That's pretty much the crux of the issue. It doesn't matter if the Democrats have control of the Executive (President and co), the Republican representation in Congress is strong enough to overrule their reforms. Something as big as gun control is not going to happen whilst the Republicans dominate both the Senate and (especially) the House.

Something is going to have to drastically change in how the Democrats run campaigns before a President like Obama can really start causing real change.

[youtube]qCwJzWHNmAk[/youtube]

Feel so sorry for Obama. One of the few in America who recognizes shit needs to change, but has his hands bound.

My uncle did. He is a typcial red neck gun toting republican. He hates immigrants yet he is a filipino :lol:

I think its the nra . They are way to powerful and noone is game enough to take them on.

Apparently the shooter posted on /r9k/ warning everyone in the northwest not to go to school.

https://archive.moe/r9k/thread/22785073/

Not even surprised, that place is a total cesspit.

Even boards like /b/ and /pol/ hate /r9k/.

Everyone on there is either a neckbeard, Elliot Rodger or both.

Why don't you believe children should have protection ?

We'll know Obama is serious about gun control when he gets rid of his armed bodyguards

It seems to be a common left trait to misinterpret the NRA as a stand alone organization rather than representing millions of everyday Americans

The day that some americans chose their right to arms instead of caring about the their own kids after sandy hook is a sad day also a parent i can protect my kids with out guns. If your reasoning is guns will save my kids . Then you sir are a fuckwit.

:lol:

You seem to be under the impression that taking arms away from law-abiding citizens and leaving them in the hands of criminals (which is what a gun ban would do) will somehow make your children safer.

Another great day for The Red Pill and these fuckwits who think gun control doesn't work.

Congrats lads.

You seem to be under the impression that taking arms away from law-abiding citizens and leaving them in the hands of criminals (which is what a gun ban would do) will somehow make your children safer.

I didn't know that Obama was suggesting a gun ban? Oh thats right, he isnt. Anyone who is against background checks for guns seriously needs a head check. If you think it is ok for anyone to be able to stroll down to Walmart and buy an assault rifle, please kindly remove yourself from my country.

:lol: you think by having a gun/s will make kids safer? :lol: :lol: the people who are up in arms are the ones like yourself who see the righr to bare arms as a right and not a privilege. The hunters know that the gun control is needed . Why should a person with mental health issues own a gun? Back ground checks are needed. But nah my right to bear arms is more important

I was responding to MVFCs_Arsenals assertion that the second amendment should be done away with all together.

I agree with stronger background checks and mentally ill etc, but not an outright ban on the weapons themselves.

Edited by 433: 2/10/2015 08:39:27 PM

Ahh fair enough. But the amendment is just that. An amendment that amended something else. Logic dictates that this amendment can also be amended.

Not sure how they'd be "safer" in a home invasion and no means to defend yourself.

Still yet to see a single legitimate reason a civilian needs a gun

Still yet to see a single legitimate reason a civilian needs a gun

It's a right, you don't need one.

Other than sports and hunting there isn't any (bar security contractors).

-PB