Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.cricketcountry.com/news/india-vs-australia-2nd-test-r-ashwin-rohit-sharma-ruled-out-of-2nd-test-hanuma-vihari-ravindra-jadeja-in-13-member-squad-777446India has gone full retard and picked two spinners for Perth. Ashwin and Rohit are injured... 1 Vijay 2 Rahul (Shaw still injured) 3 Pujara 4 Kohli 5 Rahane 6 Vihari 5 7 Pant + 8 Jadeja 4 9 Sharma 2 10 Shami 3 11 Bumrah 1 What I would have done? Simple. Swap Jadeja for Kumar and that is the team I would have gone with.
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
Vihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play. With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong.
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half season to demonstrate match fitness. He needs to more than just demonstrate match fitness if he was to get back in the test team. He needs to bowl well and be the best Victorian quick. At the moment Tremain and Bolland are out bowling him. There is no doubting the quality of the old James Pattinson, but can the new James Pattinson show the same quality?
|
|
|
Paddles
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play.With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Dhawan could have been put on a plane from his holiday home in Melbourne and Ind A has a full squad in NZ - trust me - they have more than enough batting options, like oh so many... I agree Kumar should play...
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play.With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Dhawan could have been put on a plane from his holiday home in Melbourne and Ind A has a full squad in NZ - trust me - they have more than enough batting options, like oh so many... I agree Kumar should play... Vihari was selected in the squad ahead of Dhawan and all the others, why would they go outside the squad when they have a player who averages almost 60 in FC available?
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
My prediction is, unless the hype about the pitch ends up to be nonsense, the side who bats first will struggle to get 150, definitely not more than 200. Both sides bowling is stronger than its batting. However I have my doubts a very green pitch is also going to be a very hard fast bouncy pitch. We will see soon enough.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
I heard India were playing four quicks and no spinner. Has that changed?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play. With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Paine is keeping Finch at opener. Is this a big mistake? Boy did Warne lay into Starc in this morning's Tele.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play. With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Paine is keeping Finch at opener. Is this a big mistake? Boy did Warne lay into Starc in this morning's Tele. For the first comment, yes. For the second, Warne needs to do something more constructive, like coaching. He is too opinionated - and negative at times.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play. With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Paine is keeping Finch at opener. Is this a big mistake? Boy did Warne lay into Starc in this morning's Tele. For the first comment, yes. For the second, Warne needs to do something more constructive, like coaching. He is too opinionated - and negative at times. yeah its not very useful and his suggestions aren't any better (his suggestions of on field tactics are first class mind you) so he is just undermining leadership really and being a pest
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xVihari can bowl spin but I think had nothing to do with his selection. He is the only other specialist batsman in the squad with Shaw and Sharna injured, he had to play. With Ashwin injured I do not see how India can possibly justify bringing in Jadeja ahead of Kumar. Kumar surely must play. I suspect if Lyon was injured Australia would play 4 pacemen rather than bringing in Holland. As for reports that Khawaja might open, normally I would not like it. However with only one opener in the squad, Harris, someone has to open who is not really an opener. At least Khawaja has done well there recently and him being there might take some pressure off of Harris and perhaps let him build a score. Still if Khawaja goes in the first over it might just open the door to the team being routed for a small score as there is no other number 3 in the team. Burns really should be playing this test match, the selectors have got this totally wrong. Paine is keeping Finch at opener. Is this a big mistake? Boy did Warne lay into Starc in this morning's Tele. For the first comment, yes. For the second, Warne needs to do something more constructive, like coaching. He is too opinionated - and negative at times. Agree on second point.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
one thing that should be said is this oz team has more fight than any I've seen in a while
did we select subpar players that have a lot of determination? If so thats controversial but defensible
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness. Agree. As much as we could use an enforcer in our attack to replace Starc. Pattinson has to prove to CA that his fragile body can stand up to a season of red ball cricket.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xone thing that should be said is this oz team has more fight than any I've seen in a while did we select subpar players that have a lot of determination? If so thats controversial but defensible I think it is a question of lack of talent in the batting department. Across the Australia there are no stand out replacements for the Test batters we have. The players are doing the best they can, but in the age bracket of 27- 35, we have a paucity of batting talent. I think this is becoming more applicable to all sports in western countries. Most kids' major passions are video games, phones, computers. 10 years ago visiting Dutch coaches in football were talking about it being an issue throughout Western Europe.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xone thing that should be said is this oz team has more fight than any I've seen in a while did we select subpar players that have a lot of determination? If so thats controversial but defensible Determination is good. Capitulation is bad. I would prefer a no frills player that values his wicket than a showy one that does not.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xone thing that should be said is this oz team has more fight than any I've seen in a while did we select subpar players that have a lot of determination? If so thats controversial but defensible Determination is good. Capitulation is bad. I would prefer a no frills player that values his wicket than a showy one that does not. yeah we could have players who average low 40s which would be talented enough to win at home and fail away this mob I think can struggle at home and away because of their determination
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness. Agree. As much as we could use an enforcer in our attack to replace Starc. Pattinson has to prove to CA that his fragile body can stand up to a season of red ball cricket. When Cummins was bowling shorter spells in Asia, he was a terrific enforcer. He had a smaller workload, because the spinners bowled so much. I think his action takes too much out of him to sustain his pace over sustained games, and within a game as his workload increases.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xone thing that should be said is this oz team has more fight than any I've seen in a while did we select subpar players that have a lot of determination? If so thats controversial but defensible I think it is a question of lack of talent in the batting department. The players are doing the best they can, but in the age bracket of 27- 35, we have a paucity of batting talent. I think this is becoming more applicable to all sports in western countries. Most kids' major passions are video games, phones, computers. 10 years ago visiting Dutch coaches in football were talking about it being an issue throughout Western Europe. Sadly I think you have the problem nutted DC. Another is money. Elite sports people are paid too much so lose respect for their sport. Take our bratty tennis players, Krygios and Tomic. They are an embarrassment with their displays of un Australian conduct. Our rugby league players are not much better.. In recent years many have been associated with unsavory off field behaviour. Dragons champion forward Jack de Belin is the latest r/l player to be arrested for indecent off field conduct. JDB has vehemently dnied the charges. This hurts as I am a long time Dragons supporter. Even if he is acquitted..mud sticks. So he has likely killed any chance he had of being a Kangaroo.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness. Agree. As much as we could use an enforcer in our attack to replace Starc. Pattinson has to prove to CA that his fragile body can stand up to a season of red ball cricket. When Cummins was bowling shorter spells in Asia, he was a terrific enforcer. He had a smaller workload, because the spinners bowled so much. I think his action takes too much out of him to sustain his pace over sustained games, and within a game as his workload increases. You have it spot on DC. If we had a more frugal second bowler.. Cummo could be unleashed. But with Starc in poor form we do not have that liberty.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness. Agree. As much as we could use an enforcer in our attack to replace Starc. Pattinson has to prove to CA that his fragile body can stand up to a season of red ball cricket. When Cummins was bowling shorter spells in Asia, he was a terrific enforcer. He had a smaller workload, because the spinners bowled so much. I think his action takes too much out of him to sustain his pace over sustained games, and within a game as his workload increases. You have it spot on DC. If we had a more frugal second bowler.. Cummo could be unleashed. But with Starc in poor form we do not have that liberty. DC you were talking about mods. I have repeatedly asked why my old username is still being used in posts. To no avail.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x Look at this "green monster". Lot of moisture under the surface me thinks. Will be litening quick..should suit our faster men more. Pity tho Oz do not have a specialist swing bowler in our attack. Why will it suit your faster men more? The ball will bounce and skid more. As we have the quickest attack that will benefit us. Oh - that 1km/h - yeah..... nah. Not based on the last test its not. If that grass grips, Sharma and Bumrah are going to be asking some questions... Australia has to outbowl India this time. Or start dropping people... So are Haze and Cummins. Cummo will be quicker. Starc needs to lift his game. Cummins is a back of a length bowler who sometimes gets some outswing. I don't see him trying to seam it around tbh. And I don't see him bowling any faster this week neither... Starc is facing the axe... It is that simple... Then with one enforcer sadly out of form and Cummins no longer express we are in the poo. Pattinson could play the enforcer role. But where is he? Pattinson just played for Vic... And he is a fine bowler, when fit. I rate him highly. Good pace, lovely outswing, nice in seam - seems a complete enough bowler to me to be a star cricketer. Pattinson needs half a season to demonstrate match fitness. Agree. As much as we could use an enforcer in our attack to replace Starc. Pattinson has to prove to CA that his fragile body can stand up to a season of red ball cricket. When Cummins was bowling shorter spells in Asia, he was a terrific enforcer. He had a smaller workload, because the spinners bowled so much. I think his action takes too much out of him to sustain his pace over sustained games, and within a game as his workload increases. You have it spot on DC. If we had a more frugal second bowler.. Cummo could be unleashed. But with Starc in poor form we do not have that liberty. DC you were talking about mods. I have repeatedly asked why my old username is still being used in posts. To no avail. One has said he is about to post here starting from yesterday, and, look into the appointment of another specific new mod who already posts here. Post this in the mod thread I've started, Baggers.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Jadeja has yet to play a test in Oz. That is a surprise.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x Jadeja has yet to play a test in Oz. That is a surprise. its a different art to spinning in the sub continent. He could do well or go for many
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
There is one salient point that has been overlooked. Australia is going into this Perth Test with one clear disadvantage as the series host. That being we lose our home ground advantage as this is the debut Test for the new stadium.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThere is one salient point that has been overlooked. Australia is going into this Perth Test with one clear disadvantage as the series host. That being they lose their home ground advantage as this is the debut Test for the new stadium. Dont we tragics just love waiting half the day to watch a cricket match from the other side of our massive continent. Sure we do.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x Jadeja has yet to play a test in Oz. That is a surprise. its a different art to spinning in the sub continent. He could do well or go for many Ashwin said he has studied Lyon's bowling in Australia in order to improve his poor figures when he has toured here before. I also read Lyon suggested he had to learn to back spin the ball more like the Asian spinners, on Asian surfaces.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x Jadeja has yet to play a test in Oz. That is a surprise. its a different art to spinning in the sub continent. He could do well or go for many Ashwin said he has studied Lyon's bowling in Australia in order to improve his poor figures when he has toured here before. I also read Lyon suggested he had to learn to back spin the ball more like the Asian spinners, on Asian surfaces. Jadeja is such a small turner of the ball I wonder how much he can adapt. We'll find out i guess
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
So the ideal scenario is Timmy calls correctly and unleashes our pace cartel on the Indians on this green monster.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSo the ideal scenario is Timmy calls correctly and unleashes our pace cartel on the Indians on this green monster. over the last few years batting first even on tough wickets has been a huge statistical advantage
|
|
|