|
sydneyfc1987
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThe crazy thing about this draw, it is possible that Celtic could end up winning the League in the match against the other lot (unless I have missed/overlooked something which is quite possible). If Celtic beat Ross County in our first game of the split, along with the other lot failing to take maximum points in their game again Motherwell, it would see Celtic extending the gap by either 8 or 9 points. Take that potential 8 or 9 point gap followed up with Celtic winning the next/last League Glasgow derby, that would see Celtic's lead at the top of the Table to 11 or 12 points with only three League matches remaining. That would see the Huns mathematically out of contention. Although it is highly unlikely to unfold as mentioned, the possibility is still there (as mentioned above - unless I have missed/overlooked something). As Sutherlandbear mentioned last week, one of the reason for the way the draw for split rounds work is to limit the chances of one of the Glasgow sides winning the League against the other Glasgow side due to how volatile the fixture is. So the above scenario was either a huge oversight on the SPFL part, or they are confident that the above scenario won't come into fruition. If it is the latter, then that's a huge gamble on their part. I personally feel/think they decided to take the gamble so not to have back-to-back-to-back succesive Glasgow derby matches. It was payback for the horrendous Cinch deal. Two old firms back to back has been done many a time. There is, no longer, an old firm. Woeful schoolboy patter Timmy. If not, then why did your rancid mob renew the copyright they co own with Rangers ? It’s not patter, it is fact. The old firm died with Rangers in 2012 and the term is redundant. Scottish football history can’t be changed and no attempt to ignore it can succeed. Your club was not relegated to the bottom tier of the SPFL. The new club applied for and was denied membership of the SPL. It then successfully applied, as a new member, for membership of the Scottish Football League and was placed in the bottom tier. The SPFL along with Celtic now refer to the fixture as the Glasgow Derby. Your clubs fans and the hun parts of the media ignore the fact that the old firm ceased with the demise of the original Rangers and only exists in their deluded minds. The new club (Rangers) has nothing to do with the holding company that owned the club and never had any ownership of the Old Firm name prior to Celtic agreeing to the renewal of the trade mark because the term has commercial value and has mutual benefits. You must find it strange that Celtic never refer to the old firm. Don’t come back with UEFA allowed a maintenance of the history of the old club. It was merely a decision to recognise the previous achievements of the old club whose assets were acquired by a new entity. Someone wrote “The only people that think that Sevco is the same club as the dead club, are either too thick to understand a simple 4 syllable word: Li-qui-day-tion or people who know damn fine well that Sevco is a New club, but it suits their own vested interests to deny this salient fact.” It wasn’t just UEFA, it was FIFA, SFA, SPFL and the ECA amongst others. Your wet dream is just that. BTW, I find nothing strange that your putrid club does. LOL. The club is less than 10 years old. The legal entity was the limited liability company that went bust. That is indisputable at law. The shame is the punishment for its fiscal misdeeds was no harsh enough. The club had to be reformed within a new company structure. Translation, new club. The effect, no old firm. Walter Smith acknowledged that when he said "We wish the new Rangers Football Club every good fortune" But speaking about the recent dramatic events in the Scottish game for the first time, Desmond insisted Rangers will not be in the basement of the game for too long.Giving a rare interview at the Dunhill Links tournament at St Andrews, Desmond, left, said: “Rangers is a fantastic club with a great history.“With the support they have, they will come back. They will, in not too long a time, be back in the SPL. I have no doubt about that. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/349917/Desmond-We-need-a-strong-Gers I agree, Scottish football needs a strong Rangers, its just a shame about its brainless and bigoted supporters, Billy Boy. Seriously , you think your lot are not bigots and brainless ? Bigots. Nowhere near the extent of Rangers fans. Brainless: Celtic fans don’t throw broken bottles onto the pitch nor do they fight themselves with bottles when celebrating in George Square. You forget that Celtic fans were voted the best in the world in the Best 2017 FIFA awards. Anyway, let’s hope for an entertaining and trouble free game tonight. From the outside looking in I'd say both clubs are sharing in/encouraging the same bigotry. And football fans are generally brainless as a rule so nobody can claim not to have that as an element of the fanbase. You are clueless. "We as a club, and the overwhelming majority of our supporters, oppose and abhor bigotry in all its forms. We have a strict anti-sectarian and non-political approach to the running of the club. Celtic has been at the forefront of efforts to eradicate sectarianism from football, yet Mr Fanning chooses to make no mention of this. He either disregards, or is not aware, of the initiatives supported by this club for many years - Bhoys against Bigotry, Sense over Sectarianism, our community and schools programmes and most recently our participation in the Scottish Executive's Working Group on these matters. No club does as much as Celtic in seeking to eliminate bigotry from football. Those efforts and successes extend to our away matches, where unprecedented work has been done to identify and take action against those who behave unacceptably." Peter T Lawwell, Chief Executive, Celtic Football Club, Celtic Park, Glasgow 😂😂😂 I'm sure Rangers have made similar official statements. Doesn't change the fact the rivalry's roots are based in bigotry and both sides are equally complicit in that. Makes for great theatre though. Looking forward to the game tonight.
(VAR) IS NAVY BLUE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Keen for tonight. Hope Rogic is starting.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
Just in case that wasn’t enough for you Sutherland Bear:
At school on the walk up the stairs to the first class my mates, who were Rangers supporters, used to sing : Hail hail the Popes in jail….” You know the rest of it.
In the High Street, just around the corner from Causeyside Street there was a shop that sold Family Crests. I have no idea if it is still there.
On the walk down to Love Street on the left hand side, there was a sporting goods shop that I once bought golf clubs from. Close to it was a book store that I sometimes visited during lunch break. Those shops used to board up their windows when the Rangers came to town.
My mates and I often bought Scottish Tablet from a shop near the town hall.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThe crazy thing about this draw, it is possible that Celtic could end up winning the League in the match against the other lot (unless I have missed/overlooked something which is quite possible). If Celtic beat Ross County in our first game of the split, along with the other lot failing to take maximum points in their game again Motherwell, it would see Celtic extending the gap by either 8 or 9 points. Take that potential 8 or 9 point gap followed up with Celtic winning the next/last League Glasgow derby, that would see Celtic's lead at the top of the Table to 11 or 12 points with only three League matches remaining. That would see the Huns mathematically out of contention. Although it is highly unlikely to unfold as mentioned, the possibility is still there (as mentioned above - unless I have missed/overlooked something). As Sutherlandbear mentioned last week, one of the reason for the way the draw for split rounds work is to limit the chances of one of the Glasgow sides winning the League against the other Glasgow side due to how volatile the fixture is. So the above scenario was either a huge oversight on the SPFL part, or they are confident that the above scenario won't come into fruition. If it is the latter, then that's a huge gamble on their part. I personally feel/think they decided to take the gamble so not to have back-to-back-to-back succesive Glasgow derby matches. It was payback for the horrendous Cinch deal. Two old firms back to back has been done many a time. There is, no longer, an old firm. Woeful schoolboy patter Timmy. If not, then why did your rancid mob renew the copyright they co own with Rangers ? It’s not patter, it is fact. The old firm died with Rangers in 2012 and the term is redundant. Scottish football history can’t be changed and no attempt to ignore it can succeed. Your club was not relegated to the bottom tier of the SPFL. The new club applied for and was denied membership of the SPL. It then successfully applied, as a new member, for membership of the Scottish Football League and was placed in the bottom tier. The SPFL along with Celtic now refer to the fixture as the Glasgow Derby. Your clubs fans and the hun parts of the media ignore the fact that the old firm ceased with the demise of the original Rangers and only exists in their deluded minds. The new club (Rangers) has nothing to do with the holding company that owned the club and never had any ownership of the Old Firm name prior to Celtic agreeing to the renewal of the trade mark because the term has commercial value and has mutual benefits. You must find it strange that Celtic never refer to the old firm. Don’t come back with UEFA allowed a maintenance of the history of the old club. It was merely a decision to recognise the previous achievements of the old club whose assets were acquired by a new entity. Someone wrote “The only people that think that Sevco is the same club as the dead club, are either too thick to understand a simple 4 syllable word: Li-qui-day-tion or people who know damn fine well that Sevco is a New club, but it suits their own vested interests to deny this salient fact.” It wasn’t just UEFA, it was FIFA, SFA, SPFL and the ECA amongst others. Your wet dream is just that. BTW, I find nothing strange that your putrid club does. LOL. The club is less than 10 years old. The legal entity was the limited liability company that went bust. That is indisputable at law. The shame is the punishment for its fiscal misdeeds was no harsh enough. The club had to be reformed within a new company structure. Translation, new club. The effect, no old firm. Walter Smith acknowledged that when he said "We wish the new Rangers Football Club every good fortune" But speaking about the recent dramatic events in the Scottish game for the first time, Desmond insisted Rangers will not be in the basement of the game for too long.Giving a rare interview at the Dunhill Links tournament at St Andrews, Desmond, left, said: “Rangers is a fantastic club with a great history.“With the support they have, they will come back. They will, in not too long a time, be back in the SPL. I have no doubt about that. https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/349917/Desmond-We-need-a-strong-Gers I agree, Scottish football needs a strong Rangers, its just a shame about its brainless and bigoted supporters, Billy Boy. Seriously , you think your lot are not bigots and brainless ? Bigots. Nowhere near the extent of Rangers fans. Brainless: Celtic fans don’t throw broken bottles onto the pitch nor do they fight themselves with bottles when celebrating in George Square. You forget that Celtic fans were voted the best in the world in the Best 2017 FIFA awards. Anyway, let’s hope for an entertaining and trouble free game tonight. From the outside looking in I'd say both clubs are sharing in/encouraging the same bigotry. And football fans are generally brainless as a rule so nobody can claim not to have that as an element of the fanbase. You are clueless. "We as a club, and the overwhelming majority of our supporters, oppose and abhor bigotry in all its forms. We have a strict anti-sectarian and non-political approach to the running of the club. Celtic has been at the forefront of efforts to eradicate sectarianism from football, yet Mr Fanning chooses to make no mention of this. He either disregards, or is not aware, of the initiatives supported by this club for many years - Bhoys against Bigotry, Sense over Sectarianism, our community and schools programmes and most recently our participation in the Scottish Executive's Working Group on these matters. No club does as much as Celtic in seeking to eliminate bigotry from football. Those efforts and successes extend to our away matches, where unprecedented work has been done to identify and take action against those who behave unacceptably." Peter T Lawwell, Chief Executive, Celtic Football Club, Celtic Park, Glasgow 😂😂😂 I'm sure Rangers have made similar official statements. Doesn't change the fact the rivalry's roots are based in bigotry and both sides are equally complicit in that. Makes for great theatre though. Looking forward to the game tonight. Not long to go now.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+xKeen for tonight. Hope Rogic is starting. He is.
|
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Rogic starting
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Ref not giving Celtic anything. Great noise and atmos
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+xRef not giving Celtic anything. Great noise and atmos Madden has been poor.
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
And he is only getting worse.
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
GET IT IN THERE!!!!
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
|
|
hellas_johnny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
very lucky deflection. Keep it up bhoys!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
I miss being part of that atmosphere 😟
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
hellas_johnny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
extra time celtic playing well but set pieces are terrible. jota came very close. shame it went to extra time. Celtic hit the bar in normal time to make it 2-0
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
hellas_johnny
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.3K,
Visits: 0
|
fuck! rangers 2-1 up 114th minutes
|
|
|
|
|
Josh
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.6K,
Visits: 0
|
Damn.
|
|
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Rangers wanted that so much more, I just don’t understand how they ran over the top of Celtic playing 240 minutes over a few nights, Celtic looked dead.
That said Carter Vickers should have buried the match, always felt that would come back to bite.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+xfuck! rangers 2-1 up 114th minutes As much as I don't like saying it. Well done Rangers.
|
|
|
|
|
BrisbaneBhoy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xfuck! rangers 2-1 up 114th minutes As much as I don't like saying it. Well done Rangers. I don't think so!!
🇮🇪Hail Hail🇮🇪
|
|
|
|
|
CanberraHarry
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.1K,
Visits: 0
|
Celtic very flat and Rangers very hungry. Celtic’s attack was impotent tonight. Disappointing showing from Celtic. Missed GG a lot and Kyogo didn’t have a sniff. Rangers also dominated the midfield. Congrats to Rangers, that was a huge effort after playing 120mins on Thursday night as well. They’ve undermined their own argument to move any League fixtures due to Europe commitments, so that might be Celtic’s only positive from the night.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xfuck! rangers 2-1 up 114th minutes As much as I don't like saying it. Well done Rangers. I don't think so!! We can't win them all and had an off day. For me, Bobby Madden let his bias show. He had a shocker and allowed the huns to kick us off the park.
|
|
|
|
|
SUTHERLANDBEAR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
And Tims being Tims revert into bheast mode by blaming the referee.
Never defeated, always cheated since 1888.
And no Rhebel treble !!
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+xAnd Tims being Tims revert into bheast mode by blaming the referee. Never defeated, always cheated since 1888. And no Rhebel treble !! Madden’s performance was predictable but Rangers deserved the win. He was poor but so were we. Was Ange’s refusal to change things up exposed? Possibly, but it was one game were Celtic was bullied out of the midfield. Rogic was nullified by foul play which often went unpunished. On one occasion he was fouled 3 times in one move before he flung the player off of him and the huns got the free kick. McGregor then ankle tapped a player and got booked. Come on. You can’t be that blind not to have noticed that. Rangers got 3 yellow cards against Rogic and should have had twice that many. Aribo rugby tackled Rogic twice and was not punished. Had anyone else been officiating you wouldn’t have finished the game with 11 men. So the ref did play a major factor but for me as much as it hurts to say it, Rangers were the better team on the day.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
The referee was horrific.
Missed so many yellows against rangers. Having said that rangers were a lot better.
Celtic didn’t seem to try much different. How many crosses straight to the keeper?
Rangers we’re good and the intensity was fantastic. You can see how they beat dortmund and braga in do or die
|
|
|
|
|
SUTHERLANDBEAR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAnd Tims being Tims revert into bheast mode by blaming the referee. Never defeated, always cheated since 1888. And no Rhebel treble !! Madden’s performance was predictable but Rangers deserved the win. He was poor but so were we. Was Ange’s refusal to change things up exposed? Possibly, but it was one game were Celtic was bullied out of the midfield. Rogic was nullified by foul play which often went unpunished. On one occasion he was fouled 3 times in one move before he flung the player off of him and the huns got the free kick. McGregor then ankle tapped a player and got booked. Come on. You can’t be that blind not to have noticed that. Rangers got 3 yellow cards against Rogic and should have had twice that many. Aribo rugby tackled Rogic twice and was not punished. Had anyone else been officiating you wouldn’t have finished the game with 11 men. So the ref did play a major factor but for me as much as it hurts to say it, Rangers were the better team on the day. It's called " the dark arts " all the big teams use it.
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
Rangers simply the better team. Celtic were awfully undersized and easily dominated in midfield and final third. Celtic couldn’t hold the ball or get any cohesion in attack. Bad tactics by Ange to play Maeda as a sole striker, needed someone like Giakoumakis to hold the ball up. Didn’t think the ref was a factor at all. Rangers were hard and physical but tackles were fair. Sad to say but Ange was tactically outsmarted in this fixture. He also made dumb substitutes. Should have left Rogic on and brought Bitton on once they went a goal up.
|
|
|
|
|
southmelb
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
Giakoumakis was injured. I think many will stop underestimating his significance to the team, he was a monster at Ibrox a couple weeks ago, they missed him.
Maeda was dissapointing, think he even went soft and pulled out of a few 50/50 balls.
|
|
|
|
|
Lurker
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 810,
Visits: 0
|
+xRangers simply the better team. Celtic were awfully undersized and easily dominated in midfield and final third. Celtic couldn’t hold the ball or get any cohesion in attack. Bad tactics by Ange to play Maeda as a sole striker, needed someone like Giakoumakis to hold the ball up. Didn’t think the ref was a factor at all. Rangers were hard and physical but tackles were fair. Sad to say but Ange was tactically outsmarted in this fixture. He also made dumb substitutes. Should have left Rogic on and brought Bitton on once they went a goal up. Rubbish. The tackles were often outside the laws of the game. Please explain how Bitton could be brought on when he wasn’t on the bench. Even a former SFA referee, Derek Crothers, "called out Bobby Madden's atrocious performance in the Scottish Cup semi-final". This is from the Daily Record: https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/bobby-madden-embarrassing-himself-blast-26731306Pundits lined up to slaughter Bobby Madden's performance at Hampden on Sunday. Madden was tasked with officiating the Scottish Cup semi final clash between Celtic and Rangers and the referee’s display didn’t go down well in some quarters. The 43-year old was taking charge of his ninth derby between the Glasgow giants and was involved in a series of controversial on-field decisions. From allowing John Lundstram several fouls before booking him to awarding Celtic a 'soft' free kick in the build-up to Greg Taylor's opener, Madden's name has been on the lips of many. Chris Sutton was first to slam the official and ripped into him after Lundstram brought down Callum McGregor. Speaking on Premier Sports, the Celtic legend said: "Bobby Madden is just embarrassing himself."Later, Sutton had another pop on the free-kick that was awarded which led to Taylor’s goal. The Record Sport columnist blasted: "He’s had a shocker all afternoon."Michael Stewart also waded in, saying: "Bobby Madden has had an absolute shocker. Some of the decisions out there were ridiculous."Sutton wasn’t finished there, though. After a free-kick was awarded to Rangers deep into extra time, Sutton added: "That’s amazing from Bobby." It wasn't just the Premier Sports commentary team that were concerned at the decisions Madden made. The whistler's antics even unified both sets of supporters online. Celtic podcast Celts Are Here tweeted, " Bobby Madden has been a disgrace in this first half. Outrageously bad." While another wrote, " Note for Bobby Madden - it's not your job to keep players on the pitch, it's your job to enforce the laws of the game and protect players safety by enforcing said laws of the game." A Rangers fan agreed saying the man in the middle shouldn't be refereeing a game of this magnitude. He tweeted: " Bobby Madden shouldn’t be near games of this level. Howling for both sides."
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
OMG someone stop the presses, need new headline ‘Celtic fans whinge and moan about referee when they were so clearly outplayed by dominant Rangers’
|
|
|
|