damonzzzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. Often the loudest whingers about those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the halving of CGT are those benefiting from paying less or nil tax. Edited by rusty: 12/12/2014 08:32:51 PM Not quite. Most people paying less or nil tax probably have no idea what negative gearing and CGT is. Our tax system punishes earning a salary and significantly favours investment backed income.
|
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Also you cant be that daft finky someone so learned like you , should know what Google is of course i do.....up to my armpits in tenders and designs racing into the X-mas break, i don't like to rely on google, TBH i was looking for you guys to fess up and tell me, isn't that the purpose of this forum, to communicate and debate? I love chicken tenders, but don't think I would want them near my armpits.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
damonzzzz wrote:rusty wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. Often the loudest whingers about those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the halving of CGT are those benefiting from paying less or nil tax. Edited by rusty: 12/12/2014 08:32:51 PM Not quite. Most people paying less or nil tax probably have no idea what negative gearing and CGT is. Our tax system punishes earning a salary and significantly favours investment backed income. In a nominal sense perhaps, but when you factor in inflation the effective tax rate for CGT disposals is frequently higher than personal income tax.
|
|
|
biscuitman1871
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:rusty wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. Often the loudest whingers about those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the halving of CGT are those benefiting from paying less or nil tax. Edited by rusty: 12/12/2014 08:32:51 PM Not quite. Most people paying less or nil tax probably have no idea what negative gearing and CGT is. Our tax system punishes earning a salary and significantly favours investment backed income. In a nominal sense perhaps, but when you factor in inflation the effective tax rate for CGT disposals is frequently higher than personal income tax. Negative gearing as it currently applies in Australia is a rort and one of, if not the major factor impacting housing affordability.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:Also you cant be that daft finky someone so learned like you , should know what Google is of course i do.....up to my armpits in tenders and designs racing into the X-mas break, i don't like to rely on google, TBH i was looking for you guys to fess up and tell me, isn't that the purpose of this forum, to communicate and debate? I love chicken tenders, but don't think I would want them near my armpits. the extra seasoning makes a huge difference....;)
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke Where do you think welfare money goes?
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently. What was unpalatable about that was she was using it as an excuse to defend her poor performance and to silence her critics. The way she tried portray herself as this poor victim made her look thin skinned and pitiful. Most PMs are absolutely savaged by the media and when it came to be her turn she just dissolved and became this quasi feminist rather than national leader.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Looks like Turnbull has secured the legacy copper and HFC networks for no extra cost. Quite a coup, especially considering most skeptics theorised it would cost at least billions to acquire.
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke Where do you think welfare money goes? The abyss :lol:
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently. What was unpalatable about that was she was using it as an excuse to defend her poor performance and to silence her critics. The way she tried portray herself as this poor victim made her look thin skinned and pitiful. Most PMs are absolutely savaged by the media and when it came to be her turn she just dissolved and became this quasi feminist rather than national leader. Abbott is using it to defend his governments poor performance and silence criticism of his female puppetmaster
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
benelsmore wrote:notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke Where do you think welfare money goes? The abyss :lol: Yep, I'm sure every welfare recipient puts half of their income under their mattress and sends the other half to their offshore accounts in the Caymans.
|
|
|
damonzzzz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 155,
Visits: 0
|
Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently. What was unpalatable about that was she was using it as an excuse to defend her poor performance and to silence her critics. The way she tried portray herself as this poor victim made her look thin skinned and pitiful. Most PMs are absolutely savaged by the media and when it came to be her turn she just dissolved and became this quasi feminist rather than national leader. Abbott is using it to defend his governments poor performance and silence criticism of his female puppetmaster Yeah his chief of staff is the reason he cant get his policie through the senate.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL.
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently. What was unpalatable about that was she was using it as an excuse to defend her poor performance and to silence her critics. The way she tried portray herself as this poor victim made her look thin skinned and pitiful. Most PMs are absolutely savaged by the media and when it came to be her turn she just dissolved and became this quasi feminist rather than national leader. Abbott is using it to defend his governments poor performance and silence criticism of his female puppetmaster Yeah his chief of staff is the reason he cant get his policie through the senate. Thank goodness that he can't.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. Rofl where are the customers you talking to? A lot of the people I deal with in Townsville with their copper lines are fucked. EDIT: Hell I even have a tech coming out today to check on our pits due to too much noise on our lines. -PB Edited by paulbagzFC: 15/12/2014 07:31:48 AM
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke Where do you think welfare money goes? same place the people who work for a living goes, so they cancel each other out, BUT the investors and business generate employment and good and services.....and a multi level tax revenue, noy just a drain on the government. really it isn't that hard to see.....just open your eyes......i have no problem with welfare for those who truly need it.....just to many bludgers out there.......people who know how to rort the system.....and the system doesn't fight back it just gets bigger and heavier and more entrenched....
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:benelsmore wrote:notorganic wrote:batfink wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:biscuitman1871 wrote:Often the loudest whingers about government "handouts" are those benefitting significantly from negative gearing and the Howard Government's halving of capital gains tax. so the rich rich or not, but getting a massive free kick from the government. big difference is welfare handouts have no return, they actually have massive social ramifications....on the other hand a few tax concessions are no drama when you consider they ARE paying tax, and the run on effect is huge, trades and services engaged during sale and purchase, insurances all who are paying tax and employing people....so to compare the two is just a joke Where do you think welfare money goes? The abyss :lol: Yep, I'm sure every welfare recipient puts half of their income under their mattress and sends the other half to their offshore accounts in the Caymans. yeah i send my money to the caymans and i have several swiss bank accounts, because i am a capitalist pigs who rips off my workers and pay expensive accountants to hide my money....](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,) ](*,)
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:rusty wrote:notorganic wrote:MvFCArsenal16.8 wrote:So abott is claiming sexism against his chief of staff. Hmm worked for him when in oppostion I remember them decrying Gillard using "the sexism card" quite vehemently. What was unpalatable about that was she was using it as an excuse to defend her poor performance and to silence her critics. The way she tried portray herself as this poor victim made her look thin skinned and pitiful. Most PMs are absolutely savaged by the media and when it came to be her turn she just dissolved and became this quasi feminist rather than national leader. Abbott is using it to defend his governments poor performance and silence criticism of his female puppetmaster Yeah his chief of staff is the reason he cant get his policie through the senate. Thank goodness that he can't. hypocrite........
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. It's not completely fucked but I know very few that are able to get ADSL2 at anything close to the maximum speed. That's a lot of times due to distance from the exchange which if designed properly will be mostly sorted via FTTN (there will still be marginal connections for sure). There's plenty though that have degraded copper that may give a slow but stable connection, that's not enough for many to complain in fact even if I myself had a connection like this I'd probably have accepted it because Telstra but it's not going to deliver much improvement in a FTTN world and they certainly won't get 100Mbps. This government's handling of the NBN is one of the worst things they've done since being in power but because of its technical nature, hardly gets reported on.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
notorganic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 21K,
Visits: 0
|
I sometimes get the sense that batfink is sometimes trying to have a sincere Keynesian Vs Trickle Down debate, but doesn't quite have the capacity for words.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:I sometimes get the sense that batfink is sometimes trying to have a sincere Keynesian Vs Trickle Down debate, but doesn't quite have the capacity for words. well to be honest, i am rushing between activities and just put up very rushed posts....i was thinking that you are a bright young lad and get the point and the meaning of the message....sorry if this is incorrect i utilise triple line accounting practices
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. It's not completely fucked but I know very few that are able to get ADSL2 at anything close to the maximum speed. That's a lot of times due to distance from the exchange which if designed properly will be mostly sorted via FTTN (there will still be marginal connections for sure). There's plenty though that have degraded copper that may give a slow but stable connection, that's not enough for many to complain in fact even if I myself had a connection like this I'd probably have accepted it because Telstra but it's not going to deliver much improvement in a FTTN world and they certainly won't get 100Mbps. This government's handling of the NBN is one of the worst things they've done since being in power but because of its technical nature, hardly gets reported on. i have had ADSL2+ for a number of years and it is delivered in a rural location over very average copper lines, it works to maximum speed and is very reliable.....
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. It's not completely fucked but I know very few that are able to get ADSL2 at anything close to the maximum speed. That's a lot of times due to distance from the exchange which if designed properly will be mostly sorted via FTTN (there will still be marginal connections for sure). There's plenty though that have degraded copper that may give a slow but stable connection, that's not enough for many to complain in fact even if I myself had a connection like this I'd probably have accepted it because Telstra but it's not going to deliver much improvement in a FTTN world and they certainly won't get 100Mbps. This government's handling of the NBN is one of the worst things they've done since being in power but because of its technical nature, hardly gets reported on. i have had ADSL2+ for a number of years and it is delivered in a rural location over very average copper lines, it works to maximum speed and is very reliable..... 1. How far are you from the exchange? 2. Can you post a speedtest? http://www.speedtest.net/ 3. What makes you say your copper lines are average? And by average do you mean that they are typical of what most people are on or that they aren't good?
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
notorganic wrote:I sometimes get the sense that batfink is sometimes trying to have a sincere Keynesian Vs Trickle Down debate, but doesn't quite have the capacity for words. Doesn't Keynes economic theory support the idea of budget surpluses and reigning in government debt? It some though Labor doesn't believe in surpluses anymore, or at least has no idea how to produce one.
|
|
|
batfink
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.9K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. It's not completely fucked but I know very few that are able to get ADSL2 at anything close to the maximum speed. That's a lot of times due to distance from the exchange which if designed properly will be mostly sorted via FTTN (there will still be marginal connections for sure). There's plenty though that have degraded copper that may give a slow but stable connection, that's not enough for many to complain in fact even if I myself had a connection like this I'd probably have accepted it because Telstra but it's not going to deliver much improvement in a FTTN world and they certainly won't get 100Mbps. This government's handling of the NBN is one of the worst things they've done since being in power but because of its technical nature, hardly gets reported on. i have had ADSL2+ for a number of years and it is delivered in a rural location over very average copper lines, it works to maximum speed and is very reliable..... 1. How far are you from the exchange? 2. Can you post a speedtest? http://www.speedtest.net/ 3. What makes you say your copper lines are average? And by average do you mean that they are typical of what most people are on or that they aren't good? 2 kilometers.....
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:batfink wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:damonzzzz wrote:Credlin looks like she would snap your neck for a pack of smokes.
Oh and good to see NBN co securing those copper networks and the inevitable fix up, sell up. That isn't going to end in Telstra 2.0 :roll:
Edited by damonzzzz: 14/12/2014 11:59:24 PM Just point to out there is no reliable empirical data to suggest the Telstra copper network is completely fucked. i work for Telstra, i deal with many many customers every day, the vast majority of customers don't have a problem with their fixed lines and ADSL. It's not completely fucked but I know very few that are able to get ADSL2 at anything close to the maximum speed. That's a lot of times due to distance from the exchange which if designed properly will be mostly sorted via FTTN (there will still be marginal connections for sure). There's plenty though that have degraded copper that may give a slow but stable connection, that's not enough for many to complain in fact even if I myself had a connection like this I'd probably have accepted it because Telstra but it's not going to deliver much improvement in a FTTN world and they certainly won't get 100Mbps. This government's handling of the NBN is one of the worst things they've done since being in power but because of its technical nature, hardly gets reported on. i have had ADSL2+ for a number of years and it is delivered in a rural location over very average copper lines, it works to maximum speed and is very reliable..... 1. How far are you from the exchange? 2. Can you post a speedtest? http://www.speedtest.net/ 3. What makes you say your copper lines are average? And by average do you mean that they are typical of what most people are on or that they aren't good? 2 kilometers..... OK so you ignored the rest but if you're getting max speed that's incredible seeming the theoretical limit for you is somewhere between 16 and 17Mbps.  Now I'm even more keen to see your speedtest results. Here's my work one  The difference it makes to my job productivity-wise is significant. Under the proper NBN, we'd all have close to this to our homes.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|