Paul01
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.9K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAnd if you're worried about CB depth then just bring Kye Rowles over Deng or Degenek. A lot of overage selections are also based on the chance to be an Olympian. Perhaps Degenek fancies it. There is also the pitfall of selecting those who aren't crucial for their club as they're less match fit. Meanwhile players like Talbot just don't offer security and he has the armband. Qualifying will be incredibly tough as the 4th placed team has a playoff against an African side. It really depends on the draw path. Japan and South Korea are so hard. Uzbekistan have very good youth sides. Iran and Saudi Arabia are always tricky. I think you're right we won't be able to bring on our absolute best. While the bunch we can bring are good, I fear once again the nativity in Asia and we'll get stuffed. In saying that this Olyroos core has done a lot together and the Toulon tournament was an excellent boost. Degenek isn't playing many minutes and is barely in contention for the Socceroos so it doesn't make much sense. Rowles is a normal choice. Even though they aren't crucial Toure is still getting some minutes and possibly Tilio/Triantis. I'd take their high level training, talent and low minutes over some of the A-League high minute guys. I do think you're right about level of difficulty. It's hard for sure. Though, I rewatched the Japan vs Aus 3rd place playoff last u23 AC and it was closer than the score line suggested, with the quality we would bring it should be very close this time. The coaching and team selections has always been a problem throughout all international teams and that could be our demise. Our attack and midfielder is set to be strong heading into the tournament, worry about our defence. Basically relying on Triantis to hold it down and solid games from Popovic and Farrell. I'd rather Madanha then Talbot and don't bring Mauragis. Talbot doesn't offer anything and both make way too mistakes. We've never punished players who make mistakes but we definitely should drop them. Thought Tilio, Triantis and Teague were good when they came on today. Three obvious starters who actually make us play legit football, useful against Asian nations. How about a fit Aidan Simmons as another right back option. He is only 20
|
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAnd if you're worried about CB depth then just bring Kye Rowles over Deng or Degenek. A lot of overage selections are also based on the chance to be an Olympian. Perhaps Degenek fancies it. There is also the pitfall of selecting those who aren't crucial for their club as they're less match fit. Meanwhile players like Talbot just don't offer security and he has the armband. Qualifying will be incredibly tough as the 4th placed team has a playoff against an African side. It really depends on the draw path. Japan and South Korea are so hard. Uzbekistan have very good youth sides. Iran and Saudi Arabia are always tricky. I think you're right we won't be able to bring on our absolute best. While the bunch we can bring are good, I fear once again the nativity in Asia and we'll get stuffed. In saying that this Olyroos core has done a lot together and the Toulon tournament was an excellent boost. Degenek isn't playing many minutes and is barely in contention for the Socceroos so it doesn't make much sense. Rowles is a normal choice. Even though they aren't crucial Toure is still getting some minutes and possibly Tilio/Triantis. I'd take their high level training, talent and low minutes over some of the A-League high minute guys. I do think you're right about level of difficulty. It's hard for sure. Though, I rewatched the Japan vs Aus 3rd place playoff last u23 AC and it was closer than the score line suggested, with the quality we would bring it should be very close this time. The coaching and team selections has always been a problem throughout all international teams and that could be our demise. Our attack and midfielder is set to be strong heading into the tournament, worry about our defence. Basically relying on Triantis to hold it down and solid games from Popovic and Farrell. I'd rather Madanha then Talbot and don't bring Mauragis. Talbot doesn't offer anything and both make way too mistakes. We've never punished players who make mistakes but we definitely should drop them. Thought Tilio, Triantis and Teague were good when they came on today. Three obvious starters who actually make us play legit football, useful against Asian nations. Hope to have the T-Spine one day. Triantis up to Teague through to Tilio. They're all good on the ball and have poise.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
trewin and natta did well
people are harsh on mauragis, but agree he needs a bit of improvement
a bit wasteful in front of goal, but Toure's goal was excellent
|
|
|
Mr Cleansheets
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 944,
Visits: 0
|
Was a bit unimpressed with that. A few did well enough as individuals but we didn't look much like a team.
Toure's goal was well taken and there were good performances from Neiuwenhof, Teague, Brooks and a couple of others. I wonder if the heat and pitch played a part - looked a tad bobbly.
|
|
|
DandyCasey
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 321,
Visits: 0
|
Thought Brooks looked the most handy or likely to make something happen.
|
|
|
Aljay
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Does anyone have a starting lineup?
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
So Tilio is fit to play and not injured or not to speed? A weird situation. Im assuming he would get game time providing Ange was still going to be coach at Celtic? But of course once he joined Spurs then a new coach comes in with a different point of view and things probably changed even with injury he picked up once he joined. Just shows the disconnect between a sporting director and head coach can be and how it can affect players. Maybe he’s better off going on loan? Otherwise what’s the point of signing someone and not using him? In terms of this squad it’s so reassuring how many options we have, options galore. Maybe right back is open because I’m not convinced about Talbot, where is Rawlins?
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
Rawlins unfortunately hasn’t kicked a ball at all this season. No idea why.
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xSo Tilio is fit to play and not injured or not to speed? A weird situation. Im assuming he would get game time providing Ange was still going to be coach at Celtic? But of course once he joined Spurs then a new coach comes in with a different point of view and things probably changed even with injury he picked up once he joined. Just shows the disconnect between a sporting director and head coach can be and how it can affect players. Maybe he’s better off going on loan? Otherwise what’s the point of signing someone and not using him? In terms of this squad it’s so reassuring how many options we have, options galore. Maybe right back is open because I’m not convinced about Talbot, where is Rawlins? I know, it sucks. I really rate Tilio. On the bright side, it’s very early days. I remember when Rogic went to Celtic. It was frustrating for a long time. And he eventually became a success and a fan favorite.
|
|
|
bbouy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 952,
Visits: 0
|
+xWas a bit unimpressed with that. A few did well enough as individuals but we didn't look much like a team. Toure's goal was well taken and there were good performances from Neiuwenhof, Teague, Brooks and a couple of others. I wonder if the heat and pitch played a part - looked a tad bobbly. I agree but I think it's probably just the fact they we are playing a mix of starters and bench players in the starting lineup. When we brought some of the better players on in key positions like Tilio, Triantis and Teague we looked way better. I have to assume they will start our strongest lineup against Saudi Arabia or close to it. Toure: Solid effort, got more involved than I thought he would. Good physicality and speed. Flat footed at times and very right foot dominant. Surprisingly good press from him all night which I like to see.
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
Do we have any indication if we qualify for the Olympics Mens tournament - will Graham Arnold take the reigns again like last time?
|
|
|
Bowden
|
|
Group: Moderators
Posts: 16K,
Visits: 0
|
+xDo we have any indication if we qualify for the Olympics Mens tournament - will Graham Arnold take the reins again like last time? No he won’t lol. Remember he qualified the Olyroos for the tournament as well, it’s not like he just rocked up at the Olympics.
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xDo we have any indication if we qualify for the Olympics Mens tournament - will Graham Arnold take the reins again like last time? No he won’t lol. Remember he qualified the Olyroos for the tournament as well, it’s not like he just rocked up at the Olympics. Ugh. Do we really think Tony Vidmar is up to it?
|
|
|
JDUB
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 94,
Visits: 0
|
Is it just a one off that this tournament is during an international window. You’d think that most players playing at an international level would be playing regular club football by the age of 23. It makes no sense and really diminishes the tournament and the teams that qualify for the Olympics.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xDo we have any indication if we qualify for the Olympics Mens tournament - will Graham Arnold take the reins again like last time? No he won’t lol. Remember he qualified the Olyroos for the tournament as well, it’s not like he just rocked up at the Olympics. Ugh. Do we really think Tony Vidmar is up to it? Of course he is, he masterminded the FFA CoE's 12-0 demolition of Riverina Rhinos in 2017
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xDo we have any indication if we qualify for the Olympics Mens tournament - will Graham Arnold take the reins again like last time? No he won’t lol. Remember he qualified the Olyroos for the tournament as well, it’s not like he just rocked up at the Olympics. Ugh. Do we really think Tony Vidmar is up to it? Of course he is, he masterminded the FFA CoE's 12-0 demolition of Riverina Rhinos in 2017 How could I forget..
|
|
|
bbouy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 952,
Visits: 0
|
This is my 'way too early' 18 man squad I'd take to Paris 2024 (IF WE QUALIFY) - Bilokapic
- Cook
- Miller
- Rowles
- Circati
- Triantis
- Bos
- Farrell
- Teague
- Nieuwenhof
- Yazbek
- Robertson
- Volpato
- G. Kuol
- Tilio
- Irankunda
- Toure
- Maclaren
The 18 man restriction was a real pain to work around, I'd assume similar to last time we would bring 3-5 train-ons up until the tournament starts. I chose Miller, Rowles and Maclaren as my over-age players as they fit specific needs. Miller fits into the starting RB, Rowles can play multiple positions in defence and Maclaren could be really handy against this level of competition and could use someone to finish off the excellent delivery he will likely receive around him. I used the same formula we used in Tokyo 2021. 2 GK's, 6 defenders, 5 mids and 5 attackers. Very important that we have players like Farrell and Rowles who can play multiple positions. I figured in midfield we don't need two 10's because we have Tilio, Robertson and Kuol who can fill that void if necessary. It's very diverse in attack and midfield with many different lineups you could lineup. I can't see any other u23 players breaking into this squad, and I just went off necessity for the over-age. Thanks for listening to me ramble.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis is my 'way too early' 18 man squad I'd take to Paris 2024 (IF WE QUALIFY) - Bilokapic
- Cook
- Miller
- Rowles
- Circati
- Triantis
- Bos
- Farrell
- Teague
- Nieuwenhof
- Yazbek
- Robertson
- Volpato
- G. Kuol
- Tilio
- Irankunda
- Toure
- Maclaren
The 18 man restriction was a real pain to work around, I'd assume similar to last time we would bring 3-5 train-ons up until the tournament starts. I chose Miller, Rowles and Maclaren as my over-age players as they fit specific needs. Miller fits into the starting RB, Rowles can play multiple positions in defence and Maclaren could be really handy against this level of competition and could use someone to finish off the excellent delivery he will likely receive around him. I used the same formula we used in Tokyo 2021. 2 GK's, 6 defenders, 5 mids and 5 attackers. Very important that we have players like Farrell and Rowles who can play multiple positions. I figured in midfield we don't need two 10's because we have Tilio, Robertson and Kuol who can fill that void if necessary. It's very diverse in attack and midfield with many different lineups you could lineup. I can't see any other u23 players breaking into this squad, and I just went off necessity for the over-age. Thanks for listening to me ramble. Great looking squad. Id just replace one of the overage players. I agree with miller and rowles since those are weaker positions, but im confident in our striking options id consider gauci since he would really improve the side and could use the experience
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis is my 'way too early' 18 man squad I'd take to Paris 2024 (IF WE QUALIFY) - Bilokapic
- Cook
- Miller
- Rowles
- Circati
- Triantis
- Bos
- Farrell
- Teague
- Nieuwenhof
- Yazbek
- Robertson
- Volpato
- G. Kuol
- Tilio
- Irankunda
- Toure
- Maclaren
The 18 man restriction was a real pain to work around, I'd assume similar to last time we would bring 3-5 train-ons up until the tournament starts. I chose Miller, Rowles and Maclaren as my over-age players as they fit specific needs. Miller fits into the starting RB, Rowles can play multiple positions in defence and Maclaren could be really handy against this level of competition and could use someone to finish off the excellent delivery he will likely receive around him. I used the same formula we used in Tokyo 2021. 2 GK's, 6 defenders, 5 mids and 5 attackers. Very important that we have players like Farrell and Rowles who can play multiple positions. I figured in midfield we don't need two 10's because we have Tilio, Robertson and Kuol who can fill that void if necessary. It's very diverse in attack and midfield with many different lineups you could lineup. I can't see any other u23 players breaking into this squad, and I just went off necessity for the over-age. Thanks for listening to me ramble. Wow. That’s actually a monstrous squad. Here’s hoping we qualify so we have the chance to see something like this. Very optimistic thinking Volpato would accept though lol
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9i6fB4ZS5YDraw 8pm AEST. With these players we can't afford any cheapness to stuff around. All out for qualifying and all out at the Olympics. It's true clubs won't budge but it's a fact of life like the Asian or Africa Cup. It's the freedom to not release that's the issue.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9i6fB4ZS5YDraw 8pm AEST. With these players we can't afford any cheapness to stuff around. All out for qualifying and all out at the Olympics. It's true clubs won't budge but it's a fact of life like the Asian or Africa Cup. It's the freedom to not release that's the issue. We have to go to war with clubs since it will be such a blow if we dont qualify robertson, neiwenhof, yazbek, kuol and toure should be gettable circati is in a promotion battle, bos in a relagation battle so they may be hard to poach. Volpato we just try our luck when the tournament starts. It’s a beast of a squad and hopefully the quality we can expert from here on
|
|
|
Mr Cleansheets
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 944,
Visits: 0
|
No reason for Volpato to turn down the chance to be an Olympian. It doesn't lock him in for the Oz NT.
I wouldn't take any overage players unless they were at least close to 23.
|
|
|
Quicky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThis is my 'way too early' 18 man squad I'd take to Paris 2024 (IF WE QUALIFY) - Bilokapic
- Cook
- Miller
- Rowles
- Circati
- Triantis
- Bos
- Farrell
- Teague
- Nieuwenhof
- Yazbek
- Robertson
- Volpato
- G. Kuol
- Tilio
- Irankunda
- Toure
- Maclaren
The 18 man restriction was a real pain to work around, I'd assume similar to last time we would bring 3-5 train-ons up until the tournament starts. I chose Miller, Rowles and Maclaren as my over-age players as they fit specific needs. Miller fits into the starting RB, Rowles can play multiple positions in defence and Maclaren could be really handy against this level of competition and could use someone to finish off the excellent delivery he will likely receive around him. I used the same formula we used in Tokyo 2021. 2 GK's, 6 defenders, 5 mids and 5 attackers. Very important that we have players like Farrell and Rowles who can play multiple positions. I figured in midfield we don't need two 10's because we have Tilio, Robertson and Kuol who can fill that void if necessary. It's very diverse in attack and midfield with many different lineups you could lineup. I can't see any other u23 players breaking into this squad, and I just went off necessity for the over-age. Thanks for listening to me ramble. That's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke.
|
|
|
Neanderthal
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThat's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke. It’d definitely be nice to trust our U-23 strikers for once. Isn’t Alou Kuol elegible? If so, I’d think him plus Mo Toure and Botic are the three in contention to play #9. The others still seem a bit inexperienced and/or young for Olympic level… Need their clubs to play them more.
|
|
|
Quicky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThat's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke. It’d definitely be nice to trust our U-23 strikers for once. Isn’t Alou Kuol elegible? If so, I’d think him plus Mo Toure and Botic are the three in contention to play #9. The others still seem a bit inexperienced and/or young for Olympic level… Need their clubs to play them more. I'm not across the eligibility criteria but Alou Kuol is 23 in July 2024 and the Olympics are November 2024 so I don't think he is eligible? That said he'd be a good pick as an over ager if his form warrants it at the time. I'd be cool with it provided there is a development focus.
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThat's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke. It’d definitely be nice to trust our U-23 strikers for once. Isn’t Alou Kuol elegible? If so, I’d think him plus Mo Toure and Botic are the three in contention to play #9. The others still seem a bit inexperienced and/or young for Olympic level… Need their clubs to play them more. I'm not across the eligibility criteria but Alou Kuol is 23 in July 2024 and the Olympics are November 2024 so I don't think he is eligible? That said he'd be a good pick as an over ager if his form warrants it at the time. I'd be cool with it provided there is a development focus. Men's teams are restricted to under-23 players (born on or after 1 January 2001) with a maximum of three overage players allowed
|
|
|
Quicky
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThat's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke. It’d definitely be nice to trust our U-23 strikers for once. Isn’t Alou Kuol elegible? If so, I’d think him plus Mo Toure and Botic are the three in contention to play #9. The others still seem a bit inexperienced and/or young for Olympic level… Need their clubs to play them more. I'm not across the eligibility criteria but Alou Kuol is 23 in July 2024 and the Olympics are November 2024 so I don't think he is eligible? That said he'd be a good pick as an over ager if his form warrants it at the time. I'd be cool with it provided there is a development focus. Men's teams are restricted to under-23 players (born on or after 1 January 2001) with a maximum of three overage players allowed That rules Alou Kuol in then. Was born 5 July 2001. I'd definitely consider him for the squad if he finds form before the Olympics. Been a slow burn for CCM this season so far though. Needs time.
|
|
|
Melbcityguy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 10K,
Visits: 0
|
Lads it's on YouTube on the football Australia account at midnight
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Still no idea who got the goal
we are struggling to win the midfield battle at the moment but its an enjoyable game to watch. As usual, saudi arabia are technically very strong
|
|
|
bbouy
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 952,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThis is my 'way too early' 18 man squad I'd take to Paris 2024 (IF WE QUALIFY) - Bilokapic
- Cook
- Miller
- Rowles
- Circati
- Triantis
- Bos
- Farrell
- Teague
- Nieuwenhof
- Yazbek
- Robertson
- Volpato
- G. Kuol
- Tilio
- Irankunda
- Toure
- Maclaren
The 18 man restriction was a real pain to work around, I'd assume similar to last time we would bring 3-5 train-ons up until the tournament starts. I chose Miller, Rowles and Maclaren as my over-age players as they fit specific needs. Miller fits into the starting RB, Rowles can play multiple positions in defence and Maclaren could be really handy against this level of competition and could use someone to finish off the excellent delivery he will likely receive around him. I used the same formula we used in Tokyo 2021. 2 GK's, 6 defenders, 5 mids and 5 attackers. Very important that we have players like Farrell and Rowles who can play multiple positions. I figured in midfield we don't need two 10's because we have Tilio, Robertson and Kuol who can fill that void if necessary. It's very diverse in attack and midfield with many different lineups you could lineup. I can't see any other u23 players breaking into this squad, and I just went off necessity for the over-age. Thanks for listening to me ramble. That's a cool list. I like it. I'm not sure I'd go with overage players and certainly no Maclaren. I think i'd back u23s and would pick Italiano (RB) Popovic (CB) and whoever is in form from Botic, Jovanovic, Goodwin, Waddingham as a no.9. If I were to pick a 9 as an overager it would definitely be Duke. I'd back our U23's but Miller is 4 months off being eligible. He is basically an u23 and Talbot and Italiano are shocking. Italiano is having an all-time stinker right now against Saudi Arabia. EDIT: As soon as I type this he gets an assist. Ofc
|
|
|