|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
Finally Hazlewood replaced with Starc, I just hope they don't take Cummins off and bowl Hazlewood from that end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
OMG they did. STROKE, STROKE,STROKE, it's no longer funny, 1st ball 4
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
Almost a wicket, NOPE 4, 12 runs to Kholi off that Hazlewood over
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xFinally the least experienced player finally gets another wicket with good aggressive bowling. He has looked the most likely.. a huge turn around from his last test. Will this spur Cummo back to being an express bowler. If he was injured Baggers for the first 2 tests I'd say he's over it now. But it doesn't excuse playing a non 100% player. Would that edge have carried to a second slip? Coms seem to think it may have.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xFinally the least experienced player finally gets another wicket with good aggressive bowling. He has looked the most likely.. a huge turn around from his last test. Will this spur Cummo back to being an express bowler. If he was injured Baggers for the first 2 tests I'd say he's over it now. But it doesn't excuse playing a non 100% player. Would that edge have carried to a second slip? Coms seem to think it may have. You come on just to rubbish H/Wood?
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
Baggers I don't need to rubbish Hazlewood he does it by himself. I'm just pointing it out, real live transmission. You know you're rubbish when M Marsh comes on to replace you.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBut credit to Mayank Agarwal in his debut test showing up a very innocuous bowling attack. Surely this has to be a message to those concerned, that they have the Australian bowling order wrong and Cummins has to be given the new ball. I cannot believe Lyons in the 1st session of the 1st day of a test is bowling before Cummins. Starc and Hazlewood wasted the new ball and Cummins never gets the opportunity with a harder ball and proud seam. And Baggers you wonder why I am frustrated with Hazlewood. Surely you agree. Hazlewood did his job as opener in first two tests. Where were your biast comments then Mike ? Not often I concur with you but yes Cummins new found pace has to be utilised with the new ball. If the ball is not swinging.. Starc is all but useless.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBut credit to Mayank Agarwal in his debut test showing up a very innocuous bowling attack. Surely this has to be a message to those concerned, that they have the Australian bowling order wrong and Cummins has to be given the new ball. I cannot believe Lyons in the 1st session of the 1st day of a test is bowling before Cummins. Starc and Hazlewood wasted the new ball and Cummins never gets the opportunity with a harder ball and proud seam. And Baggers you wonder why I am frustrated with Hazlewood. Surely you agree. Hazlewood did his job as opener in first two tests. Where were your biast comments then Mike ? Not often I concur with you but yes Cummins new found pace has to be utilised with the new ball. If the ball is not swinging.. Starc is all but useless. Blokes with the pace to bang in the ball will profit on this deck. I can see Bumrah doing a similar job to Cummins.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
ideally we would like to break this partnership before the second new ball
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xBut credit to Mayank Agarwal in his debut test showing up a very innocuous bowling attack. Surely this has to be a message to those concerned, that they have the Australian bowling order wrong and Cummins has to be given the new ball. I cannot believe Lyons in the 1st session of the 1st day of a test is bowling before Cummins. Starc and Hazlewood wasted the new ball and Cummins never gets the opportunity with a harder ball and proud seam. And Baggers you wonder why I am frustrated with Hazlewood. Surely you agree. Hazlewood did his job as opener in first two tests. Where were your biast comments then Mike ? Not often I concur with you but yes Cummins new found pace has to be utilised with the new ball. If the ball is not swinging.. Starc is all but useless. Blokes with the pace to bang in the ball will profit on this deck. I can see Bumrah doing a similar job to Cummins. Kohli edges another and again falls safely.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
marsh surprisingly useful with the ball so far
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xBut credit to Mayank Agarwal in his debut test showing up a very innocuous bowling attack. Surely this has to be a message to those concerned, that they have the Australian bowling order wrong and Cummins has to be given the new ball. I cannot believe Lyons in the 1st session of the 1st day of a test is bowling before Cummins. Starc and Hazlewood wasted the new ball and Cummins never gets the opportunity with a harder ball and proud seam. And Baggers you wonder why I am frustrated with Hazlewood. Surely you agree. Hazlewood did his job as opener in first two tests. Where were your biast comments then Mike ? Not often I concur with you but yes Cummins new found pace has to be utilised with the new ball. If the ball is not swinging.. Starc is all but useless. Just for you Baggers here is the list of leading wicket takers for 2018 http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/records/bowling/most_wickets_career.html?class=1;id=2018;type=yearNote the average and his position, his strike rate etc, etc, etc. Am I reading this right only 23 wickets this year? And he gets paid over a million dollars to do that? I don't see you pointing this out during your pro Josh "Glow-worm" Hazlewood campaign, but I won't lower myself to call you bias. That's just insulting. And yes I do know Chris Tremain is born in Dubbo NSW, a very nice place to visit, ever been to the zoo there?
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
hazelwood way out of form lately. You need that line and length bowler to succeed
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
I wouldn't mind a rotation policy when it comes to fast bowlers. It makes sense given our depth and the workload on bowlers
would also give an excuse to try new bowlers
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+xI wouldn't mind a rotation policy when it comes to fast bowlers. It makes sense given our depth and the workload on bowlers would also give an excuse to try new bowlers Finally I've met someone that speaks common sense, TRY NEW BOWLERS, Cheers Grazor.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xBut credit to Mayank Agarwal in his debut test showing up a very innocuous bowling attack. Surely this has to be a message to those concerned, that they have the Australian bowling order wrong and Cummins has to be given the new ball. I cannot believe Lyons in the 1st session of the 1st day of a test is bowling before Cummins. Starc and Hazlewood wasted the new ball and Cummins never gets the opportunity with a harder ball and proud seam. And Baggers you wonder why I am frustrated with Hazlewood. Surely you agree. Hazlewood did his job as opener in first two tests. Where were your biast comments then Mike ? Not often I concur with you but yes Cummins new found pace has to be utilised with the new ball. If the ball is not swinging.. Starc is all but useless. Blokes with the pace to bang in the ball will profit on this deck. I can see Bumrah doing a similar job to Cummins. Kohli edges another and again falls safely. Pujara is rock like once he gets in. Can see why the quicks say he is the big Indian wicket.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI wouldn't mind a rotation policy when it comes to fast bowlers. It makes sense given our depth and the workload on bowlers would also give an excuse to try new bowlers I like that idea. The incumbent quicks wont.. but it makes sense.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
marsh getting a touch of reverse here
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI wouldn't mind a rotation policy when it comes to fast bowlers. It makes sense given our depth and the workload on bowlers would also give an excuse to try new bowlers I like that idea. The incumbent quicks wont.. but it makes sense. Marsh has been very tidy. He is an under rated bowler in my view.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI wouldn't mind a rotation policy when it comes to fast bowlers. It makes sense given our depth and the workload on bowlers would also give an excuse to try new bowlers I like that idea. The incumbent quicks wont.. but it makes sense. Marsh has been very tidy. He is an under rated bowler in my view. One more before stumps boys.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
weird review
were they claiming he wasn't offering a shot?
|
|
|
|
|
MikeR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 478,
Visits: 0
|
+xweird review were they claiming he wasn't offering a shot? They're desperate now.
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
the quick ball shoulder height has been a lot more effective today than head height for some reason
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
lyon bowling too fast now
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
surprisingly good shape from Hazelwood
can he get the line right
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
hazelwood used to get quite a bit of movement but transformed into a mcgrath type line and length bowler
|
|
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
wasting the new ball here
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
No new ball, very strange decision, questioning Paine's captaincy here.
|
|
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xNo new ball, very strange decision, questioning Paine's captaincy here. New ball swung for first two overs. Two gazzundas from a new ball.. What a bloody joke of a track.
|
|
|
|
|
Test_Fan
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xNo new ball, very strange decision, questioning Paine's captaincy here. New ball swung for first two overs. Two gazzundas from a new ball.. What a bloody joke of a track. Yeah, not good. Something went wrong with this pitch.
|
|
|
|