paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
Quote:What do you think of when you hear the name Colonel Gaddafi? Tyrant? Dictator? Terrorist? Well, a national citizen of Libya may disagree but we want you to decide. For 41 years until his demise in October 2011, Muammar Gaddafi did some truly amazing things for his country and repeatedly tried to unite and empower the whole of Africa. So despite what you’ve heard on the radio, seen in the media or on the TV, Gaddafi did some powerful things that are not characteristic of a “vicious dictator” as portrayed by the western media. Here are ten things Gaddafi did for Libya that you may not know about… Muammar Gaddafi Libya 1. In Libya a home is considered a natural human right In Gaddafi’s Green Book it states: ”The house is a basic need of both the individual and the family, therefore it should not be owned by others”. Gaddafi’s Green Book is the formal leader’s political philosophy, it was first published in 1975 and was intended reading for all Libyans even being included in the national curriculum. 2. Education and medical treatment were all free Under Gaddafi, Libya could boast one of the best healthcare services in the Middle East and Africa. Also if a Libyan citizen could not access the desired educational course or correct medical treatment in Libya they were funded to go abroad. 3. Gaddafi carried out the world’s largest irrigation project The largest irrigation system in the world also known as the great manmade river was designed to make water readily available to all Libyan’s across the entire country. It was funded by the Gaddafi government and it said that Gaddafi himself called it ”the eighth wonder of the world”.  4. It was free to start a farming business If any Libyan wanted to start a farm they were given a house, farm land and live stock and seeds all free of charge. 5. A bursary was given to mothers with newborn babies When a Libyan woman gave birth she was given 5000 (US dollars) for herself and the child. 6. Electricity was free Electricity was free in Libya meaning absolutely no electric bills! 7. Cheap petrol During Gaddafi’s reign the price of petrol in Libya was as low as 0.14 (US dollars) per litre. 8. Gaddafi raised the level of education Before Gaddafi only 25% of Libyans were literate. This figure was brought up to 87% with 25% earning university degrees. 9. Libya had It’s own state bank Libya had its own State bank, which provided loans to citizens at zero percent interest by law and they had no external debt. 10. The gold dinar Before the fall of Tripoli and his untimely demise, Gaddafi was trying to introduce a single African currency linked to gold. Following in the foot steps of the late great pioneer Marcus Garvey who first coined the term ”United States of Africa”. Gaddafi wanted to introduce and only trade in the African gold Dinar – a move which would have thrown the world economy into chaos. The Dinar was widely opposed by the ‘elite’ of today’s society and who could blame them. African nations would have finally had the power to bring itself out of debt and poverty and only trade in this precious commodity. They would have been able to finally say ‘no’ to external exploitation and charge whatever they felt suitable for precious resources. It has been said that the gold Dinar was the real reason for the NATO led rebellion, in a bid to oust the outspoken leader. So, was Muammar Gaddafi a Terrorist? Few can answer this question fairly, but if anyone can, it’s a Libyan citizen who has lived under his reign? Whatever the case, it seems rather apparent that he did some positive things for his country despite the infamous notoriety surrounding his name. And that’s something you should try to remember when judging in future. This quirky video documentary spells out an interesting, if rather different, story from the one we think we know. [youtube]TkTUDw0mjMA[/youtube] http://www.globalresearch.ca/libya-ten-things-about-gaddafi-they-dont-want-you-to-know/5414289 -PB
|
|
|
|
Slobodan Drauposevic
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Highly recommend everyone to read The Green Book.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
A similar list could be produced for Hitler - amazing the good you can do with your right hand, whilst you left is killing people left right and center.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect.
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Wtf?  Predator Drone strikes of course. What a silly statement to make. -PB
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Wtf?  Predator Drone strikes of course. What a silly statement to make. -PB left hand
|
|
|
paulbagzFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 44K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:paulbagzFC wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Wtf?  Predator Drone strikes of course. What a silly statement to make. -PB left hand No that's the right hand. That's the good stuff he's done. Geez learn to comprehend man. -PB
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt. so you think Libya is now better off for his absence since it was liberated by Obama and Gaddafi was murdered by the mercenaries paid for by the US led kinetic action?
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt. so you think Libya is now better off for his absence since it was liberated by Obama and Gaddafi was murdered by the mercenaries paid for by the US led kinetic action? I think the world is a better place without Gaddafi in it.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:i wonder what supreme leader Obama has done with his right hand Same as most US Presidents I would suspect. so he gets a free pass then, ok If I post up a list of the great things Obama has achieved, feel free to rebut with the fact that he's responsible for thousands of dead and a heap of debt that will ruin many lives... However, on this occasion, someone popped up a list of nice things Gaddafi did for his people (or believed should be done for his people), so I felt compelled to point out that Gaddafi was a murderous c*nt. so you think Libya is now better off for his absence since it was liberated by Obama and Gaddafi was murdered by the mercenaries paid for by the US led kinetic action? I think the world is a better place without Gaddafi in it. ok. so islamic militants now running riot all over north africa and flooding into Syria and Iraq which has occurred since Gaddafi was murdered is part of making the world a better place is it... ok
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Religious zealots existed long before Gaddafi, existed during his reign, and will continue to exist long after we are gone. Getting rid of Gaddafi wasn't the problem, the entire attitude toward the region is the problem.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Religious zealots existed long before Gaddafi, existed during his reign, and will continue to exist long after we are gone. Getting rid of Gaddafi wasn't the problem, the entire attitude toward the region is the problem. Gaddafi kept them in check in his country now its a staging ground for ISIS training the place is now a failed state and you talk about 'attitude'
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Religious zealots existed long before Gaddafi, existed during his reign, and will continue to exist long after we are gone. Getting rid of Gaddafi wasn't the problem, the entire attitude toward the region is the problem. Gaddafi kept them in check in his country now its a staging ground for ISIS training the place is now a failed state and you talk about 'attitude' Libya was a staging post of IRA training throughout the 70s and 80s - and Gaddafi loved them, visited them in person, encouraged them to strike down at their oppressors, etc. Different leaders now, different terrorists.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Religious zealots existed long before Gaddafi, existed during his reign, and will continue to exist long after we are gone. Getting rid of Gaddafi wasn't the problem, the entire attitude toward the region is the problem. Gaddafi kept them in check in his country now its a staging ground for ISIS training the place is now a failed state and you talk about 'attitude' Libya was a staging post of IRA training throughout the 70s and 80s - and Gaddafi loved them, visited them in person, encouraged them to strike down at their oppressors, etc. Different leaders now, different terrorists. how is that even relevant when it was stopped 25 years ago under Gaddafi?
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
Erm... Perhaps because a lot of innocent people died as a result of him actively supporting and supplying the IRA - and perhaps, just maybe, because the blood is still on his hands whether he belatedly changes his mind about his support or not. Those people didn't just suddenly come back to life once he decided that playing nice may be a better option.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:Erm... Perhaps because a lot of innocent people died as a result of him actively supporting and supplying the IRA - and perhaps, just maybe, because the blood is still on his hands whether he belatedly changes his mind about his support or not. Those people didn't just suddenly come back to life once he decided that playing nice may be a better option. what about the blood on the hands of Tony Blair and a million dead Iraqis? and every US president since? you seem to have this idealistic view on things, what of all the innocents that have died as a direct result of the kinetic action in Libya? thats ok, they're just brown people in the desert right... as long as you can exact revenge on someone who you say had blood on his hands because he supported one side in a war 25 years ago....damn the consequences of the vacuum it created
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:Benjamin wrote:Erm... Perhaps because a lot of innocent people died as a result of him actively supporting and supplying the IRA - and perhaps, just maybe, because the blood is still on his hands whether he belatedly changes his mind about his support or not. Those people didn't just suddenly come back to life once he decided that playing nice may be a better option. what about the blood on the hands of Tony Blair and a million dead Iraqis? and every US president since? you seem to have this idealistic view on things, what of all the innocents that have died as a direct result of the kinetic action in Libya? thats ok, they're just brown people in the desert right... as long as you can exact revenge on someone who you say had blood on his hands because he supported one side in a war 25 years ago....damn the consequences of the vacuum it created Once again, you jump to conclusions about my political beliefs. I'm struggling to think of an occasion that I have exonerated Tony Blair, or Margaret Thatcher, or any other political leader for the deaths of innocent people that they have supported. But hey, I see you have no problem with supporting those who support terrorism on one hand, so long as it keeps another bunch of terrorists temporarily in their place.
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. Crackers is the textbook example of 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' - he will support anyone who stands up to America - and no doubt he'll tell us that his extensive research on all these matters has brought him to a conclusive position which he will not change - no matter what evidence is put infront of him, because all that evidence has no doubt been cooked up by America or their lackies.
|
|
|
Benjamin
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 23K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork. +1. Dem jews control everything.
|
|
|
humbert
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.6K,
Visits: 0
|
ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork. +1. Dem jews control everything. what do jews have to do with zionism?
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
humbert wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right At what point have I said anything about my position vis a vis the Islamic state? context the vacuum of killing Gaddafi has allowed the Islamic State to flourish
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:ricecrackers wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. I'm no particular fan of Gaddafi however he provided an iron fisted buffer against far worse evils as a number of the dictators in the region have done but if you're satisfied with the Islamic State running rampant through north africa and the middle east and sending them back to the middle ages then who am I to question your motives perhaps it all serves the interests of Israel in the end right Sooner or later every conspiracy theorist comes back to the Zionist stance. Clockwork. sooner or later every zionist comes back to the conspiracy theorist stance. clockwork
|
|
|
ricecrackers
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 3.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Benjamin wrote:humbert wrote:Vintage rc. Not yet encountered a dictator he didn't slobber over.
"Rivers of blood" Gaddafi it is. Crackers is the textbook example of 'The enemy of my enemy is my friend' - he will support anyone who stands up to America - and no doubt he'll tell us that his extensive research on all these matters has brought him to a conclusive position which he will not change - no matter what evidence is put infront of him, because all that evidence has no doubt been cooked up by America or their lackies. what part of "Thou shalt not kill" dont you understand? because you openly have supported the killing of Gaddafi, and how did that turn out for you?
|
|
|