|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Yea that's because you're too fucking stupid. To dumb it down so you're peanut brain can understand, the earlier central point was that the justice system has been politicized. Our Judges who are supposed to be above the politics, the media, their own biases and prejuduces and are anything but. Pell's wrongful imprisonment was an example. You insinuated that it wasthe political right that was responsible for the Catholic Church failures to protect children from pedo priests Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Same crime, different justice. If you can't keep up, then log off. I am not insinuating anything. I am stating clearly that you are trying to justify the paedo network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xAs for Muz, if something affirms his life views, it must have been the right call, that, and because someone is "qualified" and "more experienced" they too must be right and anyone who disgrees is an arrogant RWNJ You really are a fool. Change the words here and it exactly describes you. Weeks spent in court, hundreds and hundreds of hours of testimony, thousands of pages of documents, dozens of witnesses and because SOMETHING didn't affirm your life view IT HAS TO BE WRONG. No ifs, no buts, no possible consideration that perhaps you've misjudged the situation and perhaps Lehrmann is actually a giant cockhead. Nope. Simply unfathomable to you. You are apparently more than qualified than a person who's spent decades in the field and profession because of the 'vibe' and your 'experience'. Your lack of introspection would keep a psychologist busy for months. You are a cynical misanthrope. You mean like the 3 Judges who imprisoned Pell wrongly when I had said they had imprisoned him wrongly. You're right, prison was wrong. A bullet instead. amazing you stick up for this guy, at absolute very best he was a pedophile enabler who moved known paedophiles to other areas to destroy more children I don't stand up for HIM, and I think you do, you mention him a lot like he suffered the greatest injustice of all. a man, who has in double figures the amount of suicides from destroyed children who he turned a blind eye (and this is at very best too) and allowed his paedo mates to be alone with in remote circumstances, knowing fair well they;d go on to sexually abuse more kids. but stinking lefties are groomers right? You can imagine whatever you want. I don't know what he did or didn't do, and neither should you. That's for the Law. Seven Justices of the High Court determined that a great injustice had been committed he was immediatetly released. That ought to be good enough for you, but it isn't. What is? Plenty of lefties in government schools doing the grooming too. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2024/mar/06/victoria-education-department-child-sexual-abuse-public-schools-cover-up-cultureWhere's your outrage? You want me to goon to bat for a paedos (or their enablers) like you are doing? No thanks You should be equally outraged at the the government education departments..but strangely you're not. In one example 4 teacher pedos abused 109 school kids. Where's your outrage calling for the bullet of those who covered that up? they should be punished in the same manner as your favourite paedo should've been You're a fucking disgrace. from someone who oes in to bat for cretins and enablers of child abuse I take that as a compliment.
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
There isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
Yeah the catholic church are the real victims here.
Amazing the mental gymnastics here to simply not take accountability for child abuse.
And the only thing here that is imaginary are your sky faiiries.
|
|
|
|
roosty
|
|
Group: Banned Members
Posts: 758,
Visits: 0
|
+xYeah the catholic church are the real victims here.
Thank you for acknowledging this
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Wait, what did Canberra have to do with that? Or am I supposed to be reading that as 'Canberra is a shithole' and 'that happened in Victoria'?
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Wait, what did Canberra have to do with that? Or am I supposed to be reading that as 'Canberra is a shithole' and 'that happened in Victoria'? Sounds like something a typical marxist would say. Fuck you marxist.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
Just a friendly reminder that Lehrmann has a committal hearing in Toowoomba in June for 2 counts of alleged rape. But you know, nothing to see here.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Yea that's because you're too fucking stupid. To dumb it down so you're peanut brain can understand, the earlier central point was that the justice system has been politicized. Our Judges who are supposed to be above the politics, the media, their own biases and prejuduces and are anything but. Pell's wrongful imprisonment was an example. You insinuated that it wasthe political right that was responsible for the Catholic Church failures to protect children from pedo priests Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Same crime, different justice. If you can't keep up, then log off. I am not insinuating anything. I am stating clearly that you are trying to justify the paedo network. Then I am clearly saying you are still a fuckwit, fuckwit.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Wait, what did Canberra have to do with that? Or am I supposed to be reading that as 'Canberra is a shithole' and 'that happened in Victoria'? Both are left wing shitholes, full of left wing shitheads. Where was the Socialist People's Republic of Victoria protecting the 109 (that afre known of) abused school children within its government school system.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xYeah the catholic church are the real victims here.
Amazing the mental gymnastics here to simply not take accountability for child abuse.
And the only thing here that is imaginary are your sky faiiries. So The Simple Fan is that like when the secular government allowed hundreds of school children to be abused for decades and only took accountability last year? That sort of mental gymnastics? Where's your and Muzzies outrage? Where is the media outrage? Where are the jaile sentences for those leaders in the government under whose watch it all happened?
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite?
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? And that the THREE lower Court Judges who convicted him were wrong? They fucked up- like I said earlier in this thread. Do you question WHY those THREE Judges came to the incorrect decision that they did in Pell's case? What might have influenced them to GET IT SO COMPLETELY WRONG that not ONE of the High Court agreed with them? Not for a fucking a minute, because the decision suits your utter hate for religion, and if it means the leaders are falsely jailed, then that is even better. Like all SJW's you don't give a fuck about Justice. Its all about the politics for people like you. That's why you're so contemptable. And now like the other SJW's, you're jizzing all over your curtains that a Judge (experienced in defamation and not criminal law) found Lehrman guilty of a crime, to the civil not criminal standard, mind. In your mind, there is no possibility that he too could have fucked up and be influenced by extraneous factors. Like the three that wrongly convicted Pell. Oh FYI there is at least one legal expert who believes his lawyers would be stupid not to appeal.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
Albo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old.
This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world.
Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough.
Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship
At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+xAlbo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old. This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world. Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough. Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing. twitter? the same twitter that has already censored and removed content on behalf of the likes of belarus, hungary, Saudi arabia, turkey and russia? lol yeah your warrior of free speech right there you know there are already laws around violent and sexual imagery etc being broadcast, or are you one of those weirdo libertarians that want to use it as a mask to be able to see even worse/sick content while screaming 'free speech'... "At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing." lol, so they don;t show it? way to prove the point
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? And that the THREE lower Court Judges who convicted him were wrong? They fucked up- like I said earlier in this thread. Do you question WHY those THREE Judges came to the incorrect decision that they did in Pell's case? What might have influenced them to GET IT SO COMPLETELY WRONG that not ONE of the High Court agreed with them? Not for a fucking a minute, because the decision suits your utter hate for religion, and if it means the leaders are falsely jailed, then that is even better. Like all SJW's you don't give a fuck about Justice. Its all about the politics for people like you. That's why you're so contemptable. And now like the other SJW's, you're jizzing all over your curtains that a Judge (experienced in defamation and not criminal law) found Lehrman guilty of a crime, to the civil not criminal standard, mind. In your mind, there is no possibility that he too could have fucked up and be influenced by extraneous factors. Like the three that wrongly convicted Pell. Oh FYI there is at least one legal expert who believes his lawyers would be stupid not to appeal. I admire passion in people, but when it's to rabidly defend a paedo or at best a paedo enabler, it's rather concerning.
|
|
|
|
|
NicCarBel
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xreally hard to see your point there or the mental gymnastics you're trying to bend Well, Marxists hate religion and the Austalian MSM hates Christians (Muslims are too risky and Jews are a protected group, until a few months ago). It was the Marxist Victorian government, the most leftist outside of the shithole known as Canberra that failed to protect 109 children from 4 pedo state teachers. Where was the media frenzy and the outrage of this gross failure of secularism, where are the Court cases, where are the jail sentences? Wait, what did Canberra have to do with that? Or am I supposed to be reading that as 'Canberra is a shithole' and 'that happened in Victoria'? Both are left wing shitholes, full of left wing shitheads. Where was the Socialist People's Republic of Victoria protecting the 109 (that afre known of) abused school children within its government school system. Yep, I'm one of the minorities here
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xAlbo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old. This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world. Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough. Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing. twitter? the same twitter that has already censored and removed content on behalf of the likes of belarus, hungary, Saudi arabia, turkey and russia? lol yeah your warrior of free speech right there you know there are already laws around violent and sexual imagery etc being broadcast, or are you one of those weirdo libertarians that want to use it as a mask to be able to see even worse/sick content while screaming 'free speech'... "At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing." lol, so they don;t show it? way to prove the point Enzo probably thinks child porn should and snuff videos are OK because 'censorship', 'George Orwell', 'Marxists', 'leftards' etc.. It's funny to see Enzo defending twitter now because it's a PRIVATE COMPANY, because when twitter, A PRIVATE COMPANY, banned Trump they lost their shit. And then he has the hide to call the left hypocrites. Weird and delusional. As usual.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Muz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? No I don't 'agree' because I'm not a high court judge, I didn't sit in the case and I don't have 40 years experience in the legal profession. If they say he was falsely convicted then that's enough for me. I don't need to issue a dissenting decision based on the 'vibe' or what I thought was going through the judges mind's when they made their decision. Something you think you can do.
Member since 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAlbo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old. This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world. Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough. Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing. twitter? the same twitter that has already censored and removed content on behalf of the likes of belarus, hungary, Saudi arabia, turkey and russia? lol yeah your warrior of free speech right there you know there are already laws around violent and sexual imagery etc being broadcast, or are you one of those weirdo libertarians that want to use it as a mask to be able to see even worse/sick content while screaming 'free speech'... "At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing." lol, so they don;t show it? way to prove the point It's funny to see Enzo defending twitter now because it's a PRIVATE COMPANY, because when twitter, A PRIVATE COMPANY, banned Trump they lost their shit. lol true. same guy who lost it over Woolworths (a private company) not selling Australia day merchandise
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? No I don't 'agree' because I'm not a high court judge, I didn't sit in the case and I don't have 40 years experience in the legal profession. If they say he was falsely convicted then that's enough for me. I don't need to issue a dissenting decision based on the 'vibe' or what I thought was going through the judges mind's when they made their decision. Something you think you can do. I admire passion in people, but when it's to rabidly defend a paedo or at best a paedo enabler, it's rather concerning.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xAlbo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old. This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world. Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough. Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing. twitter? the same twitter that has already censored and removed content on behalf of the likes of belarus, hungary, Saudi arabia, turkey and russia? lol yeah your warrior of free speech right there you know there are already laws around violent and sexual imagery etc being broadcast, or are you one of those weirdo libertarians that want to use it as a mask to be able to see even worse/sick content while screaming 'free speech'... "At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing." lol, so they don;t show it? way to prove the point Enzo probably thinks child porn should and snuff videos are OK because 'censorship', 'George Orwell', 'Marxists', 'leftards' etc.. It's funny to see Enzo defending twitter now because it's a PRIVATE COMPANY, because when twitter, A PRIVATE COMPANY, banned Trump they lost their shit. And then he has the hide to call the left hypocrites. Weird and delusional. As usual. I'm not defending Twitter you dickhead, I'm highlighting the hypocrisy that both you and The Simple Fool lack the self-awareness to recognize. And quit with the disgusting insinuations because I can take it there, wanker.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xAlbo, Plibersek and his Minister of Truth Inman Grant on a war path with X owner Elon Musk for daring to keep uplaoaded the video of the stabbing of a Christian Priest by a muslim 15 year old. This is a private international business, but Australia thinks it can decide on behalf of the world. Silent when social media has been doing the Left's bidding tough. Just as in Orwell's book this goivernment wants decide what is misinfofrmation and disinformation through censorship At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing. twitter? the same twitter that has already censored and removed content on behalf of the likes of belarus, hungary, Saudi arabia, turkey and russia? lol yeah your warrior of free speech right there you know there are already laws around violent and sexual imagery etc being broadcast, or are you one of those weirdo libertarians that want to use it as a mask to be able to see even worse/sick content while screaming 'free speech'... "At the same time Australians own ABC has multiple videos uploaded on its youtube channels showing the video up to the point of the stabbing." lol, so they don;t show it? way to prove the point It's funny to see Enzo defending twitter now because it's a PRIVATE COMPANY, because when twitter, A PRIVATE COMPANY, banned Trump they lost their shit. lol true. same guy who lost it over Woolworths (a private company) not selling Australia day merchandise And of course a simpleton like you misses the point entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
Enzo Bearzot
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 4.5K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day.
Got me. On the bolded bit...the fact that you or anybody else didn't know about IS THE FUCKING POINT. WHY isn't it front page of all the MSM? Where is the outrage? Where are the criminal charges? Where are the jailings?. This has been going on for decades with the secular school system why only has this been admitted by the government as having happened Same crime. Different justice. Leftards don't give a flying fuck about justice for the victims child sexual abuse if there is no political advantage or worse harms it.
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
takes a special kind of someone to throw their protective arms around a paedo (or an enabler depending if you believe the victim's testimony or just go with the official enabler line) and point in another direction
|
|
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? And that the THREE lower Court Judges who convicted him were wrong? They fucked up- like I said earlier in this thread. Do you question WHY those THREE Judges came to the incorrect decision that they did in Pell's case? What might have influenced them to GET IT SO COMPLETELY WRONG that not ONE of the High Court agreed with them? Not for a fucking a minute, because the decision suits your utter hate for religion, and if it means the leaders are falsely jailed, then that is even better. Like all SJW's you don't give a fuck about Justice. Its all about the politics for people like you. That's why you're so contemptable. And now like the other SJW's, you're jizzing all over your curtains that a Judge (experienced in defamation and not criminal law) found Lehrman guilty of a crime, to the civil not criminal standard, mind. In your mind, there is no possibility that he too could have fucked up and be influenced by extraneous factors. Like the three that wrongly convicted Pell. Oh FYI there is at least one legal expert who believes his lawyers would be stupid not to appeal. Small point of contention there Enzo.. The judge did not rule that little grubby rapist GUILTY of any crime... it was a defamation case he was ruling on...
|
|
|
|
|
tsf
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 14K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xThere isn’t any evidence that Pell knowingly protected paediphiles. When he was a priest in Ballarat the Commission found that it was “implausible” that he did not know of a particular offending priests crimes involving young boys, but as he was just a low ranking priest at the time he himself was not personally responsible for relocating that priest to another archdiocese. But of course implausible things happen all the time, and Pell always maintained his innocence with respect to this matter, as he did with regards to the Victorian criminal case that was brought before him, successfully prosecuted to a jury and upheld by the court of appeals, only to be fully exonerated by the Highest court in the land. In fact the Commission dismissed almost all of the allegations made against him, and largely exonerated him of being anything other than a good man and faithful servant of his community. I know all of this because I had heard on the grapevine that he was this terrible person who spent his life protecting and relocated and covered up the crimes of dozens of offending priests, but of course when I did research I found that it was all a bunch of baloney pushed by anti Catholic zealots using paedophile victims to wage a cultural war on the church.
So when TSF and others rant about Pell and his imaginary crimes, rest assured that the driving force of this isn’t moral indignation and concern for young molested boys, it’s their anti Catholic bigotry. If Pell was a Muslim or a Jew or a teacher or a doctor or a member of the progressive wing or the Labor party then wouldn’t care on iota.
Or if it happened under the secular public shool system. These zealots care not one iota for the abuse. What matters is the political mileage they can get from it. But TSF and Mu know better than SEVEN hgh Court Justices. Wait what? Since when did I say abuse in secular institutions was OK? I know it suits you to say I said that, even though I never did, because it frames me where you want to put me. Don't put words in my mouth you silly little man. Well where is where is your outrage? A White Knight like you surely you'd be leading from the front and demanding justice? How can the leaders of secular instutions not be held accountable? None have been jailed, and aknowldgement occured just this year. Why aren't you as angry that no-one has been charged let alone jailed? So here's your chance. Do you know more than SEVEN High Court Justices about Pell's case. Did the SEVEN High Court Justices get it wrong on overturning Pell's conviction? Or are you- as becoming patently obvious-just another boring pretentious ;leftard hypocrite? I'd rather be a white knight than a selfish, narcissistic misanthrope. So disappointed I didn't get the 'Marxist' insult you usually dole out. Will have to live with 'leftard'. You need to start to learn to read chump. When and where did I saw the 7 high court judges were wrong. I didn't. Not once. Ever. As for 'where's my outrage?' Ooh that is a gotcha by you isn't it? Pull up stumps, we're done because I'm not outraged by something I didn't even know about until the other day. Got me. So you agree that the High Court Judges were right to find that Pell was falsely convicted and jailed? And that the THREE lower Court Judges who convicted him were wrong? They fucked up- like I said earlier in this thread. Do you question WHY those THREE Judges came to the incorrect decision that they did in Pell's case? What might have influenced them to GET IT SO COMPLETELY WRONG that not ONE of the High Court agreed with them? Not for a fucking a minute, because the decision suits your utter hate for religion, and if it means the leaders are falsely jailed, then that is even better. Like all SJW's you don't give a fuck about Justice. Its all about the politics for people like you. That's why you're so contemptable. And now like the other SJW's, you're jizzing all over your curtains that a Judge (experienced in defamation and not criminal law) found Lehrman guilty of a crime, to the civil not criminal standard, mind. In your mind, there is no possibility that he too could have fucked up and be influenced by extraneous factors. Like the three that wrongly convicted Pell. Oh FYI there is at least one legal expert who believes his lawyers would be stupid not to appeal. Small point of contention there Enzo.. The judge did not rule that little grubby rapist GUILTY of any crime... it was a defamation case he was ruling on... and unfortunately because of a highly suspicious move by a jury member the criminal case was aborted
|
|
|
|