

To top it all off you can still get them on the Wayback machine or the NLA's Pandora service. If they had tried to remove them from those sorts of sources, that's when you worry.

I'm sounding like LNP supporter but I just hate trashy articles regardless of who they are favouring. If this was a News corp article about Labor many would be calling out the bias.

Personally I think Tony Abbott is already the worst PM we've ever had. There's enough legitimate crap to call him out on.

oh the meladrama of it all.....LOL....:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :-"

Generic Batfink response to LNP sucking arse #121051

-PB

lol....whatever...the opposition are 10 times worse then the coalition in opposition......
disgraceful behaviour and hypocrisy of the highest level.....

you are all screaming rape about someone having a sexual thought.....lol....:-" :-"

#121052

If he'd removed ALL speeches you'd have a point, but it's only select speeches that have disappeared.

If you are a journalist and rely on a ministers web page for an accurate archive of past speeches and interviews, you're doing your job wrong.

If they tried to get 3rd party sources purged, that's a problem.

Edited by mcjules: 3/12/2013 02:16:31 PM

Doublethink.

I've seen less backflips at the olympic gymnastics.

no mention of the $1.2 billion Shorten pulled out of education funding in the weeks leading up to the election???

Repeating this false line really demonstrated your blind role as a link in the ever shrinking LNP circlejerk, despite your claims of impartiality.

lol...right....you are a media premature ejectulator....you cream at the mere wiff of an anti Abbott story...lol

sad really

And yet you have to lie to find am alternative. Keep saying scraping finky.

Holy fuckballs

Make Mirabella ABC director, Lib party room hears

http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/tony-abbott-threatens-to-make-mps-sit-through-christmas-abc-attacked-in-coalition-meeting-20131203-2ynlg.html

the fact remains that Shorten chopped 41.2 billion out of education prior to the election, so the LNP say we will honour thoe previous governments committments, then Shorten lies and denies he cut the funding forcing Pyne to reinstate $1.2 billion in funding....very simple politics for the well informed....MATT

so go and do your homework...you are way off the mark.....

Labor pretty much confirmed that they don't care if they sit again.

The big issue is the inordinate amount of time spent on censoring the ABC, because sometimes the truth is a bit inconvenient.

It's spin, it's not a fact. Thankfully though, you're about as convincing as the mincing poodle himself.

High Court reserves decision on Commonwealth challenge to ACT laws: will allow same-sex marriages to take place in Canberra from Saturday.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-03/high-court-reserves-decision-on-same-sex-marriage/5132346

Will be reversed on Thursday. Commonwealth argument is compelling.

Got some source?

-PB

Being?

-PB

Marriage is a federal issue.

Don't you think that the court would have put an injunction if they intended to reverse?

Marriage as a federal issue isn't as compelling as the act argument: only heterosexual marriage is legislated for federally in the marriage act, and it does not preclude states from making legislation to cater for other types of marriage.

Ahh roger.

-PB

I'll leave the high court to adjudicate. In Australia marriage is between a man and a woman.

Brings me back to the point I already made. Only an incompetent or cruel court would allow for marriages to go ahead for 6 days before repealing them. That there is no injunction is a huge indication of where the court is likely to rule.