I doubt it, Bill Maher isn't really a Libertarian.

Are you confusing Humbert with Benelsmore?
Am I?

IS THIS REAL LIFE??

Are you confusing Humbert with Benelsmore?
Am I?

IS THIS REAL LIFE??

Bill Maher is a piss stain.

In actual global news...

Anyone seen the hacked noods?

Gotta wait till home from work rofl.

-PB

Want me to text?

Fake mobile phone towers used to hack phones

This story was published: 6 days ago September 03, 2014 1:03PM

Mysterious fake mobile phone towers have been found across America spying on users.

MYSTERIOUS fake mobile phone towers have been found across America. Nobody knows who owns them and they’re listening in on unsuspecting users.

They look identical to any other mobile phone mast and you wouldn’t think twice they could be for anything other than providing a good signal, except seventeen 17 towers were discovered after it was found data was being leaked from owners’ handsets.

HOW TO MAKE SURE YOUR PHONE IS SAFE

A report by privacy website welivesecurity claims the fake towers are dotted across the country and have been found to attack mobile phones through eavesdropping and installing spyware without owners knowing. They were found by people using a specialised Android device known as the CrytoPhone 500, which uses a secure version of the software that can detect if their phone is subject to a “baseband attack”.

The leaks led them to the mysterious towers and the article describes how a road trip from Florida to North Carolina “found eight different interceptors”. It’s understood these towers can intercept voice calls and texts as well as allow voice manipulation, modification, and calling and sending texts on behalf of the user. They can also find the location of a user through random call monitoring.

Not only can your average mobile phone not detect if anything malicious has happened to it, but it’s also a lot more vulnerable to attacks. It’s a scary thought, but even scarier is how nobody knows who built or runs the towers. It’s believed the technology is beyond that of average hackers but one clue has found a relation to the location of the fake towers being next to US military bases.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/online/fake-mobile-phone-towers-used-to-hack-phones/story-fnjwnj25-1227046328473

When I was a Revolutionary Marxist, we were all in favour of as much immigration as possible. It wasn’t because we liked immigrants, but because we didn’t like Britain. We saw immigrants – from anywhere – as allies against the staid, settled, conservative society that our country still was at the end of the Sixties. Also, we liked to feel oh, so superior to the bewildered people – usually in the poorest parts of Britain – who found their neighbourhoods suddenly transformed into supposedly ‘vibrant communities’. If they dared to express the mildest objections, we called them bigots.

Revolutionary students didn’t come from such ‘vibrant’ areas (we came, as far as I could tell, mostly from Surrey and the nicer parts of London). We might live in ‘vibrant’ places for a few (usually squalid) years, amid unmown lawns and overflowing dustbins.

But we did so as irresponsible, childless transients – not as homeowners, or as parents of school-age children, or as old people hoping for a bit of serenity at the ends of their lives. When we graduated and began to earn serious money, we generally headed for expensive London enclaves and became extremely choosy about where our children went to school, a choice we happily denied the urban poor, the ones we sneered at as ‘racists’.

What did we know, or care, of the great silent revolution which even then was beginning to transform the lives of the British poor? To us, it meant patriotism and tradition could always be derided as ‘racist’. And it also meant cheap servants for the rich new middle-class, for the first time since 1939, as well as cheap restaurants and – later on – cheap builders and plumbers working off the books.

It wasn’t our wages that were depressed, or our work that was priced out of the market. Immigrants didn’t do the sort of jobs we did. They were no threat to us. The only threat might have come from the aggrieved British people, but we could always stifle their protests by suggesting that they were modern-day fascists.

I have learned since what a spiteful, self-righteous, snobbish and arrogant person I was (and most of my revolutionary comrades were, too).

I have seen places that I knew and felt at home in, changed completely in a few short years. I have imagined what it might be like to have grown old while stranded in shabby, narrow streets where my neighbours spoke a different language and I gradually found myself becoming a lonely, shaky-voiced stranger in a world I once knew, but which no longer knew me.

I have felt deeply, hopelessly sorry that I did and said nothing in defence of those whose lives were turned upside down, without their ever being asked, and who were warned very clearly that, if they complained, they would be despised outcasts. And I have spent a great deal of time in the parts of Britain where the revolutionary unintelligentsia don’t go. Such people seldom, if ever, visit their own country. Their orbits are in fashionable London zones, and holiday destinations. They are better acquainted with the Apennines of Italy than with the Pennines of their own country.

The worst part of this is the deep, deep hypocrisy of it. Even back in my Trotskyist days I had begun to notice that many of the migrants from Asia were in fact not our allies. They were deeply, unshakably religious. They were socially conservative. Their attitudes towards girls and women were, in many cases, close to medieval. Many of them were horribly hostile to Jews, in a way which we would have condemned fiercely if anyone else had expressed it, but which we somehow managed to forgive and forget in their case.

Many of these new arrivals, though we revolutionaries welcomed them, knew and cared nothing of the great liberal causes we all supported. Or they were hostile to them.

Many on the Left still lie to themselves about this. Of course, all political parties are compromises, but there is a big difference between splitting the difference and flatly ignoring a profound clash of principles. This sort of cynicism has been at the heart of the deal. Immigrants have been used by those who wanted to transform the country. They have taken the parts of them they liked, and made much of them. They have ignored the parts they did not like.

At that time, the revolutionary liberals were hoping to wave goodbye to the Church, and were busy driving discipline out of the state schools. So nobody ever said ‘Let us adapt our society to the demands of these newcomers’. They had the wrong sort of demands.

The same forces destroyed Ray Honeyford, a Bradford headmaster who – long before it was fashionable – tried to stand up against political correctness in schools. He was driven from his job and of course condemned as a ‘racist’. Yet it would have been very much in the interests of integration and real equality in Bradford if his warnings had been heeded and acted upon. As it is, as any observant visitor finds, Bradford’s Muslim citizens and its non-Muslim citizens live in two separate solitudes, barely in contact with each other. Much of the Islamic community is profoundly out of step with modern Britain.

It couldn’t be more obvious that ‘race’ isn’t the problem. The thing that makes these new residents different is culture – language, customs, attitudes, sense of humour.

Rather than them adapting to our way of life, we were adapting to theirs. This wasn’t integration. It was a revolution. Yet nobody – especially their elected representatives – would listen to them, because they were assumed to be Powellite bigots, motivated by some sort of unreasoning hatred.

I now believe that the unreasoning hatred comes almost entirely from the liberal Left. Of course, there are still people who harbour stupid racial prejudices. But most of those concerned about immigration are completely innocent of such feelings.

The screaming, spitting intolerance comes from a pampered elite who are ashamed of their own country, despise patriotism in others and feel none themselves. They long for a horrible borderless Utopia in which love of country has vanished, nannies are cheap and other people’s wages are low.

Read in full: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-230174/How-invasion-immigrants-corner-England-mockery-PMs-promise-close-door

amazing how the left have suddenly become war advocates

amazing how the left have suddenly become war advocates

http://www.dw.de/german-muslim-community-announces-protest-against-extremism/a-17926770

It's amazing they even have to do this or people will label all Muslims sympathisers of terrorists. How many Christian groups came out to denounce Anders Breivik?