Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xJust listened to a bunch of Trump supporters swearing black and blue that votes are being printed off, votes are being burnt, votes are being thrown away. 'I know it, nobody can tell me it's not happening'. They are fucked in the head. In Arizona they're chanting 'count the vote'. In Pennsylvania they're chanting 'stop the vote'. Yup, the South will live on, a nation divided. -PB The nation was divided already. Trump just courted the right wing kkk vote .and the whole world saw how divided and broken the us is. Sadly the rural white people who voted for him because latinos are taking their jobs are the ones who have suffered under the republicans the most
|
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xJust switched over to see what Tucker Carlson was saying about the election. You've really gotta be in another world not to see the coercion in his rhetoric. There's a great story about Tucker getting sued for something he said. Their defence, and this is not a joke, was anything said by him shouldn't be taken seriously. Alex Jones used that one too and he lost
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
I'm just waiting to see the #obeseturtle hashtag to trend
Anderson Cooper's response to the Trump press conference. "That is the president of the United States. That is the most powerful person in the world. We see him like an obese turtle on his back flailing in the hot sun, realizing his time is over."
|
|
|
Carlito
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI'm just waiting to see the #obeseturtle hashtag to trend Anderson Cooper's response to the Trump press conference. "That is the president of the United States. That is the most powerful person in the world. We see him like an obese turtle on his back flailing in the hot sun, realizing his time is over." Zing . Him and his supporters don't care . Why do they want to see their country burn
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
PBS Newshour on now on SBS (also free accessible on YouTube). Imo, some of the best and most balanced coverage there is Stateside. Although, in Australia some of the expert commentators on the ABC are right up there.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+xPBS Newshour on now on SBS (also free accessible on YouTube). Imo, some of the best and most balanced coverage there is Stateside. Although, in Australia some of the expert commentators on the ABC are right up there. Channel 9 in Oz have been excellent. Peter Overton is hosting with another bloke whose name escapes me. They have correspondents all over the US. When you think the media and journalism is getting worse it's been good to see all of this coverage which I'd say (not Rusty though) is fairly balanced. Can't believe I'm going to say this but Fox News's election coverage and analysis has been excellent.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Bets on when the first mass shooting occurs at a counting station? That Trump presser was off the hook. He is fried.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
mcjules
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 8.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America. Yeah I don't think they'll do that. There's clearly elements of this strategy that worked but it looks like he might have lost the more moderate republicans. Expect the next Trump to follow the same strategies but just tone down the more outrageous aspects a little.
Insert Gertjan Verbeek gifs here
|
|
|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xTrump to run as an independent next election? Actually not as silly as it sounds. Fox will support the Republicans so he will have to start Trump TV. He'll always have info wars Alex Jones could even be his running mate.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Can anyone explain why Trump went nuts when Fox called Arizona? Calling it just means you think it's over it's not actually official so what's the deal. Apparently they rang Rupert and Fox directly to try and get them to retract it. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/us/politics/trump-fox-news-arizona.htmlMr. Trump and his advisers erupted at the news. If it was true that Arizona was lost, it would call into doubt on any claim of victory the president might be able to make. What ensued for Mr. Trump was a night of angry calls to Republican governors and advice from campaign aides that he ignored, leading to a middle-of-the-night presidential briefing in which he made a reckless and unsubstantiated string of remarks about the democratic process. Standing in the East Room at 2:30 a.m., he dismissed the election as a “fraud” and claimed he wanted to stop the counting of votes and leave the results to the Supreme Court.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xCan anyone explain why Trump went nuts when Fox called Arizona? Calling it just means you think it's over it's not actually official so what's the deal. Apparently they rang Rupert and Fox directly to try and get them to retract it. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/04/us/politics/trump-fox-news-arizona.htmlMr. Trump and his advisers erupted at the news. If it was true that Arizona was lost, it would call into doubt on any claim of victory the president might be able to make. What ensued for Mr. Trump was a night of angry calls to Republican governors and advice from campaign aides that he ignored, leading to a middle-of-the-night presidential briefing in which he made a reckless and unsubstantiated string of remarks about the democratic process. Standing in the East Room at 2:30 a.m., he dismissed the election as a “fraud” and claimed he wanted to stop the counting of votes and leave the results to the Supreme Court. Clutching at straws?
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America. Yeah I don't think they'll do that. There's clearly elements of this strategy that worked but it looks like he might have lost the more moderate republicans. Expect the next Trump to follow the same strategies but just tone down the more outrageous aspects a little. I fear that the next Republican candidate may be Tom Cotton. He’s potentially far more dangerous than Trump. Perhaps not as charismatic, in Trump’s unique way, but Cotton would appeal to a lot of hardcore republicans. Ideologically, he’s basically super conservative (he’d be a big shift away from the John McCain type of Republican). But unlike Trump, Cotton has genuine longterm potential. He is way smarter than Trump. He’s probably about as intelligent as some of the brighter Democrats, just a lot less compassionate as an individual (not that all Republicans lack compassion, McCain had it in spades). Cotton would come with the Ivy League education, the intellectual acumen, political ruthlessness. He’s also a war vet and could probably get lots of military support. If Trump fans (and even non-Trump fans) feel disillusioned by the Democrats and even politics in the US, Cotton would offer them a far more robust alternative than Trump has offered (the only probable thing lacking being Trump’s unpredictability which has kinda been oddly helpful in some of his foreign policy ventures). I consider this to be horrifying. And it only highlights how stupid the Democrats would be to nominate a candidate such as Michelle Obama, almost entirely on the basis of symbolism (first woman of colour as POTUS). Many voters would be hugely unimpressed by that kind of symbolism purely for the sake of symbolism rather than merit). It’d be regarded as basically the embodiment of quota culture (except for the highest office in the US). An opponent with genuine accomplishments (albeit a nasty, ultra conservative) would manage to siphon off huge amounts of votes from a purely symbolic Democrat.
|
|
|
quickflick
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI can't understand how they can count millions in one day and yet it takes 2 or 3 days to count a million. Different rules in different states (it’s a federation, and I think that’s reasonable). Aside from that, PBS NewsHour suggested that it depends on the capacity and efficiency of the processing centres. Understandably, they vary a great deal. And then in-person vs mail-in ballots. The latter take far longer to count. They have to verify extra things.
|
|
|
patjennings
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 6.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America. Yeah I don't think they'll do that. There's clearly elements of this strategy that worked but it looks like he might have lost the more moderate republicans. Expect the next Trump to follow the same strategies but just tone down the more outrageous aspects a little. I fear that the next Republican candidate may be Tom Cotton. He’s potentially far more dangerous than Trump. Perhaps not as charismatic, in Trump’s unique way, but Cotton would appeal to a lot of hardcore republicans. Ideologically, he’s basically super conservative (he’d be a big shift away from the John McCain type of Republican). But unlike Trump, Cotton has genuine longterm potential. He is way smarter than Trump. He’s probably about as intelligent as some of the brighter Democrats, just a lot less compassionate as an individual (not that all Republicans lack compassion, McCain had it in spades). Cotton would come with the Ivy League education, the intellectual acumen, political ruthlessness. He’s also a war vet and could probably get lots of military support. If Trump fans (and even non-Trump fans) feel disillusioned by the Democrats and even politics in the US, Cotton would offer them a far more robust alternative than Trump has offered (the only probable thing lacking being Trump’s unpredictability which has kinda been oddly helpful in some of his foreign policy ventures). I consider this to be horrifying. And it only highlights how stupid the Democrats would be to nominate a candidate such as Michelle Obama, almost entirely on the basis of symbolism (first woman of colour as POTUS). Many voters would be hugely unimpressed by that kind of symbolism purely for the sake of symbolism rather than merit). It’d be regarded as basically the embodiment of quota culture (except for the highest office in the US). An opponent with genuine accomplishments (albeit a nasty, ultra conservative) would manage to siphon off huge amounts of votes from a purely symbolic Democrat. He would be a very impressive candidate. The problem for the dems is that they are to use a John Howard term a 'broad church' There is the louder progressive one-third that deliver huge votes in liberal states and there there are the much more quieter traditional two-thirds of the party that will deliver the tight victories in Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Finding a candidate that caters for both parts of their constituency is incredibly difficult. This will be the challenge for Biden. How to blend policies that appeal to his own constituents while trying to also appeal to the more moderate republicans.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America. Fair enough. Agree that Trumpism is here to stay.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xI can't understand how they can count millions in one day and yet it takes 2 or 3 days to count a million. Different rules in different states (it’s a federation, and I think that’s reasonable). 100%. The intent was very much for the states to choose the President and hence each state is entitled to their own method.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xI can't understand how they can count millions in one day and yet it takes 2 or 3 days to count a million. Different rules in different states (it’s a federation, and I think that’s reasonable). 100%. The intent was very much for the states to choose the President and hence each state is entitled to their own method. I realise that. What I meant was in the one state they can count 7 million in one day and then it takes 2 days to count the last million.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xJust wondering when senior Republicans cut him loose. Rick Santorum was strident in criticism on CNN and said no senior republicans will stand with the entirety of his claims. Even Pence seems to be backing off. Yep did hear that. Was semi-encouraging. Agree that within 48 hours, all these guys that were initially against him but fell into line will be making moves to establish themselves in the power vacuum. They’re going to say that he was really a Dem and never stood for our values etc They'd be crazy to do that. 70 million people voted for the putz. Obviously he has huge support in America. Yeah I don't think they'll do that. There's clearly elements of this strategy that worked but it looks like he might have lost the more moderate republicans. Expect the next Trump to follow the same strategies but just tone down the more outrageous aspects a little. I fear that the next Republican candidate may be Tom Cotton. He’s potentially far more dangerous than Trump. Perhaps not as charismatic, in Trump’s unique way, but Cotton would appeal to a lot of hardcore republicans. Ideologically, he’s basically super conservative (he’d be a big shift away from the John McCain type of Republican). But unlike Trump, Cotton has genuine longterm potential. He is way smarter than Trump. He’s probably about as intelligent as some of the brighter Democrats, just a lot less compassionate as an individual (not that all Republicans lack compassion, McCain had it in spades). Cotton would come with the Ivy League education, the intellectual acumen, political ruthlessness. He’s also a war vet and could probably get lots of military support. If Trump fans (and even non-Trump fans) feel disillusioned by the Democrats and even politics in the US, Cotton would offer them a far more robust alternative than Trump has offered (the only probable thing lacking being Trump’s unpredictability which has kinda been oddly helpful in some of his foreign policy ventures). I consider this to be horrifying. And it only highlights how stupid the Democrats would be to nominate a candidate such as Michelle Obama, almost entirely on the basis of symbolism (first woman of colour as POTUS). Many voters would be hugely unimpressed by that kind of symbolism purely for the sake of symbolism rather than merit). It’d be regarded as basically the embodiment of quota culture (except for the highest office in the US). An opponent with genuine accomplishments (albeit a nasty, ultra conservative) would manage to siphon off huge amounts of votes from a purely symbolic Democrat. He would be a very impressive candidate. The problem for the dems is that they are to use a John Howard term a 'broad church' There is the louder progressive one-third that deliver huge votes in liberal states and there there are the much more quieter traditional two-thirds of the party that will deliver the tight victories in Minnesota, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Finding a candidate that caters for both parts of their constituency is incredibly difficult. This will be the challenge for Biden. How to blend policies that appeal to his own constituents while trying to also appeal to the more moderate republicans. Aim for the centre rather than the far left then. There'd be plenty of Repubs and Dems that would come back to the centre.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Only 26,319 left in it in PA. Epic.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI can't understand how they can count millions in one day and yet it takes 2 or 3 days to count a million. Different rules in different states (it’s a federation, and I think that’s reasonable). 100%. The intent was very much for the states to choose the President and hence each state is entitled to their own method. I realise that. What I meant was in the one state they can count 7 million in one day and then it takes 2 days to count the last million. A lot of it is about how many rules the Republicans got through to fuck with postal votes.
|
|
|
petszk
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.2K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xPBS Newshour on now on SBS (also free accessible on YouTube). Imo, some of the best and most balanced coverage there is Stateside. Although, in Australia some of the expert commentators on the ABC are right up there. Channel 9 in Oz have been excellent. Peter Overton is hosting with another bloke whose name escapes me. They have correspondents all over the US. When you think the media and journalism is getting worse it's been good to see all of this coverage which I'd say (not Rusty though) is fairly balanced. Can't believe I'm going to say this but Fox News's election coverage and analysis has been excellent. On one of the (very left leaning) US forums I'm following, they say that, weirdly, although Fox is hard core right wing, their election coverage is always fair and balanced.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
Hopefully this 2018 Grand Final VAR-no VAR situation doesn't turn into some O'Donovan on Thomas violence situation.
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Compare and contrast McCain's concession speech with the tantrum going on in the whitehouse at the moment. Empathy, humility, decency, statesmanship. 4 words you'd never put in a sentence with Trump in a positive sense. https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/us-election-results-why-arizonas-cindy-mccain-could-seal-trumps-loss/news-story/901eeec36326ee36fa66d4e4c6c429f7
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah it's a shame he had to go up against Obama. Lost an opportunity there.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
Burztur
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 9.1K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI can't understand how they can count millions in one day and yet it takes 2 or 3 days to count a million. Different rules in different states (it’s a federation, and I think that’s reasonable). 100%. The intent was very much for the states to choose the President and hence each state is entitled to their own method. I realise that. What I meant was in the one state they can count 7 million in one day and then it takes 2 days to count the last million. The 7 million are spread across multiple counties. The last million get bottle necked.
|
|
|
paladisious
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 39K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYeah it's a shame he had to go up against Obama. Lost an opportunity there. There's another dimension where the Republicans picked McCain in the primaries instead of George W Bush in 2000, but McCain wasn't against interracial dating, so he was out.
|
|
|