grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. he did his sap and game development stages here to be fair. I agree though that the ideal is to get our of here by 15 if you can (he got out at 12ish iirc)
|
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. he did his sap and game development stages here to be fair. I agree though that the ideal is to get our of here by 15 if you can (he got out at 12ish iirc) Did he really came through here? He was born in Scotland and left to the UK around 12 I think.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. he did his sap and game development stages here to be fair. I agree though that the ideal is to get our of here by 15 if you can (he got out at 12ish iirc) Did he really came through here? He was born in Scotland and left to the UK around 12 I think. move to sydney from 4 to 12 years
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end.
|
|
|
Barca4Life
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. he did his sap and game development stages here to be fair. I agree though that the ideal is to get our of here by 15 if you can (he got out at 12ish iirc) Did he really came through here? He was born in Scotland and left to the UK around 12 I think. move to sydney from 4 to 12 years Cheers, It also helps that he’s dad is a former player as well.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
our youth development has had 2 steps forwards 1 step backwards steps forward: a league academies and ntc step backwards: shutdown of ais and nyl, lower quality rep coaches possible steps forward in future: state based ais and nst Having said that, it is interesting looking at the number of players to break through in each age group in at least the 2nd tier or europe by u24 76-79 at least 10 players (don't have a full list) 80-83 at least 5 players (don't have a full list) 84-87 4 players 88-91 11 players (jump explained by super coach Jan Versleijen and extra funding for AIS around 08-11) 92-95 7 players (some of these are ais and Jan, but we wound down ais and nyl) 96-99 7 players (some are early academy graduates) 00-03 9 players with another 4 starting regularly, 2 injured at the start of the season who could make it and around 16 players born 02 and 03 getting regular game time in the a league who could join them There is no magic bullet to youth development, every bit helps, a full nyl, an ais, state based ais, academies, an ntc, an nst, proper rep youth coaches. We often bring in some new thing after scrapping the last thing.....
|
|
|
Bunch of Hacks
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato.
|
|
|
SUTHERLANDBEAR
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.3K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIt doesn't matter what players Arnie uses because he is going to make them play his one way. Every team has watched us play under Arnie and they all know how to stuff us up - with no Plan B as we know. If he restructures to some other formation he still has them playing the same way. I saw maybe 4 or 5 really nice pieces of play between a couple of different players in that last game and everything else was individuals doing something good to get the ball back. Yengi stood offside the whole game during our build ups, clearly telling Bahrain that we are not going up the middle and will attack up the wings. Our 6s moved laterally with our backline's side passing and all game you could see that a quick and accurate pass to O'Neill would have drawn two or three players to him immediately as the Bahrain players were ball chasers. He could then have passed back to whoever gave him the ball and Bahrain's high press was moved around and forced to make decisions - giving us opportunity. But we did not pass anything into the middle and the two or three forward Bahrain players just had to jog back and forth to keep the middle clear. We have the players to do better if we play a way that allows them to do better. Nisbet is a brilliant player. Irankunda has vision, individual flair, pace and power. He would make a difference being in the starting side regardless of his inexperience because the defenders can't just keep him wide like they do with our standard Arnie wing attack. He will cut in, take players on inside or outside, and in the middle of the flurry he can spot and pass to a player making a run and open up behind. But Arnie will not change his system and if he brings these better players in he takes away the very thing that makes them effective. If he plays Nisbet he will no doubt make him isolated up front and put high balls to him all night. When he plays Irankunda he will isolate him just as badly by directing traffic up the wings slowly and safely until the defence is settled around him then expect the cross field pass to unlock the set defence and free Irankunda. I am really tired of reading and writing the same criticisms of Arnie and our playing group to see nothing change. We can just visit the last 'Arnie Out' type of thread and it will all read the same. That game was disgraceful on every level and one of the worst live experiences I have had with football. It is once again all on Arnie in my eyes and he just will not change anything with his blinkered and negative views on our chances, his expectations of players and favouritism/laziness, and his 'One Notion' system. Our opponents know how he plays - he needs to earn his huge salary by working on alternative systems. We do not deserve to be where we are in the World Rankings and it shows with every minnow that pushes us around. I do not have unreasonably high expectations of what we can do - but we are definitely not doing what we could do with Arnie as our manager. What do you base your opinion on " Nisbet is a brilliant player " ? I think he is decent wee player, but he was a free agent for months and the best he could get was Ross County, hardly where a brilliant player would end up. You obviously didn’t watch him much in the last A league season. I’m confident that clubs who rejected the idea of signing him will rue their missed opportunity. In Fairness, i watched him quite a bit, but the difference between the A-league and international football is quite significant.
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them.
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xIf he doesn't start Nizz and Irankunda on Tuesday, I'll assume he's taken a Saudi bribe to set us up as poorly as possible. I dont agree, Indonesia will be very physical and the conditions hot and sticky, I dont know much about little Nisbet but putting an inexperienced playemaker in and expecting him to change the game in such a hsotile envirnoment would be suicide. Irankunda is just wasted at national level at the moment, why the hell even put him on the pitch as it plays out? No service, no ball to run onto, the poor kid was trying to drive at players from outside the box for lack of any other movement... I bet the first thing that crossed his mind after the match last night was how farking good the Bayern Youth team puts it on a plate for him.... I'd hardly call the best player in the A League an inexperienced playmaker. He's Australia's most technical player and definitely most creative player. Not to play him is suicide. Sorry , no disrespect to the kid, I haven't really seen him play to judge him, I meant inexperienced at senior international level
|
|
|
Monoethnic Social Club
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 11K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xunless we break the bank we can't get anyone better than arnie imoI do think something went terribly wrong here. 300 passes down from normal - the ball movement was really really slow I think with all of our attacking mids out as well as all our rbs out the emphasis was on nothing going wrong. It was arch conservative. We played 3 defensive minded mids and 3 cbs, we had only 2 players in between bahrains lines....was really really conservative... hope he turns it around... Really????? https://financefootball.com/2022/07/04/best-paid-head-coaches-in-2022-fifa-world-cup/#google_vignetteBest Paid Head Coaches in 2022 FIFA World Cup- Hans-Dieter Flick (GERMANY) - €6.500.000
- Gareth Southgate (ENGLAND) - €5.800.000
- Didier Deschamps (FRANCE) - €3.800.000
- Tite (BRAZIL) - €3.600.000
- Louis van Gaal (NETHERLANDS) - €2.900.000
- Gerardo Martino (MEXICO) - €2.900.000
- Lionel Scaloni (ARGENTINA) - €2.600.000
- Félix Sánchez Bas (QATAR) - €2.400.000
- Fernando Santos (PORTUGAL) - €2.250.000
- Murat Yakın (SWITZERLAND) - €1.600.000
- Paulo Bento (SOUTH KOREA) - €1.300.000
- Graham Arnold (AUSTRALIA) - €1.300.000
- Gregg Berhalter (USA) - €1.250.000
- Roberto Martínez (BELGIUM) - €1.200.000
- Kasper Hjulmand (DENMARK) - €1.150.000
- Luis Enrique (SPAIN) - €1.150.000
- Hervé Renard (SAUDI ARABIA) - €1.100.000
- Hajime Moriyasu (JAPAN) - €1.050.000
- Vahid Halilhodžić (MAROCCO) - €920.000
- Diego Alonso (URUGUAY) - €860.000
- Gustavo J. Alfaro (ECUADOR) - €770.000
- Dragan Stojković (SERBIA) - €650.000
- Dragan Skočić (IRAN) - €650.000
- Zlatko Dalić (CROATIA) - €550.000
- Czesław Michniewicz (POLAND) - €500.000
- John Herdman (CANADA) - €480.000
- Chris Hughton (GHANA) - €400.000
- Rob Page (WALES) - €380.000
- Luis F. Suárez (COSTA RICA) - €350.000
- Rigobert Song (CAMEROON) - €340.000
- Aliou Cissé (SENEGAL) - €310.000
- Jalel Kadri (TUNISIA) - €130.000
Nice list, thanks for compiling But which of those paid at pr less than arnold do u think would do better? We probably end up with 14-18 points with any of them. We have 3 regulars in the big 5, all defensive minded players. indonesia have a regular in seri a, japan and south korea have a zillion, jordan have a regular in ligue 1, syria have several in argentinas top flight We really dont dominate on paper, there will be bad days and even good days will be ones where we win through a lucky pen or deflection. Same was true under ange who is an epl coach. It sux but we just arent that good and surely the anger needs to be at our lack of pathways. How many teams have multiple national teirs and p and r? Well, this is just the managers of world cup qualified teams there are another 2 hundred or so national team managers on less money than Arnie. From this alone I would rather , Enrique from Spain., Halihodzic from Marocco, Dalic from Croatia... I mean what a steal at 1/3 of what we are paying Arnie... Point I was trying to make is that we are NOT underpaying for a manager, why not get a good one?
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Major as far as I'm concerned is that you've actually made it and a start up 1st team player IMO. Irakunda/Circati have enormous potential and still young and learning - lets not forget the other great "major :)" suspect not too long ago was Kuol signed up by Newcastle. Hows that going by the way. Hey all power to our young up and comers wish them all the best hopefully making it to the top but lets not carry on chicken before the egg. We do this so so much its annoying. The trhead is about our over rated gaffa, I like GA due to his past and passion/loyalty for our badge like any of us BUT I really don't see him helping our NT players grow into the potential they could play on the park. Too much preventative maintanence that is good to get through qualifying but at the same time its holding back what lies underneath. Its like don't go outside because the boogy man will get you. Sure we might get ripped openning up but nothign ventured nothing gained. I still don't think we have the players really capable, a core so to speak that can hold a game together whatever is thrown at them under the pump and our neighbours above and the ME have progressed and look as if they want it far more than our guys. Is that because of GA's style - maybe so as well. I'd like to see a coach that juggles things up, live by the sword die by the sword - we lack variety.
Love Football
|
|
|
Mr Cleansheets
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 944,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIf he doesn't start Nizz and Irankunda on Tuesday, I'll assume he's taken a Saudi bribe to set us up as poorly as possible. I dont agree, Indonesia will be very physical and the conditions hot and sticky, I dont know much about little Nisbet but putting an inexperienced playemaker in and expecting him to change the game in such a hsotile envirnoment would be suicide. Irankunda is just wasted at national level at the moment, why the hell even put him on the pitch as it plays out? No service, no ball to run onto, the poor kid was trying to drive at players from outside the box for lack of any other movement... I bet the first thing that crossed his mind after the match last night was how farking good the Bayern Youth team puts it on a plate for him.... I'd hardly call the best player in the A League an inexperienced playmaker. He's Australia's most technical player and definitely most creative player. Not to play him is suicide. Sorry , no disrespect to the kid, I haven't really seen him play to judge him, I meant inexperienced at senior international level He was the best player in the team that travelled all over Asia to win a continental trophy. That's experience enough. He's proved people wrong his entire career and will do it again once he gets his chance for the Socceroos - by which I mean a starting chance and not a token ten mins in an already beaten team.
|
|
|
robbos
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.8K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe.
The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Lets not forget that only Kewell & Viduka were in the first teams in the top sides. Timmy Cahill the only other high profile one & I love Timmy, but I think he would struggle to be a CAM for many of the top teams today. Football has changed a lot since the early 2000s, these days Kante, Rodri, Jordan Hendson, Casmerio, all the donkeys (workers) can also play.
|
|
|
Lupi33
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 291,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Major as far as I'm concerned is that you've actually made it and a start up 1st team player IMO. Irakunda/Circati have enormous potential and still young and learning - lets not forget the other great "major :)" suspect not too long ago was Kuol signed up by Newcastle. Hows that going by the way. not too well he struggled on loan in the SPL last season, now toiling in the Dutch second division
|
|
|
libelous
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 889,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+xIt doesn't matter what players Arnie uses because he is going to make them play his one way. Every team has watched us play under Arnie and they all know how to stuff us up - with no Plan B as we know. If he restructures to some other formation he still has them playing the same way. I saw maybe 4 or 5 really nice pieces of play between a couple of different players in that last game and everything else was individuals doing something good to get the ball back. Yengi stood offside the whole game during our build ups, clearly telling Bahrain that we are not going up the middle and will attack up the wings. Our 6s moved laterally with our backline's side passing and all game you could see that a quick and accurate pass to O'Neill would have drawn two or three players to him immediately as the Bahrain players were ball chasers. He could then have passed back to whoever gave him the ball and Bahrain's high press was moved around and forced to make decisions - giving us opportunity. But we did not pass anything into the middle and the two or three forward Bahrain players just had to jog back and forth to keep the middle clear. We have the players to do better if we play a way that allows them to do better. Nisbet is a brilliant player. Irankunda has vision, individual flair, pace and power. He would make a difference being in the starting side regardless of his inexperience because the defenders can't just keep him wide like they do with our standard Arnie wing attack. He will cut in, take players on inside or outside, and in the middle of the flurry he can spot and pass to a player making a run and open up behind. But Arnie will not change his system and if he brings these better players in he takes away the very thing that makes them effective. If he plays Nisbet he will no doubt make him isolated up front and put high balls to him all night. When he plays Irankunda he will isolate him just as badly by directing traffic up the wings slowly and safely until the defence is settled around him then expect the cross field pass to unlock the set defence and free Irankunda. I am really tired of reading and writing the same criticisms of Arnie and our playing group to see nothing change. We can just visit the last 'Arnie Out' type of thread and it will all read the same. That game was disgraceful on every level and one of the worst live experiences I have had with football. It is once again all on Arnie in my eyes and he just will not change anything with his blinkered and negative views on our chances, his expectations of players and favouritism/laziness, and his 'One Notion' system. Our opponents know how he plays - he needs to earn his huge salary by working on alternative systems. We do not deserve to be where we are in the World Rankings and it shows with every minnow that pushes us around. I do not have unreasonably high expectations of what we can do - but we are definitely not doing what we could do with Arnie as our manager. What do you base your opinion on " Nisbet is a brilliant player " ? I think he is decent wee player, but he was a free agent for months and the best he could get was Ross County, hardly where a brilliant player would end up. You obviously didn’t watch him much in the last A league season. I’m confident that clubs who rejected the idea of signing him will rue their missed opportunity. In Fairness, i watched him quite a bit, but the difference between the A-league and international football is quite significant. And Irankunda? Everyone seems to be screaming for his inclusion but he hasn’t made an appearance at Bundesliga 1 level.
|
|
|
Balin Trev
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 3.7K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+xIt doesn't matter what players Arnie uses because he is going to make them play his one way. Every team has watched us play under Arnie and they all know how to stuff us up - with no Plan B as we know. If he restructures to some other formation he still has them playing the same way. I saw maybe 4 or 5 really nice pieces of play between a couple of different players in that last game and everything else was individuals doing something good to get the ball back. Yengi stood offside the whole game during our build ups, clearly telling Bahrain that we are not going up the middle and will attack up the wings. Our 6s moved laterally with our backline's side passing and all game you could see that a quick and accurate pass to O'Neill would have drawn two or three players to him immediately as the Bahrain players were ball chasers. He could then have passed back to whoever gave him the ball and Bahrain's high press was moved around and forced to make decisions - giving us opportunity. But we did not pass anything into the middle and the two or three forward Bahrain players just had to jog back and forth to keep the middle clear. We have the players to do better if we play a way that allows them to do better. Nisbet is a brilliant player. Irankunda has vision, individual flair, pace and power. He would make a difference being in the starting side regardless of his inexperience because the defenders can't just keep him wide like they do with our standard Arnie wing attack. He will cut in, take players on inside or outside, and in the middle of the flurry he can spot and pass to a player making a run and open up behind. But Arnie will not change his system and if he brings these better players in he takes away the very thing that makes them effective. If he plays Nisbet he will no doubt make him isolated up front and put high balls to him all night. When he plays Irankunda he will isolate him just as badly by directing traffic up the wings slowly and safely until the defence is settled around him then expect the cross field pass to unlock the set defence and free Irankunda. I am really tired of reading and writing the same criticisms of Arnie and our playing group to see nothing change. We can just visit the last 'Arnie Out' type of thread and it will all read the same. That game was disgraceful on every level and one of the worst live experiences I have had with football. It is once again all on Arnie in my eyes and he just will not change anything with his blinkered and negative views on our chances, his expectations of players and favouritism/laziness, and his 'One Notion' system. Our opponents know how he plays - he needs to earn his huge salary by working on alternative systems. We do not deserve to be where we are in the World Rankings and it shows with every minnow that pushes us around. I do not have unreasonably high expectations of what we can do - but we are definitely not doing what we could do with Arnie as our manager. What do you base your opinion on " Nisbet is a brilliant player " ? I think he is decent wee player, but he was a free agent for months and the best he could get was Ross County, hardly where a brilliant player would end up. You obviously didn’t watch him much in the last A league season. I’m confident that clubs who rejected the idea of signing him will rue their missed opportunity. In Fairness, i watched him quite a bit, but the difference between the A-league and international football is quite significant. And Irankunda? Everyone seems to be screaming for his inclusion but he hasn’t made an appearance at Bundesliga 1 level. Nestor has been named in Bayern M CL squad which means he’s more than qualified to start against side ranked 80th in world. You can’t win football games without creative attacking players like Irankunda. Bahrain result proves that. Likes of Boyle didn’t even get around an opponent/get shot on target v Bahrain yet Irankunda managed to beat several defenders to create shot on target and got Roos closer to actually scoring with several dribbles forward around pen box. You’ve got to attack deep block sides with skillful attacking players- who would have thought
|
|
|
jas88
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 5.8K,
Visits: 0
|
I dont think we have actual 6 who can receive the ball from defense and play a forward pass through a press.... seems very difficult to find.
Maybe Balard/Triantis or could Circati push forward? It's amazing how many 8's we got that don't really want the ball haha
|
|
|
zimbos_05
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 15K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Major as far as I'm concerned is that you've actually made it and a start up 1st team player IMO. Irakunda/Circati have enormous potential and still young and learning - lets not forget the other great "major :)" suspect not too long ago was Kuol signed up by Newcastle. Hows that going by the way. Hey all power to our young up and comers wish them all the best hopefully making it to the top but lets not carry on chicken before the egg. We do this so so much its annoying. The trhead is about our over rated gaffa, I like GA due to his past and passion/loyalty for our badge like any of us BUT I really don't see him helping our NT players grow into the potential they could play on the park. Too much preventative maintanence that is good to get through qualifying but at the same time its holding back what lies underneath. Its like don't go outside because the boogy man will get you. Sure we might get ripped openning up but nothign ventured nothing gained. I still don't think we have the players really capable, a core so to speak that can hold a game together whatever is thrown at them under the pump and our neighbours above and the ME have progressed and look as if they want it far more than our guys. Is that because of GA's style - maybe so as well. I'd like to see a coach that juggles things up, live by the sword die by the sword - we lack variety. That's what I meant. Sorry, I probably didn't word myself properly. Major is players in the starting 11. We talk about Nestory like he is making it big at Bayern, but he hasn't done anything of note yet. Like you say, look at what happened to Kuol. There's many examples of players who have gone over with so much hype and nothing has come of them. Amini, Arzani are two that come to mind. +x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe.
The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Lets not forget that only Kewell & Viduka were in the first teams in the top sides. Timmy Cahill the only other high profile one & I love Timmy, but I think he would struggle to be a CAM for many of the top teams today. Football has changed a lot since the early 2000s, these days Kante, Rodri, Jordan Hendson, Casmerio, all the donkeys (workers) can also play. They were not the only. Schwarzer, Emerton, Grella, Bresciano were all playing in starting sides. I'm sure I am missing others too. You might differ on what you consider a top side which is fine. However, they were playing in top leagues against top players and sides week in and week out. You don't have to play for a top 6 to be successful. Jedinak and Ryan proved that too.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xI dont think we have actual 6 who can receive the ball from defense and play a forward pass through a press.... seems very difficult to find. Maybe Balard/Triantis or could Circati push forward? It's amazing how many 8's we got that don't really want the ball haha We do seem light on pure 6s and 10s while having an abubdance of 8s
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
Circati is a major talent
I also dont count my chickens with irankunda just yet
Robertson, volpato, bos all look like they are potential major talents in the next 2 years
|
|
|
BA81
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.9K,
Visits: 0
|
Admittedly I haven't watched the Qatar '22 doco mentioned below, but I can't say I'm at all surprised by what's mentioned about Arnie:
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Major as far as I'm concerned is that you've actually made it and a start up 1st team player IMO. Irakunda/Circati have enormous potential and still young and learning - lets not forget the other great "major :)" suspect not too long ago was Kuol signed up by Newcastle. Hows that going by the way. Hey all power to our young up and comers wish them all the best hopefully making it to the top but lets not carry on chicken before the egg. We do this so so much its annoying. The trhead is about our over rated gaffa, I like GA due to his past and passion/loyalty for our badge like any of us BUT I really don't see him helping our NT players grow into the potential they could play on the park. Too much preventative maintanence that is good to get through qualifying but at the same time its holding back what lies underneath. Its like don't go outside because the boogy man will get you. Sure we might get ripped openning up but nothign ventured nothing gained. I still don't think we have the players really capable, a core so to speak that can hold a game together whatever is thrown at them under the pump and our neighbours above and the ME have progressed and look as if they want it far more than our guys. Is that because of GA's style - maybe so as well. I'd like to see a coach that juggles things up, live by the sword die by the sword - we lack variety. That's what I meant. Sorry, I probably didn't word myself properly. Major is players in the starting 11. We talk about Nestory like he is making it big at Bayern, but he hasn't done anything of note yet. Like you say, look at what happened to Kuol. There's many examples of players who have gone over with so much hype and nothing has come of them. Amini, Arzani are two that come to mind. +x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe.
The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Lets not forget that only Kewell & Viduka were in the first teams in the top sides. Timmy Cahill the only other high profile one & I love Timmy, but I think he would struggle to be a CAM for many of the top teams today. Football has changed a lot since the early 2000s, these days Kante, Rodri, Jordan Hendson, Casmerio, all the donkeys (workers) can also play. They were not the only. Schwarzer, Emerton, Grella, Bresciano were all playing in starting sides. I'm sure I am missing others too. You might differ on what you consider a top side which is fine. However, they were playing in top leagues against top players and sides week in and week out. You don't have to play for a top 6 to be successful. Jedinak and Ryan proved that too. yep I kind of got you were meaning to say, hence I expanded :) My throw out Q re Kuol was just that and I knew what to expect, crickets, too much fappping when babies, some here talk it up like we're on the path of the new dawn GG on some players. Sure some are showing promising signs, prove it, show us, break through in time, be there for season on season (heck 2/3 will do) in the starting line up like your always on the start sheet and a "player" delivering week in week out. Thats major. Yer Arzani good mention. We've seen so many before. Goo dpoints re the some other very notable of the GG, I reckon MS had a brilliant GK career, brilliant still rate him above MR. Bresh is one of my favs totally and Grella the silent assassin.
Love Football
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. One of the reasons I am not coaching this season was because of the politics around team selections. I had a player whose father coached one of the younger grades. His son is an incredibly lazy player, talented, but lazy. If he didn't get game time, there would be complaints and because the father was a coach at the club he would complain to the board and they would then have a word with me. The other issue at the level I was at was that because players get upset if they are not getting time, you need to balance the minutes. So you could be chasing a win for example and want a certain player out there, but you might have to sub them because another player hasn't had the same amount of minutes as everyone else. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe. The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Major as far as I'm concerned is that you've actually made it and a start up 1st team player IMO. Irakunda/Circati have enormous potential and still young and learning - lets not forget the other great "major :)" suspect not too long ago was Kuol signed up by Newcastle. Hows that going by the way. Hey all power to our young up and comers wish them all the best hopefully making it to the top but lets not carry on chicken before the egg. We do this so so much its annoying. The trhead is about our over rated gaffa, I like GA due to his past and passion/loyalty for our badge like any of us BUT I really don't see him helping our NT players grow into the potential they could play on the park. Too much preventative maintanence that is good to get through qualifying but at the same time its holding back what lies underneath. Its like don't go outside because the boogy man will get you. Sure we might get ripped openning up but nothign ventured nothing gained. I still don't think we have the players really capable, a core so to speak that can hold a game together whatever is thrown at them under the pump and our neighbours above and the ME have progressed and look as if they want it far more than our guys. Is that because of GA's style - maybe so as well. I'd like to see a coach that juggles things up, live by the sword die by the sword - we lack variety. That's what I meant. Sorry, I probably didn't word myself properly. Major is players in the starting 11. We talk about Nestory like he is making it big at Bayern, but he hasn't done anything of note yet. Like you say, look at what happened to Kuol. There's many examples of players who have gone over with so much hype and nothing has come of them. Amini, Arzani are two that come to mind. +x+x+x+x+x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. Until Australian football moves away from its obsession with pace and power at all levels we will continue to struggle to develop enough players with strong 1v1 ability at the elite level it’s not to say we don’t have any but when we do have players they are in the minority sadly. Its not to say that physique and power has a say especially at the top level but the basics on 1v1 is technique and skill all the top players developed that when they were young and added the other parts of their game such as the pace and power as they got older. Im not sure what’s goes at youth level these days but it seems we still get it all wrong here when pace and power is prioritised over technique, and yes it seems the curriculum or the implementation of it hasn’t done enough to improve on this regard. I definitely coached this with my U14s NPL side last year. We had some sessions where the focus was specifically on 1v1. We had a great TD who had a clear structure for each year level so that players were developing with certain skills and ideology all the way through the ranks. Unfortunately he got usurped by one of the board members mates who was quick to get rid of certain coaches. He kept the coaches who didn't turn up to the TD's training sessions and such. In saying that, certain clubs are trying to do the right thing. There is a massive disconnect between club level and A-league level. It's like the FA and the respective state organisations don't talk to each other. It's almost like everyone is doing their own thing. Our biggest issue is having heads of organisations who play everything as some sort of political game. +x+x+xI just heard the press conference, Vince rugari asked a very fair question regarding why we can’t break down block defences and Arnie basically said that we lack in 1v1 ability with the players and the ball didn’t bounce the right way for us. This is concerning for two reasons. 1) There are four core concepts taught at the SAP level. 1v1 is one of those core things. If players at International level do not have that ability, then what is going on in our development and pathways that they can get to this stage, and not have the ability to take on opposition players in a 1v1 situation. I get that even players with that skill would struggle if going up against the very best. But when you are going up against a side ranked 80, that is very worrying if your players cannot do that. 2) Arnie has been manager since 2018. He has had more than enough time to have no identified this issue and corrected it. If he has not corrected a core skill that is meant to be taught at the U13/14 level, then what is he actually doing? I'm sorry, but Arnold has had two chances at this gig and has failed on both occasions. Yes he may have a 60% win rate, but that hides the turgid style of football, and the regression of player talent. We can't dish out jobs for mates at this level. He needs to go. The way this is developed is NOT small sided games. It is street/backyard football. When you are playing with 30 or 40 kids and rarely get the ball you develop your 1 v 1 skills for 2 reasons. First there is no room for passing, so keeping the ball is a must. Second, if you want to keep the ball you have to develop the skills. I read your other posts as well as you sound extremely cynical. Not many players from Spain, Germany, Italy, Portugal, England etc are playing street ball. They all developed in small sided and built from there. There is also no chance that people are playing matches agaisnt 30 or 40 kids. Even in places where they do play street football, those numbers are not realistic. SSG can definitely develop the skill, but it all comes down to the player and how they approach it and apply it. It’s good to explain your experience, I agree the game here is too disconnected and too many are keen on doing there own thing rather than what’s best for the players and their own careers. SSG’s and even futsal is good if done properly, SAP is meant to improve the skill level too but I feel the issues are bigger at play as the other things are good ideas in theory. The question I feel is why we are not developing enough, creative and 1v1 is it down to the coaching standards and talent ID? I.e Picking the big kid that can run fast just because he or she is a good athlete doesn’t mean they will be able to play at the highest level possible. Coaching the skills in SAP then play a different style of football because are more keen helping their own CVs just to get results on the weekend.
We got to stop this obsession with pace and power in the crucial age groups because this harms us at the top end. +x+xBeen saying Arnie out for some time, but he got by because Redmayne saved a penalty and we beat Denmark, so Arnie was apparently the messiah. He has never been a very good manager, at least not at the International level. Domestically he is fine, but once the level ramps up, he struggles. It's inexcusable the downward trend that the Socceroos have been on since Ange left. No major talents coming through and no noticeable brand of top level football being played. Arnie won't be sacked any time soon because he beat Lebanon and Bangladesh. Not to mention that we still don't have a Matildas coach, so the FA are busy with that. They don't want to have to multitask. No major talents coming through?!? We have an 18 Yr old whose just been registered in Bayerns champions league squad. We have a 20 Yr old center back playing every minute in a mid table serie a team. All the best players in the A league are olyroos.. Probably the only time in A league history we could say that. 21 Yr old jordie bos is prob the best player in his mid table Belgian team. Then throw on top Robertson and Volpato. 2 players who are currently at a big team and a mid table team. Yes, they qualify as potential talents but they are not major. Major is someone who is breaking into the first team of a top side. Remember when we had players playing in the first eleven across Europe.
The players you mentioned would fall under potential, not major talents. Robetson and Volpato have done their training outside of Aus. They may be Aus players, if they choose us, but they have come through different systems. Let's not take credit for them. Lets not forget that only Kewell & Viduka were in the first teams in the top sides. Timmy Cahill the only other high profile one & I love Timmy, but I think he would struggle to be a CAM for many of the top teams today. Football has changed a lot since the early 2000s, these days Kante, Rodri, Jordan Hendson, Casmerio, all the donkeys (workers) can also play. They were not the only. Schwarzer, Emerton, Grella, Bresciano were all playing in starting sides. I'm sure I am missing others too. You might differ on what you consider a top side which is fine. However, they were playing in top leagues against top players and sides week in and week out. You don't have to play for a top 6 to be successful. Jedinak and Ryan proved that too. yep I kind of got you were meaning to say, hence I expanded :) My throw out Q re Kuol was just that and I knew what to expect, crickets, too much fappping when babies, some here talk it up like we're on the path of the new dawn GG on some players. Sure some are showing promising signs, prove it, show us, break through in time, be there for season on season (heck 2/3 will do) in the starting line up like your always on the start sheet and a "player" delivering week in week out. Thats major. Yer Arzani good mention. We've seen so many before. Goo dpoints re the some other very notable of the GG, I reckon MS had a brilliant GK career, brilliant still rate him above MR. Bresh is one of my favs totally and Grella the silent assassin. I dont know anyone who thinks we will have a new gg (except my editor at the roar but i dont choose the titles) My guestimate is that we have 5 players born 2000-2003 that will play more than a couple of seasons of regular football in the big 5 or champions league (at least group stages) based on the fact that there is a big jump in players from that group getting regular game time in europe at a young age (u24 or younger). Things could go better or worse than expectations tho, of course. But 5 players is well done on the 8 or so from 77-80 that hit that mark. Also we would need 2 really good cohorts back to back to match the gg - the gg had a good 73-76 as well. But then even if this and the next generation exceeds expectation, having 6 or 7 regulars at a high level, we still wouldnt match the gg on paper until the 07-04 generation reaches 25 which is in 2032.
|
|
|
LFC.
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 13K,
Visits: 0
|
Graz yer that was my own description re NDGG, just for the sake of "hope" we end up with a "core" that takes us to new frontiers in the modern age of football. Its all what IF and time, we have been waiting for sometime mind you. For me the "bar" Asia wise is Japan. Would i be wrong in saying their current players (last 5yrs let say) are pretty much a core of 10/11 players playing in top/strong leagues last I checked - thats the bar wouldn't you agree for starters ? Maybe too high considering their population and football structure compared to us but I'd sooner we use them as a target or example. Trouble is we're going to struggle getting there by the way the FA is managing football development lack of foresight. Just reading what zimbos says being a NPL coach and the angst because johnny didn't get his minutes confirms what I have watched from the sidelines for years in NPL as well. Christ your vision makes for hard reading, 2032, I had " blinded hope" when AL came to be something was going to really change for the game but alas I was misled for below kept being left in the mirror, 2032, thats 28yrs later omg. What a utter cluster F our game keeps being in.
Love Football
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+xGraz yer that was my own description re NDGG, just for the sake of "hope" we end up with a "core" that takes us to new frontiers in the modern age of football. Its all what IF and time, we have been waiting for sometime mind you. For me the "bar" Asia wise is Japan. Would i be wrong in saying their current players (last 5yrs let say) are pretty much a core of 10/11 players playing in top/strong leagues last I checked - thats the bar wouldn't you agree for starters ? Maybe too high considering their population and football structure compared to us but I'd sooner we use them as a target or example. Trouble is we're going to struggle getting there by the way the FA is managing football development lack of foresight. Just reading what zimbos says being a NPL coach and the angst because johnny didn't get his minutes confirms what I have watched from the sidelines for years in NPL as well. Christ your vision makes for hard reading, 2032, I had " blinded hope" when AL came to be something was going to really change for the game but alas I was misled for below kept being left in the mirror, 2032, thats 28yrs later omg. What a utter cluster F our game keeps being in. Yeah i hear u. I often watch old roos games due to the frustration of not having zillions of top players Japan indeed has left us for dead, huge connected pyramid with p and r. Their participation rate is 6 million which is quite small for their population we could probably catch up to them one day if we get our act together I tend to excited about young players because i lowered my expectations. If you compare to the a league era there will be a sharp improvement in the next decade due to the swelling in numbers of youth getting earlyish game time in europe. But we are still well projected to stay down on both japan and our gg. There is still some hope we could do better by 2032 than what my projection says (which is still a good projection compared to what we have had! Assuming 2004-2007 are as good as 03-00 maybe 10ish players between 25 and 32 who have more than 2 seasons at the top) If we launch a nsd by 2032 it might be in time to produce another player who reaches an acceptable level by 2032 If we started spending on proper rep youth coachs like we did with jans verseijan (excuse spelling) and qualify regularly for underage world cups that will swell the playing pool in europe a bit more and will probably result in an extra player or two at an acceptable level by 2032 If we brought about a home and away nyl that might have some decent results, though its difficult to estimate how much a nyl helps. The only data we have is that a longer nyl leads to more young players getting a league debuts If jj is succesful bring about a new state and federal academy system maybe that helps too in time? He mentioned he wants to use the brissy olympics to bring back the ais football center of excellence and next year wants to roll our state academies A league expansion could help too by increasing the pathways. If by some miracle we introduce p and r then league quality might rise, making for a smaller jump to europe The thing about youth development is there is no magic bullet. Every initiative is cumulative and it all adds up.
|
|
|
charlied
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 2.4K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. Where is he though? Playing in a dire rock bottom Championship side. Not much to wrote home about, truth be told.
|
|
|
grazorblade
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 19K,
Visits: 0
|
+x+x+xour players that have gone through v1 of sap are better but either injured or mostly too young to break through. Bos, irankunda, circati,robertson, toure, neiwenhof, triantis, italiano, Volpato (if we get him) all are getting game time when fit but we've had a bit of an injury crisis I don't think it's arnies job to improve their 1v1 much - it's too late by the time you get to this age I think our main issue is lack of pathways as it has been throughout the a league era. A league expansion, A league academies and nst will help, as will a full h&a NYL. We probably see the benefits of academies by the end of this season or next season with all the youth getting game time in europe. We still have a problem where our athletic players who are good off the ball have better success in europe than our technical players. So if you put all our best players on the pitch at the same time it is an athletic and defensive side Robertson development is largely due to England, not Australia imo. I doubt he would be where he is if he had stayed in Australia. Probably making appearances off the bench for an A-league side. Where is he though? Playing in a dire rock bottom Championship side. Not much to wrote home about, truth be told. 21 though. Historically a good fraction of our players getting regular time in the championship by that age go on to greaner pastures when they are older. But yes you are right it is no sure thing. I am more optimistic not because of any one player but because we have more so if some don't go to expectations, hopefully others will exceed expectations
|
|
|
astonvilla1
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 1.2K,
Visits: 0
|
Another loss today should be sacked on the spot !.
|
|
|
johnszasz
|
|
Group: Forum Members
Posts: 28K,
Visits: 0
|
Got to win. Just got to get a win. Feels like the team confidence is shattered but the training clips seem determined so hopefully a big turnaround in play.
|
|
|