If the earth's orbit and Milankovitch Cycles were responsible for a change in climate as you've previously attempted to contend then the fact that we're going through what should be, according to the theory, a cooling stage in the cycle instead of the global increase in temperatures means that you're just outright wrong.

So shut up and stop spouting bullshit you don't even understand.

we are going into a cooling cycle
there is no warming. there has been no warming for 15 years

*insert graphs and evidence here*

-PB

You obviously know what you are talking about. I would love to read your peer reviewed papers on the subject so I can get better informed, or maybe you can point me towards the various journals and scientific institutes that have published your work.

The biggest issue is that at present there are massive heat sinks in the Antarctic, the Arctic and the world's oceans that are soaking up the majority of warming for the time being.

By way of analogy if you put a glass of hot water in a chest freezer full of ice to reach equilibrium there will be a massive drop in the temperature of the water in the glass and only a slight, almost imperceptible, raising in the overall temperature of the "system".

Put that same glass in an empty freezer and the temperature of the "system" will rise, in magnitude, many times more compared to the former example.

The issue will be what happens after the earth loses it's ability to soak up the constant input of heat.

The problem is it is hundreds of years from happening hence Crackers and the rest of them.

We're in a cooling phase at the moment http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19729653

you people have a bullshit explanation for when your predictions continue to fail
credibility is non existent

we're going into a cool phase
this is the end of the warming period

comprehension fails you for the nth time

your data ends at 2000. um that'd be 14 years ago right?


Edited by ricecrackers: 11/6/2014 01:45:45 PM

show me your evidence there has been warming for the past 15 years

You do realise that you're talking about something that takes place over the course of 24,000 years and 14 years is essentially negligible, right?

The "warming phase" ended some 8,000 years ago and we're currently close to the Perigee apsis of our orbit.

The claim: that the sun is the most influential thing in climate change.

The claim was made by you. The onus is upon YOU to produce evidence.

you claimed that the sun wasnt the most influential factor on the earth's climate
seriously, you claimed that

smack yourself in the head (twice)

lets just remove the sun altogether then

what kind of climate do you think the earth will have then afrodope?

Are you fucking shitting me? Nobody can be this stupid.

Just kill yourself. Seriously.

well I thought nobody could be that stupid until I met you



Edited by ricecrackers: 11/6/2014 02:05:47 PM

feeling stupid afrodope?

original claim right there. Evidence or GTFO.

you want me to provide evidence that the sun is the largest influence on the earth's climate?
are you fucking kidding me?

:lol:

The earth is the biggest influence on the earth's climate. No earth means no climate for the sun to impact on.

#ricecrackerslogic

afrodope, do yourself a favour next time before you post
write it down on a piece of paper instead, screw up it then throw it in the bin

you'll feel like you've responded but you wont suffer the embarrassment

Yeah, good rebuttal. You've been schooled and have nothing. Shut up.

:-"

Show us your evidence that there's no anthropogenic climate change.

Don't be ridiculous, ricecrackers doesn't need evidence. It's beneath his dignity. You should just believe everything he says.

thats not evidence, thats hearsay

show me your evidence there has been warming for the past 15 years

Further reading

1. I didnt ask you afrodope. You've demonstrated already that you have no idea.

2. You can draw a trendline anywhere you want to spin a lie however an accurate trendline for that last period would be horizontal. Look at it again and think hard about how you've been duped. I'm not interested in your response, so dont bother replying to me.

oh and...

3. Please stop posting/referring to the disgraced and discredited "skeptical science" to back up your points.

Edited by ricecrackers: 11/6/2014 11:02:35 PM

Evidence there's climate change: 1 article with over 30 sources and 8 different graphs and charts.

ricecrackers' evidence that there's no climate change: none.

Wonder which one I should believe...

yes you can draw a trendline anywhere to dupe the masses. the above example certainly didnt follow any mathematical formula.

have you found your evidence yet or are you still trawling through biology blogger posts?

you havent produced a scrap of evidence, nothing
you just talk about nebulous hearsay and link to opinion pieces