BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xYou beauty Siddle! The dangerous Bairstow caught by Warner in slip! ATM if anyone is dropped for Lords it should be Patto. Pattinson has been disappointing. So has Cummins. Hazlewood back for Lords. You are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! From what I have seen here of Patto and Cummins.. feel Haze and Siddle partnership wudda done better. Yes Cummins has improved.. but his poor day yesterday helped the Pommies to parity with us.
|
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xLyons is also worrying Ali as he clean bowls another left hander! Two wickets in an over for GOAT. It looked like a top spinner. How do finger spinners bowl straight balls? Grazor? Paddles, you must be mad mooting the dropping of Lyon! Paddles you have a ally. Who? Not me! Me. You must be joking to suggest dropping GOAT, Baggers!
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xLyons is also worrying Ali as he clean bowls another left hander! Two wickets in an over for GOAT. It looked like a top spinner. How do finger spinners bowl straight balls? Grazor? Paddles, you must be mad mooting the dropping of Lyon! Paddles you have a ally. Who? Not me! Me. You must be joking to suggest dropping GOAT, Baggers! Not so much dropping him..rather use him in a horses for courses manner. Paddles has a point. Lyon leaked runs and let off pressure yesterday when introduced too early because we went into this game one bowler short.
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
Broad is going well for a number 10.
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xLyons is also worrying Ali as he clean bowls another left hander! Two wickets in an over for GOAT. It looked like a top spinner. How do finger spinners bowl straight balls? Grazor? Paddles, you must be mad mooting the dropping of Lyon! Paddles you have a ally. Who? Not me! Me. You must be joking to suggest dropping GOAT, Baggers! Not so much dropping him..rather use him for horses for courses manner. Paddles has a point. Lyon leaked runs and let off pressure yesterday when introduced too early because we went into this game one bowler short. Lyon has been very good today and had plenty of good moments yesterday. He only conceded just over 2 per over as well yesterday.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Lyon is all over Woakes.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
You are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers!
Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho..
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xLyons is also worrying Ali as he clean bowls another left hander! Two wickets in an over for GOAT. It looked like a top spinner. How do finger spinners bowl straight balls? Grazor? Paddles, you must be mad mooting the dropping of Lyon! Paddles you have a ally. Who? Not me! Me. You must be joking to suggest dropping GOAT, Baggers! Not so much dropping him..rather use him for horses for courses manner. Paddles has a point. Lyon leaked runs and let off pressure yesterday when introduced too early because we went into this game one bowler short. Lyon has been very good today and had plenty of good moments yesterday. He only conceded just over 2 per over as well yesterday. Lyon always looks good when he has ruff to assist him. He leaked early runs yesterday. Check the commentary. Went for a boundary almost off his first 5/6 overs. I dont altogether blame him as he was forced to bowl with a newish ball as we lack a fourth paceman in this game.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho.. In cricket we have stats. Why fo you think H struggled to take wickets in the last 12 months of Tests.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Will anderson bat? I think a 50 run lead puts australia slightly back in front
We're in a good position considering some rotten luck (to be fair that luck is balanced by andersons injury)
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho.. In cricket we have stats. Why fo you think H struggled to take wickets in the last 12 months of Tests. Dunno to be honest. Looked to be bowling the same pressure building stuff he has always bowled. Just a lack of wickets phase his career is having?
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
yesterday lyon was bowling hand granades without luck
a paradox of his career is he has not taken as many wickets as you would expect when conditions are favorable yet often finds a way in tough conditions
O'keefe by contrast is a bit like jadeja. Looks innocuous but takes wickets!
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho.. Actually, H may be quicker than Patto over an entire Test at this point in time.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xWill anderson bat? I think a 50 run lead puts australia slightly back in front We're in a good position considering some rotten luck (to be fair that luck is balanced by andersons injury) Max 75 lead grazor otherwise we are behind the 8 ball. Thankfully they dont have a class spinner as this deck is turning and it is only the second day. Hope also Anderson is not fit to bowl.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xYou are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho.. Actually, H may be quicker than Patto over an entire Test at this point in time. Pace is not everything. Hazlewood does not need pace to take wickets.. he needs guile and skill and luck.. specialist seamers need luck as they dont always get the conditions that best suit them.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+xyesterday lyon was bowling hand granades without luck
I thought so too when I was watching.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xyesterday lyon was bowling hand granades without luck a paradox of his career is he has not taken as many wickets as you would expect when conditions are favorable yet often finds a way in tough conditions O'keefe by contrast is a bit like jadeja. Looks innocuous but takes wickets! I rate Jadeja over O'Keefe.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYou are a fan boy of Hazlewood, Baggers! Yes I am DC. I happen to think that a specialist seamer is more skilful than a tearaway. He has to put the ball on a handkerchief and not just let rip which requires brawn not brain. Despite Haze's drop in wicket taking form.. he remains the best seamer in the country imho.. Most of the posters on WP agree with me.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Ok can we win it from here? 50/50.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xWill anderson bat? I think a 50 run lead puts australia slightly back in front We're in a good position considering some rotten luck (to be fair that luck is balanced by andersons injury) Max 75 lead grazor otherwise we are behind the 8 ball. Thankfully they dont have a class spinner as this deck is turning and it is only the second day. Hope also Anderson is not fit to bowl. I’d prefer to see a victory with England having all players being fully fit.
|
|
|
Keyboard Warrior
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 885,
Visits: 0
|
+xOk can we win it from here? 50/50. We need to take the next 2 wickets quickly.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Sangakarra just released a stat that stated Lyon has beaten the bat over 30 times.
How does Broad manage to keep sweeping him from wide of off stump to leg?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSangakarra just released a stat that stated Lyon has beaten the bat over 30 times. How does Broad manage to keep sweeping him from wide of off stump to leg? He is getting good assistance from the ruff. Some of those plays and misses may have been negated with some smart footwork too.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xOk can we win it from here? 50/50. We need to take the next 2 wickets quickly. 52 lead. Pattinson needs to rip out these last two soon.
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xOk can we win it from here? 50/50. We need to take the next 2 wickets quickly. 52 lead. Pattinson needs to rip out these last two soon. Anyone needs to get them!
|
|
|
Decentric
|
|
Group: Awaiting Activation
Posts: 22K,
Visits: 0
|
Why the lack of short balls?
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xOk can we win it from here? 50/50. We need to take the next 2 wickets quickly. 52 lead. Pattinson needs to rip out these last two soon. Times like this we miss Starc.. the best tail remover in the business.
|
|
|
BaggyGreens
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xOk can we win it from here? 50/50. We need to take the next 2 wickets quickly. 52 lead. Pattinson needs to rip out these last two soon. Anyone needs to get them! Patto needs to do something to warrant reselection for Lords.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
lead getting a little more dangerous here
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
bit of a disaster this session you have to say
we havent looked likely
|
|
|