AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
Except that Turnbull is still far more popular than Abbott was when he was ousted.... Among lefties Among the electorate overall.
|
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
I think this aspect of the PM polling is underrated in its importance: "Voters also think the Coalition will win the July 2 election, with 44% rating the Coalition likely victors compared with one-quarter who think Labor will win. But the expectation of a Coalition win has slipped from 55% since the question was last asked in mid-March". Expectation of the likely result of an election is really critical in determining the scope for improving in the polls. People have to expect it is possible for you to win, before they can think its likely, before they will actually decide to vote for you. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/23/election-2016-malcolm-turnbull-poll-rating-slumps-labor-maintains-51-49-lead
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. It should have been FTTN all the way from the beginning, as was Rudd's original plan. We could have had a modest internet upgrade for roughly $4 billion taxpayers keeping us competitive for at least the next couple of decades, invested in other important infrastructure such mas metro rail which we are severely lagging in and left open the possibility for further NBN investments such as G fast , 5G or FTTP depending on global technology trends and economic and budget considerations. Instead Conroy and Labor got carried away and decided to play Nostradamus and pork barrel our building fund into securing Conroy's personal legacy. If they stuck with FTTN the network would be complete by now, we'd be top 20 or higher for international broadband rankings and we'd have saved tens of billions of dollars that could be used to invest in roads and rail. Ah the old wireless is going to take over argument. Simple physics says that that idea is bullshit. Global technology trends are already FTTP, we've been put behind the eightball yet again.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) Sorry missed this one earlier, definitely all of the above. 1. was the initial idea but those other 2 were nice bonuses for them. I thought point 2 was conspiracy nutty at the time it was suggested, until you sit down and contemplate it. It makes sense. I'm on Optus HFC, high speed (up to 100Mbps) and regularly have connection problems with streaming. Almost always an issue during and after rain. One thing that people like rusty like to hide from the public is the concept of contention. Your cable is shared medium with a finite capacity, there might be 100 homes using that same bit of cable before it hits the backbone network (where contention can be an issue again and is on the NBN because of the rates they're charging ISPS but I'm digressing). If there are too many homes trying to max out their connections at the same time, there is contention for bandwidth and inevitably there are dropouts to your streaming. This is why wireless taking over is bullshit because you might get 5000 users+ all competing for that same finite bandwidth on that medium. It's simple physics, and the only solutions are: 1. Using more of the electromagnetic spectrum, 4G is using the old analog TV spectrum and eventually we'll need to reallocate Digital TV and radio's too and everything will be IP streaming. 2. Install more wireless towers, more expensive and people love having those things in their backyards so this seems like a harder sell. As for the rain issues, it's well documented that Optus have neglected their HFC network and it's going to have to be replaced.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
Except that Turnbull is still far more popular than Abbott was when he was ousted.... Among lefties Among the electorate overall. That's because he has more support from the left relative to Abbott inflating his popularity, but they still wont vote for him
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:I If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats. Like Fiona Scott who suggested that the western distributor in Sydney was a carpark due to refugees...? :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:I think this aspect of the PM polling is underrated in its importance: "Voters also think the Coalition will win the July 2 election, with 44% rating the Coalition likely victors compared with one-quarter who think Labor will win. But the expectation of a Coalition win has slipped from 55% since the question was last asked in mid-March". Expectation of the likely result of an election is really critical in determining the scope for improving in the polls. People have to expect it is possible for you to win, before they can think its likely, before they will actually decide to vote for you. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/23/election-2016-malcolm-turnbull-poll-rating-slumps-labor-maintains-51-49-lead The belief of who will win typically translates into support for the underdog
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:mcjules wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:So out of interest, what do forumites think of why the Libs chose a second rate NBN? I see it between 3 alternatives: 1) Purely as a marketing point of difference to Labor in 2010 2) To keep the internet slower for homes, so Murdoch's Foxtel cable tv would be more competitive against streaming services 3) To keep Telstra more relevant, to make up for its terrible valuation since its staged sale from 1997 & help the Libs 'save face' over its sale (its worth noting that the stage two sale in 1999 resulted in massive losses for buyers at $7.40/share, now under $4.00 in 1999 terms) Sorry missed this one earlier, definitely all of the above. 1. was the initial idea but those other 2 were nice bonuses for them. I thought point 2 was conspiracy nutty at the time it was suggested, until you sit down and contemplate it. It makes sense. I'm on Optus HFC, high speed (up to 100Mbps) and regularly have connection problems with streaming. Almost always an issue during and after rain. One thing that people like rusty like to hide from the public is the concept of contention. Your cable is shared medium with a finite capacity, there might be 100 homes using that same bit of cable before it hits the backbone network (where contention can be an issue again and is on the NBN because of the rates they're charging ISPS but I'm digressing). If there are too many homes trying to max out their connections at the same time, there is contention for bandwidth and inevitably there are dropouts to your streaming. This is why wireless taking over is bullshit because you might get 5000 users+ all competing for that same finite bandwidth on that medium. It's simple physics, and the only solutions are: 1. Using more of the electromagnetic spectrum, 4G is using the old analog TV spectrum and eventually we'll need to reallocate Digital TV and radio's too and everything will be IP streaming. 2. Install more wireless towers, more expensive and people love having those things in their backyards so this seems like a harder sell. As for the rain issues, it's well documented that Optus have neglected their HFC network and it's going to have to be replaced. On your last sentence, I am sick & tired of ringing Optus to complain (again a problem this morning, but I couldn't be bothered anymore). High speed HFC which is supposedly faster than FTTN. I have learnt that the Indian on the other end in tech support has been instructed to say that (only after being pressed and doing his usual switch modem off/on advice crap) "I have checked, Optus is working on an upgrade in your area & as soon as its fixed we'll let you know. What is your mobile number so we can send you a confirmation SMS?" A communications network is only as good as its weakest link, hence why FTTN is lipstick on a pig. Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 23/5/2016 12:08:56 PM
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:rusty wrote:It's not surprise at all that Shorten is catching up to Turnbull in approval and popularity ratings. He was only really popular among lefty green and labor supporters because of his pro gay marriage, pro environment stance, even though they would never vote for the liberal party. All Shorten had to do was take a side step to the left and make marriage equality and green taxes the focal point of his campaign in order to claw back that support. This is what happens when parties react to polls rather than fighting for their principles. If Liberals lose the election I hope they go down badly and those bedwetters who ousted Abbott lose their seats.
Except that Turnbull is still far more popular than Abbott was when he was ousted.... Among lefties Among the electorate overall. That's because he has more support from the left relative to Abbott inflating his popularity, but they still wont vote for him It might surprise you, but most people don't allocate themselves to "The Left" or "The Right". That classification is only relevant to the talking heads on Sky news and opinion piece writers in Newscorp. Abbott was universally unpopular to everyone, bar a fringe older very conservative demographic.
|
|
|
AzzaMarch
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:I think this aspect of the PM polling is underrated in its importance: "Voters also think the Coalition will win the July 2 election, with 44% rating the Coalition likely victors compared with one-quarter who think Labor will win. But the expectation of a Coalition win has slipped from 55% since the question was last asked in mid-March". Expectation of the likely result of an election is really critical in determining the scope for improving in the polls. People have to expect it is possible for you to win, before they can think its likely, before they will actually decide to vote for you. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/23/election-2016-malcolm-turnbull-poll-rating-slumps-labor-maintains-51-49-lead The belief of who will win typically translates into support for the underdog Why do you think that? I don't think that is borne out in the evidence.
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
AzzaMarch wrote:Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:AzzaMarch wrote:I think this aspect of the PM polling is underrated in its importance: "Voters also think the Coalition will win the July 2 election, with 44% rating the Coalition likely victors compared with one-quarter who think Labor will win. But the expectation of a Coalition win has slipped from 55% since the question was last asked in mid-March". Expectation of the likely result of an election is really critical in determining the scope for improving in the polls. People have to expect it is possible for you to win, before they can think its likely, before they will actually decide to vote for you. http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2016/may/23/election-2016-malcolm-turnbull-poll-rating-slumps-labor-maintains-51-49-lead The belief of who will win typically translates into support for the underdog Why do you think that? I don't think that is borne out in the evidence. I remember it being raised during a past election campaign. Cant remember if it was state or federal
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
This will boost Labor's numbers even further :cool: Quote:Federal Labor says it will cut some of the travel allowances politicians receive if it wins power in July. Shadow Treasurer Chris Bowen says Labor will make an announcement about politicians "double-dipping" on their Canberra housing arrangements before the election. MPs and senators are able to claim travel allowance of $273 a night for staying in their own property in Canberra and they are also able to receive a tax deduction for the costs associated with that property. Mr Bowen said politicians should not be able to claim both of those benefits... http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-23/election-2016-alp-may-crackdown-politicans-double-dipping/7436558
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. Japan also has one of the highest population/device densities in the world and those connections still need fibre backbones to maintain. You won't see Australia putting up a tower in the middle of nowhere to service 2-3 farms with 4G lol. You're also assuming that Telco's will actually end up offering data plans like they have in places like Japan as well as the upgrade of the panel infrastructure to stop the terrible congestion that we have even now (and on NBN fixed wireless). As for evolution of Sat service, as someone who used Hibis/Satellite for 6+ years I'd love to see how they're going to make latency better. -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
grazorblade wrote:Meanwhile since I said busway. Melbourne could really use a brisbane style busway
has anyone used that busway? It rocks. Best part of Bris public transport Lord Mayor is going to replace part of it with Rubber Tyre Metro, which will probably create choke points along the network without increasing capacity. I agree BRT is one of the most underrated public transport modes, especially for big open sparsely populated cities like Australian capitals.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. Japan also has one of the highest population/device densities in the world and those connections still need fibre backbones to maintain. You won't see Australia putting up a tower in the middle of nowhere to service 2-3 farms with 4G lol. You're also assuming that Telco's will actually end up offering data plans like they have in places like Japan as well as the upgrade of the panel infrastructure to stop the terrible congestion that we have even now (and on NBN fixed wireless). As for evolution of Sat service, as someone who used Hibis/Satellite for 6+ years I'd love to see how they're going to make latency better. -PB Physics rules don't apply in rusty's world. Waves can travel faster than the speed of light!
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
BETHFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 8.2K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. Japan also has one of the highest population/device densities in the world and those connections still need fibre backbones to maintain. You won't see Australia putting up a tower in the middle of nowhere to service 2-3 farms with 4G lol. You're also assuming that Telco's will actually end up offering data plans like they have in places like Japan as well as the upgrade of the panel infrastructure to stop the terrible congestion that we have even now (and on NBN fixed wireless). As for evolution of Sat service, as someone who used Hibis/Satellite for 6+ years I'd love to see how they're going to make latency better. -PB Physics rules don't apply in rusty's world. Waves can travel faster than the speed of light! Just move the satelites closer brah :lol:
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
BETHFC wrote:mcjules wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:Aikhme wrote:They can actually still install FTTP down the track but spending the extra money?
It's just that they chose to save the money and roll out the the FTTN Network 4 years ahead of time. With technology becoming smaller and wireless and mobile services becoming the norm I think fixed line technologies are five minutes to midnight. There's already a trend happening in countries such in Japan where people are ditching their fibre connections in favour of 4G/5G alternatives. As the evolution of satellite and wireless technologies continues it will crowd out the fixed line market as people won't want to pay for multiple services when their smart phone can do fulfill most of their needs. Japan also has one of the highest population/device densities in the world and those connections still need fibre backbones to maintain. You won't see Australia putting up a tower in the middle of nowhere to service 2-3 farms with 4G lol. You're also assuming that Telco's will actually end up offering data plans like they have in places like Japan as well as the upgrade of the panel infrastructure to stop the terrible congestion that we have even now (and on NBN fixed wireless). As for evolution of Sat service, as someone who used Hibis/Satellite for 6+ years I'd love to see how they're going to make latency better. -PB Physics rules don't apply in rusty's world. Waves can travel faster than the speed of light! Just move the satelites closer brah :lol: Muh radiationz. -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Ah the old wireless is going to take over argument. Simple physics says that that idea is bullshit. Global technology trends are already FTTP, we've been put behind the eightball yet again. Simply untrue, VDSL penetration it outpacing FTTP in Europe. Once MTM is complete, even with our "obsolete" FTTN we will be on one of the worlds premier broadband destinations. :lol: The only reason we are so far behind in the global rankings is because FTTP deployment is just so slow. Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true. It WILL happen, it's currently happening, picking up steady momentum. It's will be attractive for operators from an finance perspective, as they will able to manage their networks and customer base with reduced operating/maintenance costs and field/IT staff expenditures.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true. It WILL happen, it's currently happening, picking up steady momentum. It's will be attractive for operators from an finance perspective, as they will able to manage their networks and customer base with reduced operating/maintenance costs and field/IT staff expenditures.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
Condemned666
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.4K,
Visits: 0
|
Greatest episode of television ever, had me coming back for more the week after
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Great explanation provided on Media Watch about the NBN Co (AFP) raids and how there was no national security or national interest concerns to justify them. The Libs probably leant on the AFP for political gain and both sides have done it before, thanks to an outdated law from 1914. It's just unique in that it's never been done during an election campaign. It's definitely backfired, but the NBN is not a key concern for voters.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true. It WILL happen, it's currently happening, picking up steady momentum. It's will be attractive for operators from an finance perspective, as they will able to manage their networks and customer base with reduced operating/maintenance costs and field/IT staff expenditures. And if it takes 50 years? We're just gonna chill on our shit copper till then? -PB
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true. It WILL happen, it's currently happening, picking up steady momentum. It's will be attractive for operators from an finance perspective, as they will able to manage their networks and customer base with reduced operating/maintenance costs and field/IT staff expenditures. And if it takes 50 years? We're just gonna chill on our shit copper till then? -PB Governments aren't very good predictors of technology trends that's why it's better to respond to current needs than guessing 50-100 years in advance what the technology environment will be like and spending on that basis. With FTTN if there's an economic need to extend fibre closer to the premises (either FTTdp or FTTH) the accelerated revenues will help pay for it rather than raiding infrastructure funds.
|
|
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
We have been really screwed over by the eelenpee with this lipstick on a pig FTTN, that will cost this country Billions more (already at $56B) thanks to the additional costs of maintenance and subsequent inevitable upgrade to FTTP. We ultimately have to thank the simpleton voters who ate up the fear mongering of Abbott 2013.
Edited by Murdoch Rags Ltd: 24/5/2016 09:53:11 AM
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:rusty wrote:Wireless will eventually supersede fixed networks, technologies to overcome spectrum limitations are already in development. Doesn't matter how many times you say it, it doesn't make it true. It WILL happen, it's currently happening, picking up steady momentum. It's will be attractive for operators from an finance perspective, as they will able to manage their networks and customer base with reduced operating/maintenance costs and field/IT staff expenditures. And if it takes 50 years? We're just gonna chill on our shit copper till then? -PB Governments aren't very good predictors of technology trends that's why it's better to respond to current needs than guessing 50-100 years in advance what the technology environment will be like and spending on that basis. With FTTN if there's an economic need to extend fibre closer to the premises (either FTTdp or FTTH) the accelerated revenues will help pay for it rather than raiding infrastructure funds. Yes they usually underestimate which is exactly what's happening here.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
mcjules wrote:Governments aren't very good predictors of technology trends that's why it's better to respond to current needs than guessing 50-100 years in advance what the technology environment will be like and spending on that basis. With FTTN if there's an economic need to extend fibre closer to the premises (either FTTdp or FTTH) the accelerated revenues will help pay for it rather than raiding infrastructure funds. Yes they usually underestimate which is exactly what's happening here.[/quote] It's better to underestimate because they can always catch up, when they overestimate and get it wrong there's no going back. It's simply not government job to outlay billions of taxpayers valuable dollars based on speculation and guesswork.
|
|
|
rusty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Murdoch Rags Ltd wrote:We have been really screwed over by the eelenpee with this lipstick on a pig FTTN, that will cost this country Billions more (already at $56B) thanks to the additional costs of maintenance and subsequent inevitable upgrade to FTTP. We ultimately have to thank the simpleton voters who ate up the fear mongering of Abbott 2013.
A pig with lipstick is still a pig. think the taxpayers have the right to be fearful as seeing $70+ billion dollars going down the toilet.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
rusty wrote:mcjules wrote:Governments aren't very good predictors of technology trends that's why it's better to respond to current needs than guessing 50-100 years in advance what the technology environment will be like and spending on that basis. With FTTN if there's an economic need to extend fibre closer to the premises (either FTTdp or FTTH) the accelerated revenues will help pay for it rather than raiding infrastructure funds. Yes they usually underestimate which is exactly what's happening here. It's better to underestimate because they can always catch up, when they overestimate and get it wrong there's no going back. It's simply not government job to outlay billions of taxpayers valuable dollars based on speculation and guesswork. [/quote] OK this is boring now, your assumption is that it actually is cheaper to go this way. There's plenty of evidence to suggest that it's not the case so your argument is invalid.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|