pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSPORT TV RATINGS FOR SATURDAY !! 1) NRL: Cowboys v Raiders (Fox Sports 333k) 2) NRL: Titans v Roosters (Fox Sports 241K) 3) NRL: Dragons v Panthers (Fox Sports 229k) 4) Cricket: Second Test/Day 1 (Fox Sports 167/207/224k) 5) AFL: JLT Series Dockers v Pies (Fox Footy 82k) 6) AFL: JLT Series Blues v Saints (Fox Footy 72k) 7) AFL: JLT Series Crows v Lions (Fox Footy 60k) 8) Rugby: Highlanders v Crusaders (Fox Sports 53k) 9) Rugby: Brumbies v Sharks (Fox Sports 50k) 10) A-League: WSW v Adelaide (Fox Sports 44k) 11) Rugby: Hurricanes v Rebels (Fox Sports 41k) 12) A-League: Wellington v Perth (Fox Sports 37k) 13) AFL: JLT Series Blues v Bulldogs (Fox Footy 31k) Nos 7 and 13 aren't the JLT Series, they are Women's AFL. It's pretty good that Nix v Glory got higher ratings than an AFL Women's game featuring two Melbourne teams.
|
|
|
|
azzaMVFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Friday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Fox numbers, the replay at 10pm rated more than the live game at 5pm.
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Sun STV Central Coast v Melb City 70k, Newcastle Jets v Brisbane Roar 63k
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Fox Top 20 Sunday 5 March 2017 Rank | Description | Channel\Market | (r) National STV | 1 | LIVE: CRICKET: IND V AUS 2ND TEST DAY 2 | FOX SPORTS 503 | 265,000 | 2 | LIVE: CRICKET: IND V AUS 2ND TEST DAY 2 | FOX SPORTS 503 | 258,000 | 3 | LIVE: CRICKET: IND V AUS 2ND TEST DAY 2 | FOX SPORTS 503 | 218,000 | 4 | LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V EELS | FOX LEAGUE | 215,000 | 5 | LIVE: NRL WARRIORS V KNIGHTS | FOX LEAGUE | 198,000 | 6 | LIVE: CRICKET: IND V AUS 2ND TEST DAY 2 | FOX SPORTS 503 | 164,000 | 7 | LIVE: SUPERCARS CLIPSAL 500: RACE 2 | FOX SPORTS 506 | 132,000 | 8 | LIVE: SUPERCARS CLIPSAL 500: SHOOTOUT 2 | FOX SPORTS 506 | 113,000 | 9 | LIVE: CRICKET: IND V AUS PRE MATCH | FOX SPORTS 503 | 98,000 | 10 | LIVE: SUPERCARS CLIPSAL 500: QUAL 2 | FOX SPORTS 506 | 95,000 | 11 | SYDNEY: REAL HOUSEWIVES OF… | ARENA | 88,000 | 12 | LIVE: SUPERCARS ADELAIDE SUPPORTS | FOX SPORTS 506 | 87,000 | 13 | LIVE: SUPERCARS LIVE CLIPSAL SUNDAY | FOX SPORTS 506 | 83,000 | 14 | LIVE: NRL SUNDAY TICKET | FOX LEAGUE | 83,000 | 15 | LIVE: NRL SUNDAY TICKET | FOX LEAGUE | 82,000 | 16 | LIVE: SUPERCARS CLIPSAL 500: DRIVERS PDE | FOX SPORTS 506 | 76,000 | 17 | LIVE: SUPERCARS LIVE CLIPSAL SUNDAY | FOX SPORTS 506 | 73,000 | 18 | LIVE: AFL: JLT SERIES: PORT ADEL V RICH | FOX FOOTY | 71,000 | 19 | LIVE: SUPERCARS LIVE CLIPSAL SUNDAY | FOX SPORTS 506 | 71,000 | 20 | LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE CCM V MCY | FOX SPORTS 505 | 70,000 | ":{\"dĈ���
|
|
|
jatz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 361,
Visits: 0
|
+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. Obviously not a ratings winner (sarcasm noted), but for women's sport, AFL takes that as a win.
|
|
|
azzaMVFC
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. Obviously not a ratings winner (sarcasm noted), but for women's sport, AFL takes that as a win. how can you be bothered posting from so many different accounts?
|
|
|
jatz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 361,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. Obviously not a ratings winner (sarcasm noted), but for women's sport, AFL takes that as a win. how can you be bothered posting from so many different accounts? I am a bot.
|
|
|
MarkfromCroydon
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.7K,
Visits: 0
|
I just watched Velez beat Estudiantes 3-2 on my phone. It was a free live telecast on the website of tv publica, an argentine t.v network. Juan Manuel Martinez (older brother of Wanderers player) was pretty good in this match. Anyway, it got me thinking. For the A League, I think the 'split' between those watching on t.v and those watching on devices (phones, ipad etc) would be much less than other football codes in Australia eg. maybe 70% of the total audience watch it on t.v and 30% on devices, whereas the AFL/NRL might be 90% on t.v and 10% on devices. Now the only reason I'm saying this is the ease of watching those other sports on t.v (they're on free to air) and the demographics of older people watching say AFL/NRL who wouldn't like to watch on a device (it seems that the A league demographic is much younger than the other codes). Now what I'd like to know, is has the FFA or anyone quantified this? What is their strategy to maximise the digital rights now and in the future? Is there anywhere where the figures for 'livestream's on devices other than t.v's is published?
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI just watched Velez beat Estudiantes 3-2 on my phone. It was a free live telecast on the website of tv publica, an argentine t.v network. Juan Manuel Martinez (older brother of Wanderers player) was pretty good in this match. Anyway, it got me thinking. For the A League, I think the 'split' between those watching on t.v and those watching on devices (phones, ipad etc) would be much less than other football codes in Australia eg. maybe 70% of the total audience watch it on t.v and 30% on devices, whereas the AFL/NRL might be 90% on t.v and 10% on devices. Now the only reason I'm saying this is the ease of watching those other sports on t.v (they're on free to air) and the demographics of older people watching say AFL/NRL who wouldn't like to watch on a device (it seems that the A league demographic is much younger than the other codes). Now what I'd like to know, is has the FFA or anyone quantified this? What is their strategy to maximise the digital rights now and in the future? Is there anywhere where the figures for 'livestream's on devices other than t.v's is published? You do occasionally see them, Wookie sometimes finds them and puts them up on his site. I know it's a popular view on this site, but it would be a mistake for anyone to think that the A-League attracts a bigger digital audience than the AFL. As for the value of those digital rights, I'm going off memory now, but I think part of the digital rights are included in the Foxtel deal, but they don't have exclusivity on the digital rights, the FFA can still get some additional value for them (although to date, we've heard nothing more on that front).,
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
MarkfromCroydon http://www.footyindustry.com/?page_id=486This is a pretty good article by wookie on how hard it is to get digital numbers for any sport, but he has tracked down some numbers for the AFL and NRL. According to MCN Digital in October 2015, h the AFL held the No.1 spot for sport brands on all mobile devices. The AFL Live App currently sits at over 3 million downloads – the most of any sporting app in Australia. NRL featured prominently with the No.3 Sport brand on smartphones and No.4 on tablet. Fox Sports, which recently added a new all-in one app, made its presence felt in market ranked the No.3 on tablet and No.4 on smartphones.On May 29th, 2016, The Financial Review reported that the NRL’s digital strategy, another area it lags behind the AFL. That was borne out in the latest Nielsen digital ratings figures released showed the AFL growing its unique monthly audience total in April by 22 per cent from the previous month to 3.9 million, while the NRL rose 13 per cent to 2.1 million.
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
MediaweekVerified account @MediaweekAUS 4h4 hours ago
Sat STV #ALeague #FoxSports #MVCvPER 73k
|
|
|
Footballer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Friday night
SFC v CCM - 48k on fox
Anyone have FTA?
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Top 11 Fox shows for last Friday night: Rank | Description | Channel\Market | (r) National STV | 1 | LIVE: NRL BRONCOS V COWBOYS | FOX LEAGUE | 295,000 | 2 | LIVE: PROFESSOR’S SECOND YEAR SYNDROME | FOX LEAGUE | 286,000 | 3 | LIVE: NRL WARRIORS V STORM | FOX LEAGUE | 227,000 | 4 | LIVE: AFL: JLT SERIES: FRE V CARL | FOX FOOTY | 106,000 | 5 | NRL WARRIORS V STORM | FOX LEAGUE | 75,000 | 6 | LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: BRUMBIES V FORCE | FOX SPORTS 501 | 61,000 | 7 | LIVE: NRL FRIDAY NIGHT FOOTY ON FOX | FOX LEAGUE | 56,000 | 8 | LIVE: AFL: JLT SERIES: GWS V NTH MELB | FOX FOOTY | 54,000 | 9 | LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE SYDNEY V C CST | FOX SPORTS 505 | 48,000 | 10 | NCIS: LOS ANGELES | TVH!TS | 45,000 | 11 | LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: CHIEFS V HURRICANES | FOX SPORTS 501 | 44,000 |
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
Top 18 Fox shows for last Saturday: Rank | Description | Channel\Market | (r) National STV | 1 | LIVE: NRL RAIDERS V SHARKS | FOX LEAGUE | 321,000 | 2 | LIVE: NRL SEA EAGLES V RABBITOHS | FOX LEAGUE | 266,000 | 3 | LIVE: NRL KNIGHTS V TITANS | FOX LEAGUE | 208,000 | 4 | LIVE: NRL SUPER SATURDAY | FOX LEAGUE | 200,000 | 5 | LIVE: NRL SUPER SATURDAY | FOX LEAGUE | 196,000 | 6 | LIVE: AFL: JLT SERIES: RICH V COLL | FOX FOOTY | 95,000 | 7 | LIVE: AFL: JLT SERIES: ADEL V BRIS | FOX FOOTY | 95,000 | 8 | PROFESSOR’S SECOND YEAR SYNDROME | FOX LEAGUE | 84,000 | 9 | LIVE: NRL SUPER SATURDAY | FOX LEAGUE | 77,000 | 10 | LIVE: FOOTBALL: A-LEAGUE MELB V V PERTH | FOX SPORTS 505 | 73,000 | 11 | LIVE: RUGBY CENTRAL SATURDAY | FOX SPORTS 501 | 67,000 | 12 | LIVE: AFL WOMEN’S: ADELAIDE V MELBOURNE | FOX FOOTY | 65,000 | 13 | LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: REDS V CRUSADERS | FOX SPORTS 501 | 61,000 | 14 | MIDSOMER MURDERS | UKTV | 51,000 | 15 | CRIMINAL | Foxtel Movies Premiere | 44,000 | 16 | LIVE: PREMIERSHIP NSW | FOX LEAGUE | 44,000 | 17 | SELLING HOUSES AUSTRALIA | LifeStyle Channel | 42,000 | 18 | LIVE: SUPER RUGBY: BLUES V HIGHLANDERS | FOX SPORTS 501 | 39,000 | mens&ut�(��V�
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return.
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return. Fox will pay as I understand 3 million or make up to 3 million if they go FTA.
|
|
|
Australian Football dude
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 274,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return. Fox will pay as I understand 3 million or make up to 3 million if they go FTA. The latter The $50m a year includes a FTA component
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return. Fox will pay as I understand 3 million or make up to 3 million if they go FTA. The latter The $50m a year includes a FTA component are you sure? not really sure how this can be the case when the FTA provider hasn't been awarded yet.
|
|
|
Australian Football dude
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 274,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return. Fox will pay as I understand 3 million or make up to 3 million if they go FTA. The latter The $50m a year includes a FTA component are you sure? not really sure how this can be the case when the FTA provider hasn't been awarded yet. Not sure...but pretty sure. Seems the headline figure when the deal was announced was a "best case scenario" with the more reliable journalists (ie possessing critical faculties one usually desires in one's choice of reliable journalistic sources) like DD and BM being fed information that has progressively unpacked the original figure. This was DD earlier this month... http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/football/a-league/aleague-hopefuls-have-vowed-to-push-on-despite-ffa-admitting-they-cant-afford-to-expand/news-story/b6bbd930d366179072e845c88ccfce00"It’s understood that the $346 million-dollar, six-year deal that FFA trumpeted in December already incorporates moneys that would be paid for expansion and the Free-to-Air component."
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xFriday AFLW on FTA (I think channel 7?) rated 22k at 5pm and then 24k at 10pm, so obviously womens AFL is becoming a real FTA ratings winner. Friday Fox rated 22. The top of the table clash Sat rated 202 on FTA and 60 on fox. do people think the ALeague would get better numbers on a primary FTA channel on a Saturday night? If promoted correctly and have a much improved production than SBS, then I think the answer is a definite yes. Probably, but a primary FTA channel has to put up its hand to want to do it. In all likelihood, the FFA would have to allow them to do it for free for 2 or 3 years before it saw any commercial return. Fox will pay as I understand 3 million or make up to 3 million if they go FTA. The latter The $50m a year includes a FTA component are you sure? not really sure how this can be the case when the FTA provider hasn't been awarded yet. Not sure...but pretty sure. Seems the headline figure when the deal was announced was a "best case scenario" with the more reliable journalists (ie possessing critical faculties one usually desires in one's choice of reliable journalistic sources) like DD and BM being fed information that has progressively unpacked the original figure. This was DD earlier this month... http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/football/a-league/aleague-hopefuls-have-vowed-to-push-on-despite-ffa-admitting-they-cant-afford-to-expand/news-story/b6bbd930d366179072e845c88ccfce00"It’s understood that the $346 million-dollar, six-year deal that FFA trumpeted in December already incorporates moneys that would be paid for expansion and the Free-to-Air component." Yeh, it has become increasingly clear, bit by bit, slowly does it, that that's the case.
|
|
|
bitza
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Am i right in saying the FTA cpart pf the TV DEAL will not be sorted until the Cricket deal is done? Which was sipposed to be done by now?
If so it is very stupid to make your negotiation dependent on the result pf someone else's.
Not only are we second fiddle, we act like a second fiddle organisation.
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAm i right in saying the FTA cpart pf the TV DEAL will not be sorted until the Cricket deal is done? Which was sipposed to be done by now? If so it is very stupid to make your negotiation dependent on the result pf someone else's. Not only are we second fiddle, we act like a second fiddle organisation. blitza 1. The FFA didn't have a lot of choice in the matter, it's the FTAs who showed the FFA the door. 2. It now transpires that the minimum guarantee Fox gave for the FTA sat night game is already included in the total broadcast deal, i.e. there's only extra money coming from FTA if a broadcaster bids over $3 mill per annum (what Fox has guaranteed). We pretty much already know that TEN will be the ones broadcasting that game, and given there close relationship with Fox, do not expect to see any additional money for the Sat. night game.
|
|
|
Footballer
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAm i right in saying the FTA cpart pf the TV DEAL will not be sorted until the Cricket deal is done? Which was sipposed to be done by now? If so it is very stupid to make your negotiation dependent on the result pf someone else's. Not only are we second fiddle, we act like a second fiddle organisation. blitza 1. The FFA didn't have a lot of choice in the matter, it's the FTAs who showed the FFA the door. 2. It now transpires that the minimum guarantee Fox gave for the FTA sat night game is already included in the total broadcast deal, i.e. there's only extra money coming from FTA if a broadcaster bids over $3 mill per annum (what Fox has guaranteed). We pretty much already know that TEN will be the ones broadcasting that game, and given there close relationship with Fox, do not expect to see any additional money for the Sat. night game. Thats actually right. Foxtel own 15% of Ten. Given Ten are montys to get the FTA rights, there is no chance there 'upping' the bid from Foxtels $3M. We genuinely get the scraps.
|
|
|
Midfielder
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.7K,
Visits: 0
|
I think I could be the odd one out here but if we go to 10 on their primary channel .... I would be over the moon... if we get 3 million that would be a bonus...
We have to prove we can rate ... FFS SBS rate less than Fox most weeks...
I got bored in the rain tonight and went back to TV Tonight every saturday night the A-League has been on this season.
I entered into a spreadsheet what is needed each week to make the top 20, top 15, top 12, top 10 & top 5 audience on Saturday night.
Essentially we need to prove we can draw an audience my guess over 275, 000 per week to ever talk about any serious revenue coming from FTA.
I think we can... as I also tracked on the same nights the ratings on Fox.
To make the top 20 varies between 1.9 and 3.7 times the existing Fox rating .
i.e. last weekend our top rating was 73K to get 275 K is around 3.7. where our best Fox rating of 142 k only needs an uplift of 1.9 times.
My spread sheet shows to make the top 20 we need an average uplift of 2.53 times the Fox ratings.
Two extra variables also impact the thinking.
1] Generally by being on FTA will increase Foxs ratings and being on a commercial should logic says lift Fox ratings ... although how much is a guess.
2} The games would be our best and these actually don't rate to bad.
However no one especially with limited ad breaks is willing to risk a big payout until ratings can be proven....
Herein lies a dilemma .....to achieve the best ratings things needed to be promoted .... so say we still have ten teams and still in argument over future structures with everyone insisting on their right to be heard and the constant slag off on FFA continues ... it cannot help but effect ratings and thus the size of the next media deal or the extra revenue if new teams come in... Conversely if we all keep quite would FFA become slower than they are now.
Its in all our interest to boost the league to help especially the first year ratings ... as ratings = revenue ... I guess at some distance point hopefully not that far away the various stakeholders can determine a way forward and we can start to promote the game ...
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
its more and more starting to appear that this TV deal was an absolute dud for the game. whats the bet ch 10 will shunt the ALeague to one of its secondary channels?
|
|
|
pippinu
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+xits more and more starting to appear that this TV deal was an absolute dud for the game. whats the bet ch 10 will shunt the ALeague to one of its secondary channels? I think we have to expect that that will be the case. Not because it's a poor product, or anything like that, but just the difficulty in selling traditional ad space means it's a bit too risky putting it on the main channel. Having said that, Saturdays are pretty much dead TV time, so it's not completely out of the question that they might take a punt on using their main channel. Ten has been the lowest rating channel for a very long time, so it all just depends on how they view the product, whether they see real growth in it, etc.
|
|
|
TheSelectFew
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 30K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xits more and more starting to appear that this TV deal was an absolute dud for the game. whats the bet ch 10 will shunt the ALeague to one of its secondary channels? I think we have to expect that that will be the case. Not because it's a poor product, or anything like that, but just the difficulty in selling traditional ad space means it's a bit too risky putting it on the main channel. Having said that, Saturdays are pretty much dead TV time, so it's not completely out of the question that they might take a punt on using their main channel. Ten has been the lowest rating channel for a very long time, so it all just depends on how they view the product, whether they see real growth in it, etc. Dont use we mr eggtits.
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xits more and more starting to appear that this TV deal was an absolute dud for the game. whats the bet ch 10 will shunt the ALeague to one of its secondary channels? Ten has been the lowest rating channel for a very long time, so it all just depends on how they view the product, whether they see real growth in it, etc. one positive about ch 10 is that they target a younger demographic, which is perfect for football really.
|
|
|