Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAlthough there is plenty of time for that number to catch up it's a bit of a concern considering the positives that should be helping. In addition to WU being introduced, I'm surprised WSW members don't seem to be returning in solid numbers considering they have a fantastic new stadium. Most clubs seem to be keeping the numbers to themselves but if we take that 45,128 and minus the numbers we know (MV 17,778, PG 5,984, MC 4,500) we get 16,866. If we average that between the remaining 8 clubs we get an average of 2,108 per club. Not great. One thing to note about the Independent HAL is that it hasn't been completely finalised yet. The clubs still do not officially own their IP. Once that happens I reckon will see new marketing campaigns from all of the clubs. Especially when it comes to merch sales. I understand that Wanderers had over 13,000 auto renewals so I doubt that the 45,18 is up to date. I think clubs are majoring on marketing and building memberships rather than reporting numbers.
|
|
|
|
sirhcdobo
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 666,
Visits: 0
|
+xAlthough there is plenty of time for that number to catch up it's a bit of a concern considering the positives that should be helping. In addition to WU being introduced, I'm surprised WSW members don't seem to be returning in solid numbers considering they have a fantastic new stadium. Most clubs seem to be keeping the numbers to themselves but if we take that 45,128 and minus the numbers we know (MV 17,778, PG 5,984, MC 4,500) we get 16,866. If we average that between the remaining 8 clubs we get an average of 2,108 per club. Not great. One thing to note about the Independent HAL is that it hasn't been completely finalised yet. The clubs still do not officially own their IP. Once that happens I reckon will see new marketing campaigns from all of the clubs. Especially when it comes to merch sales. not sure if the numbers are completely accurate or being updated regularly. apparently the roar are tracking at similar numbers as last year. I think i have heard they are around the 5-6k mark at the moment. that would leave 10k for NJ, SFC, WSW, CCM, NIX, ADL and WU. there is no way that SFC is running below the roar, WSW should be about the same as the roar if not more, ADL i would guess is around MC same with NJ. Nix, WU and CCM i would guess around 2k each (though WU only just opened up memberships).
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
So where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another source?
|
|
|
AJF
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.7K,
Visits: 2
|
+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs).
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
I would expect Roar to crack 15,000 members easily this year - not because of any improvement in the team or better marketing but because of Redcliffe.
Theyll likely get their 6k full season members again and another 6k of the 3/5 game memberships at Suncorp.
Then the three games at Redcliffe will give them another 4-5k in 3 game memberships
|
|
|
nomates
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Expecting Nix's to hit 5 to 6k this year. I think we will get more once the league becomes fully independent so the confidence will be there.
Wellington Phoenix FC
|
|
|
Footballismyreligion
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16,
Visits: 0
|
+xExpecting Nix's to hit 5 to 6k this year. I think we will get more once the league becomes fully independent so the confidence will be there. Hey Nomates, Surely there a 10,000 to 15,000 rectangular stadium in or around Auckland that the Nix could play out of? The cake tin has no atmosphere.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members?
|
|
|
nomates
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xExpecting Nix's to hit 5 to 6k this year. I think we will get more once the league becomes fully independent so the confidence will be there. Hey Nomates, Surely there a 10,000 to 15,000 rectangular stadium in or around Auckland that the Nix could play out of? The cake tin has no atmosphere. Best thing to do is build our own stadium near Wellington, Auckland can have there own team and play where ever they like.
Wellington Phoenix FC
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much
|
|
|
nomates
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 5.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much Are they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general.
Wellington Phoenix FC
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAre they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general. well the AFL pass 1 million every year, so what do you think?
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much Are they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general. Hard to say. I think they’re too low personally Roar should be 20k members by now, not 15k, as should 3 other clubs and Victory should be cracking 30k (although it’s hard to criticise their numbers). The bottom line is attendance is the number number that matters
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much Are they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general. Hard to say. I think they’re too low personally Roar should be 20k members by now, not 15k, as should 3 other clubs and Victory should be cracking 30k (although it’s hard to criticise their numbers). The bottom line is attendance is the number number that matters i think victory have trouble hitting 30k due to the number of seats at aami park or something
|
|
|
scott20won
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much Are they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general. Hard to say. I think they’re too low personally Roar should be 20k members by now, not 15k, as should 3 other clubs and Victory should be cracking 30k (although it’s hard to criticise their numbers). The bottom line is attendance is the number number that matters ”The bottom line is attendance is the number number that matters” Said the accountant never
|
|
|
jacksone10
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 199,
Visits: 0
|
+xI would expect Roar to crack 15,000 members easily this year - not because of any improvement in the team or better marketing but because of Redcliffe. Theyll likely get their 6k full season members again and another 6k of the 3/5 game memberships at Suncorp. Then the three games at Redcliffe will give them another 4-5k in 3 game memberships That many really? I'd be very impressed and amazed with 15k..
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xSo where do this years numbers come from? The A League website isn’t updating so is there another sousource? @Waz, thats the official HAL website, same as has been used in previous seasons. Cant blame FFA for this one, perhaps new Independent HAL should add this to their list of thought bubbles. When I checked the HAL site it was blank for all the clubs but just double checked after your post and saw the top has 45k even though the individual club entries are blank. So until the the individual club numbers open up we don’t know if we’re comparing apples to apples or not. 45k for all clubs would be a disaster. 45k for 2-3 clubs would be on par with last years finish (basically that looks like the auto renewals for Vuck, the drive-bys and the Smurfs). Don't we crack 100-120k each year in members? Pretty much Are they good numbers? compared to other codes or just football in general. Hard to say. I think they’re too low personally Roar should be 20k members by now, not 15k, as should 3 other clubs and Victory should be cracking 30k (although it’s hard to criticise their numbers). The bottom line is attendance is the number number that matters i think victory have trouble hitting 30k due to the number of seats at aami park or something Pretty much. AAMI holds 30,500. Then you need to look at how the stadium is zoned for MV: - 17 x General Admin Bays.
- 16 x C Bays (including 6 active bays and 1 dry bay).
- 12 x B Bays.
- 18 x A Bays.
- 1 x Away Bay.
In order to get close to that 30k they would need to either attract more people willing to shell out for the A memberships or re-zone it so there is more B & C bays. Realistically, that 25-27k number is about all they can achieve without moving back to Marvel for all games. But nobody wants that.
|
|
|
jacksone10
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 199,
Visits: 0
|
I think 45k total supplied from FFA is a very old figure and may possibly not include all the clubs numbers. My guess is around 60-70k currently.
|
|
|
TheRealFootballSupporter
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 351,
Visits: 0
|
Victory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals?
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Jets 11,634
|
|
|
ErogenousZone
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Melbourne has a strong membership culture, always have & it puts into stark relief Melbourne City's failure to engage the community.
|
|
|
marconi101
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Jets 11,634 That seems too good to be true with so much time left.
He was a man of specific quirks. He believed that all meals should be earned through physical effort. He also contended, zealously like a drunk with a political point, that the third dimension would not be possible if it werent for the existence of water.
|
|
|
someguyjc
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Jets 11,634 That seems too good to be true with so much time left. They do have the by far the cheapest memberships in the league. It wasn't all that long ago that they consistently had the second highest membership numbers in the league. If it wasn't for their owner getting Trumped, they would be in a very strong position right now.
|
|
|
Waz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Jets 11,634 That seems too good to be true with so much time left. Can’t argue with your thought process. That numbers the one up on the website though.
|
|
|
Feed_The_Brox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+xi think victory have trouble hitting 30k due to the number of seats at aami park or something i don't think its that. Its more about the downturn of the league in recent years. our numbers haven't dropped like most teams, but has clearly plateaued. I think the club could do a bit better with initiatives to grow memberships as well. But I guess all clubs can improve in this area.
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.3K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
evolution
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 384,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xVictory up to 18,270. Any other clubs with current visible totals? Jets 11,634 That seems too good to be true with so much time left. Pretty positive that was our 18/19 season final tally, not a snowflakes chance in hell that is for this coming season.
|
|
|
jacksone10
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 199,
Visits: 0
|
Perth at 5984
|
|
|
Gyfox
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Figures at 25 August 2018. ADL=== 3, 530 ROA=== 6, 044 MAR=== 2, 919 MEC=== 6, 477 MEV=== 18, 990 JETs=== 6, 309 PhG=== 5, 100 SFC=== 8, 566 NIX=== 1, 651 WSW=== 14, 730 Total – 74, 316
Membership totals have been updated on the A-League website. 26 August 2019
Adelaide 3,175 Brisbane 6,806 Central Coast 2,262 Melbourne City 5,413 Melbourne Victory 17,778 Newcastle Jets 6,567 Perth Glory 5,901 Sydney FC 7,939 Wellington Phoenix 1,854 Western Sydney 12,639 Western United 1,044 TOTAL 71,378
|
|
|